Skip to main content
Organisation

Uniswap

7 placements on ChainChoice under Uniswap, each scored against its own category's pool and criteria — #1 in 2 of them. The placements are not averaged and not ranked against each other: a #1 exchange and a #6 crypto card are two different products in two different markets.

DEXs
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Contract failure: the code holding the funds is exploited.
    Scored by Security & track record · 60%
  • Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Decentralization & trust-minimization · 40%
Not assessed by this ranking: Oracle failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Web3 Apps
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
None of this ranking's criteria scores a way of losing money; the families that apply are listed below as not assessed.
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Use-case fit (30%), Ecosystem fit (24%), Operating style (22%), Confidence signal (24%).
Intent Networks
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Execution failure: you get a worse price, later, or nothing.
    Scored by Bid set visibility · 34% (UniswapX 4/10)
    Scored by Solver admission · 20% (UniswapX 8/10)
    Scored by Fallback when nobody fills · 24% (UniswapX 8/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Regulatory failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Network fee disclosure (22%).
Flash Loan Venues
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Contract failure: the code holding the funds is exploited.
    Scored by Venue incident record · 20% (Uniswap v4 (flash accounting) 8/10, Uniswap v3 flash swaps 9/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Single-transaction borrowable depth (30%), Loan cost in basis points (28%), Integration surface (22%).
DEX Aggregators
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Contract failure: the code holding the funds is exploited.
    Scored by Security & track record · 60%
  • Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Trust-minimization · 40%
Not assessed by this ranking: Custody failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
MEV Protection
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Liveness failure (UniswapX 5/10): the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
    Scored by Inclusion breadth and what happens when your transaction is dropped · 20%
  • Execution failure (UniswapX 2/10): you get a worse price, later, or nothing.
    Scored by Order-flow privacy in practice · 30%
  • Information failure (UniswapX 4/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
    Scored by Independence and quality of the protection evidence · 20%
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Regulatory failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Rebate published AND reaching the end user's address (30%).