Stablecoin Issuance Platforms
Stablecoin Issuance Platforms evaluated across whose charter the coin is issued under, what share of the reserve yield the brand keeps, who holds the mint key and what the brand keeps if it leaves, and the published platform price to the issuer.
13providers tracked
6ranked (methodology v2026.11.1)
12 November 2026Ranking snapshot
30 September 2026oldest read · due 14 NovIndependent. Evidence-based.We rank with a published method and sourced evidence. No one can pay to rank.How it works
Set your country and amount to see your costs ·
Your setup
What your country changes
Pick a country to see which issuance platforms serve it. Nothing is hidden — any that does not is listed with that reason.- 🇺🇸 United States
- 🇨🇦 Canada
- 🇲🇽 Mexico
- 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
- 🇩🇪 Germany
- 🇫🇷 France
- 🇮🇹 Italy
- 🇪🇸 Spain
- 🇳🇱 Netherlands
- 🇨🇭 Switzerland
- 🇸🇪 Sweden
- 🇳🇴 Norway
This affects provider availability.
Requirements (0)
Preferences (0)
Preferences re-weight Fit for you, which needs your country.
More filters
6 providers match your requirements
Out of 6 ranked providers. 0 excluded.
What this ranks
Ranked here: stablecoin issuance platforms that sell issuance to a third-party brand, so the brand can launch its own branded dollar.Not ranked here: issuers of their own tokens, platforms selling access to somebody else's dollar, the infrastructure layer beneath issuance platforms, and offerings that are still pre-product.6 of the 13 assessed are ranked; 7 were turned away by name. Who, and whyRequirements narrow the list; they never change a published ChainChoice Score. How the ranking works
Brale
How Brale was chosen
Leads this ranking on Published Platform Price to the IssuerA US money-transmitter-licensed platform
80 / 100 out of 100published score, #1 of all 6 worldwide
Evidence
High
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.Issuer price publishedIssuer of record charter
Why it leads
- Brale is 5 points ahead of Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance), mainly because it scores higher on its issuer price published and its mint authority and exit.
- Best in this ranking on mint authority and exit and issuer price published
- Ahead of Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance) on issuer price published (+3.4 points) and mint authority and exit (+2.7 points)
Tradeoff
Issuer of record charter: 1 point below the best in this ranking
Share
#ProviderPriceCompare
2
The OCC-chartered national bank
75 / 100 out of 100
3
An OCC-chartered national trust bank
74 / 100 out of 100
4
PA
The white-label issuer behind PayPal's PYUSD
70 / 100 out of 100
5
A brand hires Stripe-owned Bridge to be the...
64 / 100 out of 100
6
CO
A managed white-label programme
59 / 100 out of 100
Compare providers (0)
See key differences in features, fees, security and more.
Reserve yield split
What Share of the Reserve Yield the Brand Keeps
25% of the published criteria weight. Scored 0–10 from the published evidence; the order below is by this criterion, then the published ranking.
| Provider | Reserve yield split (0–10) | ChainChoice Score |
|---|---|---|
| BitGo Stablecoin-as-a-Service | 7 | 74 |
| Brale | 6 | 80 |
| Bridge Open Issuance (Stripe) | 6 | 64 |
| Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance) | 5 | 75 |
| Paxos (Stablecoin Issuance / Stablecoin-as-a-Service) | 5 | 70 |
| Coinbase Custom Stablecoins | 5 | 59 |
Issuer price published
Published Platform Price to the Issuer
18% of the published criteria weight. Scored 0–10 from the published evidence; the order below is by this criterion, then the published ranking.
| Provider | Issuer price published (0–10) | ChainChoice Score |
|---|---|---|
| Brale | 9 | 80 |
| Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance) | 6 | 75 |
| BitGo Stablecoin-as-a-Service | 6 | 74 |
| Bridge Open Issuance (Stripe) | 5 | 64 |
| Paxos (Stablecoin Issuance / Stablecoin-as-a-Service) | 4 | 70 |
| Coinbase Custom Stablecoins | 3 | 59 |
Mint authority and exit
Who Holds the Mint Key, and What the Brand Keeps If It Leaves
22% of the published criteria weight. Scored 0–10 from the published evidence; the order below is by this criterion, then the published ranking.
| Provider | Mint authority and exit (0–10) | ChainChoice Score |
|---|---|---|
| Brale | 6 | 80 |
| Coinbase Custom Stablecoins | 5 | 59 |
| Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance) | 4 | 75 |
| Paxos (Stablecoin Issuance / Stablecoin-as-a-Service) | 4 | 70 |
| Bridge Open Issuance (Stripe) | 4 | 64 |
| BitGo Stablecoin-as-a-Service | 3 | 74 |
Issuer of record charter
Whose Charter the Coin Is Issued Under
35% of the published criteria weight. Scored 0–10 from the published evidence; the order below is by this criterion, then the published ranking.
| Provider | Issuer of record charter (0–10) | ChainChoice Score |
|---|---|---|
| Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance) | 9 | 75 |
| Brale | 8 | 80 |
| BitGo Stablecoin-as-a-Service | 8 | 74 |
| Paxos (Stablecoin Issuance / Stablecoin-as-a-Service) | 8 | 70 |
| Bridge Open Issuance (Stripe) | 4 | 64 |
| Coinbase Custom Stablecoins | 3 | 59 |
All 4 published criteria
Every ranked row’s score on each criterion, in the published order. Choose a column to order by it.
| Provider | ChainChoice Score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brale | 8 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 80 |
| 2 | Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance) | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 75 |
| 3 | BitGo Stablecoin-as-a-Service | 8 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 74 |
| 4 | Paxos (Stablecoin Issuance / Stablecoin-as-a-Service) | 8 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 70 |
| 5 | Bridge Open Issuance (Stripe) | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 64 |
| 6 | Coinbase Custom Stablecoins | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 59 |
How this ranking works
How firm the #1 is, the per-criterion arithmetic behind each score, who pays ChainChoice, and which stablecoin issuance platforms were assessed and left out.
FirmThis verdict holds under every one-point re-read
See the arithmetic
Every published criterion was moved up and down by one point and the ranking re-run. The same product came first each time. The published rankings file
Why this score4 published criteria · leads 2 of 4
Published criterionWtScore, and the best hereGap/10 out of 10Pts
Whose Charter the Coin Is Issued Under8.4−189.0
What Share of the Reserve Yield the Brand Keeps6−164.8
Who Holds the Mint Key, and What the Brand Keeps If It Leaves5.3·64.2
Published Platform Price to the Issuer4.3·95.2
Σ methodology points23.2/32
Each bar is the score on that criterion’s own 0–10 scale, never rescaled to the pool. The dark line is the best any product here reached on that axis. Wt is the most the criterion can add to the 86-point weighted total. Pts is weight × score × 32; the sum is the methodology score, and each weighted point behind the leader costs 2.6 on the displayed score. how these are weighted
Why it ranks first
Why Brale leads this category right now
A US money-transmitter-licensed platform that issues a fintech's branded dollar under Brale's own name and rails — Brale is the regulated issuer of record, holds the reserves and keeps the contract's private keys, while the customer gets the brand, the API and a published share of the reserve yield. Strongest on published platform price to the issuer (9/10): Brale publishes a full rate card: plans at $0, $10 and $500 a month, $2 per RTP, $20 per wire, 25¢ per ACH, on-chain transfers at gas plus 20%, and 0 bps on standard money movement except 5 bps on USDT conversions. Volume pricing and two ACH-return fees sit off the card. Weakest on what share of the reserve yield the brand keeps (6/10): Brale's pricing page sells '90/10 program rewards' on the $500-a-month Pro plan, and its docs say treasury revenue is shared monthly. Its Business User Agreement says the customer is 'not entitled to any returns' on the instruments holding reserves, and its own revenue calculators book 100% of the yield. Published price: Published in full at https://brale.xyz/pricing (Brale's pricing page, fetched 2026-09-30 as raw HTML, HTTP 200; every quoted string below is present verbatim on that page), the only rate card in the pool.
Best for
Issuer price published — 9/10
Main tradeoff
You are not buying your own stablecoin — you are renting Brale's, and two things you cannot see on the pricing page are in the contract you sign. FIRST, THE YIELD. The rate card sells Pro at $500/month for "90/10 program rewards, so you keep the majority of the economics generated by reserves backing your stablecoin program." The Business User Agreement (https://brale.xyz/legal/business-user-agreement, updated 2026-05-27) — the only contract Brale publishes — says the reverse: "All Reference Assets are generally held in one or more accounts titled in the name of Brale. You acknowledge that Brale may, in its sole discretion, hold Reference Assets in various instruments, and that you are not entitled to any returns that may be earned on such instruments." Whatever grants you the 90 lives in an unpublished MSA or tier addendum; nothing on a vendor surface shows it. AND THERE IS A THIRD ANSWER, found at verification, on the tool Brale gives you to size the deal: its own revenue calculators (brale.xyz/calculator/stablecoin-revenue-early-program and -mature-program, linked from its docs) publish 'Reserve Yield: 4.0% annually' and project 'Annual Revenue' as the FULL 100% of that yield, deducting neither the 10% nor the $500/month — $133.2K of reserves shown as $5.3K rather than $4.8K, $1.5M as $60.0K rather than $54.0K. Brale therefore tells a prospect three incompatible things about the same number: you keep 90% (rate card), 0% (contract), or 100% (calculator). SECOND, THE EXIT. "You acknowledge and agree that Brale owns all rights in and to any Smart Contracts deployed pursuant to this Agreement and their associated Private Keys." On termination Brale "shall retain all Private Keys and shall not share the same with you," and so you "may continue to use Digital Assets in their existing state ... but may not modify, update, amend the functionality of, or issue new or existing Digital Assets." Your coin keeps circulating; you can never mint another one, and you cannot take the contract to another provider. Two consequences follow that no marketing page mentions: Brale is the issuer of record (its own token page: "Coinflow USD (cfUSD) is issued by Brale in partnership with Coinflow"), so its licence — a FinCEN MSB registration and state money-transmitter licences, NMLS #2376957, not a bank or trust charter — is the only authority under which your dollar exists; and on-chain, a single non-multisig EOA (0xb180f98037a63a3dca66b6b4ddbf250265b65110) holds mint, denylist, pause, UUPS-upgrade and role-admin over live cfUSD on Base, contrary to Brale's own contract comment that "{automator_} should use a multisig contract." One more thing the rate card hides in plain sight: $500/month is the Pro tier, which is the tier that carries the reserve-yield split — the cheapest tier that can actually 'Create a stablecoin' is Mini at $10/month. Verified 2026-08-27. NMLS Consumer Access still returns HTTP 403 to every tool, but at verification the licence WAS independently confirmed from a different regulator: the Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance's licensee list dated 02/10/2026 carries '2376957 Brale Inc. 1301 Locust St., Suite C Des Moines IA 50309' under the Money Transmitters Act — confirming both the number and, decisively, that what Brale holds is a money-transmitter licence and not a charter.
Verify before signup
Published in full at https://
Recommendation summary
What should decide this category
Do you need your own charter, or does the platform carry it — and which of you ends up the issuer of record?
What share of the reserve yield do you keep, and can you read the split before a sales call?
Who holds the mint, freeze and upgrade keys on your coin, and is that key shared with other brands?
What does the platform charge you to issue, and what do you keep if you walk away?
Quick picks
Strong options in this category
Start with the lead choice first, then use the shortlist only if you still need a challenger or stronger fit for a specific setup.
Best overall
Brale
A US money-transmitter-licensed platform that issues a fintech's branded dollar under Brale's own name and rails — Brale is the regulated issuer of record, holds the reserves and keeps the contract's private keys, while the customer gets the brand, the API and a published share of the reserve yield.
A US money-transmitter-licensed platform that issues a fintech's branded dollar under Brale's own name and rails — Brale is the regulated issuer of record, holds the reserves and keeps the contract's private keys, while the customer gets the brand, the API and a published share of the reserve yield. Strongest on published platform price to the issuer (9/10): Brale publishes a full rate card: plans at $0, $10 and $500 a month, $2 per RTP, $20 per wire, 25¢ per ACH, on-chain transfers at gas plus 20%, and 0 bps on standard money movement except 5 bps on USDT conversions. Volume pricing and two ACH-return fees sit off the card. Weakest on what share of the reserve yield the brand keeps (6/10): Brale's pricing page sells '90/10 program rewards' on the $500-a-month Pro plan, and its docs say treasury revenue is shared monthly. Its Business User Agreement says the customer is 'not entitled to any returns' on the instruments holding reserves, and its own revenue calculators book 100% of the yield. Published price: Published in full at https://brale.xyz/pricing (Brale's pricing page, fetched 2026-09-30 as raw HTML, HTTP 200; every quoted string below is present verbatim on that page), the only rate card in the pool.
Best for: Issuer price published — 9/10
Whose Charter the Coin Is Issued Under · weight 35%8/10What Share of the Reserve Yield the Brand Keeps · weight 25%6/10Who Holds the Mint Key, and What the Brand Keeps If It Leaves · weight 22%6/10Published Platform Price to the Issuer · weight 18%9/10
Quick pick
Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance)
The OCC-chartered national bank that issues your branded dollar under its OWN charter — you license the trademark to it, Anchorage Digital Bank remains "sole issuer and sole obligor", keeps the reserve income by default, and publishes no exit terms and no key-holder addresses.
The OCC-chartered national bank that issues your branded dollar under its OWN charter — you license the trademark to it, Anchorage Digital Bank remains "sole issuer and sole obligor", keeps the reserve income by default, and publishes no exit terms and no key-holder addresses. Strongest on whose charter the coin is issued under (9/10): Anchorage Digital Bank, N.A. is sole issuer and obligor for every covered stablecoin, including USDtb and ZLUSD, and the brand licenses its trademark as a 'Brand Partner'. OCC charter 25243 is on the OCC register but appears only in page markup, not in visible copy. Weakest on who holds the mint key, and what the brand keeps if it leaves (4/10): Anchorage's terms allocate minting and freezing to the bank and say nothing on upgrade or exit. It publishes its contract addresses, but on-chain USDtb's minter, blocklister and pauser roles and its proxy-admin owner are externally owned addresses Anchorage never names. Published price: A price IS published, but only for one leg of the deal. Anchorage's Covered Stablecoin Service Fee Schedule, https://www.anchorage.com/anchorage-digital-bank-n-a-covered-stablecoin-service-fee-schedule (fetched 2026-09-30, HTTP 200; header "Effective date:…
Best for: Issuer of record charter — 9/10
Whose Charter the Coin Is Issued Under · weight 35%9/10What Share of the Reserve Yield the Brand Keeps · weight 25%5/10Who Holds the Mint Key, and What the Brand Keeps If It Leaves · weight 22%4/10Published Platform Price to the Issuer · weight 18%6/10
Quick pick
BitGo Stablecoin-as-a-Service
An OCC-chartered national trust bank that will either issue your branded dollar itself or run the reserves, smart contracts and mint/redeem rails while your own bank charter carries the issuance — the model it ships both ways, on USD1 and SoFiUSD.
An OCC-chartered national trust bank that will either issue your branded dollar itself or run the reserves, smart contracts and mint/redeem rails while your own bank charter carries the issuance — the model it ships both ways, on USD1 and SoFiUSD. Strongest on whose charter the coin is issued under (8/10): BitGo's terms name the issuer of each live coin: BitGo Bank & Trust, N.A. for its own coin and SoFi Bank, N.A., a nationally chartered bank, for SoFiUSD. No charter number appears on any BitGo page (the OCC register lists 25366 and 20862), and what a customer must hold is not stated. Weakest on who holds the mint key, and what the brand keeps if it leaves (3/10): BitGo publishes no holder of mint, freeze or upgrade authority, no contract address and no exit terms, and disclaims the smart contracts. On-chain, SoFiUSD's admin, upgrader and freezer roles sit with externally owned addresses BitGo never names; USD1's proxy admin is a Safe needing three signatures. Published price: NO RATE CARD FOR STABLECOIN ISSUANCE IS PUBLISHED ON ANY BITGO WEBSITE SURFACE; THE FEE SCHEDULE IS BEHIND A LOGIN.
Best for: Issuer of record charter — 8/10
Whose Charter the Coin Is Issued Under · weight 35%8/10What Share of the Reserve Yield the Brand Keeps · weight 25%7/10Who Holds the Mint Key, and What the Brand Keeps If It Leaves · weight 22%3/10Published Platform Price to the Issuer · weight 18%6/10
Quick pick
PA
Paxos (Stablecoin Issuance / Stablecoin-as-a-Service)
The white-label issuer behind PayPal's PYUSD: your brand goes on the token and Paxos itself is the legal issuer, holding the reserves, the OCC national trust charter and the mint key — so you need no charter of your own, and you get no contract control either.
The white-label issuer behind PayPal's PYUSD: your brand goes on the token and Paxos itself is the legal issuer, holding the reserves, the OCC national trust charter and the mint key — so you need no charter of your own, and you get no contract control either. Strongest on whose charter the coin is issued under (8/10): Paxos says it issues and manages the brand's coin as a regulated trust, 'our name on the obligations', with PYUSD live on that model, and names Paxos Trust Company, N.A. under the OCC. Charter 25379 appears only in page markup and on the OCC register; the developer docs still name a superseded LLC. Weakest on who holds the mint key, and what the brand keeps if it leaves (4/10): Paxos publishes PYUSD's supply-control address, which matches the chain, and nothing on freeze, upgrade or exit. On-chain, one externally owned address Paxos never names holds PYUSD's admin, pause and asset-protection (freeze and wipe) roles, and another unnamed one is the proxy admin. Published price: NO PRICE IS PUBLISHED TO THE ISSUER ON ANY PAXOS-OWNED SURFACE.
Best for: Issuer of record charter — 8/10
Whose Charter the Coin Is Issued Under · weight 35%8/10What Share of the Reserve Yield the Brand Keeps · weight 25%5/10Who Holds the Mint Key, and What the Brand Keeps If It Leaves · weight 22%4/10Published Platform Price to the Issuer · weight 18%4/10
Considered and not ranked
7 products we looked at and left out
A shortlist is only honest if it says who it turned away. Each of these was assessed against the same published criteria as the ranked table and excluded for a stated reason — not overlooked.
We assessed 13 products here and rank 6 — 46% of what we looked at. That share is of the products we assessed, not of the category: how many exist is not something we can count, so we do not claim a number for it.
Tether HadronM0Agora FinanceVisa Stablecoin Platform· Not live yetQuantoz Payments, StraitsX and Membrane FinanceCircleZero Hash and Fireblocks Tokenization Engine· Ranked elsewhere
What this ranking does not assess
- Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
- Custody failure: whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.
- Insolvency failure: the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.
- Exit failure: you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
These can still cost you money here; the ranking does not measure them, so a high place says nothing about them. Which criterion scores each family, and why the others do not apply, is in /data/risk-coverage.json.
How this ranking is built
Reviewed on whose charter the coin is issued under, what share of the reserve yield the brand keeps, who holds the mint key, and what the brand keeps if it leaves, and published platform price to the issuer.
Data checked Sep 2026 · Independent rankings · We show our work
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means every product ranked on this page was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
Direct answer
What is the best issuance platform in 2026?
Brale ranks #1 overall for stablecoin issuance platforms on ChainChoice. A US money-transmitter-licensed platform that issues a fintech's branded dollar under Brale's own name and rails — Brale is the regulated issuer of record, holds the reserves and keeps the contract's private keys, while the customer gets the brand, the API and a published share of the reserve yield. It holds that rank under an affiliate-blind methodology scored across 4 published, weighted criteria — the code that ranks providers physically cannot read affiliate payouts (CI-enforced), so a payout can't move a rank. The verdict re-computes on every fee change, incident, or regulatory action; the full reasoning and the audit receipt are under Methodology.
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.Scored by Who Holds the Mint Key, and What the Brand Keeps If It Leaves · 22% (Brale 6/10, Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance) 4/10, BitGo Stablecoin-as-a-Service 3/10)
- Regulatory failure: no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Whose Charter the Coin Is Issued Under · 35% (Brale 8/10, Anchorage Digital (Stablecoin Issuance) 9/10, BitGo Stablecoin-as-a-Service 8/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: What Share of the Reserve Yield the Brand Keeps (25%), Published Platform Price to the Issuer (18%).
FAQs
3 questions readers ask before choosing stablecoin issuance platforms.
Frequently asked
Questions people ask before choosing issuance
What does it cost to have someone issue your stablecoin?
One rate card in six is readable without a sales call; the other five deals are priced entirely in a room. That is the finding, and it is why published price carries only 18% here — weighting it higher would rank the pool on a field almost nobody fills. Note the trap the tie-break rules record: a published figure that the vendor’s own binding contract contradicts is worth LESS than silence, because it settles a question that is not settled.
Is this the same as stablecoin settlement?
No, and the two are ranked separately for that reason. Stablecoin settlement is for moving money in someone else’s stablecoin. This is for hiring someone to issue yours. Different buyer, different contract, different failure — and if you have not already decided to launch a coin of your own, the settlement page is the one you want.
Who actually holds the mint key on my coin?
Read the deployed contract, because marketing cannot edit one. This criterion has a verifiable on-chain half and it produced the pool’s sharpest finding: on Solana, four coins issued through the same platform — USDtb, USDPT, USDGO and ZLUSD — carry the SAME mintAuthority and permanentDelegate, so the key is shared across brands. The same reads found one externally owned account holding mint, denylist, pause and upgrade roles across three chains at once, contrary to that vendor’s own contract comment that the role should use a multisig.
Free advisor·No signup needed
Still unsure? Get your best issuance pick
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — then review the evidence before deciding.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Best picks
Best stablecoin issuance platforms in 2026
Weighted on whose charter the coin is issued under (35), what share of the reserve yield the brand keeps (25), who holds the mint key and what the brand keeps if it leaves (22), and published platform price (18). THE CHARTER QUESTION LEADS BECAUSE IT DECIDES WHETHER YOU CAN LAUNCH AT ALL, and this pool answers it three different and equally legitimate ways: Anchorage issues under its own OCC national trust charter, so you need none; BitGo makes YOU the issuer of record, which is why the brand that shipped through it was SoFi Bank, N.A.; Brale gives you money-transmitter rails and you issue. A buyer who reads this criterion as "is the vendor regulated" gets the wrong answer, and discovers after signature that it is the issuer of record and needs a charter it does not hold. THE SECOND-HEAVIEST CRITERION IS ONE MOST OF THIS POOL DOES NOT INTEND TO ANSWER. Reserve yield is the entire commercial case for a branded dollar, and across the six vendors’ own machine-readable corpora — Bridge 262 pages, Paxos 376, Anchorage 299 plus 253 running to 1,969,489 characters, BitGo 803 documents, Brale 99 — the split is largely absent. That absence was established by reading those corpora, not assumed. No platform in this category has an affiliate programme with ChainChoice, so nothing here pays a commission.
Best overall
Brale
A US money-transmitter-licensed platform that issues a fintech's branded dollar under Brale's own name and rails — Brale is the regulated issuer of record, holds the reserves and keeps the contract's private keys, while the customer gets the brand, the API and a published share of the reserve yield.
Data checked Sep 2026
A US money-transmitter-licensed platform that issues a fintech's branded dollar under Brale's own name and rails — Brale is the regulated issuer of record, holds the reserves and keeps the contract's private keys, while the customer gets the brand, the API and a published share of the reserve yield. Strongest on published platform price to the issuer (9/10): Brale publishes a full rate card: plans at $0, $10 and $500 a month, $2 per RTP, $20 per wire, 25¢ per ACH, on-chain transfers at gas plus 20%, and 0 bps on standard money movement except 5 bps on USDT conversions. Volume pricing and two ACH-return fees sit off the card. Weakest on what share of the reserve yield the brand keeps (6/10): Brale's pricing page sells '90/10 program rewards' on the $500-a-month Pro plan, and its docs say treasury revenue is shared monthly. Its Business User Agreement says the customer is 'not entitled to any returns' on the instruments holding reserves, and its own revenue calculators book 100% of the yield. Published price: Published in full at https://brale.xyz/pricing (Brale's pricing page, fetched 2026-09-30 as raw HTML, HTTP 200; every quoted string below is present verbatim on that page), the only rate card in the pool.
Best for: Issuer price published — 9/10
Browse this network
MS
Written and reviewed by Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research