Provider at a glance
- Category
- Tax Software
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- blockpit.io
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 80 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Blockpit
Crypto tax software from Austria
Tax Software
#2 Overall
Ranked #2 of 11 tax software in the published ranking
80
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- €99 your cost/yr
Is Blockpit right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?9/10, the category best
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?8/10, the category best
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?8/10; the category best is 9
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?6/10 here; Koinly scores 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto tax software shows where it lands for you.
What will Blockpit cost you?
€99 your cost/yr
- Transactions per year
- 1k
- Published tiers
- 5
- Cheapest tier that covers you
- Medium
Level with the median of 3 priced tax software.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Blockpit?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no authorisation required. The register record
Alternatives to Blockpit
Compare all 4- 1Koinly1 point above · stronger on record portability (8 against 6)81$99
- 3CoinLedger2 points below · stronger on record portability (7 against 6)78$99
- 4Divly2 points below · weaker on cost-basis method (7 against 8)78€99
For your setup
Find out if Blockpit fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Blockpit lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best crypto tax softwareNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Blockpit ranks #2
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (25.3 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 2 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
329+9.228.09#1/11Loading evidence…
268+6.667.08#1/11Loading evidence…
228+5.637.09#2/11Loading evidence…
206+3.846.08#4/11Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−1behind Koinly, #1
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 78–81 and ranks #1–#2
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Blockpit’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? 9 → 10 on its ladder · passes Koinly+181#2 → #1
Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? 8 → 9 on its ladder · passes Koinly+181#2 → #1
My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? 8 → 9 on its ladder · passes Koinly+181#2 → #1
Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? 6 → 7 on its ladder · passes Koinly+181#2 → #1
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? 9 → 7 on its ladder · CoinLedger passes it−277#2 → #5
Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? 8 → 6 on its ladder · CoinLedger passes it−277#2 → #5
My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? 8 → 6 on its ladder · CoinLedger passes it−278#2 → #3
Smallest climb: “Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?” 9 → 10 passes Koinly, #1.
Strengths
3 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? — 9/10, the category best
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? — 8/10, the category best
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? — 8/10, category best 9/10
Tradeoffs
1 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? — 6/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- You buy the tax-year licence and then find part of the interface still locked. Per-transaction cost basis ON SCREEN is NOT in the €49–€549 licence: "To view the Tax Details, you need an active Blockpit Plus subscription!" tax • Billed as annual subscription". The number itself is not withheld: the purchased PDF prints 'Kosten (€)', 'Erlös (€)' and 'Gewinn (€)' per transaction (verified on the sample report, pages 16-18). Blockpit Plus buys the on-screen view, not the data. The second sting is the cap, and it bites the buyer who did the right thing. The limit counts a self-transfer TWICE — "Transfers are counted twice because the incoming and outgoing components are separate transactions." (https://intercom.help/blockpit/en/articles/12137278-how-to-understand-the-transaction-limits-of-my-tax-year, "July 20, 2026") — so connecting one more hardware wallet after payment can push you past the package you already bought, and then, on a DIFFERENT help page (https://intercom.help/blockpit/en/articles/12137280-what-happens-if-i-exceed-the-transaction-limit-for-my-purchased-tax-year, "October 1, 2025"): "Once you exceed the transaction limit, you will no longer be able to download the tax report. Upgrade to a higher transaction package to regain access." The step from 50 transactions at 49€ to 1,000 at 99€ is a doubling with nothing in between. Blockpit does only charge the delta, same page: "We will, of course, only charge you the difference between your current package and the higher transaction package." Third, if you ever leave, your lot matching does not come with you: "Transfers are only exported in form of their basic transaction types: Deposit & Withdrawal. The exact reconciliation/reconstruction of previously linked transactions (Transfers) is therefore currently not possible via our export feature." (https://intercom.help/blockpit/en/articles/12137149-how-to-export-my-blockpit-transactions-as-a-csv-file). The CSV that leaves Blockpit has thirteen columns and not one of them is a cost basis. 50 transactions is the cheapest paid tax tier, not a free cap. Fifth, Blockpit names no audit partner: across the 33 Blockpit pages read for this review there is no mention of PwC, and the only claim is unnamed: "Blockpit features country specific and compliant tax frameworks in cooperation with Big4 companies." Its terms are issued by "Blockpit AG".
Competitive position
Where Blockpit leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 1114.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#2 / 1119.0 of 30 · best 19.2
Friction#1 / 112.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 113.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 118.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Blockpit leads
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?#1 / 11
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?#1 / 11
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?#2 / 11
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?#4 / 11
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Koinly#1 of 11 · score 81 · 1.0 point ahead
Blockpit leads on
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?9 vs 8
Koinly leads on
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?8 vs 6
Largest single reason Koinly is ahead: published criteria (+0.5 display points).Scenario cost: Blockpit has no verified pricing for this scenario.
CoinLedger#3 of 11 · score 78 · 2.0 points behind
Blockpit leads on
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?9 vs 8
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?8 vs 7
CoinLedger leads on
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?7 vs 6
Largest single reason Blockpit is ahead: published criteria (+2.3 display points).Scenario cost: Blockpit has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Divly#4 of 11 · score 78 · 2.0 points behind
Blockpit leads on
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?8 vs 7
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?8 vs 7
Divly leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Blockpit is ahead: published criteria (+2.9 display points).Scenario cost: Divly is the same.
Against the leader
81 vs 80 · gap 1.0Why Koinly ranks above Blockpit
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 1.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisKoinlyGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight19.019.2−0.5, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisKoinlyPoints
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? · w3298+1.02, better
Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? · w2068−1.28, worse
Net8081−1.0
Your scenario
What Blockpit costs on your scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Published tiers · published rate5
Cheapest tier that covers you · published rateMedium
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 29 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in EUR; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
€99
Under the default inputs · EURCategory median€993 of 11 rows priced · Blockpit at the median
Cheapest priced€99 · BlockpitBlockpit is the cheapest priced row for this scenario · availability not applied — set your country to filter
2 of 11 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
6 of 11 quote a zero fee that leaves costs out, so they are absent from the median and the cheapest row, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 29 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #1 to #2 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 29 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?strength 9 · weight 32Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?strength 8 · weight 26Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?strength 8 · weight 22Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?strength 6 · weight 20Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Regulatory failure (Blockpit 9/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? · 32%
- Exit failure (Blockpit 6/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? · 20%
- Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? · 26% (Blockpit 8/10)Scored by My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? · 22% (Blockpit 8/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- https://
www .blockpit .io /pricing — fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200, plain curl, prices in static HTML. The page was redesigned since 19 August 2026; the prices are unchanged. Top cards: "Portfolio Tracking" "Free"; "Crypto Tax report" "From €49 per tax year"; "Blockpit PLUS" "€3.99 per month". Tax-report ladder, each card reading "One-time purchase per tax year • PDF & CSV export": "Small · up to 50 transactions" "€49"; "Medium · up to 1,000 transactions" "€99"; "Large · up to 3,000 transactions" "€149"; "X-Large · up to 10,000 transactions" "€229"; "XX-Large · more than 10,000 transactions" "€549". Stated basis: "Pricing is based on the number of transactions in the selected tax year, not on the size or value of the portfolio." Blockpit PLUS: "Only €3.99/month" "Incl. tax • Billed as annual subscription", listing "Cost basis, gains, losses per transaction". Human service, now priced on this page: "Free initial consultation" "Free" "15 minutes"; "Expert Check" "€99" "30 minutes"; "Expert Service" "Full tax report preparation" "from €199" "per hour". Source of Funds: "1 Credit" "€19.99"; "3 Credits" "€49.99"; "5 Credits" "€79.99", with "Unused credits remain available until they are needed." The pricing-page FAQ that stated "no subscription and no automatic renewal" is no longer served; the purchased-year permanence stands in the terms (https:// www .blockpit .io /terms, "Revised, 25. August 2025", clause 7.3.2).Blockpit — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026 - Prices published in
- EURBlockpit — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- AUSTRIA — PRODUCT CLAIM, NOT A RULES GUIDE, RE-FETCHED AND UNCHANGED.
- Supported chains
- Not published
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Blockpit: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 29 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 80, #2 of 11. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 1 October 2026
2026.10.0Layer-2 chains are ranked on whether you can leave with your funds- added Four l2_chains criteria with published band ladders: proof system (18), withdrawals if the operator stops (18), rollup stage (14) and exit window before an upgrade (6). EVM equivalence moves 40 to 17, Ethereum data availability 25 to 15 and maturity 35 to 12. Every chain's emergency exit window reads None, so the exit-window ladder also reads L2BEAT's regular, non-emergency upgrade path (Arbitrum One 10 days, Starknet and Arbitrum Nova 7, zkSync Era 4 days 3 hours); data availability separates full transaction data (10) from state diffs only (9, L2BEAT: Onchain (SD)). A stage L2BEAT marks Under review keeps its last score for at most one 45-day cycle and is never interpolated.
- changed l2_chains ranks through scoreCriterionObjective on fitStrength, like the other criterion-ranked categories; the hand-written structural scorer is deleted. All 105 criterion scores across 15 rows carry a quote and source in research-pending/rereads/2026-10-01-l2_chains.json; 131 of 135 quotes re-fetched verbatim on the read date, and the four behind a bot wall or a JavaScript shell were read by the adversarial model run.
- fixed Four facts corrected on the read: Scroll, Mantle and Blast are EVM-compatible, not equivalent (their own documentation, and for Blast live RPC probes); Starknet's public mainnet opened to users in 2022, not 2021. Arbitrum Nova's data has gone to Ethereum as blobs since 31 August 2026, and the row now leads with the Arbitrum DAO's decision to minimise it.
- fixed The old scorer credited Ethereum data availability whenever the data-availability text contained the word "ethereum", so Arbitrum Nova's committee ("…Ethereum L1 rollup fallback") and Polygon zkEVM's off-chain data ("…Ethereum L1 before the sunset") both scored full marks. Data availability is now a quoted L2BEAT reading.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt tax_software:blockpit:2026.10.18:1bf07a0203ab
Are you Blockpit? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.