Provider at a glance
- Category
- Onchain Analytics
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- tokenterminal.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 70 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in October 2026.
Token Terminal
Financial metrics for blockchains and apps
Onchain Analytics
#2 Overall
Ranked #2 of 7 onchain analytics in the published ranking
70
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- $0.00 your cost/yr
Is Token Terminal right for you?
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Query & data portability (lock-in)7/10 here; Dune scores 9
- Attribution & methodology auditability7/10 here; Dune scores 9
- Chain & data coverage8/10 here; Dune scores 10
- Published pricing & free-tier honesty6/10 here; Dune scores 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best analytics platform shows where it lands for you.
What will Token Terminal cost you?
$0.00 your cost/yr
- Transactions per year
- 1k
- Monthly price
- $0
Level with the median of 6 priced onchain analytics.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Token Terminal?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read October 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Token Terminal
Compare all 4- 1Dune12 points above · stronger on query portability (9 against 7)82$780
- 3Artemis9 points below · stronger on pricing honesty (7 against 6)61$0.00
- 4Messari12 points below · weaker on coverage depth (5 against 8)58$0.00
For your setup
Find out if Token Terminal fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Token Terminal lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best analytics platformNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Token Terminal ranks #2
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (22.6 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
307+6.725.09#2/7Loading evidence…
257+5.605.09#2/7Loading evidence…
258+6.406.010#2/7Loading evidence…
206+3.846.08#4/7Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−12behind Dune, #1
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 68–71 and stays #2
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Token Terminal’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Query & data portability (lock-in) 7 → 2 on its ladder · Artemis passes it−560#2 → #3
Attribution & methodology auditability 7 → 1 on its ladder · Artemis passes it−660#2 → #3
Chain & data coverage 8 → 2 on its ladder · Artemis passes it−660#2 → #3
Strengths
0 from the score dataWhere it leads
No scored criterion is at or within one point of the category best, so no strength can be stated from the data.
Tradeoffs
4 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Query & data portability (lock-in) — 7/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Attribution & methodology auditability — 7/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Chain & data coverage — 8/10 against a category best of 10/10
- Published pricing & free-tier honesty — 6/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- The $350 Pro tier gives you "Access to MCP" but not the REST API. Actual programmatic access is the separately quoted API tier, and warehouse delivery (BigQuery/Snowflake) is the even more expensive Data Room. If you buy Pro expecting to pipe data into your own stack, you have bought a browser seat — and per-seat monthly billing means the team cost scales linearly.
Competitive position
Where Token Terminal leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 714.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#2 / 716.9 of 30 · best 21.7
Friction#1 / 72.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 73.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 78.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Token Terminal leads
- Query & data portability (lock-in)#2 / 7
- Attribution & methodology auditability#2 / 7
- Chain & data coverage#2 / 7
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Artemis#3 of 7 · score 61 · 9.0 points behind
Token Terminal leads on
- Query & data portability (lock-in)7 vs 5
- Attribution & methodology auditability7 vs 5
- Chain & data coverage8 vs 6
Artemis leads on
- Published pricing & free-tier honesty7 vs 6
Largest single reason Token Terminal is ahead: published criteria (+8.6 display points).Scenario cost: Artemis is the same.
Dune#1 of 7 · score 82 · 12.0 points ahead
Token Terminal leads onNo scored criterion
Dune leads on
- Query & data portability (lock-in)9 vs 7
- Attribution & methodology auditability9 vs 7
- Chain & data coverage10 vs 8
Largest single reason Dune is ahead: published criteria (+12.5 display points).Scenario cost: Dune is +$780 against Token Terminal.
Messari#4 of 7 · score 58 · 12.0 points behind
Token Terminal leads on
- Query & data portability (lock-in)7 vs 5
- Attribution & methodology auditability7 vs 5
- Chain & data coverage8 vs 5
Messari leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Token Terminal is ahead: published criteria (+11.4 display points).Scenario cost: Messari is the same.
Against the leader
82 vs 70 · gap 12.0Why Dune ranks above Token Terminal
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 12.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisDuneGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight16.921.7−12.5, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisDunePoints
Query & data portability (lock-in) · w3079−1.92, worse
Attribution & methodology auditability · w2579−1.60, worse
Chain & data coverage · w25810−1.60, worse
Published pricing & free-tier honesty · w2068−1.28, worse
Net7082−12.0
Your scenario
What Token Terminal costs on your scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Monthly price · published rate$0
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 22 October 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$0.00
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$0.006 of 7 rows priced · Token Terminal at the median
Cheapest priced$0.00 · Token TerminalToken Terminal is the cheapest priced row for this scenario · availability not applied — set your country to filter
1 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 22 October 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #2 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 22 October 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Query & data portability (lock-in)strength 7 · weight 30Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Attribution & methodology auditabilitystrength 7 · weight 25Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Chain & data coveragestrength 8 · weight 25Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Published pricing & free-tier honestystrength 6 · weight 20Report an error—22 October 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Exit failure (Token Terminal 7/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Query & data portability (lock-in) · 30%
- Information failure (Token Terminal 7/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by Attribution & methodology auditability · 25%
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Chain & data coverage (25%), Published pricing & free-tier honesty (20%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- tokenterminal.com/pricing (read 22 October 2026): Free "$0" (3 custom dashboards, full historical data). Pro "$350" per month, or "$292" per month on annual billing ("Save 15%"), with a 7-day trial. API: "Custom pricing", "250,000 requests/day". Datashare (formerly Data Room): "Custom pricing", "Everything in API" plus "Raw blockchain data access" and "Data sharing in BigQuery and Snowflake" (Snowflake no longer marked "Coming soon"). The Free card lists "CSV data exports", MCP, Sheets and team access, but the page's own comparison table ticks none of them for Free (CSV, MCP, team access and the Sheets/Excel plugins start at Pro; Sheets rate limits 500k / month on Pro, 1M / month on API). Team members are charged monthly per user added.Token Terminal — official pricing page ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Prices published in
- USDToken Terminal — official pricing page ↗ · 22 October 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Multi-chain
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Token Terminal's Terms of Service (tokenterminal.com/terms, last updated 22 February 2024, read 22 October 2026) name no restricted or served countries; they cover "access to and use of the following website: www.tokenterminal.com" and the associated subscriptions, and are "governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Finland".
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Token Terminal: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- 22 October 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 70, #2 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt onchain_analytics:token_terminal:2026.10.18:d2814b98dbc9
Are you Token Terminal? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.