Provider at a glance
- Category
- Tokenised Funds
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- bitwiseinvestments.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 68 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)
Tokenised crypto carry fund
Tokenised Funds
#3 Overall
Ranked #3 of 7 tokenised funds in the published ranking
68
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $75 your cost/yr
Is Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- What you own8/10; the category best is 9
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Redemption mechanics8/10 here; WisdomTree Digital Funds scores 10
- Fees vs the cheapest route7/10 here; WisdomTree Digital Funds scores 9
- Open to you2/10 here; WisdomTree Digital Funds scores 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: United States, Europe, Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best tokenised fund shows where it lands for you.
What will Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) cost you?
$75 your cost/yr
- Your balance
- $10k
- Annual management fee
- 0.75%
$13 above the median of 4 priced tokenised funds.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)
Compare all 4- 1WisdomTree Digital Funds15 points above · stronger on open to you (8 against 2)83$5.00
- 2Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)3 points above · stronger on open to you (4 against 2)71$50
- 4ADDX12 points below · stronger on open to you (5 against 2)56
For your setup
Find out if Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best tokenised fundNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) ranks #3
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (21.0 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
308+7.684.09#2/7Loading evidence…
268+6.665.010#3/7Loading evidence…
247+5.383.09#2/7Loading evidence…
202+1.283.08#6/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−3behind Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA), #2
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 66–70 and stays #3
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
What you own and against whom 8 → 10 on its ladder · passes Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)+272#3 → #2
Redemption mechanics 8 → 10 on its ladder · passes Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)+271#3 → #2
Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent 7 → 9 on its ladder · passes Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)+271#3 → #2
Who can subscribe 2 → 4 on its ladder · passes Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)+271#3 → #2
What you own and against whom 8 → 1 on its ladder · ADDX passes it−755#3 → #4
Redemption mechanics 8 → 0 on its ladder · ADDX passes it−855#3 → #4
Smallest climb: what you own and against whom 8 → 10 passes Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA), #2.
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- What you own and against whom — 8/10, category best 9/10
Tradeoffs
3 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Redemption mechanics — 8/10 against a category best of 10/10
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent — 7/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Who can subscribe — 2/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- Qualified purchasers only ($5M+ test) with a $100,000 minimum — accredited is not enough
- Strategy risk: basis compresses toward cash yields and 0.75% then eats most of the edge
- Assets sit at crypto exchanges and prime brokers
- Manager changed from Superstate to Bitwise on 1 June 2026
Competitive position
Where Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 714.0 of 20 · pool best
Published criteria#2 / 715.7 of 30 · best 21.7
Friction#2 / 72.7 of 10 · best 7.3
Trust record#5 / 73.2 of 8 · best 6.4
Measured data#1 / 79.7 of 18 · constant here
Where Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) leads
- What you own and against whom#2 / 7
- Redemption mechanics#3 / 7
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent#2 / 7
Where it trails
- Who can subscribe#6 / 7
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA)#2 of 7 · score 71 · 3.0 points ahead
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) leads on
- What you own and against whom8 vs 7
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent7 vs 3
Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) leads on
- Redemption mechanics9 vs 8
- Who can subscribe4 vs 2
Largest single reason Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) is ahead: trust record (+6.2 display points).Scenario cost: Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) is −$25 against Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC).
ADDX#4 of 7 · score 56 · 12.0 points behind
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) leads on
- What you own and against whom8 vs 3
- Redemption mechanics8 vs 5
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent7 vs 2
ADDX leads on
- Who can subscribe5 vs 2
Largest single reason Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) is ahead: published criteria (+17.9 display points).Scenario cost: ADDX has no verified pricing for this scenario.
WisdomTree Digital Funds#1 of 7 · score 83 · 15.0 points ahead
Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) leads onNo scored criterion
WisdomTree Digital Funds leads on
- What you own and against whom9 vs 8
- Redemption mechanics10 vs 8
- Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent9 vs 7
Largest single reason WisdomTree Digital Funds is ahead: published criteria (+15.6 display points).Scenario cost: WisdomTree Digital Funds is −$70 against Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC).
Against the leader
83 vs 68 · gap 15.0Why WisdomTree Digital Funds ranks above Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 15.0 to within rounding. Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) is ahead on availability (+20.8 in its favour).
DimensionThisWisdomTree Digital FundsGap share
Availability · 23% weight14.06.0+20.8, better
Published criteria · 35% weight15.721.7−15.6, worse
Friction · 12% weight2.77.3−12.0, worse
Trust record · 9% weight3.26.4−8.3, worse
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here9.79.7same
Published criterionThisWisdomTree Digital FundsPoints
What you own and against whom · w3089−0.96, worse
Redemption mechanics · w26810−1.66, worse
Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent · w2479−1.54, worse
Who can subscribe · w2028−3.84, worse
Net6883−15.0
Your scenario
What Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) costs on your scenario
The annual management fee on your balance. Excludes performance fees, spreads and any redemption charge. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your balance · your input$10k
Annual management fee · published rate0.75%
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 22 October 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$75
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$634 of 7 rows priced · Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) +$13 vs median
Cheapest priced$5.00 · WisdomTree Digital FundsBitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) costs +$70 more · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with WisdomTree Digital Funds
3 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 22 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #3 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 22 October 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
What you own and against whomstrength 8 · weight 30Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Redemption mechanicsstrength 8 · weight 26Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Fee load vs the cheapest equivalentstrength 7 · weight 24Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Who can subscribestrength 2 · weight 20Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Insolvency failure (Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) 8/10): the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.Scored by What you own and against whom · 30%
- Regulatory failure (Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) 2/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Who can subscribe · 20%
- Exit failure (Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) 8/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Redemption mechanics · 26%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Custody failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Fee load vs the cheapest equivalent (24%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Bitwise’s USCC page (bitwiseinvestments.com/crypto-funds/uscc, read 22 October 2026): "The management fee is payable monthly in arrears, and is equal to an annual rate of 0.75% of USCC's average daily Net Asset Value. USCC is not subject to a performance-based fee or allocation." and "Minimum Investment $100,000"; Superstate’s USCC docs (read 22 October 2026): "The minimum initial investment is $100,000 unless waived by Superstate." Redemption in USDC runs through a third party: "Redemption in USDC is done through Circle, a third party." Sold as an unregistered private placement, not a registered fund despite the US domicile: "The Shares will be offered and sold under the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 of Regulation D" and "The Shares are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933".Bitwise USCC fund page + Superstate USCC docs ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDBitwise USCC fund page + Superstate USCC docs ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- full
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Ethereum, Plume, Solana
- Markets served
- us, europe, global
- Primary markets
- Professional and accredited investors
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Purchases and redemptions in USD or USDC, with liquidity each market day; proceeds are delivered T+1 for requests received before 5pm ET, or T+2 after.
- Availability note
- Superstate’s Getting started page (docs.superstate.com/investors/getting-started, read 22 October 2026): Superstate Funds are "Only available to Qualified Purchasers in supported countries with at least $5m in investable assets for individuals, or $25m for institutions." Supported countries for Superstate Funds: "United States, Australia, Bermuda, Bahamas, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, France, Georgia, Germany, Gibraltar, Hong Kong, Italy, Ireland, Jersey, Luxembourg, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Panama, Poland, Seychelles, Singapore, Spain, Saint Kitts and Nevis, South Korea, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom." (ISO codes: US, AU, BM, BS, VG, CA, KY, CY, FR, GE, DE, GI, HK, IT, IE, JE, LU, MH, MX, PA, PL, SC, SG, ES, KN, KR, CH, AE, GB); the page adds "Please note that this list is updated regularly." Bitwise’s USCC page: "Eligible Investors Qualified Purchasers in supported jurisdictions". Accredited-but-not-QP investors and all retail investors cannot buy.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC): where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 22 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 68, #3 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.7Forty-one more products are offered only where their own quoted terms serve- fixed 141 country exclusions on 31 rows, each the name of a country the row's own quoted terms exclude: for example Mercuryo Hungary, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Chile, Colombia and Morocco; Gemini Custody the United Kingdom, Australia and the EU after its wind-down; Backed xStocks the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Nigeria, the Philippines and Venezuela.
- changed Thirteen rows list the only countries their terms serve: Coins.ph the Philippines, Spritz bill pay, Brex, Unchained, WisdomTree, Franklin BENJI and AnchorWatch the United States (with its territories for AnchorWatch), PRYPCO Mint the UAE, N26 crypto seven EU countries, Gemini Tokenized Stocks the EU, XNET the US, Canada and the UK, Coldbit Steel and MetaMask Card the countries they list.
- changed Published (no-country) orders do not move. Country results change: in India six categories each lose one row (bill pay, cards, off-ramps, P2P, seed backup, tokenised real estate), and bill pay there has no row confirmed available, so it shows the published order marked as such; country pages list 23 fewer rows (24,357 to 24,334). The grounding test now matches full country names in any case, which shows seven earlier exclusions were quoted all along: the named debt of unquoted exclusions falls from 40 to 33 pairs.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt tokenised_funds:uscc_bitwise_superstate:2026.10.18:e1aa4e390f0e
Are you Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC)? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.