Provider at a glance
- Category
- Tokenised Funds
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- addx.co
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 56 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
ADDX
Tokenised fund venue in Singapore
Tokenised Funds
#4 Overall
Ranked #4 of 7 tokenised funds in the published ranking
56
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is ADDX right for you?
Look elsewhere if these come first
- What you own3/10 here; Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) scores 8
- Redemption mechanics5/10 here; Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) scores 9
- Fees vs the cheapest route2/10 here; Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) scores 7
- Open to you5/10 here; the category best is 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global. Restricted: United States.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best tokenised fund shows where it lands for you.
What will ADDX cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Your balance
- $10k
How safe is ADDX?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to ADDX
Compare all 4- 2Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)15 points above · stronger on what you own (7 against 3)71$50
- 3Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)12 points above · stronger on what you own (8 against 3)68$75
- 5KAIO15 points below · weaker on redemption mechanics (2 against 5)41
For your setup
Find out if ADDX fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where ADDX lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best tokenised fundNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why ADDX ranks #4
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (11.8 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
303+2.884.09#5/7Loading evidence…
265+4.165.010#4/7Loading evidence…
242+1.543.09#6/7Loading evidence…
205+3.203.08#2/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−12behind Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC), #3
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 54–58 and stays #4
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of ADDX’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
What you own and against whom 3 → 10 on its ladder · passes Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)+769#4 → #3
Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent 2 → 10 on its ladder · passes Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)+868#4 → #3
Smallest climb: what you own and against whom 3 → 10 passes Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC), #3.
Strengths
0 from the score dataWhere it leads
No scored criterion is at or within one point of the category best, so no strength can be stated from the data.
Tradeoffs
4 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- What you own and against whom — 3/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Redemption mechanics — 5/10 against a category best of 10/10
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent — 2/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Who can subscribe — 5/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- Accredited investors ONLY — the low minimum does not lower the eligibility bar
- Single-venue dependency: custody, issuance and secondary trading all with one operator
- Platform fee opacity: a subscription fee plus additive underlying fund fees
- 2026 pivot to white-label infrastructure may draw resources from the investor marketplace
Competitive position
Where ADDX leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 714.0 of 20 · pool best
Published criteria#4 / 78.8 of 30 · best 21.7
Friction#2 / 72.7 of 10 · best 7.3
Trust record#2 / 75.6 of 8 · best 6.4
Measured data#1 / 79.7 of 18 · constant here
Where ADDX leads
- Who can subscribe#2 / 7
Where it trails
- What you own and against whom#5 / 7
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent#6 / 7
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)#3 of 7 · score 68 · 12.0 points ahead
ADDX leads on
- Who can subscribe5 vs 2
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) leads on
- What you own and against whom8 vs 3
- Redemption mechanics8 vs 5
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent7 vs 2
Largest single reason Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) is ahead: published criteria (+17.9 display points).Scenario cost: ADDX has no verified pricing for this scenario.
KAIO#5 of 7 · score 41 · 15.0 points behind
ADDX leads on
- What you own and against whom3 vs 2
- Redemption mechanics5 vs 2
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent2 vs 1
KAIO leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason ADDX is ahead: published criteria (+10.7 display points).Scenario cost: KAIO has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)#2 of 7 · score 71 · 15.0 points ahead
ADDX leads on
- Who can subscribe5 vs 4
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) leads on
- What you own and against whom7 vs 3
- Redemption mechanics9 vs 5
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent3 vs 2
Largest single reason Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) is ahead: published criteria (+14.3 display points).Scenario cost: ADDX has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
83 vs 56 · gap 27.0Why WisdomTree Digital Funds ranks above ADDX
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 27.0 to within rounding. ADDX is ahead on availability (+20.8 in its favour).
DimensionThisWisdomTree Digital FundsGap share
Availability · 23% weight14.06.0+20.8, better
Published criteria · 35% weight8.821.7−33.5, worse
Friction · 12% weight2.77.3−12.0, worse
Trust record · 9% weight5.66.4−2.1, worse
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here9.79.7same
Published criterionThisWisdomTree Digital FundsPoints
What you own and against whom · w3039−5.76, worse
Redemption mechanics · w26510−4.16, worse
Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent · w2429−5.38, worse
Who can subscribe · w2058−1.92, worse
Net5683−27.0
Your scenario
ADDX is not priced for this scenario
The annual management fee on your balance. Excludes performance fees, spreads and any redemption charge. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your balance · your input$10k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 22 October 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$634 of 7 rows priced
Cheapest priced$5.00 · WisdomTree Digital FundsDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with WisdomTree Digital Funds
3 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 22 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #4 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 22 October 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
What you own and against whomstrength 3 · weight 30Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Redemption mechanicsstrength 5 · weight 26Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Fee load vs the cheapest equivalentstrength 2 · weight 24Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Who can subscribestrength 5 · weight 20Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Insolvency failure (ADDX 3/10): the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.Scored by What you own and against whom · 30%
- Regulatory failure (ADDX 5/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Who can subscribe · 20%
- Exit failure (ADDX 5/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Redemption mechanics · 26%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Custody failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent (24%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- ADDX homepage (addx.co/en, read 22 October 2026): "Unlike many other platforms, you will be charged only a one-time, non-recurring subscription fee with each investment and its exact amount will be shown before you submit your order." The fee cards read "One time subscription fee" and "No annual management fee", followed by "Please note other fees may apply, such as management fees and performance fees.", and the banner footnote reads "*We may only charge a single non-recurring ADDX fee for each subscription you make. Other fees may be charged by other parties with respect of your investment." The underlying fund’s fees are therefore ADDITIVE and are the dominant cost. No subscription percentage is published on the homepage or on the FAQ (addx.co/en/faq, read 22 October 2026).ADDX homepage and FAQ (underlying fees additive) ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDADDX homepage and FAQ (underlying fees additive) ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- full
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Private permissioned ledger
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Professional and accredited investors
- Restricted markets
- United States
- Operating limits
- Varies by product: daily access funds with no lock-ups, 3–12 month commercial papers, private credit with monthly or quarterly payouts, and lower-liquidity private equity.
- Availability note
- ADDX FAQ (addx.co/en/faq, read 22 October 2026): "No, you can open an account with ADDX as an investor from any country except for current U.S. citizens or U.S. taxpayers. We have currently onboarded investors from more than 30 countries. All applications will be subjected to our Know Your Customer (KYC), Anti-money Laundering (AML) processes, and any local regulatory requirements." and "We are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in one of the top financial centers of the world, and open to all non-US individual accredited, corporate accredited, and institutional investors." The homepage adds: "Due to regulations, we’re currently only able to serve accredited investors (AIs) who are neither U.S. citizens nor U.S. taxpayers." Retail investors cannot buy, and citizens and taxpayers of the United States are excluded wherever they live.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with ADDX: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 22 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 56, #4 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.7Forty-one more products are offered only where their own quoted terms serve- fixed 141 country exclusions on 31 rows, each the name of a country the row's own quoted terms exclude: for example Mercuryo Hungary, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Chile, Colombia and Morocco; Gemini Custody the United Kingdom, Australia and the EU after its wind-down; Backed xStocks the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Nigeria, the Philippines and Venezuela.
- changed Thirteen rows list the only countries their terms serve: Coins.ph the Philippines, Spritz bill pay, Brex, Unchained, WisdomTree, Franklin BENJI and AnchorWatch the United States (with its territories for AnchorWatch), PRYPCO Mint the UAE, N26 crypto seven EU countries, Gemini Tokenized Stocks the EU, XNET the US, Canada and the UK, Coldbit Steel and MetaMask Card the countries they list.
- changed Published (no-country) orders do not move. Country results change: in India six categories each lose one row (bill pay, cards, off-ramps, P2P, seed backup, tokenised real estate), and bill pay there has no row confirmed available, so it shows the published order marked as such; country pages list 23 fewer rows (24,357 to 24,334). The grounding test now matches full country names in any case, which shows seven earlier exclusions were quoted all along: the named debt of unquoted exclusions falls from 40 to 33 pairs.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt tokenised_funds:addx:2026.10.18:e1aa4e390f0e
Are you ADDX? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.