DeFi Dashboards
DeFi Dashboards evaluated across valuation auditability, custody and the address exposure it asks of you, how faithfully long-tail tokens and LP positions are shown, and pricing transparency and continuity.
16providers tracked
7ranked (methodology v2026.11.1)
12 November 2026Ranking snapshot
3 November 2026oldest read · due 18 DecIndependent. Evidence-based.We rank with a published method and sourced evidence. No one can pay to rank.How it works
Set your country and amount to see your costs ·
Your setup
What your country changes
Pick a country to see which DeFi dashboards serve it. Nothing is hidden — any that does not is listed with that reason.- 🇺🇸 United States
- 🇨🇦 Canada
- 🇲🇽 Mexico
- 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
- 🇩🇪 Germany
- 🇫🇷 France
- 🇮🇹 Italy
- 🇪🇸 Spain
- 🇳🇱 Netherlands
- 🇨🇭 Switzerland
- 🇸🇪 Sweden
- 🇳🇴 Norway
This affects provider availability.
Requirements (0)
Preferences (0)
Preferences re-weight Fit for you, which needs your country.
More filters
7 providers match your requirements
Out of 7 ranked providers. 0 excluded.
What this ranks
Ranked here: DeFi dashboards that track and value your onchain positions, for a reader who needs those numbers to be checkable.Not ranked here: dashboards shut down, offline or absorbed, position-management tools that are not dashboards, and dashboard libraries under onchain analytics (Nansen Portfolio is here, Nansen's analytics there).7 of the 16 assessed are ranked; 9 were turned away by name. Who, and whyRequirements narrow the list; they never change a published ChainChoice Score. How the ranking works
Rotki
How Rotki was chosen
Leads this ranking on Valuation AuditabilityOpen-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application
81 / 100 out of 100published score, #1 of all 7 worldwide
Evidence
High
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.Valuation AuditabilityCustody & Address Exposure
Why it leads
- Rotki is 16 points ahead of Octav, mainly because it scores higher on its custody and data exposure and its valuation auditability.
- Best in this ranking on valuation auditability and custody and data exposure
- Ahead of Octav on custody and data exposure (+10.9 points) and valuation auditability (+9.4 points)
Tradeoff
Long tail and LP fidelity: 2 points below the best in this ranking
Share
#ProviderPriceCompare
2
OC
DeFi portfolio intelligence and NAV reporting...
65 / 100 out of 100
3
Multi-chain wallet
59 / 100 out of 100
4
Free DeFi yield explorer and zap routing API
54 / 100 out of 100
5
Same score, not joint · ordered by weighted total (37.60 against 37.40)
Multi-chain EVM portfolio tracker
54 / 100 out of 100
6
NA
Onchain analytics platform
52 / 100 out of 100
7
Mass-market crypto portfolio tracker spanning...
49 / 100 out of 100
Not confirmed (1) — not ranked until its source is read again; listed, not ruled out.
- DefiLlama · Re-read pending, source paused: DefiLlama’s own pages are a source we paused on 27 October 2026.
Compare providers (0)
See key differences in features, fees, security and more.
Pricing transparency and continuity
Pricing Transparency & Continuity
20% of the published criteria weight. Scored 0–10 from the published evidence; the order below is by this criterion, then the published ranking.
| Provider | Pricing transparency and continuity (0–10) | ChainChoice Score |
|---|---|---|
| Octav | 9 | 65 |
| Rotki | 7 | 81 |
| Zerion | 6 | 59 |
| Nansen Portfolio | 6 | 52 |
| CoinStats | 6 | 49 |
| DeBank | 5 | 54 |
| Portals (Explorer) | 4 | 54 |
Valuation auditability
Valuation Auditability
30% of the published criteria weight. Scored 0–10 from the published evidence; the order below is by this criterion, then the published ranking.
| Provider | Valuation auditability (0–10) | ChainChoice Score |
|---|---|---|
| Rotki | 10 | 81 |
| Octav | 5 | 65 |
| Zerion | 3 | 59 |
| CoinStats | 3 | 49 |
| Portals (Explorer) | 2 | 54 |
| DeBank | 2 | 54 |
| Nansen Portfolio | 2 | 52 |
Custody and data exposure
Custody & Address Exposure
25% of the published criteria weight. Scored 0–10 from the published evidence; the order below is by this criterion, then the published ranking.
| Provider | Custody and data exposure (0–10) | ChainChoice Score |
|---|---|---|
| Rotki | 10 | 81 |
| Portals (Explorer) | 5 | 54 |
| DeBank | 4 | 54 |
| Octav | 3 | 65 |
| Zerion | 3 | 59 |
| Nansen Portfolio | 2 | 52 |
| CoinStats | 1 | 49 |
Long tail and LP fidelity
Long-Tail & LP Fidelity
25% of the published criteria weight. Scored 0–10 from the published evidence; the order below is by this criterion, then the published ranking.
| Provider | Long tail and LP fidelity (0–10) | ChainChoice Score |
|---|---|---|
| Zerion | 7 | 59 |
| Octav | 6 | 65 |
| Rotki | 5 | 81 |
| Portals (Explorer) | 5 | 54 |
| DeBank | 5 | 54 |
| Nansen Portfolio | 5 | 52 |
| CoinStats | 3 | 49 |
All 4 published criteria
Every ranked row’s score on each criterion, in the published order. Choose a column to order by it.
| Provider | ChainChoice Score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rotki | 10 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 81 |
| 2 | Octav | 5 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 65 |
| 3 | Zerion | 3 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 59 |
| 4 | Portals (Explorer) | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 54 |
| 5 | DeBank | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 54 |
| 6 | Nansen Portfolio | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 52 |
| 7 | CoinStats | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 49 |
How this ranking works
How firm the #1 is, the per-criterion arithmetic behind each score, who pays ChainChoice, and which DeFi dashboards were assessed and left out.
FirmThis verdict holds under every one-point re-read
See the arithmetic
Every published criterion was moved up and down by one point and the ranking re-run. The same product came first each time. The published rankings file
Why this score4 published criteria · leads 2 of 4
Published criterionWtScore, and the best hereGap/10 out of 10Pts
Valuation Auditability7.2·109.6
Custody & Address Exposure6·108.0
Long-Tail & LP Fidelity6−254.0
Pricing Transparency & Continuity4.8−274.5
Σ methodology points26.1/32
Each bar is the score on that criterion’s own 0–10 scale, never rescaled to the pool. The dark line is the best any product here reached on that axis. Wt is the most the criterion can add to the 86-point weighted total. Pts is weight × score × 32; the sum is the methodology score, and each weighted point behind the leader costs 2.6 on the displayed score. how these are weighted
Why it ranks first
Why Rotki leads this category right now
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application. Strongest on valuation auditability (10/10): Rotki names its price oracles (CryptoCompare, CoinGecko, DefiLlama, Alchemy, Moralis, Uniswap V2 and V3, plus Kraken for latest prices), lets the user reorder them, gives manual prices precedence, and publishes its full source code under AGPL-3.0. Weakest on long-tail & LP fidelity (5/10): Rotki breaks liquidity pools into their underlying assets, but part of that detail sits behind a premium lock. Its docs call spam assets "a plague in EVM chains" and concede that a legitimate token may be ignored by mistake. Published price: rotki.com/pricing (read 2026-11-03): Starter "Free"; Supporter "9€ /mo", Basic "25€ /mo", Advanced "45€ /mo", each "Billed monthly"; Custom "Contact us".
Best for
Valuation Auditability — 10/10
Main tradeoff
The self-hosted option is no longer the cheap one. Rotki held pricing flat from 2017 to 2025, then moved Basic to €25/month and force-migrated 3- and 6-month subscribers to monthly billing at that rate. Basic is €300/year billed monthly (€250 billed annually), more than Zerion Premium ($99/year) or one Octav Lite address ($149/year), though below DefiLlama Pro ($490/year) and Nansen Pro ($588/year annual); a €9/month Supporter tier is also listed. You are paying a premium for auditability and locality, not saving money.
Verify before signup
rotki.com/pricing (read 3 November 2026): Starter "Free"; Supporter "9€ /mo", Basic "25€ /mo", Advanced "45€ /mo", each "Billed monthly"; Custom "Contact us". The "Yearly billing" toggle ("Save 2 months vs monthly") is priced in the page's own plan data at "90.00", "250.00" and "450.00" EUR a year. The page says "Prices shown for DE". Per the rotki blog, Basic replaced Premium on 10 November 2025 and 3- and 6-month plans moved to monthly billing. The local app is free to use.
Recommendation summary
What should decide this category
How much of your position is in LP, staked or lending forms rather than plain tokens?
Are you comfortable handing a company the full list of wallets you control?
Would you need to defend one of these numbers to an accountant or an investor?
Quick picks
Strong options in this category
Start with the lead choice first, then use the shortlist only if you still need a challenger or stronger fit for a specific setup.
Best overall
Rotki
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application. Strongest on valuation auditability (10/10): Rotki names its price oracles (CryptoCompare, CoinGecko, DefiLlama, Alchemy, Moralis, Uniswap V2 and V3, plus Kraken for latest prices), lets the user reorder them, gives manual prices precedence, and publishes its full source code under AGPL-3.0. Weakest on long-tail & LP fidelity (5/10): Rotki breaks liquidity pools into their underlying assets, but part of that detail sits behind a premium lock. Its docs call spam assets "a plague in EVM chains" and concede that a legitimate token may be ignored by mistake. Published price: rotki.com/pricing (read 2026-11-03): Starter "Free"; Supporter "9€ /mo", Basic "25€ /mo", Advanced "45€ /mo", each "Billed monthly"; Custom "Contact us".
Best for: Valuation Auditability — 10/10
Valuation Auditability · weight 30%10/10Custody & Address Exposure · weight 25%10/10Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · weight 25%5/10Pricing Transparency & Continuity · weight 20%7/10
Quick pick
OC
Octav
DeFi portfolio intelligence and NAV reporting for funds and DAOs
DeFi portfolio intelligence and NAV reporting for funds and DAOs. Strongest on pricing transparency & continuity (9/10): Octav prints its licences in plain text: Free at $0, Lite at $149 a year and Pro at $499 a year, each per wallet address and billed annually, with API credits from $10 for 400 to $20,000 for 1,000,000. Its changelog is active. Weakest on custody & address exposure (3/10): Octav is read-only and never takes private keys, but it is a hosted service with an email-bound account (magic-link sign-in) and per-address licences, and it offers no self-hosted option. Published price: Octav Widget Explorer docs (docs.octav.fi/docs/widget-explorer, read 2026-11-03): "Free License $0" (all free widgets, "No credit card required"), "Lite License $149 / year" per address and "Pro License $499 / year" per address; Enterprise is a listed tier…
Best for: Pricing Transparency & Continuity — 9/10
Valuation Auditability · weight 30%5/10Custody & Address Exposure · weight 25%3/10Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · weight 25%6/10Pricing Transparency & Continuity · weight 20%9/10
Quick pick
Zerion
Multi-chain wallet, portfolio dashboard and developer API
Multi-chain wallet, portfolio dashboard and developer API. Strongest on long-tail & LP fidelity (7/10): Zerion's API flags low-quality or deceptive assets with an is_trash field on every asset and transaction, and Zerion advertises more than 4,500 indexed DeFi protocols. Weakest on valuation auditability (3/10): Zerion publishes that it computes profit and loss with the FIFO method, but names no price source for position values, and its code is closed. Published price: Zerion Premium (zerion.io/premium, read 2026-11-03): "Individual 12 months $99 / year", "One wallet. No automatic renewal.", with "50% off swap and bridge fees".
Best for: Long-Tail & LP Fidelity — 7/10
Valuation Auditability · weight 30%3/10Custody & Address Exposure · weight 25%3/10Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · weight 25%7/10Pricing Transparency & Continuity · weight 20%6/10
Quick pick
Portals (Explorer)
Free DeFi yield explorer and zap routing API with wallet view
Free DeFi yield explorer and zap routing API with wallet view. Strongest on custody & address exposure (5/10): Portals Explorer shows any wallet address without sign-up, but its privacy policy says Portals may receive users' public blockchain addresses and wallet details, and there is no self-hosted option. Weakest on valuation auditability (2/10): Portals names no price source or valuation method for portfolio positions, and its own blog warns that tracker data "may not be perfectly accurate" and should be checked directly with each protocol. Published price: Portals' blog (blog.portals.fi) calls Portals Explorer "a free portfolio tracking tool", "Free with no sign-up".
Best for: Custody & Address Exposure — 5/10
Valuation Auditability · weight 30%2/10Custody & Address Exposure · weight 25%5/10Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · weight 25%5/10Pricing Transparency & Continuity · weight 20%4/10
Considered and not ranked
9 products we looked at and left out
A shortlist is only honest if it says who it turned away. Each of these was assessed against the same published criteria as the ranked table and excluded for a stated reason — not overlooked.
We assessed 16 products here and rank 7 — 44% of what we looked at. That share is of the products we assessed, not of the category: how many exist is not something we can count, so we do not claim a number for it.
DefiLlama· Re-read pending, pausedZapper· No longer operatingStep Finance· No longer operatingParsecLlamaFolioSonarWatch (now Jupiter Portfolio)· No longer operatingAPY.vision· No longer operatingDune· Ranked elsewhereDeFi Saver· Different job
What this ranking does not assess
- Exit failure: you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
These can still cost you money here; the ranking does not measure them, so a high place says nothing about them. Which criterion scores each family, and why the others do not apply, is in /data/risk-coverage.json.
How this ranking is built
Reviewed on valuation auditability, custody & address exposure, long-tail & LP fidelity, and pricing transparency & continuity.
Data checked Nov 2026 · Independent rankings · We show our work
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means every product ranked on this page was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
Direct answer
What is the best DeFi dashboard in 2026?
Rotki ranks #1 overall for DeFi dashboards on ChainChoice. Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application. It holds that rank under an affiliate-blind methodology scored across 4 published, weighted criteria — the code that ranks providers physically cannot read affiliate payouts (CI-enforced), so a payout can't move a rank. The verdict re-computes on every fee change, incident, or regulatory action; the full reasoning and the audit receipt are under Methodology.
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by Valuation Auditability · 30% (Rotki 10/10, Octav 5/10, Zerion 3/10)Scored by Custody & Address Exposure · 25% (Rotki 10/10, Octav 3/10, Zerion 3/10)Scored by Long-Tail & LP Fidelity · 25% (Rotki 5/10, Octav 6/10, Zerion 7/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Pricing Transparency & Continuity (20%).
Guides & FAQs
3 questions readers ask before choosing DeFi dashboards, and 2 guides that go further.
Frequently asked
Questions people ask before choosing dashboards
What is the best crypto DeFi dashboard for most users?
The one whose numbers you can check. Named price oracles and a published valuation methodology matter more than protocol counts, because an unexplained figure on an illiquid LP position is where the wildly wrong numbers come from.
Do I need a DeFi dashboard if I only use one exchange?
It is the quiet cost of the category. Connecting means disclosing every address you control to a company that never custodies your assets but does learn your entire onchain position — which is why a genuine self-hosted option is scored rather than treated as a niche preference.
What matters most when choosing a DeFi dashboard?
Whether a valuation can be audited, and what connecting exposes — together 55% of the weight. Depth of decoding for LP and staked positions follows, then whether the price is actually published.
Free advisor·No signup needed
Still unsure? Get your best dashboards pick
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — then review the evidence before deciding.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Best picks
Best DeFi dashboards in 2026
Weighted on valuation auditability (30), custody & address exposure (25), long-tail & LP fidelity (25), and pricing transparency & continuity (20). The heaviest is valuation auditability: Can you inspect how a position's number was computed — named price oracles, published methodology, readable source — or is the figure a black box you must accept?
Best overall
Rotki
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application
Data checked Nov 2026
Open-source, locally-run portfolio tracker and crypto accounting application. Strongest on valuation auditability (10/10): Rotki names its price oracles (CryptoCompare, CoinGecko, DefiLlama, Alchemy, Moralis, Uniswap V2 and V3, plus Kraken for latest prices), lets the user reorder them, gives manual prices precedence, and publishes its full source code under AGPL-3.0. Weakest on long-tail & LP fidelity (5/10): Rotki breaks liquidity pools into their underlying assets, but part of that detail sits behind a premium lock. Its docs call spam assets "a plague in EVM chains" and concede that a legitimate token may be ignored by mistake. Published price: rotki.com/pricing (read 2026-11-03): Starter "Free"; Supporter "9€ /mo", Basic "25€ /mo", Advanced "45€ /mo", each "Billed monthly"; Custom "Contact us".
Best for: Valuation Auditability — 10/10
Head-to-head comparisons
Comparison guides for this category
Zerion vs DeBank
Choose between a cleaner wallet-first tracker and a more DeFi-native tracking surface.
Zerion vs CoinStats
Choose between a cleaner onchain tracker and broader mixed wallet-and-exchange coverage.
Browse this network
MS
Written and reviewed by Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research