Provider at a glance
- Category
- Tax Software
- Entity
- All 2 Ledgible products
- Official website
- ledgible.io
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 62 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Ledgible
US crypto tax form generator
Tax Software
#11 Overall
Ranked #11 of 11 tax software in the published ranking
62
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is Ledgible right for you?
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?5/10 here; ZenLedger scores 7
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?4/10 here; CoinTracking.info scores 7
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?5/10 here; ZenLedger scores 7
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?6/10 here; ZenLedger scores 7
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto tax software shows where it lands for you.
What will Ledgible cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Transactions per year
- 1k
- Published tiers
- 1
How safe is Ledgible?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Ledgible
Compare all 4- 8ZenLedger11 points above · stronger on your tax form (7 against 5)73$199
- 9CoinTracking.info10 points above · stronger on cost-basis method (7 against 4)72$169
- 10TokenTax4 points above · stronger on cost-basis method (6 against 4)66$199
For your setup
Find out if Ledgible fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Ledgible lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best crypto tax softwareNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Ledgible ranks #11
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (15.8 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
325+5.128.09#10/11Loading evidence…
264+3.337.08#11/11Loading evidence…
225+3.527.09#11/11Loading evidence…
206+3.846.08#4/11Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−4behind TokenTax, #10
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 60–64 and stays #11
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Ledgible’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? 5 → 8 on its ladder · passes TokenTax+368#11 → #10
Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? 4 → 7 on its ladder · passes TokenTax+367#11 → #10
My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? 5 → 9 on its ladder · passes TokenTax+467#11 → #10
Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? 6 → 10 on its ladder · passes TokenTax+467#11 → #10
Smallest climb: “Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?” 5 → 8 passes TokenTax, #10.
Strengths
0 from the score dataWhere it leads
No scored criterion is at or within one point of the category best, so no strength can be stated from the data.
Tradeoffs
4 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? — 5/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? — 4/10 against a category best of 8/10
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? — 5/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? — 6/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- The $49 is a lifetime-transaction toll, not a this-year toll, and the caps that decide your bill are published only inside a PNG. Ledgible's own words: "Pricing is based on the total number of transactions you've made from the beginning of your transaction history to the end of the current tax year date (rather than annual transactions)" (support.ledgible.io/hc/en-us/articles/4405478844045, updated 2026-08-09). A filer with eight years of history and four trades this year is priced on all eight years. The base tier is also far narrower than the pricing page admits — "The basic package starts at $49 and includes up to 2 wallets and 1 exchange in their data sources with up to 200 transactions." (article 360058705432); that 2-wallet and 1-exchange limit appears NOWHERE on ledgible.io/pricing/, whose own base-tier image says only 'Tax-year reporting and up to 200 transactions'. (The pricing page does print '2 wallets', but inside an Enterprise Accounting usage example, not as the $49 cap — do not read it as the consumer limit.) Second, the buyer arriving from the marketing site will find the automation isn't there: the FAQ says "Yes, the Ledgible Platform offers full support for DeFi and NFT trading." while the documentation says "NFT tracking isn’t done automatically on Ledgible, so tracking the activity will be best done manually.", DeFi auto-categorisation covers only Ethereum and Algorand, and "However, income cannot be automatically detected and therefore transactions that are to be taxed as such must be designated by the user." — so every staking reward, airdrop and fork is hand-labelled. Third, and most expensive to discover late: this is a US-only filing artefact whose US rulebook is stale. Rev. Proc. 2024-28 wallet-level basis allocation is not mentioned once in 277 knowledge-base articles — while Ledgible's institutional whitepaper explains the rule in detail, so the silence is in the consumer product, not in the company. The FIFO/LIFO/HIFO guidance still cites the superseded IRS Virtual Currency FAQ Q39-41, and the preparer instructions still assert crypto is 'not currently reported on 1099s' in the first Form 1099-DA season.
Competitive position
Where Ledgible leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 1114.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#11 / 1111.9 of 30 · best 19.2
Friction#1 / 112.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 113.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 118.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Ledgible leads
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?#4 / 11
Where it trails
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?#10 / 11
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?#11 / 11
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?#11 / 11
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
TokenTax#10 of 11 · score 66 · 4.0 points ahead
Ledgible leads onNo scored criterion
TokenTax leads on
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?6 vs 4
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?6 vs 5
Largest single reason TokenTax is ahead: published criteria (+4.4 display points).Scenario cost: Ledgible has no verified pricing for this scenario.
CoinTracking.info#9 of 11 · score 72 · 10.0 points ahead
Ledgible leads on
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?6 vs 5
CoinTracking.info leads on
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?7 vs 5
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?7 vs 4
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?7 vs 5
Largest single reason CoinTracking.info is ahead: published criteria (+10.1 display points).Scenario cost: Ledgible has no verified pricing for this scenario.
ZenLedger#8 of 11 · score 73 · 11.0 points ahead
Ledgible leads onNo scored criterion
ZenLedger leads on
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?7 vs 5
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?6 vs 4
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?7 vs 5
Largest single reason ZenLedger is ahead: published criteria (+11.2 display points).Scenario cost: Ledgible has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
81 vs 62 · gap 19.0Why Koinly ranks above Ledgible
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 19.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisKoinlyGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight11.919.2−19.0, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisKoinlyPoints
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? · w3258−3.07, worse
Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? · w2648−3.33, worse
My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? · w2258−2.11, worse
Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? · w2068−1.28, worse
Net6281−19.0
Your scenario
Ledgible is not priced for this scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Published tiers · published rate1
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 29 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$1346 of 11 rows priced
Cheapest priced$99 · KoinlyDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with Koinly
2 of 11 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
3 of 11 quote a zero fee that leaves costs out, so they are absent from the median and the cheapest row, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 29 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #11 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 29 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?strength 5 · weight 32Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?strength 4 · weight 26Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?strength 5 · weight 22Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?strength 6 · weight 20Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Regulatory failure (Ledgible 5/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? · 32%
- Exit failure (Ledgible 6/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? · 20%
- Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? · 26% (Ledgible 4/10)Scored by My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? · 22% (Ledgible 5/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- https://
ledgible .io /pricing / — fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200, plain curl; text unchanged from 19 August 2026. The page publishes one price as text: tabs "Professional Tax" "(Starting at $49)" and "Enterprise Accounting" "(Custom Pricing)"; lead "Our tax platform has straightforward base pricing with clearly defined transaction tiers."; "Ledgible Crypto Tax Pro is free for Tax Professionals to use. Clients are charged directly on a per client basis." The tier ladder is served only inside two images (alt text "crypto tax tracking software"; ledgible.io/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Group-5301.png and Group-5302.png, both re-downloaded 29 September 2026 and read visually, so not byte-verifiable): IMAGE-READ "Base Price" $49 "Tax-year reporting and up to 200 transactions"; IMAGE-READ "Usage-Based Incremental Pricing" $50 "200–1000 transactions" and $100 "Each set of 2500 transactions over 1000". Enterprise: no price, only cost drivers ("Account Users", "Exchange Connections", "Wallets", "Transaction Volume", "General Ledger Integrations") and two unpriced examples. The binding caps for the $49 buyer are in the help centre, https:// support .ledgible .io /hc /en-us /articles /360058705432 -Purchasing-Reports (read 29 September 2026 via the Zendesk API, updated 22 August 2024): "The basic package starts at $49 and includes up to 2 wallets and 1 exchange in their data sources with up to 200 transactions." Counting basis, https:// support .ledgible .io /hc /en-us /articles /4405478844045 -Intro-to-Ledgible-Products (updated_at 9 August 2026, unchanged): "Pricing for Ledgible Crypto Tax begins at $49 a tax year and increases based on the number of total transactions added to your Ledgible account" | "Pricing is based on the total number of transactions you've made from the beginning of your transaction history to the end of the current tax year date (rather than annual transactions)". Refunds, https:// ledgible .io /terms-of-service .pdf / ("Last Updated: December 20, 2019", fetched 29 September 2026): "MEMBERSHIP FEES WILL NOT BE REFUNDED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE LAW." Prices unchanged since 19 August 2026.Ledgible — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDLedgible — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- The default IS disclosed in writing and IS surfaced where the number is produced — but the rule it is anchored to has been superseded, and the product has no concept of the allocation that now binds. Disclosure, character-exact: "Ledgible Crypto Tax defaults to calculating taxes using the First-In First-Out (FIFO) calculation method."
- Supported chains
- Not published
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
Legal entity on file: Ledgible, placed in 2 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Ledgible: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 29 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 62, #11 of 11. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 1 October 2026
2026.10.0Layer-2 chains are ranked on whether you can leave with your funds- added Four l2_chains criteria with published band ladders: proof system (18), withdrawals if the operator stops (18), rollup stage (14) and exit window before an upgrade (6). EVM equivalence moves 40 to 17, Ethereum data availability 25 to 15 and maturity 35 to 12. Every chain's emergency exit window reads None, so the exit-window ladder also reads L2BEAT's regular, non-emergency upgrade path (Arbitrum One 10 days, Starknet and Arbitrum Nova 7, zkSync Era 4 days 3 hours); data availability separates full transaction data (10) from state diffs only (9, L2BEAT: Onchain (SD)). A stage L2BEAT marks Under review keeps its last score for at most one 45-day cycle and is never interpolated.
- changed l2_chains ranks through scoreCriterionObjective on fitStrength, like the other criterion-ranked categories; the hand-written structural scorer is deleted. All 105 criterion scores across 15 rows carry a quote and source in research-pending/rereads/2026-10-01-l2_chains.json; 131 of 135 quotes re-fetched verbatim on the read date, and the four behind a bot wall or a JavaScript shell were read by the adversarial model run.
- fixed Four facts corrected on the read: Scroll, Mantle and Blast are EVM-compatible, not equivalent (their own documentation, and for Blast live RPC probes); Starknet's public mainnet opened to users in 2022, not 2021. Arbitrum Nova's data has gone to Ethereum as blobs since 31 August 2026, and the row now leads with the Arbitrum DAO's decision to minimise it.
- fixed The old scorer credited Ethereum data availability whenever the data-availability text contained the word "ethereum", so Arbitrum Nova's committee ("…Ethereum L1 rollup fallback") and Polygon zkEVM's off-chain data ("…Ethereum L1 before the sunset") both scored full marks. Data availability is now a quoted L2BEAT reading.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt tax_software:ledgible:2026.10.18:1bf07a0203ab
Are you Ledgible? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.
Show this rank on your site
Editorial review of Ledgible , on file since April 2026 — the review is separate from the score.