Provider at a glance
- Category
- Portfolio Tracking
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- kubera.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 72 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Kubera
Net-worth tracker with crypto accounts
Portfolio Tracking
#2 Overall
Ranked #2 of 7 portfolio tracking in the published ranking
72
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $250 your cost/yr
Is Kubera right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?9/10, the category best
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?9/10, the category best
Look elsewhere if these come first
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?6/10 here; Delta scores 8
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?7/10 here; CoinTracking scores 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto portfolio tracker shows where it lands for you.
What will Kubera cost you?
$250 your cost/yr
- Transactions per year
- 1k
- Published tiers
- 3
- Cheapest tier that covers you
- Kubera Essentials
$139 above the median of 4 priced portfolio tracking.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Kubera?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Kubera
Compare all 4- 3CoinTracking1 point below · stronger on API key blast radius (7 against 6)71$169
- 4Delta5 points below · stronger on API key blast radius (8 against 6)67$54
- 5CoinTracker (portfolio)7 points below · weaker on tier truth and continuity (6 against 9)65
For your setup
Find out if Kubera fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Kubera lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best crypto portfolio trackerNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Kubera ranks #2
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (24.3 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 2 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
306+5.767.09#5/7Loading evidence…
259+7.208.09#1/7Loading evidence…
257+5.608.010#5/7Loading evidence…
209+5.767.09#1/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−10behind Rotki, #1
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 70–74 and ranks #2–#3
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Kubera’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? 6 → 5 on its ladder · CoinTracking passes it−170#2 → #3
The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying? 9 → 8 on its ladder · CoinTracking passes it−170#2 → #3
When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? 7 → 6 on its ladder · CoinTracking passes it−170#2 → #3
Strengths
2 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying? — 9/10, the category best
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history? — 9/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
2 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? — 6/10 against a category best of 9/10
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? — 7/10 against a category best of 10/10
Record watch-outs
- You pay $250/year and broken connections are still partly your problem: Kubera's own help center says connections 'may occasionally break, or show wrong balances' and 'might not always be resolvable', with manual-entry tracking as the documented fallback — and your exchange API keys sit on Kubera's servers with read-only merely instructed at setup, not enforced at connect time.
Competitive position
Where Kubera leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 714.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#2 / 718.2 of 30 · best 22.2
Friction#1 / 72.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 73.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 78.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Kubera leads
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?#1 / 7
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?#1 / 7
Where it trails
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?#5 / 7
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?#5 / 7
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
CoinTracking#3 of 7 · score 71 · 1.0 point behind
Kubera leads on
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?9 vs 8
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?9 vs 7
CoinTracking leads on
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?7 vs 6
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?8 vs 7
Largest single reason Kubera is ahead: published criteria (+0.5 display points).Scenario cost: CoinTracking is −$81 against Kubera.
Delta#4 of 7 · score 67 · 5.0 points behind
Kubera leads on
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?9 vs 4
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?9 vs 7
Delta leads on
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?8 vs 6
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?8 vs 7
Largest single reason Kubera is ahead: published criteria (+4.9 display points).Scenario cost: Delta is −$196 against Kubera.
CoinTracker (portfolio)#5 of 7 · score 65 · 7.0 points behind
Kubera leads on
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?9 vs 7
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?9 vs 6
CoinTracker (portfolio) leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Kubera is ahead: published criteria (+6.8 display points).Scenario cost: CoinTracker (portfolio) has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
82 vs 72 · gap 10.0Why Rotki ranks above Kubera
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 10.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisRotkiGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight18.222.2−10.4, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisRotkiPoints
If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? · w3069−2.88, worse
When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? · w25710−2.40, worse
Net7282−10.0
Your scenario
What Kubera costs on your scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Published tiers · published rate3
Cheapest tier that covers you · published rateKubera Essentials
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 29 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$250
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$1114 of 7 rows priced · Kubera +$139 vs median
Cheapest priced$0.00 · CoinStatsKubera costs +$250 more · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with CoinStats
3 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 29 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #2 to #3 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 29 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?strength 6 · weight 30Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?strength 9 · weight 25Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?strength 7 · weight 25Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?strength 9 · weight 20Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Custody failure (Kubera 6/10): whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.Scored by If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? · 30%
- Exit failure (Kubera 9/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history? · 20%
- Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying? · 25% (Kubera 9/10)Scored by When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? · 25% (Kubera 7/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Homepage pricing cards (https://
www .kubera .com /, fetched 29 September 2026): Essentials — "Everything except what's listed under Black" — "$250 /year"; Black — "For complex multi-entity wealth." (adds "Ownership tags", "Nested Portfolios", "Guided Onboarding", "VIP Support") — "$2500 /year"; "Try for 14 days" — "Try it fully loaded. Choose the subscription plan after the trial."; "Book a 30-minute demo for $250, credited when you join Black". Headline on the same page: "$250 a year, not 1% of your wealth." No free plan exists. Kubera White Label is no longer priced on the homepage; its own page (https:// www .kubera .com /white-label, fetched 29 September 2026) states "$300 a month". https:// www .kubera .com /pricing still returns HTTP 404 — pricing is served on the homepage.Kubera — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDKubera — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Multi-chain
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- No market restriction found. The terms carry only the standard sanctions eligibility representation — 'You are not located in a country that is subject to a United States government embargo' (https://
www .kubera .com /legal) — which is an everywhere-applicable eligibility rule, not a regional footprint. Aggregator roster is deliberately global (Lean for MENA, Akahu for New Zealand, Salt Edge for Europe, Plaid/MX/Akoya for North America), and the legal page documents GDPR/UK GDPR handling for EU/EEA users.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Kubera: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- 29 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 72, #2 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 1 October 2026
2026.10.0Layer-2 chains are ranked on whether you can leave with your funds- added Four l2_chains criteria with published band ladders: proof system (18), withdrawals if the operator stops (18), rollup stage (14) and exit window before an upgrade (6). EVM equivalence moves 40 to 17, Ethereum data availability 25 to 15 and maturity 35 to 12. Every chain's emergency exit window reads None, so the exit-window ladder also reads L2BEAT's regular, non-emergency upgrade path (Arbitrum One 10 days, Starknet and Arbitrum Nova 7, zkSync Era 4 days 3 hours); data availability separates full transaction data (10) from state diffs only (9, L2BEAT: Onchain (SD)). A stage L2BEAT marks Under review keeps its last score for at most one 45-day cycle and is never interpolated.
- changed l2_chains ranks through scoreCriterionObjective on fitStrength, like the other criterion-ranked categories; the hand-written structural scorer is deleted. All 105 criterion scores across 15 rows carry a quote and source in research-pending/rereads/2026-10-01-l2_chains.json; 131 of 135 quotes re-fetched verbatim on the read date, and the four behind a bot wall or a JavaScript shell were read by the adversarial model run.
- fixed Four facts corrected on the read: Scroll, Mantle and Blast are EVM-compatible, not equivalent (their own documentation, and for Blast live RPC probes); Starknet's public mainnet opened to users in 2022, not 2021. Arbitrum Nova's data has gone to Ethereum as blobs since 31 August 2026, and the row now leads with the Arbitrum DAO's decision to minimise it.
- fixed The old scorer credited Ethereum data availability whenever the data-availability text contained the word "ethereum", so Arbitrum Nova's committee ("…Ethereum L1 rollup fallback") and Polygon zkEVM's off-chain data ("…Ethereum L1 before the sunset") both scored full marks. Data availability is now a quoted L2BEAT reading.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt portfolio_tracking:kubera:2026.10.18:513f775a7a6a
Are you Kubera? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.