Skip to main content
Country guidePLPLNMiCA-regulated

Best crypto-backed loans in Poland

#1 for PolandFigure78 out of 100 ChainChoice Score
Audit receipt#cc-PL-CBL-2026.09-c39d9633 Methodology §3affiliate economics did not influence this ranking

Figure ranks highest in ChainChoice’s published crypto-backed loans ranking among the providers that list Poland. Flat 19% — straightforward. PLN-rail availability varies; many users on-ramp via SEPA + EUR.

RegulatorKNFKomisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF) · Polish Financial Supervision Authority
Currencyzł PLNPolish Zloty
Payment railsSEPABLIK · Przelewy24
MiCA statusAppliesCASP licensing required
Reviewed Next review by Published Methodology v2026.11.1
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means every product ranked on this page was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Direct answer

Which crypto-backed loan should Poland residents use in November 2026?

Figure ranks highest in ChainChoice’s published crypto-backed loans ranking among the providers that list Poland. The order is the published ranking itself; providers whose terms exclude Poland are removed. Check authorisation with KNF before depositing.

Right fit for this list
  • Poland residents holding capital in PLN
  • Users who need KNF-aligned compliance and audit-grade reporting
  • Buy-and-hold profiles benefiting from Poland's tax treatment
  • Sophisticated retail and family-office treasurers
Wrong fit — look elsewhere
  • Derivatives / perpetuals traders (use a regulated futures venue instead)
  • Privacy-focused users avoiding KYC (these are licensed venues)
  • Day-traders chasing the lowest spreads regardless of regulator posture
  • Anyone needing a service KNF does not currently authorise

General guidance for Poland: the ranking engine does not compute these notes and they do not change the order below. If none fits you, answer the Find My Best questions for a result for your profile.

3 crypto-backed loans listed for Poland

In ChainChoice’s published ranking order, from this category’s 5 providers: those whose terms exclude Poland are removed; naming Poland or a region that covers it counts the same, and those whose terms do not state it come last. Each chip names the basis: a dated check, a region listing, or the provider's own claim.

  1. #1 for PolandFigure#1 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Figure Markets' binding Terms of Service keep title to pledged crypto with the borrower and bar its sale, loan or hypothecation unless the borrower instructs it, in a per-loan wallet partition — but Figure's 2025 annual report on Form 10-K says the loan collateral "is in the Company’s control" and that the Company "has the ability to rehypothecate, stake, lend or otherwise use" it, and only that it "does not have a practice" of doing so; no Figure crypto-backed loan agreement is public, so the borrower's insolvency rank is unstated.

    Lender of record and lending licence — 7/10Margin call and forced sale — 6/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Figure · figure.com.

  2. #2 for PolandLedn#2 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Ledn publishes its USD loan agreement, and the agreement says title to your bitcoin passes to Ledn, that Ledn may pledge it onward, that you rank as an unsecured creditor, and that you still owe the shortfall after a forced sale.

    Computable cost before you apply — 7/10Collateral title and reuse — 5/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Ledn · ledn.io.

  3. #3 for PolandNexo#4 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Nexo's Credit Line is not a secured loan: the binding agreement transfers legal title of your bitcoin to Nexo on deposit, the borrower irrevocably waives any secured claim in Nexo's insolvency, and liquidation may happen without notice against a threshold Nexo publishes nowhere.

    Computable cost before you apply — 3/10Lender of record and lending licence — 2/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Nexo · nexo.com.

Commission: None of these providers pays ChainChoice anything for these links. Disclosure

Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Oracle failure: a wrong price or outcome liquidates or settles a position.
    Scored by Who sets the price that liquidates you, how long do you really get, and can they sell without telling you? · 26% (Figure 6/10, Ledn 4/10, Nexo 1/10)
  • Insolvency failure: the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.
    Scored by If the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? · 34% (Figure 5/10, Ledn 5/10, Nexo 1/10)
  • Regulatory failure: no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.
    Scored by Which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? · 18% (Figure 7/10, Ledn 5/10, Nexo 2/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Execution failure, Exit failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply? (22%).

Each cell is verified against the provider's filings or the KNF register; a gap shows "—", never an estimate.

Fee, KYC, rails and licence by provider in Poland
ProviderTaker fee in PolandKYC tierPLN railsKNF license
#1Figure————
#2Ledn————
#3Nexo————

Source: ChainChoice provider catalog cross-referenced with the KNF register; each fee as of its entry's latest verification (accuracy methodology).

Is using a crypto-backed loan legal in Poland?

Yes. Poland regulates crypto-asset service providers under MiCA (EU Regulation 2023/1114), enforced from 30 December 2024. KNF oversees crypto-backed loans operating in Poland; only providers authorised under MiCA may serve retail clients. Verify any provider against ESMA’s interim MiCA register.

How is crypto taxed in Poland?

Crypto gains taxed at a flat 19% under the capital gains category. Losses can offset other crypto gains within the same year. Editorial summary, not tax advice: consult a qualified tax advisor in Poland before filing.

What payment methods work for buying crypto in Poland?

The most common rails for retail onramps in Poland are: SEPA, BLIK, Przelewy24.

Are international platforms (Coinbase, Kraken, Binance) available in Poland?

Coinbase and Kraken hold MiCA authorisation valid in Poland. Binance does not: no Binance entity is on ESMA's register (read 10 November 2026); every transitional period ended by 1 July 2026, so none covers it there.

Who supervises crypto services in Poland

No authority is designated yet to authorise crypto-asset service providers in Poland. The authorities below supervise only the remit shown.

  • KNF · Komisja Nadzoru Finansowegoe-money tokens onlyRead on knf.gov.pl

Authorities read . Each source is re-read within 180 days, or the build fails.

Country data verifiednot publishedSourceKNF ↗Methodology v2026.11.1
Best crypto-backed loans — other countries