Provider at a glance
- Category
- Tokenised Funds
- Official website
- wisdomtree.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 83 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
WisdomTree Digital Funds
Tokenised registered funds
Tokenised Funds
#1 Overall
Ranked #1 of 7 tokenised funds in the published ranking
83
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $5.00 your cost/yr
Is WisdomTree Digital Funds right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- What you own9/10, the category best
- Redemption mechanics10/10, the category best
- Fees vs the cheapest route9/10, the category best
- Open to you8/10, the category best
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: United States.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best tokenised fund shows where it lands for you.
What will WisdomTree Digital Funds cost you?
$5.00 your cost/yr
- Your balance
- $10k
- Annual management fee
- 0.05%
$58 below the median of 4 priced tokenised funds.
How this is calculatedHow safe is WisdomTree Digital Funds?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to WisdomTree Digital Funds
Compare all 4- 2Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)12 points below · weaker on fees vs the cheapest route (3 against 9)71$50
- 3Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)15 points below · weaker on open to you (2 against 8)68$75
- 4ADDX27 points below · weaker on what you own (3 against 9)56
For your setup
Find out if WisdomTree Digital Funds fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where WisdomTree Digital Funds lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best tokenised fundNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why it leads
Why WisdomTree Digital Funds ranks #1
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (29.0 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on every criterion.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
309+8.644.09#1/7Loading evidence…
2610+8.325.010#1/7Loading evidence…
249+6.913.09#1/7Loading evidence…
208+5.123.08#1/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin+12over Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA), #2
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 82–83 and stays #1
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of WisdomTree Digital Funds’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
What you own and against whom 9 → 2 on its ladder · Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) passes it−779#1 → #2
Redemption mechanics 10 → 2 on its ladder · Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) passes it−880#1 → #2
Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent 9 → 0 on its ladder · Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) passes it−979#1 → #2
Strengths
4 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- What you own and against whom — 9/10, the category best
- Redemption mechanics — 10/10, the category best
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent — 9/10, the category best
- Who can subscribe — 8/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
0 from the score dataWhere it trails
No scored criterion trails the category best by two points or more, so no tradeoff can be stated from the data.
Record watch-outs
- US investors only — non-US buyers cannot access it at all
- The token is explicitly NOT the security — the onchain record is legally secondary
- Tiny scale ($18.06M flagship net assets): minimal bid depth and DeFi utility
- Onchain features add little to what a normal brokerage already gives you
Competitive position
Where WisdomTree Digital Funds leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#6 / 76.0 of 20 · best 14.0
Published criteria#1 / 721.7 of 30 · pool best
Friction#1 / 77.3 of 10 · pool best
Trust record#1 / 76.4 of 8 · pool best
Measured data#1 / 79.7 of 18 · constant here
Where WisdomTree Digital Funds leads
- What you own and against whom#1 / 7
- Redemption mechanics#1 / 7
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent#1 / 7
- Who can subscribe#1 / 7
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)#2 of 7 · score 71 · 12.0 points behind
WisdomTree Digital Funds leads on
- What you own and against whom9 vs 7
- Redemption mechanics10 vs 9
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent9 vs 3
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason WisdomTree Digital Funds is ahead: published criteria (+19.2 display points).Scenario cost: Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) is +$45 against WisdomTree Digital Funds.
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)#3 of 7 · score 68 · 15.0 points behind
WisdomTree Digital Funds leads on
- What you own and against whom9 vs 8
- Redemption mechanics10 vs 8
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent9 vs 7
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason WisdomTree Digital Funds is ahead: published criteria (+15.6 display points).Scenario cost: Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) is +$70 against WisdomTree Digital Funds.
ADDX#4 of 7 · score 56 · 27.0 points behind
WisdomTree Digital Funds leads on
- What you own and against whom9 vs 3
- Redemption mechanics10 vs 5
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent9 vs 2
ADDX leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason WisdomTree Digital Funds is ahead: published criteria (+33.5 display points).Scenario cost: ADDX has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against #2
83 vs 71 · gap 12.0Why WisdomTree Digital Funds ranks above Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)
DimensionThisJanus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)Gap share
Availability · 23% weight6.014.0−20.8, worse
Published criteria · 35% weight21.714.3+19.2, better
Friction · 12% weight7.32.7+12.0, better
Trust record · 9% weight6.45.6+2.1, better
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here9.79.7same
Published criterionThisJanus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)Points
What you own and against whom · w3097+1.92, better
Redemption mechanics · w26109+0.83, better
Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent · w2493+4.61, better
Who can subscribe · w2084+2.56, better
Net8371+12.0
Your scenario
What WisdomTree Digital Funds costs on your scenario
The annual management fee on your balance. Excludes performance fees, spreads and any redemption charge. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your balance · your input$10k
Annual management fee · published rate0.05%
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 22 October 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$5.00
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$634 of 7 rows priced · WisdomTree Digital Funds −$58 vs median
Cheapest priced$5.00 · WisdomTree Digital FundsWisdomTree Digital Funds is the cheapest priced row for this scenario · availability not applied — set your country to filter
3 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 22 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #1 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 22 October 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
What you own and against whomstrength 9 · weight 30Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Redemption mechanicsstrength 10 · weight 26Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Fee load vs the cheapest equivalentstrength 9 · weight 24Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Who can subscribestrength 8 · weight 20Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Insolvency failure (WisdomTree Digital Funds 9/10): the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.Scored by What you own and against whom · 30%
- Regulatory failure (WisdomTree Digital Funds 8/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Who can subscribe · 20%
- Exit failure (WisdomTree Digital Funds 10/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Redemption mechanics · 26%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Custody failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent (24%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- WisdomTree 500 Digital Fund (SPXUX) fact sheet (WisdomTree, data as of 06/30/2026, read 22 October 2026): "Gross Expense Ratio 0.05%" and "Net Expense Ratio 0.05%", so the flagship carries 0.05% a year with no fee waiver that can lapse: an ordinary mutual-fund expense ratio, not a tokenisation premium, and the lowest load in this category by an order of magnitude. The same fact sheet states "WisdomTree’s Digital Funds are open-end mutual funds registered with the SEC under the 1940 Act". WisdomTree Connect FAQ (wisdomtreeconnect.com, read 22 October 2026): "There are no transaction, subscription or minting fees or other service fees for transactions. Investors are responsible for gas fees* and potentially burn fees** if utilizing USDC via the stablecoin conversion service." Redemption is daily at NAV: "Subscriptions and redemptions generally settle shortly after the NAV strike at 4:00 pm ET."WisdomTree SPXUX fund fact sheet ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDWisdomTree SPXUX fund fact sheet ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- full
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Ethereum, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Optimism, and more
- Markets served
- us
- Primary markets
- Professional and accredited investors
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Daily redemption at NAV with no queue, gate, lock-up or pro-ration; T+0 on the money fund, T+1 elsewhere.
- Availability note
- WisdomTree Connect SPXUX page (wisdomtreeconnect.com/digital-funds/equity/spxux, read 22 October 2026): "U.S. investors only" and "The information provided is for informational purposes only and intended solely for U.S. persons over the age of 18." WisdomTree Prime FAQ (wisdomtreeprime.com/faq, read 22 October 2026): "WisdomTree Prime is available in all 50 US states." Only the United States is served; the institutional route is narrower still: "WisdomTree Connect is generally available to institutional investors only."
Legal entity on file: WisdomTree, placed in 3 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with WisdomTree Digital Funds: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 22 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 83, #1 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.7Forty-one more products are offered only where their own quoted terms serve- fixed 141 country exclusions on 31 rows, each the name of a country the row's own quoted terms exclude: for example Mercuryo Hungary, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Chile, Colombia and Morocco; Gemini Custody the United Kingdom, Australia and the EU after its wind-down; Backed xStocks the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Nigeria, the Philippines and Venezuela.
- changed Thirteen rows list the only countries their terms serve: Coins.ph the Philippines, Spritz bill pay, Brex, Unchained, WisdomTree, Franklin BENJI and AnchorWatch the United States (with its territories for AnchorWatch), PRYPCO Mint the UAE, N26 crypto seven EU countries, Gemini Tokenized Stocks the EU, XNET the US, Canada and the UK, Coldbit Steel and MetaMask Card the countries they list.
- changed Published (no-country) orders do not move. Country results change: in India six categories each lose one row (bill pay, cards, off-ramps, P2P, seed backup, tokenised real estate), and bill pay there has no row confirmed available, so it shows the published order marked as such; country pages list 23 fewer rows (24,357 to 24,334). The grounding test now matches full country names in any case, which shows seven earlier exclusions were quoted all along: the named debt of unquoted exclusions falls from 40 to 33 pairs.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt tokenised_funds:wisdomtree_digital_funds:2026.10.18:e1aa4e390f0e
Are you WisdomTree Digital Funds? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.