Provider at a glance
- Category
- Tokenised Funds
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- app.centrifuge.io
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 71 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)
Tokenised AAA CLO fund
Tokenised Funds
#2 Overall
Ranked #2 of 7 tokenised funds in the published ranking
71
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $50 your cost/yr
Is Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Redemption mechanics9/10; the category best is 10
Look elsewhere if these come first
- What you own7/10 here; WisdomTree Digital Funds scores 9
- Fees vs the cheapest route3/10 here; WisdomTree Digital Funds scores 9
- Open to you4/10 here; WisdomTree Digital Funds scores 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Europe, Global. Restricted: United States.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best tokenised fund shows where it lands for you.
What will Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) cost you?
$50 your cost/yr
- Your balance
- $10k
- Annual management fee
- 0.5%
$13 below the median of 4 priced tokenised funds.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)
Compare all 4- 1WisdomTree Digital Funds12 points above · stronger on fees vs the cheapest route (9 against 3)83$5.00
- 3Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)3 points below · stronger on fees vs the cheapest route (7 against 3)68$75
- 4ADDX15 points below · stronger on open to you (5 against 4)56
For your setup
Find out if Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best tokenised fundNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) ranks #2
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (19.1 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
307+6.724.09#3/7Loading evidence…
269+7.495.010#2/7Loading evidence…
243+2.303.09#3/7Loading evidence…
204+2.563.08#3/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−12behind WisdomTree Digital Funds, #1
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 69–72 and stays #2
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
What you own and against whom 7 → 5 on its ladder · Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) passes it−267#2 → #3
Redemption mechanics 9 → 7 on its ladder · Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) passes it−267#2 → #3
Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent 3 → 1 on its ladder · Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) passes it−268#2 → #3
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Redemption mechanics — 9/10, category best 10/10
Tradeoffs
3 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- What you own and against whom — 7/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent — 3/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Who can subscribe — 4/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- 0.50% management fee plus unquantified third-party fees, versus 0.20% all-in for the SAME manager’s listed ETF
- Daily redemption over a securitised credit book rewards whoever exits first
- The fund share is for non-US professional investors only, from 500,000 USDC — US persons excluded, including from the deJAAA wrapper
- BVI professional fund: a thinner investor-protection regime than a registered fund
Competitive position
Where Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 714.0 of 20 · pool best
Published criteria#3 / 714.3 of 30 · best 21.7
Friction#2 / 72.7 of 10 · best 7.3
Trust record#2 / 75.6 of 8 · best 6.4
Measured data#1 / 79.7 of 18 · constant here
Where Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) leads
- What you own and against whom#3 / 7
- Redemption mechanics#2 / 7
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent#3 / 7
- Who can subscribe#3 / 7
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)#3 of 7 · score 68 · 3.0 points behind
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) leads on
- Redemption mechanics9 vs 8
- Who can subscribe4 vs 2
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) leads on
- What you own and against whom8 vs 7
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent7 vs 3
Largest single reason Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) is ahead: trust record (+6.2 display points).Scenario cost: Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) is +$25 against Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA).
WisdomTree Digital Funds#1 of 7 · score 83 · 12.0 points ahead
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) leads onNo scored criterion
WisdomTree Digital Funds leads on
- What you own and against whom9 vs 7
- Redemption mechanics10 vs 9
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent9 vs 3
Largest single reason WisdomTree Digital Funds is ahead: published criteria (+19.2 display points).Scenario cost: WisdomTree Digital Funds is −$45 against Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA).
ADDX#4 of 7 · score 56 · 15.0 points behind
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) leads on
- What you own and against whom7 vs 3
- Redemption mechanics9 vs 5
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent3 vs 2
ADDX leads on
- Who can subscribe5 vs 4
Largest single reason Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) is ahead: published criteria (+14.3 display points).Scenario cost: ADDX has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
83 vs 71 · gap 12.0Why WisdomTree Digital Funds ranks above Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 12.0 to within rounding. Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) is ahead on availability (+20.8 in its favour).
DimensionThisWisdomTree Digital FundsGap share
Availability · 23% weight14.06.0+20.8, better
Published criteria · 35% weight14.321.7−19.2, worse
Friction · 12% weight2.77.3−12.0, worse
Trust record · 9% weight5.66.4−2.1, worse
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here9.79.7same
Published criterionThisWisdomTree Digital FundsPoints
What you own and against whom · w3079−1.92, worse
Redemption mechanics · w26910−0.83, worse
Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent · w2439−4.61, worse
Who can subscribe · w2048−2.56, worse
Net7183−12.0
Your scenario
What Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) costs on your scenario
The annual management fee on your balance. Excludes performance fees, spreads and any redemption charge. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your balance · your input$10k
Annual management fee · published rate0.5%
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 22 October 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$50
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$634 of 7 rows priced · Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) −$13 vs median
Cheapest priced$5.00 · WisdomTree Digital FundsJanus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) costs +$45 more · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with WisdomTree Digital Funds
3 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 22 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #2 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 22 October 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
What you own and against whomstrength 7 · weight 30Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Redemption mechanicsstrength 9 · weight 26Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Fee load vs the cheapest equivalentstrength 3 · weight 24Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Who can subscribestrength 4 · weight 20Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Insolvency failure (Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) 7/10): the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.Scored by What you own and against whom · 30%
- Regulatory failure (Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) 4/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Who can subscribe · 20%
- Exit failure (Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) 9/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Redemption mechanics · 26%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Custody failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent (24%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Anemoy JAAA fact sheet (June 2026, on IPFS, read 22 October 2026): "Entry fee $0", "Min. investment 500,000 USDC", "Mgmt. fee 50 basis points annually" (0.50% a year; the Centrifuge fund page shows "Expense ratio 0.50%"), and "Third party service providers for brokerage, custody, banking, administration and auditing services apply" on top, unquantified. Neither the fact sheet nor the fund page publishes performance- or redemption-fee terms. The Centrifuge fund page (read 22 October 2026) adds: "USDT subscriptions and redemptions might be subject to a USDT/USDC conversion fee, which is passed through directly to the investor." BENCHMARK IT HONESTLY: the same manager’s NYSE Arca-listed AAA CLO ETF (also ticker JAAA) shows "Gross Annual Expense Ratio (As of most recent prospectus) 0.20%" and "Net Annual Expense Ratio (As of most recent prospectus) 0.20%" with "Total Net Assets (As of 10/21/2026 ) $32.58B" on janushenderson.com (read 22 October 2026). Our arithmetic: the tokenised fund’s management fee alone is 2.5 times the ETF’s all-in ratio for the same strategy and portfolio managers.Anemoy JAAA fund fact sheet (June 2026) + Janus Henderson JAAA ETF page ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDAnemoy JAAA fund fact sheet (June 2026) + Janus Henderson JAAA ETF page ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- full
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Ethereum, Avalanche, Solana, Base, Stellar, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Monad, Pharos, X Layer
- Markets served
- europe, global
- Primary markets
- Professional and accredited investors
- Restricted markets
- United States
- Operating limits
- Daily subscription and redemption at NAV in stablecoins (T+0 with a 10:00 ET cutoff, or T+1 with a 15:00 ET cutoff); no lock-up; the fund share has a 500,000 USDC minimum and the deJAAA wrapper a 10,000 USD minimum.
- Availability note
- Centrifuge JAAA fund page (app.centrifuge.io/pool/281474976710663, read 22 October 2026): "Eligibility Non-US Professional Investors" and "Min. investment 500,000.00 USD"; the Anemoy fact sheet calls it an "Open ended BVI licensed fund for non-US Professional Investors". The deJAAA note page (app.centrifuge.io/pool/281474976710659, read 22 October 2026): "Issuer Open Market Factory Limited", "Min. investment 10,000 USD", "Eligibility Non-US Persons and Entities". Investors in the United States can buy neither.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA): where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 22 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 71, #2 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.7Forty-one more products are offered only where their own quoted terms serve- fixed 141 country exclusions on 31 rows, each the name of a country the row's own quoted terms exclude: for example Mercuryo Hungary, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Chile, Colombia and Morocco; Gemini Custody the United Kingdom, Australia and the EU after its wind-down; Backed xStocks the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Nigeria, the Philippines and Venezuela.
- changed Thirteen rows list the only countries their terms serve: Coins.ph the Philippines, Spritz bill pay, Brex, Unchained, WisdomTree, Franklin BENJI and AnchorWatch the United States (with its territories for AnchorWatch), PRYPCO Mint the UAE, N26 crypto seven EU countries, Gemini Tokenized Stocks the EU, XNET the US, Canada and the UK, Coldbit Steel and MetaMask Card the countries they list.
- changed Published (no-country) orders do not move. Country results change: in India six categories each lose one row (bill pay, cards, off-ramps, P2P, seed backup, tokenised real estate), and bill pay there has no row confirmed available, so it shows the published order marked as such; country pages list 23 fewer rows (24,357 to 24,334). The grounding test now matches full country names in any case, which shows seven earlier exclusions were quoted all along: the named debt of unquoted exclusions falls from 40 to 33 pairs.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt tokenised_funds:jaaa_anemoy_centrifuge:2026.10.18:e1aa4e390f0e
Are you Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.