Provider at a glance
- Category
- Portfolio Tracking
- Entity
- All 2 Rotki products
- Official website
- rotki.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 82 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Rotki
Open-source self-hosted portfolio tracker
Portfolio Tracking
#1 Overall
Ranked #1 of 7 portfolio tracking in the published ranking
82
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is Rotki right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?9/10, the category best
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?9/10, the category best
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?10/10, the category best
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?9/10, the category best
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto portfolio tracker shows where it lands for you.
What will Rotki cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Transactions per year
- 1k
How safe is Rotki?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Rotki
Compare all 4- 2Kubera10 points below · weaker on API key blast radius (6 against 9)72$250
- 3CoinTracking11 points below · weaker on API key blast radius (7 against 9)71$169
- 4Delta15 points below · weaker on data monetization truth (4 against 9)67$54
For your setup
Find out if Rotki fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Rotki lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best crypto portfolio trackerNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why it leads
Why Rotki ranks #1
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (29.6 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on every criterion.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
309+8.647.09#1/7Loading evidence…
259+7.208.09#1/7Loading evidence…
2510+8.008.010#1/7Loading evidence…
209+5.767.09#1/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin+10over Kubera, #2
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 82–83 and stays #1
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Rotki’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? 9 → 3 on its ladder · Kubera passes it−680#1 → #3
The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying? 9 → 2 on its ladder · Kubera passes it−780#1 → #2
When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? 10 → 3 on its ladder · Kubera passes it−780#1 → #2
Strengths
4 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? — 9/10, the category best
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying? — 9/10, the category best
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? — 10/10, the category best
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history? — 9/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
0 from the score dataWhere it trails
No scored criterion trails the category best by two points or more, so no tradeoff can be stated from the data.
Record watch-outs
- The free tier's 1,000-event ceiling bites fast for an active trader — real history and PnL effectively cost 25 EUR/mo (Basic), since the 9 EUR Supporter tier keeps the 3K-event cap but withholds graphs and event analysis — and self-hosting means you install, update and troubleshoot the app yourself; margin and futures trades don't sync at all.
Competitive position
Where Rotki leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 714.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#1 / 722.2 of 30 · pool best
Friction#1 / 72.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 73.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 78.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Rotki leads
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?#1 / 7
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?#1 / 7
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?#1 / 7
- What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?#1 / 7
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Kubera#2 of 7 · score 72 · 10.0 points behind
Rotki leads on
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?9 vs 6
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?10 vs 7
Kubera leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Rotki is ahead: published criteria (+10.4 display points).Scenario cost: Rotki has no verified pricing for this scenario.
CoinTracking#3 of 7 · score 71 · 11.0 points behind
Rotki leads on
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?9 vs 7
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?9 vs 8
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?10 vs 8
CoinTracking leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Rotki is ahead: published criteria (+10.9 display points).Scenario cost: Rotki has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Delta#4 of 7 · score 67 · 15.0 points behind
Rotki leads on
- If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?9 vs 8
- The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?9 vs 4
- When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?10 vs 8
Delta leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Rotki is ahead: published criteria (+15.3 display points).Scenario cost: Rotki has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against #2
82 vs 72 · gap 10.0Why Rotki ranks above Kubera
DimensionThisKuberaGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight22.218.2+10.4, better
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisKuberaPoints
If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? · w3096+2.88, better
When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? · w25107+2.40, better
Net8272+10.0
Your scenario
Rotki is not priced for this scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 29 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$1114 of 7 rows priced
Cheapest priced$0.00 · CoinStatsDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with CoinStats
3 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 29 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #1 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 29 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here?strength 9 · weight 30Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying?strength 9 · weight 25Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong?strength 10 · weight 25Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history?strength 9 · weight 20Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Custody failure (Rotki 9/10): whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.Scored by If my API keys leak, can someone trade or withdraw with them — and has that already happened here? · 30%
- Exit failure (Rotki 9/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by What does the free tier quietly stop tracking, and will this app outlive my history? · 20%
- Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by The dashboard is free — so who is paying, and what of mine are they buying? · 25% (Rotki 9/10)Scored by When the app and my exchange disagree on a balance, will I ever find out which one is wrong? · 25% (Rotki 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Live tier API (https://
rotki .com /webapi /2 /tiers /info, fetched 29 September 2026): Supporter "monthly_plan":{"price":"9.00" and "yearly_plan":{"price":"90.00" — "Historical events limit" "3K events", "Use your premium account in one device", no detailed graphs or event analysis; Basic "monthly_plan":{"price":"25.00" and "yearly_plan":{"price":"250.00" — "30K events", "Encrypted data backups" "Store up to 150MB", "Connect and sync up to 2 devices", "Track ETH Staking" "up to 128 ETH"; Advanced "monthly_plan":{"price":"45.00" and "yearly_plan":{"price":"450.00" — "100K events", "Store up to 600MB", "Connect and sync up to 4 devices", "up to 384 ETH". Currency: the vendor's pricing page (https:// rotki .com /pricing, served at rotki.com/checkout/pay) renders no numbers without JavaScript but declares "priceCurrency":"EUR" in its structured data, so every tier price above is in euros. Free tier (https:// rotki .com /products, 29 September 2026): "Free users can access up to 1,000 of their most recent events." and "Free users can add up to 10 notes."Rotki — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDRotki — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Ethereum, Optimism, Polygon PoS, Arbitrum One, Base, Gnosis, Scroll, Binance Smart Chain, Avalanche, zkSync Lite, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Polkadot, Kusama, Solana
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- No geographic restriction found anywhere: rotki is downloadable self-hosted software (desktop + Docker) with no account required for the free tier, and neither the docs nor the privacy policy (https://
rotki .com /privacy-policy, 29 September 2026) carries a market restriction or an OFAC/sanctions representation for the software. The tier endpoint https:// rotki .com /webapi /2 /available-tiers does report the visitor's country — it returned "settings":{"is_authenticated":false,"country":"DE"} on 29 September 2026 — but that is display geolocation, not an eligibility rule; nothing on the served pages limits who may buy or run rotki. This is a genuinely global footprint.
Legal entity on file: Rotki, placed in 2 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Rotki: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- 29 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 82, #1 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 1 October 2026
2026.10.0Layer-2 chains are ranked on whether you can leave with your funds- added Four l2_chains criteria with published band ladders: proof system (18), withdrawals if the operator stops (18), rollup stage (14) and exit window before an upgrade (6). EVM equivalence moves 40 to 17, Ethereum data availability 25 to 15 and maturity 35 to 12. Every chain's emergency exit window reads None, so the exit-window ladder also reads L2BEAT's regular, non-emergency upgrade path (Arbitrum One 10 days, Starknet and Arbitrum Nova 7, zkSync Era 4 days 3 hours); data availability separates full transaction data (10) from state diffs only (9, L2BEAT: Onchain (SD)). A stage L2BEAT marks Under review keeps its last score for at most one 45-day cycle and is never interpolated.
- changed l2_chains ranks through scoreCriterionObjective on fitStrength, like the other criterion-ranked categories; the hand-written structural scorer is deleted. All 105 criterion scores across 15 rows carry a quote and source in research-pending/rereads/2026-10-01-l2_chains.json; 131 of 135 quotes re-fetched verbatim on the read date, and the four behind a bot wall or a JavaScript shell were read by the adversarial model run.
- fixed Four facts corrected on the read: Scroll, Mantle and Blast are EVM-compatible, not equivalent (their own documentation, and for Blast live RPC probes); Starknet's public mainnet opened to users in 2022, not 2021. Arbitrum Nova's data has gone to Ethereum as blobs since 31 August 2026, and the row now leads with the Arbitrum DAO's decision to minimise it.
- fixed The old scorer credited Ethereum data availability whenever the data-availability text contained the word "ethereum", so Arbitrum Nova's committee ("…Ethereum L1 rollup fallback") and Polygon zkEVM's off-chain data ("…Ethereum L1 before the sunset") both scored full marks. Data availability is now a quoted L2BEAT reading.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt portfolio_tracking:rotki:2026.10.18:513f775a7a6a
Are you Rotki? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.
Show this rank on your site
Editorial review of Rotki , on file since April 2026 — the review is separate from the score.