Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Portfolio Tracking

Rotki vs Kubera Rotki leads by 10 points.

Rotki scores 10 points above Kubera, led by API key blast radius and sync fidelity and gap honesty. Rotki ranks #1 and Kubera #2 of 7 published portfolio tracking. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Rotki82
Kubera72
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #1 and #2 of 7
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-ROTKI-VS-KUBERA-71deb32e
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Rotki leads by 10 points

Rotki scores 10 points above Kubera, led by API key blast radius and sync fidelity and gap honesty.

Rotki #1 of 782
Kubera #2 of 772
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termRotki leads on 2 of 4 published criteria; Kubera on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermRotkiKuberaWeightPoints
API key blast radius9/106/107.2+5.6for Rotki+2.9 of 32
Sync fidelity and gap honesty10/107/106+4.7for Rotki+2.4 of 32
Net of the terms+10.3
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+10.4
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below8272+10.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

2 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactRotkiKubera
PricingSnapshotLive tier API (https://rotki.com/webapi/2/tiers/info, fetched 29 September 2026): Supporter "monthly_plan":{"price":"9.00" and "yearly_plan":{"price":"90.00" — "Historical events limit" "3K events", "Use your premium account in one device", no detailed graphs or event analysis; Basic "monthly_plan":{"price":"25.00" and "yearly_plan":{"price":"250.00" — "30K events", "Encrypted data backups" "Store up to 150MB", "Connect and sync up to 2 devices", "Track ETH Staking" "up to 128 ETH"; Advanced "monthly_plan":{"price":"45.00" and "yearly_plan":{"price":"450.00" — "100K events", "Store up to 600MB", "Connect and sync up to 4 devices", "up to 384 ETH". Currency: the vendor's pricing page (https://rotki.com/pricing, served at rotki.com/checkout/pay) renders no numbers without JavaScript but declares "priceCurrency":"EUR" in its structured data, so every tier price above is in euros. Free tier (https://rotki.com/products, 29 September 2026): "Free users can access up to 1,000 of their most recent events." and "Free users can add up to 10 notes."Homepage pricing cards (https://www.kubera.com/, fetched 29 September 2026): Essentials — "Everything except what's listed under Black" — "$250 /year"; Black — "For complex multi-entity wealth." (adds "Ownership tags", "Nested Portfolios", "Guided Onboarding", "VIP Support") — "$2500 /year"; "Try for 14 days" — "Try it fully loaded. Choose the subscription plan after the trial."; "Book a 30-minute demo for $250, credited when you join Black". Headline on the same page: "$250 a year, not 1% of your wealth." No free plan exists. Kubera White Label is no longer priced on the homepage; its own page (https://www.kubera.com/white-label, fetched 29 September 2026) states "$300 a month". https://www.kubera.com/pricing still returns HTTP 404 — pricing is served on the homepage.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotglobalglobal
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Rotki

82#1 of 7
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Rotki if API key blast radius matters most — it scores 9/10 to Kubera's 6/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Sync fidelity and gap honesty — 10/10
Tradeoff
The free tier's 1,000-event ceiling bites fast for an active trader — real history and PnL effectively cost 25 EUR/mo (Basic), since the 9 EUR Supporter tier keeps the 3K-event cap but withholds graphs and event analysis — and self-hosting means you install, update and troubleshoot the app yourself; margin and futures trades don't sync at all.

Kubera

72#2 of 7
Pick it when
Kubera leads Rotki on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Data monetization truth — 9/10
Tradeoff
You pay $250/year and broken connections are still partly your problem: Kubera's own help center says connections 'may occasionally break, or show wrong balances' and 'might not always be resolvable', with manual-entry tracking as the documented fallback — and your exchange API keys sit on Kubera's servers with read-only merely instructed at setup, not enforced at connect time.
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

RotkiLeads

Choose Rotki if API key blast radius matters most

  • API key blast radius: 9/10 against 6/10 for Kubera (weight 30)
  • Sync fidelity and gap honesty: 10/10 against 7/10 for Kubera (weight 25)
Kubera

Kubera leads Rotki on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

API key blast radius

by 3 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Rotki leads
Rotki9 out of 10
Kubera6 out of 10

Data monetization truth

weight 6 of 86Tie
Rotki9 out of 10
Kubera9 out of 10

Sync fidelity and gap honesty

by 3 of 10weight 6 of 86Rotki leads
Rotki10 out of 10
Kubera7 out of 10

Tier truth and continuity

weight 4.8 of 86Tie
Rotki9 out of 10
Kubera9 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Rotki14/20Kubera14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Rotki22.2/30Kubera18.2/30
Rotki leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Rotki2.7/10Kubera2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Rotki3.2/8Kubera3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Rotki8.3/18Kubera8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Rotki unless the term Kubera leads on is the one you are buying.

Kubera leads Rotki on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
    Scored by If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? · 30% (Rotki 9/10, Kubera 6/10)
  • Exit failure: you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
    Scored by What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history? · 20% (Rotki 9/10, Kubera 9/10)
  • Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
    Scored by The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying? · 25% (Rotki 9/10, Kubera 9/10)
    Scored by When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? · 25% (Rotki 10/10, Kubera 7/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Rotki scores 10 points above Kubera, led by API key blast radius and sync fidelity and gap honesty. Published scores, out of 100: Rotki 82 (rank 1 of 7 portfolio tracking), Kubera 72 (rank 2 of 7).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research