Skip to main content

Best defi dashboards in 2026

DeFi Dashboards evaluated across valuation auditability, custody & address exposure, long-tail & lp fidelity, and pricing transparency & continuity.

Rotki
#1 of 8 · published ranking
Rotki
81ChainChoice Score
Why it leads
Best in the pool on valuation auditability and custody and data exposure
Cost
Not priced · No comparable price is published
8 compared Ranking-blind · 392 modules checked 2026-09-18Scored under methodology v2026.09.15 (2026-09-16)
8defi dashboards · sorted by chainchoice score
ranked before any payout data is seen
#1 overallcomputed before any payout data is seenOverall
Rotki
Rotki
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application
Leads the pool on Custody & Address Exposure
81ChainChoice Score · first of 8
Catalog strengths
Valuation AuditabilityCustody & Address Exposure
Why it leads
  • Best in the pool on valuation auditability and custody and data exposure
  • 9 points ahead of DefiLlama: +6.2 pts custody and data exposure, +3.7 pts valuation auditability
  • Provider states broad availability
Evidence
4/4
criteria scored · no receipt file
Margin
+9
over DefiLlama, ranked #02
Rank stability
Firm
#1 holds when every published criterion is moved ±1
Tradeoff
−2
Long-Tail & LP Fidelity — behind this pool's best
Jurisdiction
Global
no restricted market on record
Score breakdowntick = pool best
Valuation auditability10/10
Custody and data exposure10/10
Long tail and LP fidelity5/10
Pricing transparency and continuity7/10
Ranking-blind · a guided run tailors this to your size, custody & jurisdiction
#ProviderScoreEvidenceKey strengths
2−9
DefiLlama
DefiLlama
no receipt file
Pricing Transparency & ContinuityValuation Auditability
3−6
Octav
no receipt file
Pricing Transparency & ContinuityLong-Tail & LP Fidelity
4−7
Zerion
Zerion
no receipt file
Long-Tail & LP FidelityPricing Transparency & Continuity
5−1
Portals (Explorer)
Portals (Explorer)
no receipt file
Custody & Address ExposureLong-Tail & LP Fidelity
6−1
DeBank
DeBank
no receipt file
Long-Tail & LP FidelityPricing Transparency & Continuity
7−5
Nansen Portfolio
no receipt file
Pricing Transparency & ContinuityLong-Tail & LP Fidelity
8−3
CoinStats
CoinStats
no receipt file
Pricing Transparency & ContinuityLong-Tail & LP Fidelity
Ranking-blind — order computed before any payout data is joined
Below the table

How this ranking works

Everything the table draws on continues here: how firm the #1 is, the per-criterion arithmetic behind each score, who pays ChainChoice, and the full guide to choosing.

Direct answer

What is the best defi dashboards in 2026?

Rotki ranks #1 overall for defi dashboards on ChainChoice. Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application. It holds that rank under an affiliate-blind methodology scored across 4 published, weighted criteria — the code that ranks providers physically cannot read affiliate payouts (CI-enforced), so a payout can't move a rank. The verdict re-computes on every fee change, incident, or regulatory action; full reasoning and the audit receipt are below.

Best picks

Best defi dashboards in 2026

Weighted on valuation auditability (30), custody & address exposure (25), long-tail & LP fidelity (25), and pricing transparency & continuity (20). The heaviest is valuation auditability: Can you inspect how a position's number was computed — named price oracles, published methodology, readable source — or is the figure a black box you must accept?
Best overall
Rotki
Rotki
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application
Data checked Sep 2026
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application. Strongest on valuation auditability (10/10): AGPLv3 source on GitHub (4.0k stars). The docs let the user "customize the order in which price oracles are queried, both for current and historical prices"; "Both lists offer CryptoCompare, CoinGecko, DefiLlama, Alchemy, Moralis, Uniswap V2 and Uniswap V3. Latest Prices additionally offers Kraken", and manual prices "always take precedence over any oracle". It is the only product here where you can… Weakest on long-tail & lp fidelity (5/10): LP support is partly paywalled — "Some liquidity pool details are only available with a premium subscription" — and the spam filter is an "automatic algorithm" whose docs add that "mistakes can be made and a legit token may be ignored". Published price: rotki.com/pricing lists Supporter "9.00€ /mo", Basic "25.00€ /mo" and Advanced "45.00€ /mo" billed monthly, or "€ 90.00" / "€ 250.00" / "€ 450.00" billed annually; Custom on request; "Prices shown for Germany."
Best for: Valuation Auditability — 10/10
Why this score4 published criteria · leads 2 of 4
Published criterionWtScore, and the best hereGap/10Pts
Valuation Auditability7.2·109.6
Custody & Address Exposure6·108.0
Long-Tail & LP Fidelity6−254.0
Pricing Transparency & Continuity4.8−274.5
Σ methodology points26.1/32

Each bar is the score on that criterion’s own 0–10 scale, never rescaled to the pool. The dark line is the best any product here reached on that axis. Wt is the most the criterion can add to the 86-point weighted total. Pts is weight × score × 32; the sum is the methodology score, and each weighted point behind the leader costs 2.6 on the displayed score. how these are weighted

Considered and not ranked
8 products we looked at and left out
A shortlist is only honest if it says who it turned away. Each of these was assessed against the same published criteria as the ranked table and excluded for a stated reason — not overlooked.
We assessed 12 products here and rank 4 — 33% of what we looked at. That share is of the products we assessed, not of the category: how many exist is not something we can count, so we do not claim a number for it.
Zapper· No longer operatingStep Finance· No longer operatingParsecLlamaFolioSonarWatch (now Jupiter Portfolio)· No longer operatingAPY.vision· No longer operatingDune· Ranked elsewhereDeFi Saver· Different job
Why it ranks first
Why Rotki leads this category right now
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application. Strongest on valuation auditability (10/10): AGPLv3 source on GitHub (4.0k stars). The docs let the user "customize the order in which price oracles are queried, both for current and historical prices"; "Both lists offer CryptoCompare, CoinGecko, DefiLlama, Alchemy, Moralis, Uniswap V2 and Uniswap V3. Latest Prices additionally offers Kraken", and manual prices "always take precedence over any oracle". It is the only product here where you can… Weakest on long-tail & lp fidelity (5/10): LP support is partly paywalled — "Some liquidity pool details are only available with a premium subscription" — and the spam filter is an "automatic algorithm" whose docs add that "mistakes can be made and a legit token may be ignored". Published price: rotki.com/pricing lists Supporter "9.00€ /mo", Basic "25.00€ /mo" and Advanced "45.00€ /mo" billed monthly, or "€ 90.00" / "€ 250.00" / "€ 450.00" billed annually; Custom on request; "Prices shown for Germany."
Best for
Valuation Auditability — 10/10
Main tradeoff
The self-hosted option is no longer the cheap one. Rotki held pricing flat from 2017 to 2025, then moved Basic to €25/month and force-migrated 3- and 6-month subscribers to monthly billing at that rate. Basic is €300/year billed monthly (€250 billed annually), more than Zerion Premium ($99/year) or one Octav Lite address ($149/year), though below DefiLlama Pro ($490/year) and Nansen Pro ($588/year annual); a €9/month Supporter tier is also listed. You are paying a premium for auditability and locality, not saving money.
Verify before signup
rotki.com/pricing (rendered 2026-09-14) lists every paid tier. Monthly: Supporter "9.00€ /mo", Basic "25.00€ /mo", Advanced "45.00€ /mo", "Billed monthly in EUR". Yearly: "Billed annually in € 90.00" / "€ 250.00" / "€ 450.00" ("Save 2 months vs monthly"). Custom: "Contact us". The page says "Prices shown for Germany." On 10 November 2025 Basic (€25/month, VAT included) replaced Premium, and 3- and 6-month plans moved to monthly billing. The Starter tier is free.
Recommendation summary
What should decide this category
How much of your position is in LP, staked or lending forms rather than plain tokens?
Are you comfortable handing a company the full list of wallets you control?
Would you need to defend one of these numbers to an accountant or an investor?
Quick picks
Strong options in this category
Start with the lead choice first, then use the shortlist only if you still need a challenger or stronger fit for a specific setup.
Best overall
Rotki
Rotki
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application. Strongest on valuation auditability (10/10): AGPLv3 source on GitHub (4.0k stars). The docs let the user "customize the order in which price oracles are queried, both for current and historical prices"; "Both lists offer CryptoCompare, CoinGecko, DefiLlama, Alchemy, Moralis, Uniswap V2 and Uniswap V3. Latest Prices additionally offers Kraken", and manual prices "always take precedence over any oracle". It is the only product here where you can… Weakest on long-tail & lp fidelity (5/10): LP support is partly paywalled — "Some liquidity pool details are only available with a premium subscription" — and the spam filter is an "automatic algorithm" whose docs add that "mistakes can be made and a legit token may be ignored". Published price: rotki.com/pricing lists Supporter "9.00€ /mo", Basic "25.00€ /mo" and Advanced "45.00€ /mo" billed monthly, or "€ 90.00" / "€ 250.00" / "€ 450.00" billed annually; Custom on request; "Prices shown for Germany."
Best for: Valuation Auditability — 10/10
Valuation Auditability · 30%
10/10
Custody & Address Exposure · 25%
10/10
Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · 25%
5/10
Pricing Transparency & Continuity · 20%
7/10
Quick pick
DefiLlama
DefiLlama
Open-source DeFi data platform with protocol and pool dashboards
Open-source DeFi data platform with protocol and pool dashboards. Strongest on pricing transparency & continuity (9/10): docs.llama.fi/pro-api states both tiers in full with the overage rate ($0.60 per 1,000 additional calls), served server-side, and defillama.com/subscription answers "What happens if I hit my API rate limit?" with the same $0.60 per 1,000 calls. Weakest on long-tail & lp fidelity (4/10): Pool-level and yield data is the deepest in the category and is what other trackers cite, but no wallet or position-tracking feature appears in any tier's feature list on defillama.com/subscription or in docs.llama.fi (checked 2026-09-14) — the product is organised around protocols and pools, and its "Doublecount" toggle handles LP and receipt tokens at protocol level. Published price: Pro subscription: "($49/month or $490/year)" with a "Free 7-day trial available". API tier: "($300/month or $3,000/year)", including 1,000 requests/minute and 1 million API calls monthly, with overage at "$0.60 per 1,000 additional calls".
Best for: Pricing Transparency & Continuity — 9/10
Valuation Auditability · 30%
8/10
Custody & Address Exposure · 25%
6/10
Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · 25%
4/10
Pricing Transparency & Continuity · 20%
9/10
Quick pick
Octav
DeFi portfolio intelligence and NAV reporting for funds and DAOs
DeFi portfolio intelligence and NAV reporting for funds and DAOs. Strongest on pricing transparency & continuity (9/10): Prices are stated in the developer docs with the per-address unit made explicit — "Per address - Each license applies to one wallet address" and "Each license is valid for 1 wallet address for 1 year." — which is the disclosure most vendors bury. Renewal terms (yearly, optional auto-renew) are also stated. Weakest on custody & address exposure (3/10): Hosted SaaS with no self-host path, and the per-address licence model means the vendor's billing system holds an explicit, itemised register of exactly which addresses you monitor — a sharper disclosure than a generic account. Published price: Lite License "$149 / year" per address; Pro License "$499 / year" per address; individual widgets "Lite - $10-50 per widget", "Pro - $25-50 per widget".
Best for: Pricing Transparency & Continuity — 9/10
Valuation Auditability · 30%
5/10
Custody & Address Exposure · 25%
3/10
Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · 25%
7/10
Pricing Transparency & Continuity · 20%
9/10
Quick pick
Zerion
Zerion
Multi-chain wallet, portfolio dashboard and developer API
Multi-chain wallet, portfolio dashboard and developer API. Strongest on long-tail & lp fidelity (7/10): zerion.io/api states "40+ Chains supported" and "4.5k+ DeFi protocols indexed", the developer docs describe "a built-in spam detection system that flags low-quality or deceptive assets" with an is_trash boolean on every asset and transaction, and raw LP tokens are decoded into readable positions — users see "Deposited in Aave" and "LP position in Uniswap V3" rather than opaque token balances. Weakest on custody & address exposure (3/10): Hosted SaaS plus a self-custodial wallet, and Premium is bought by an on-chain transaction signed from the covered wallet — "Connect with the wallet for which you'd like to purchase Premium … click on Purchase Premium and sign the transaction request" — which publicly links the paying address to a Zerion subscription. Published price: Premium: "$99" for a "one-year subscription" (Individual, "1 Wallet"), with "a 0.67% service fee" on swaps and bridges that Premium reduces "from 0.67% to 0.25%".
Best for: Long-Tail & LP Fidelity — 7/10
Valuation Auditability · 30%
3/10
Custody & Address Exposure · 25%
3/10
Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · 25%
7/10
Pricing Transparency & Continuity · 20%
6/10
Frequently asked
Questions people ask before choosing dashboards
What is the best crypto DeFi dashboard for most users?
The one whose numbers you can check. Named price oracles and a published valuation methodology matter more than protocol counts, because an unexplained figure on an illiquid LP position is where the wildly wrong numbers come from.
Do I need a DeFi dashboard if I only use one exchange?
It is the quiet cost of the category. Connecting means disclosing every address you control to a company that never custodies your assets but does learn your entire onchain position — which is why a genuine self-hosted option is scored rather than treated as a niche preference.
What matters most when choosing a DeFi dashboard?
Whether a valuation can be audited, and what connecting exposes — together 55% of the weight. Depth of decoding for LP and staked positions follows, then whether the price is actually published.
Free advisorNo signup needed

Still unsure? Get your best dashboards pick

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — then review the evidence before deciding.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Popular comparisons
Comparison guides people open from this category
Zerion vs DeBank
Choose between a cleaner wallet-first tracker and a more DeFi-native tracking surface.
Zerion vs CoinStats
Choose between a cleaner onchain tracker and broader mixed wallet-and-exchange coverage.
Browse this network
How this ranking is built
Reviewed on valuation auditability, custody & address exposure, long-tail & lp fidelity, and pricing transparency & continuity.
Data checked Sep 2026 · Independent rankings · We show our work
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
ChainChoice
Compare onchain. A brighter future.
© 2026 ChainChoice. All rights reserved.
System statusFeeds last refreshed 9 days ago
Built from commit ba0993b · rankings.json sha256 e1eb24980abb
ChainChoice · The decision layer for crypto · Not financial adviceEducational analysis, not investment advice. Affiliate links may contribute to operations but never alter rankings.

ChainChoice provides informational content only. Nothing on this site constitutes financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.