DODO and UniswapX tie on score at 74; the published tie-break orders them. UniswapX ranks #4 and DODO #5 of 11 published DEX aggregators. The ledger below shows where each side is ahead — pick by the criterion that matters to you.
UniswapX74
vs
DODO74
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #4 and #5 of 11
Published verdictRanking snapshot 12 November 2026
Same published score — 74 each
DODO and UniswapX tie on score at 74; the published tie-break orders them.
UniswapX #4 of 1174
DODO #5 of 1174
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termDODO leads on 0 of 2 published criteria; UniswapX on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermDODOUniswapXWeightPoints
No published term separates the two — every criterion cell and every score dimension is equal.
Net of the terms0.0
Reproduced gap0.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
This ranking scores its published criteria from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion, so they count here as one term and no single criterion is credited.
UniswapXScore 74Intent-based swaps from Uniswap — MEV-protected, permissioned fillersStrength: MEV-protected intent swapsWatch-out: Intent fills depend on quoters vetted by Uniswap Labs and on fillers competing — thin markets may fill slowerDODOScore 74PMM-based DEX + aggregator — audited, long-runningStrength: Long-running, audited protocolWatch-out: A 2021 hack hit a separate V2 Crowdpooling contract (not the SmartTrade aggregator) — a mark on the wider team record to weigh
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactUniswapXDODO
Trading feeSnapshot0% taker plus swap fees and slippage · read 3 November 2026 · source 0.1% taker · read 3 November 2026 · source
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotUnited States, Europe, GlobalUnited States, Europe, Global
Custody modelSnapshotSelf-custodialSelf-custodial
Security postureSnapshotExtensively audited; immutable core contracts; fully open source.Audited; upgradeable contracts; partly open source.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
UniswapX
Published score 74 #4 of 11
Pick it when
UniswapX leads DODO on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
MEV-protected intent swaps
Tradeoff
Intent fills depend on quoters vetted by Uniswap Labs and on fillers competing — thin markets may fill slower
DODO
Published score 74 #5 of 11
Pick it when
DODO leads UniswapX on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Long-running, audited protocol
Tradeoff
A 2021 hack hit a separate V2 Crowdpooling contract (not the SmartTrade aggregator) — a mark on the wider team record to weigh
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
UniswapX
UniswapX leads DODO on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
UniswapXScore 74Intent-based swaps from Uniswap — MEV-protected, permissioned fillersStrength: MEV-protected intent swapsWatch-out: Intent fills depend on quoters vetted by Uniswap Labs and on fillers competing — thin markets may fill slower
DODO
DODO leads UniswapX on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
DODOScore 74PMM-based DEX + aggregator — audited, long-runningStrength: Long-running, audited protocolWatch-out: A 2021 hack hit a separate V2 Crowdpooling contract (not the SmartTrade aggregator) — a mark on the wider team record to weigh
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 860 of 4 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Security
weight 14.4 of 86Not scored
UniswapXNot scored
No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.
DODONot scored
No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.
Trust
weight 9.6 of 86Not scored
UniswapXNot scored
No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.
DODONot scored
No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
UniswapX14/20DODO14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
UniswapX23.6/30DODO23.6/30
Tie
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
UniswapX2.7/10DODO2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
UniswapX3.2/8DODO3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
UniswapX5.5/18DODO5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Same published score — pick by the criterion that matters to you.
UniswapX leads DODO on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
DODO leads UniswapX on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Contract failure: the code holding the funds is exploited.
Scored by Security & track record · 60%
Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
Scored by Trust-minimization · 40%
Not assessed by this ranking: Custody failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
DODO and UniswapX tie on score at 74; the published tie-break orders them. Published scores, out of 100: UniswapX 74 (rank 4 of 11 dex aggregators), DODO 74 (rank 5 of 11).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
