DODO#4 of 12 · score 74 · same score
UniswapX leads onNo scored criterion
DODO leads onNo scored criterion
Scenario cost: DODO has no verified pricing for this scenario.
#5 overall across 12 scored dex aggregators. 9 points behind #1 Matcha (0x). Scored 74 on the published 41–99 scale under methodology 2026.09.15, from the evidence read on file.
Availability not verified. Tell the explorer where you are and this verdict tests the record’s published market tags against it. An untested record is shown as not verified — never as available. Supported markets on record: United States, Europe, Global. Set your country in the explorer
Why this rank
Why UniswapX ranks #5
2 published criteria · Σ weight 100
This category publishes 2 criteria — security & track record; trust-minimization — but no per-criterion strength has been established for UniswapX yet. Its position comes from the engine's five dimensions below, measured against the 12 ranked rows. Per-criterion receipts appear once the evidence read lands.
DimensionAgainst the poolValueBestRank
Availability / 2014.014.0#1/12
Published criteria / 3023.627.2#4/12
Friction / 102.72.7#1/12
Trust record / 83.23.2#1/12
Measured data / 185.55.5#1/12
MarginLevelbehind DODO, #4
RobustnessNot scored on criteriaits position comes from the engine’s dimensions, not from criterion scores a re-read could move
Evidence0 of 2 scoredno receipt file for this category
Strengths
4 from the score dataWhere it leads
Record says best for
- MEV-protected intent swaps
- Vetted RFQ quoters with permissionless fillers
- Fully open-source, immutable core
Tradeoffs
1 from the score dataWhere it trails
Record watch-outs
- Intent fills depend on quoters vetted by Uniswap Labs and on fillers competing — thin markets may fill slower
- Generic ERC-20 approval risk applies (use Permit2 / limited approvals) — a DeFi-wide vector
Competitive position
Where UniswapX leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 1214.0 of 20 · pool best
Published criteria#4 / 1223.6 of 30 · best 27.2
Friction#1 / 122.7 of 10 · pool best
Trust record#1 / 123.2 of 8 · pool best
Measured data#1 / 125.5 of 18 · pool best
Where UniswapX leadsNo criterion in the top third of its pool.
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
CoW Swap#3 of 12 · score 76 · 2.0 points ahead
UniswapX leads onNo scored criterion
CoW Swap leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason CoW Swap is ahead: published criteria (+2.3 display points).Scenario cost: CoW Swap has no verified pricing for this scenario.
1inch#2 of 12 · score 80 · 6.0 points ahead
UniswapX leads onNo scored criterion
1inch leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason 1inch is ahead: published criteria (+6.8 display points).Scenario cost: 1inch has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
83 vs 74 · gap 9.0Why Matcha (0x) ranks above UniswapX
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 9.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisMatcha (0x)Gap share
Availability · 23% weight14.014.00
Published criteria · 35% weight23.627.2−9.4
Friction · 12% weight2.72.70
Trust record · 9% weight3.23.20
Measured data · 21% weight5.55.50
Net7483−9.0
For your setup
Find out if UniswapX fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where UniswapX lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- 3–5 questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best dex aggregatorNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Your scenario
UniswapX is not priced for this scenario
Trading fee on your volume for a year. Excludes network gas and any withdrawal fee. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your monthly volume · your input$1k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 13 Sept 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Pricing not verified
Under the default inputs · USDCategory medianNot priced0 of 12 rows priced
Cheapest pricedNone pricedDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filter
12 of 12 rows in the pool have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
No evidence reading date recorded
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
0 of 2 cells scored
Score evidenceUnknownno observation on file
Public receiptsNo receipt filecategory publishes no receipt file
Evidence confidenceNot countedcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
Rank stabilityCould climbone point moves 3.7 display points
No structured observation is on file for this provider in this category; the strengths are the catalog’s published values.
12 listed rows in this category still await an evidence read and sit outside the scored pool.
No receipt file. This category publishes no receipt file, because no structured research payload exists for it yet. The ledger below shows the published strengths without their receipts; the scores on this page are unchanged.
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Routing: intent-based RFQ + exclusive Dutch auction (vetted quoters, permissionless fillers), MEV-protected. Since 2023. Non-custodial, immutable core. Extensively audited, no exploit. Live volume shown for context, not scored.Developer docs ↗ · 13 Sept 2026
- Prices published in
- USDDeveloper docs ↗ · 13 Sept 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- unregulated
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Not published
- Markets served
- us, europe, global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
Legal entity on file: Uniswap, placed in 7 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks and scores are recorded in a ledger, but this page does not chart that record yet, so no score line is drawn: history begins with the current verified snapshot. Below it, the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
7 methodology entries
- currentCurrent verified snapshot · methodology 2026.09.15Score 74, #5 of 12. 0 of 2 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 16 Sept 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
- 13 Sept 2026
2026.09.10dex, perp_dex and dex_aggregator re-read from primary sources: two closed venues, one replaced product, 69 corrected facts- fixed Drift: sunsetAt 2026-04-01 (Velocity docs: “The Drift program is paused”). Odos: sunsetAt 2026-07-27 (odos.xyz: “Odos trading and API services have shut down”). Vertex: sunsetAt corrected to 2025-07-16, the day trading ceased.
- fixed Synthetix Perps: perpModel offchain-orderbook, launchYear 2026, auditDepth limited, custody contract-custodied, matching offchain-matched, admin-controlled. It falls from #2 to the floor.
- fixed dex_aggregator: Matcha immutable-core (0x Settler contracts are immutable); CowSwap partial open source and a permissioned solver set; 1inch, ParaSwap and UniswapX solvers permissioned; Jupiter closed-source routing; OpenOcean and DODO MEV protection stated in their apps; ParaSwap launched 2019. The published #1 changes from CowSwap to Matcha.
- fixed perp_dex: GMX extensive audits, contract-custodied, hybrid matching; Hyperliquid limited audits; Jupiter Perps audited and admin-controlled; Paradex audited, bridged, offchain-matched; Lighter and Aster corrected; market counts and leverage updated from each venue.
- 10 Sept 2026
2026.09.5The published review cadence is now one the work actually keeps · platform-wide- changed reviewCadenceDays 30 → 45 across all 119 category specs, and the two prose sites that quoted "the 30-day review cadence" in tokenised_bonds.
- changed check-review-cadence-is-kept ceiling 7 → 3, negative-tested: restoring a single 30-day promise over 49-day evidence takes it to 4 and fails the build.
- fixed Measured by regenerating rankings.json: no category changed order and no score moved, and the golden suite confirms it independently — across all 119 fixtures and 2,217 cases the only fields that differ are methodologyVersion and contentHash. A cadence is a claim about freshness, not an input to any ranking.
Methodology
How this verdict was produced
- Methodology version
- 2026.09.15 · last platform-wide change 16 Sept 2026
- Data snapshot
- No reading date recorded
- Last recalculated
- At page build from the published inputs — the same run every visitor sees.
- Published run
- runWizardEngine(dex_aggregator, defaults) · no visitor answers
- Receipt id
- dex_aggregator:uniswapx:2026.09.15:7851369ddddb
What changed in this methodology version?
2026.09.15 · Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources
- Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
Rankings, scores and Fit read no affiliate, payout, conversion or sponsorship data. This page's commercial note appears once, beside the outbound action, and is written by no component that scores.