On-chain Analytics evaluated across query & data portability (lock-in), attribution & methodology auditability, chain & data coverage, and published pricing & free-tier honesty.
Dune
#1 of 7 · published ranking
Dune
82ChainChoice Score
4199
Why it leads
Best in the pool on query portability and attribution auditability
Chain & data coverageAttribution & methodology auditability
7−7
AK
Arkham
no receipt file
Chain & data coveragePublished pricing & free-tier honesty
Ranking-blind — order computed before any payout data is joined
Below the table
How this ranking works
Everything the table draws on continues here: how firm the #1 is, the per-criterion arithmetic behind each score, who pays ChainChoice, and the full guide to choosing.
Direct answer
What is the best on-chain analytics in 2026?
Dune ranks #1 overall for on-chain analytics on ChainChoice. SQL workbench over indexed raw and decoded blockchain data. It holds that rank under an affiliate-blind methodology scored across 4 published, weighted criteria — the code that ranks providers physically cannot read affiliate payouts (CI-enforced), so a payout can't move a rank. The verdict re-computes on every fee change, incident, or regulatory action; full reasoning and the audit receipt are below.
Best picks
Best on-chain analytics in 2026
Weighted on query & data portability (lock-in) (30), attribution & methodology auditability (25), chain & data coverage (25), and published pricing & free-tier honesty (20). The heaviest is query & data portability (lock-in): Can you take your work with you?
Best overall
Dune
Dune
SQL workbench over indexed raw and decoded blockchain data
Data checked Sep 2026
SQL workbench over indexed raw and decoded blockchain data. Strongest on chain & data coverage (10/10): Dune's data-catalog docs state "Dune indexes raw, decoded, and curated data across 100+ blockchains", across three explicit layers: raw ("Block, transaction, log, and trace data indexed directly from nodes"), decoded ("parsed using verified ABIs") and curated. Roughly 11x Glassnode's 9 chains and 5x Arkham's 18. Weakest on published pricing & free-tier honesty (8/10): The full ladder is published in docs including the overage rate ("$5.00 per 100 additional credits") and per-MB export rates (Free 20, Analyst 10, Plus 2 credits per MB), but the pricing FAQ contradicts itself on the free tier — "free executions are not supported via the API" against "Yes, the API is included in all Dune plans. This means that all teams and users, including those in the Free plan, can access the API" — and still carries the superseded data-point export lines; dune.com/pricing itself returns HTTP 403 to non-browser clients, and per-query cost is shown only after execution ("You'll see costs after execution."). Published price: Free: 2,500 credits/month at no cost. Analyst: 4,000 credits/month at $75/month; annual $65/month ($780/year). Plus: 25,000 credits/month at $399/month; annual $349/month ($4,188/year). Enterprise: "Favorable Custom Pricing".
Best for: Chain & data coverage — 10/10
Why this score4 published criteria · leads every one
Published criterionWtScore, and the best hereGap/10Pts
Query & data portability (lock-in)7.2·98.6
Attribution & methodology auditability6·97.2
Chain & data coverage6·108.0
Published pricing & free-tier honesty4.8·85.1
Σ methodology points29.0/32
Each bar is the score on that criterion’s own 0–10 scale, never rescaled to the pool. The dark line is the best any product here reached on that axis. Wt is the most the criterion can add to the 86-point weighted total. Pts is weight × score × 32; the sum is the methodology score, and each weighted point behind the leader costs 2.6 on the displayed score. how these are weighted
Considered and not ranked
8 products we looked at and left out
A shortlist is only honest if it says who it turned away. Each of these was assessed against the same published criteria as the ranked table and excluded for a stated reason — not overlooked.
We assessed 12 products here and rank 4 — 33% of what we looked at. That share is of the products we assessed, not of the category: how many exist is not something we can count, so we do not claim a number for it.
SQL workbench over indexed raw and decoded blockchain data. Strongest on chain & data coverage (10/10): Dune's data-catalog docs state "Dune indexes raw, decoded, and curated data across 100+ blockchains", across three explicit layers: raw ("Block, transaction, log, and trace data indexed directly from nodes"), decoded ("parsed using verified ABIs") and curated. Roughly 11x Glassnode's 9 chains and 5x Arkham's 18. Weakest on published pricing & free-tier honesty (8/10): The full ladder is published in docs including the overage rate ("$5.00 per 100 additional credits") and per-MB export rates (Free 20, Analyst 10, Plus 2 credits per MB), but the pricing FAQ contradicts itself on the free tier — "free executions are not supported via the API" against "Yes, the API is included in all Dune plans. This means that all teams and users, including those in the Free plan, can access the API" — and still carries the superseded data-point export lines; dune.com/pricing itself returns HTTP 403 to non-browser clients, and per-query cost is shown only after execution ("You'll see costs after execution."). Published price: Free: 2,500 credits/month at no cost. Analyst: 4,000 credits/month at $75/month; annual $65/month ($780/year). Plus: 25,000 credits/month at $399/month; annual $349/month ($4,188/year). Enterprise: "Favorable Custom Pricing".
Best for
Chain & data coverage — 10/10
Main tradeoff
The Free plan cannot keep anything up to date. Dune's own pricing FAQ states "Automated executions (API, scheduling, refreshing) are not available" and "free executions are not supported via the API", with a 120-second timeout and a maximum of "three (3) concurrent executions". Any dashboard that must stay current forces you to $75/month minimum — and credits are consumed by compute, so a badly written query can burn a month's allowance in a handful of runs.
Verify before signup
Free: 2,500 credits/month at no cost; pay-as-you-go beyond that at "$5.00 per 100 additional credits". Analyst: 4,000 credits/month at $75/month, or $65/month billed annually ($780/year). Plus: 25,000 credits/month at $399/month, or $349/month billed annually ($4,188/year). Enterprise: "Favorable Custom Pricing". Extra credits bill at the plan rate: Analyst $1.875 (monthly) / $1.625 (annual), Plus $1.596 / $1.396 per 100 credits. Exports cost credits per MB (Free 20, Analyst 10, Plus 2); CSV export is Plus and Enterprise only. Per-query credit use is not quoted in advance: "You'll see costs after execution."
Recommendation summary
What should decide this category
Will you write your own queries, or consume dashboards someone else built?
If you left in a year, could you take your queries and your data with you?
Do you need to defend a label or a metric definition to someone who will challenge it?
Quick picks
Strong options in this category
Start with the lead choice first, then use the shortlist only if you still need a challenger or stronger fit for a specific setup.
Best overall
Dune
Dune
SQL workbench over indexed raw and decoded blockchain data
SQL workbench over indexed raw and decoded blockchain data. Strongest on chain & data coverage (10/10): Dune's data-catalog docs state "Dune indexes raw, decoded, and curated data across 100+ blockchains", across three explicit layers: raw ("Block, transaction, log, and trace data indexed directly from nodes"), decoded ("parsed using verified ABIs") and curated. Roughly 11x Glassnode's 9 chains and 5x Arkham's 18. Weakest on published pricing & free-tier honesty (8/10): The full ladder is published in docs including the overage rate ("$5.00 per 100 additional credits") and per-MB export rates (Free 20, Analyst 10, Plus 2 credits per MB), but the pricing FAQ contradicts itself on the free tier — "free executions are not supported via the API" against "Yes, the API is included in all Dune plans. This means that all teams and users, including those in the Free plan, can access the API" — and still carries the superseded data-point export lines; dune.com/pricing itself returns HTTP 403 to non-browser clients, and per-query cost is shown only after execution ("You'll see costs after execution."). Published price: Free: 2,500 credits/month at no cost. Analyst: 4,000 credits/month at $75/month; annual $65/month ($780/year). Plus: 25,000 credits/month at $399/month; annual $349/month ($4,188/year). Enterprise: "Favorable Custom Pricing".
Best for: Chain & data coverage — 10/10
Query & data portability (lock-in) · 30%
9/10
Attribution & methodology auditability · 25%
9/10
Chain & data coverage · 25%
10/10
Published pricing & free-tier honesty · 20%
8/10
Quick pick
Token Terminal
Token Terminal
Standardized financial metrics for blockchains and onchain applications
Standardized financial metrics for blockchains and onchain applications. Strongest on chain & data coverage (8/10): the EVM catalog states "Standardized blocks, transactions, logs and traces for every EVM chain." — 53 EVM chains with a raw dataset plus Solana and Hyperliquid raw data, with curated pages for other chain families, below Dune's 100+ across all layers. Query & data portability (lock-in) is 7/10: SQL over raw and curated tables in your own BigQuery is real ("Catalog = BigQuery share in caller own Google Cloud project. Caller pay compute.") but only through the custom-priced Data Room, Snowflake sharing is marked "Coming soon", and no transformation code is public. Weakest on published pricing & free-tier honesty (6/10): Free ($0) and Pro ($350/month, $292 on annual billing) are published, but two of four tiers are "Custom pricing" — the two a data team actually needs — the Free card lists "CSV data exports" that the page's own comparison table does not tick for Free, and per-seat billing is disclosed only as a footnote ("charged monthly for each user"). Published price: Free: "$0". Pro: "$350" per month, or $292 per month on annual billing ("Save 15%"). API: "Custom pricing", "250,000 requests/day". Data Room: "Custom pricing", "Everything in API" plus "Raw blockchain data access" and "Data sharing in BigQuery and Snowflake".
Best for: Chain & data coverage — 8/10
Query & data portability (lock-in) · 30%
7/10
Attribution & methodology auditability · 25%
7/10
Chain & data coverage · 25%
8/10
Published pricing & free-tier honesty · 20%
6/10
Quick pick
Artemis
Artemis
Chain and protocol metrics through the Analyst and a Sheets Plugin, priced separately
Chain and protocol metrics through the Analyst and a Sheets Plugin, priced separately ("Two products, priced separately: the Analyst and the Plugin."). Strongest on published pricing & free-tier honesty (7/10): three of four products are priced ($0, $100/month, $500/month per user) and the docs give a floor for the fourth ("Managing Director starts at $50k/year; final price depends on need."), but the live page states the free cap only as "Limited queries, daily rate limits" (the 20-queries-per-month figure is only in the docs) and the data-access tier is "Custom". Attribution & methodology auditability is 5/10: per-table "Schema Description and Methodology" pages and metric definitions are published ("Revenue is the value that accrues to tokenholders from a protocol's core operations, on a recurring basis."), and the stablecoin methodology discloses restatements ("API field names are unchanged, so the same field can now return a different value."), but the code is closed and there is no accuracy rate or dispute path. Query & data portability (lock-in) is 5/10: warehouse delivery ("Snowflake data share, API, and MCP access is available on Managing Director. Contact the team.") is sales-served, delivers precomputed tables, and egress is capped by call count. Published price: Intern "$0"; Investor "$100" /month; Plugin "$500" /month per user; Managing Director "Custom".
Best for: Published pricing & free-tier honesty — 7/10
Query & data portability (lock-in) · 30%
5/10
Attribution & methodology auditability · 25%
5/10
Chain & data coverage · 25%
6/10
Published pricing & free-tier honesty · 20%
7/10
Quick pick
NA
Nansen
Wallet-label and Smart Money dashboards across 37 chains
Wallet-label and Smart Money dashboards across 37 chains. Strongest on published pricing & free-tier honesty (8/10): A single published price with no sales call ($49/mo annual, $69/mo monthly), a documented free API tier ("100 one-time credits to try the API. After those are used, a daily top-up brings your included credit balance back up to 10 credits if it has fallen below 10."), published per-plan rate limits (Free 15 req/s, Pro 75 req/s), a per-endpoint credit schedule and per-call x402 prices ("Basic | $0.01", $0.05 for premium and Smart Money endpoints). Docked because nansen.ai/pricing returns HTTP 404 and the Flexi-Credit top-up rate is not stated ("Purchase as many credits as you want, at discounted rates."). Weakest on attribution & methodology auditability (2/10): Nansen's own "Data Methodology and Technical Reference" page discloses no Smart Money criteria at all. The only public definition anywhere in its docs is "a curated list of the top 5,000 highest-performing wallets ranked by realised profit, winrate, and strong performance across market cycles" — no thresholds, no… Published price: Pro: "For $49/month (annual) or $69/month (monthly), you get unlimited access to both web and mobile, plus all the premium features" — including "2,000 AI Agent prompts per month", "Discount on trading fees", "Full PnL & Labels (incl. Smart Money)" and "API / MCP one-time credits".
Best for: Published pricing & free-tier honesty — 8/10
Query & data portability (lock-in) · 30%
3/10
Attribution & methodology auditability · 25%
2/10
Chain & data coverage · 25%
7/10
Published pricing & free-tier honesty · 20%
8/10
Frequently asked
Questions people ask before choosing analytics
What is the best crypto analytics platform for most users?
The one whose data you can take with you. Standard SQL, open transformation logic and raw export matter more than dashboard polish, because they decide whether a year of query-writing is an asset you own or a switching cost you have accepted.
Are proprietary wallet labels trustworthy?
They are assertions until the methodology is published. Entity attribution is the most valuable-looking and least checkable data in this category, so it is scored on whether a buyer could inspect how a label was derived — not on how confident the vendor sounds.
How should I read a platform's chain-coverage number?
As a claim to verify, not a total to compare. A chain carrying only raw tables is not the same coverage as one with decoded and curated layers, so headline counts are checked against the data layers actually behind them.
Free advisor·No signup needed
Still unsure? Get your best analytics pick
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — then review the evidence before deciding.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Browse this network
How this ranking is built
Reviewed on query & data portability (lock-in), attribution & methodology auditability, chain & data coverage, and published pricing & free-tier honesty.
Data checked Sep 2026 · Independent rankings · We show our work
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
//Analytics consent·GDPR · ePrivacy · TTDSG
ChainChoice measures page views and conversions with two cookieless, EU-hosted services: Plausible and Cloudflare Web Analytics. Nothing loads until you accept, and rankings are identical either way.ChainChoice measures how the engine is used — page views, conversions, referrer — through two cookieless, EU-hosted services: Plausible and Cloudflare Web Analytics. No advertising cookies, no cross-site profile, no data resale. Neither script loads until you accept, and rankings are identical whether you accept or decline.