Skip to main content

Best crypto-backed loans in 2026

Crypto-Backed Loans evaluated across what price gets you liquidated, and how far can it drift?, who sets your rate — a utilisation curve or a curator?, if one market goes bad, how much of yours goes with it?, and has it lost lender money before, and did it publish it?.

#1 of 5 · published ranking
Figure
79ChainChoice Score
Why it leads
2 points ahead of Ledn: +2.2 pts lender of record and lending licence, +1.6 pts margin call and forced sale
Cost
Not priced · No comparable price is published
5 compared Ranking-blind · 392 modules checked 2026-09-18Evidence read 2026-08-19Scored under methodology v2026.09.15 (2026-09-16)20 receipts quoted
5crypto-backed loans · sorted by chainchoice score
ranked before any payout data is seen
#1 overallcomputed before any payout data is seenOverall
Figure
The only lender in this pool whose collateral-custody terms are a loadable binding contract leaving title with the borrower — and the only one whose no-rehypothecation covenant binds a company its own disclosures say is not the lender.
Wins the weighted total without leading any single criterion
79ChainChoice Score · first of 5
Catalog strengths
Lender of record and lending licenceMargin call and forced sale
Why it leads
  • 2 points ahead of Ledn: +2.2 pts lender of record and lending licence, +1.6 pts margin call and forced sale
  • Provider states broad availability
  • Lender of record and lending licence 7/10 (weight 18%)
Evidence
4/4
criteria scored · 4 receipts quoted
Margin
+2
over Ledn, ranked #02
Rank stability
Firm
#1 holds when every published criterion is moved ±1
Tradeoff
−1
Can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply? — behind this pool's best
Jurisdiction
Global
no restricted market on record
Score breakdowntick = pool best
Collateral title and reuse5/10
Margin call and forced sale6/10
Computable cost before you apply6/10
Lender of record and lending licence7/10
Ranking-blind · a guided run tailors this to your size, custody & jurisdiction
#ProviderScoreEvidenceKey strengths
2−2
Ledn
Computable cost before you applyCollateral title and reuse
3−1
Milo
Milo
Computable cost before you applyMargin call and forced sale
4−4
SALT Lending
Lender of record and lending licenceMargin call and forced sale
5−19
Nexo
Nexo
Computable cost before you applyLender of record and lending licence
Ranking-blind — order computed before any payout data is joined
Below the table

How this ranking works

Everything the table draws on continues here: how firm the #1 is, the per-criterion arithmetic behind each score, who pays ChainChoice, and the full guide to choosing.

Direct answer

What is the best crypto-backed loans in 2026?

Figure ranks #1 overall for crypto-backed loans on ChainChoice. The only lender in this pool whose collateral-custody terms are a loadable binding contract leaving title with the borrower — and the only one whose no-rehypothecation covenant binds a company its own disclosures say is not the lender. It holds that rank under an affiliate-blind methodology scored across 4 published, weighted criteria — the code that ranks providers physically cannot read affiliate payouts (CI-enforced), so a payout can't move a rank. The verdict re-computes on every fee change, incident, or regulatory action; full reasoning and the audit receipt are below.

Best picks

Best crypto-backed loans in 2026

Weighted on collateral title and reuse (34), margin call and forced sale (26), computable cost before you apply (22), and lender of record and lending licence (18). The heaviest question is the simplest one: while the loan is open, is the bitcoin still yours, and may the lender lend it to someone else? Not one of the five clears 5 out of 10 there, and for all five it is their own worst score. Advertised APR is not the axis — a rate you can compute matters, but the coin coming back matters more.
Best overall
Figure
The only lender in this pool whose collateral-custody terms are a loadable binding contract leaving title with the borrower — and the only one whose no-rehypothecation covenant binds a company its own disclosures say is not the lender.
Data checked Aug 2026
The only lender in this pool whose collateral-custody terms are a loadable binding contract leaving title with the borrower — and the only one whose no-rehypothecation covenant binds a company its own disclosures say is not the lender. Strongest on which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? (7/10): VERIFIED 2026-08-19. THE DEEPEST LENDING-LICENCE DISCLOSURE IN THIS POOL, AND NOT ONE LINE RESOLVED ON A REGISTER FROM THIS ENVIRONMENT. CREDITOR NAMED PER LEG [both verbatim confirmed]: 'Crypto loans are offered to U.S. Weakest on if the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? (5/10): VERIFIED 2026-08-19. BINDING CUSTODY CONTRACT READ, NOT A HOMEPAGE. Figure Markets General Terms of Service (HTTP 200, 283,652 bytes — byte count reproduced exactly, 'Last Updated: July 8, 2026'), Appendix B Exchange Terms, govern the CBL collateral. Published price: RATE CARD, VERBATIM, https://www.figure.com/crypto-backed-loan/ (HTTP 200, 490,586 bytes, re-fetched 2026-08-19, byte count reproduced) — the vendor publishes TWO, in the same file, in the same fetch. CONFIRMED ON VERIFICATION.
Best for: Lender of record and lending licence — 7/10
Why this score4 published criteria · leads 2 of 4
Published criterionWtScore, and the best hereGap/10Pts
If the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then?8.2·55.4
Who sets the price that liquidates you, how long do you really get, and can they sell without telling you?6.2·65.0
Can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply?5.3−164.2
Which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend?4.3−174.0
Σ methodology points18.7/32

Each bar is the score on that criterion’s own 0–10 scale, never rescaled to the pool. The dark line is the best any product here reached on that axis. Wt is the most the criterion can add to the 86-point weighted total. Pts is weight × score × 32; the sum is the methodology score, and each weighted point behind the leader costs 2.6 on the displayed score. how these are weighted

Considered and not ranked
8 products we looked at and left out
A shortlist is only honest if it says who it turned away. Each of these was assessed against the same published criteria as the ranked table and excluded for a stated reason — not overlooked.
We assessed 12 products here and rank 4 — 33% of what we looked at. That share is of the products we assessed, not of the category: how many exist is not something we can count, so we do not claim a number for it.
DeFi money markets, BY NAME: Aave, Compound, Morpho, Spark, Euler, Venus, Kamino and Fluid — every one of the eight already ranked in lending_borrowingExchange- and broker-branded credit where the collateral goes into a public lending protocol, or where the borrowed amount cannot leave the venue: Coinbase Bitcoin-backed loans (cbBTC posted to a Morpho market), Binance Margin, Bybit, OKX and Kraken margin lines, and any front end over Aave, Morpho or Spark· Ranked elsewhereLoans where the collateral never leaves the borrower's control, BY NAME: Firefish, Debifi, Hodl Hodl Lend, Liquidium, and every DLC-, PSBT- or 2-of-2-based bitcoin loanUndercollateralised and underwritten institutional credit already ranked in private_credit: Maple, Clearpool, Goldfinch, Centrifuge, Pareto, Huma Finance, Kasu FinanceThe EARN and yield side of the same brands: Nexo Earn, Ledn Growth Accounts, SALT's interest-bearing product, and every deposit product on a lender's balance sheet· Ranked elsewhereThe card, not the loan: the Nexo Card, Crypto.com and Wirex card products and every crypto-backed credit or debit card line· Ranked elsewhereLoans whose primary lien is on real property or another off-chain asset: crypto-collateralised mortgages and HELOCs (Milo, Figure home-equity products)NFT-collateralised lending, already ranked in nft_lending
Why it ranks first
Why Figure leads this category right now
The only lender in this pool whose collateral-custody terms are a loadable binding contract leaving title with the borrower — and the only one whose no-rehypothecation covenant binds a company its own disclosures say is not the lender. Strongest on which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? (7/10): VERIFIED 2026-08-19. THE DEEPEST LENDING-LICENCE DISCLOSURE IN THIS POOL, AND NOT ONE LINE RESOLVED ON A REGISTER FROM THIS ENVIRONMENT. CREDITOR NAMED PER LEG [both verbatim confirmed]: 'Crypto loans are offered to U.S. Weakest on if the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? (5/10): VERIFIED 2026-08-19. BINDING CUSTODY CONTRACT READ, NOT A HOMEPAGE. Figure Markets General Terms of Service (HTTP 200, 283,652 bytes — byte count reproduced exactly, 'Last Updated: July 8, 2026'), Appendix B Exchange Terms, govern the CBL collateral. Published price: RATE CARD, VERBATIM, https://www.figure.com/crypto-backed-loan/ (HTTP 200, 490,586 bytes, re-fetched 2026-08-19, byte count reproduced) — the vendor publishes TWO, in the same file, in the same fetch. CONFIRMED ON VERIFICATION.
Best for
Lender of record and lending licence — 7/10
Main tradeoff
Two things, and the first is the one a borrower would resent most because they relied on it before sending the coin. Figure's product page promises 'Your collateral is held by our qualified custodian and will never be rehypothecated.' — but the string 'rehypothec' does not appear once in the 283,652 bytes of the binding Figure Markets General Terms of Service (independently re-run 2026-08-19: 0 hits), and the covenant that DOES exist there — 'neither Figure nor the operators of any MPC Nodes will sell, transfer, loan, hypothecate or otherwise alienate supported Digital Assets in your Digital Asset Wallet unless instructed to do so by you' — binds 'Figure', which those Terms define as 'Figure Markets Holdings, Inc., and its affiliates (including Figure Payments Corporation)'. The company that actually becomes the borrower's creditor is Figure Lending LLC, and Figure's own disclosure says 'Figure Lending is not affiliated with Figure Markets Holdings, Inc., Figure Technologies, LLC or any of its subsidiaries.' On pledge, that same lender becomes the UCC-8 'entitlement holder' of the collateral. So the borrower keeps title, gets a per-loan segregated sub-wallet and a watchable address — genuinely good, and all of it confirmed in a binding document — while the promise they bought is written against a different company, the loan agreement that would bind the real one is never published, and the words 'bankrupt' and 'insolven' return zero hits across the only binding document they can read. Second, the cost: a borrower who reads '9.999% APR' and 'twelve monthly payments of $74.25' is quoted the path they are NOT put on. 'By default, borrowers are opted into an interest-deferral feature' under which 'Accrued interest continues to compound during the deferral period' — they must actively opt out to get the loan whose APR they were shown, and no rate on the marketing page prices the compounding one. Compounding that, the same URL serves two different rate cards in a single load: the rendered page says 8.91%/11.50%, its own JSON-LD says 9.9%/12.4%.
Verify before signup
RATE CARD, VERBATIM, https://www.figure.com/crypto-backed-loan/ (HTTP 200, 490,586 bytes, re-fetched 2026-08-19, byte count reproduced) — the vendor publishes TWO, in the same file, in the same fetch. CONFIRMED ON VERIFICATION. (A) Rendered disclosure block: '**Repayment Period (Minimum-Maximum):** 12 months' / '**Maximum APR:** 12.62% APR (APR includes interest plus applicable fees such as the 1% origination fee). Available interest rates for Figure's Crypto-Backed Loan are 8.91% (9.999% APR) at 50% LTV or 11.50% (12.62% APR) up to 75%.' / '**Representative Example (Total Cost):** As an example, a borrower receives a Crypto Backed Loan at 50% LTV of $10,000 for a term of 12 months, with an interest rate of 8.91% and a 1% origination fee of $100, for an APR of 9.999%. In this example, the borrower will receive $10,000 and will make 12 monthly payments of $74.25. Rates will be higher for applications secured by assets with a higher LTV ratio. The Figure Crypto-Backed Loan has a 12 month interest-only repayment term and allows for a maximum initial LTV ratio of 75%. Interest rates change frequently so your exact interest rate will depend on the date you apply and may depend on many factors such as LTV ratio.' (B) The single application/ld+json block in the SAME file, SAME load — isolated from the body and confirmed: 'You can borrow up to 75% of the value of your crypto at a fixed interest rates of 9.9% at 50% or below or 12.4% up to 75%.' The body carries the same sentence updated to '8.91% (9.999% APR) at 50%'. Machine-readable and human-readable prices disagree. COMPARISON TABLE ROWS — READ BY RAW COLUMN KEY ON VERIFICATION. Figure is column two (carries Figure's rate, Figure's custodian, Figure's restricted states, 'Founded 2018'). Figure's own cells: 'Interest rates' = '8.91% (9.999% APR)<sup>2</sup> @ 50%'; 'Origination fee' = '1%<sup>2</sup>'; 'Supported assets' = 'BTC, ETH, SOL'; 'Custodian' = 'Decentralized, MPC custody'; 'Term length' = '1 year'; 'Restricted US states (retail)' = 'DC, ID, IL, KY, MD, MS, SD, TX, VT, and VA'. Table footnote: 'Chart based on 3rd party review conducted in July 2026.' CORRECTION TO THE PRIOR DRAFT: 'Up to 2 years' was cited as Figure's term row contradicting the '12 months' disclosure. It is colFourValue — a COMPETITOR's cell (custodian 'Anchorage', 'Founded 2022'). Figure's own term row reads '1 year' and is CONSISTENT with the 12-month disclosure. No term contradiction exists. LTV TIERS — SCOPED, NOT FLATLY CONTRADICTORY: 'We allow an initial loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of up to 75%.' and 'allows for a maximum initial LTV ratio of 75%' are the product's cap. 'The maximum loan-to-value ("LTV") ratio is 50% at origination.' is real but sits inside the liquidation-protection footnote (which opens 'Liquidation protection is only available in CA, NY, FL, PA, AL, AK, GA, HI, MA, UT.') and recurs on figure.com/liquidation-protection-disclosures/ scoped to that optional programme. Residual ambiguity: the footnote names 'The Figure Crypto Backed Loan (CBL)' without flagging that the 50% is programme-specific. MARGIN / LIQUIDATION TIERS, https://www.figure.com/faqs/crypto-backed-loans/ (HTTP 200, 163,549 bytes, byte count reproduced) — ladder block re-extracted contiguously and confirmed character-exact: 'Ranges for loans with an initial 50% LTV:' '* LTV ≥ 75% → courtesy notice that you may soon receive a margin call' '* LTV ≥ 80% → receive margin call and must cure to ≤ initial LTV within 48 hours*' '* LTV ≥ 90% → automatic liquidation'. 'Ranges for loans with an initial 75% LTV:' '* LTV ≥ 80% → courtesy notice that you may soon receive a margin call' '* LTV ≥ 85% → receive margin call and must cure to ≤ initial LTV within 48 hours*' '* LTV ≥ 90% → automatic liquidation'. OTHER FEES: 'A 2% liquidation fee is applicable in certain regions, which is disclosed in your loan offer documents when a CBL is taken out.' / 'A renewal fee may be charged if you opt to renew.' / 'You can prepay your loan at any time without penalty.' / 'Crypto Loans starts at a minimum of $5,000, subject to state and jurisdiction-specific legal limitations.' (all figure.com/faqs/crypto-backed-loans/, verified 2026-08-19). UNPRICED: 'A one-time, non-refundable Protection Fee is paid at loan origination to enroll in the Liquidation Protection Program' (figure.com/liquidation-protection-disclosures/) — no rate or amount published anywhere. THE PAGE THAT HIDES THE REAL DOCUMENT: no Crypto-Backed Loan Agreement is served on figure.com or figuremarkets.com. https://www.figure.com/crypto-backed-loan-agreement/ = HTTP 404 and https://www.figure.com/disclosures/crypto/ = HTTP 404 (both re-tested 2026-08-19); the agreement is referenced only as 'subject to all terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement' (figure.com/liquidation-protection-disclosures/).
Recommendation summary
What should decide this category
While the loan is open, who holds the bitcoin — and does the contract let them re-pledge or lend it out?
At a margin call, who decides, how much notice do you get, and who sells?
Can you compute the total cost from published numbers before you apply, or only after a call?
Quick picks
Strong options in this category
Start with the lead choice first, then use the shortlist only if you still need a challenger or stronger fit for a specific setup.
Best overall
Figure
The only lender in this pool whose collateral-custody terms are a loadable binding contract leaving title with the borrower — and the only one whose no-rehypothecation covenant binds a company its own disclosures say is not the lender.
The only lender in this pool whose collateral-custody terms are a loadable binding contract leaving title with the borrower — and the only one whose no-rehypothecation covenant binds a company its own disclosures say is not the lender. Strongest on which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? (7/10): VERIFIED 2026-08-19. THE DEEPEST LENDING-LICENCE DISCLOSURE IN THIS POOL, AND NOT ONE LINE RESOLVED ON A REGISTER FROM THIS ENVIRONMENT. CREDITOR NAMED PER LEG [both verbatim confirmed]: 'Crypto loans are offered to U.S. Weakest on if the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? (5/10): VERIFIED 2026-08-19. BINDING CUSTODY CONTRACT READ, NOT A HOMEPAGE. Figure Markets General Terms of Service (HTTP 200, 283,652 bytes — byte count reproduced exactly, 'Last Updated: July 8, 2026'), Appendix B Exchange Terms, govern the CBL collateral. Published price: RATE CARD, VERBATIM, https://www.figure.com/crypto-backed-loan/ (HTTP 200, 490,586 bytes, re-fetched 2026-08-19, byte count reproduced) — the vendor publishes TWO, in the same file, in the same fetch. CONFIRMED ON VERIFICATION.
Best for: Lender of record and lending licence — 7/10
If the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? · 34%
5/10
Who sets the price that liquidates you, how long do you really get, and can they sell without telling you? · 26%
6/10
Can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply? · 22%
6/10
Which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? · 18%
7/10
Quick pick
Ledn
The only lender in this pool that publishes its master loan agreement, and the agreement says title to your bitcoin passes to Ledn, that Ledn may pledge it onward, that you rank as an unsecured creditor, and that you still owe the shortfall after a forced sale.
The only lender in this pool that publishes its master loan agreement, and the agreement says title to your bitcoin passes to Ledn, that Ledn may pledge it onward, that you rank as an unsecured creditor, and that you still owe the shortfall after a forced sale. Strongest on can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply? (7/10): BAND 7-8, LANDED AT 7. Rate LEVELS are recorded as dated facts below and are not scored. WHAT LEDN GETS RIGHT, AND IT IS MORE THAN ANY OTHER LENDER IN THIS POOL: • THE BINDING DOCUMENT IS PUBLIC BEFORE APPLICATION. Weakest on which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? (5/10): BAND 5-6 — a real registration held by the contracting entity, but for a crypto-service activity rather than for lending — PLACED AT THE FLOOR. (a) THE CREDITOR IS NAMED WITH UNUSUAL PRECISION, and it is not the brand on the door. Published price: THE RATE CARD IS ON THE MARKETING PAGE AND CONTRADICTS ITSELF THREE WAYS. All strings below are server-rendered in one 148,729-byte document at https://ledn.io/bitcoin-backed-loans, HTTP 200, loaded 2026-08-19.
Best for: Computable cost before you apply — 7/10
If the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? · 34%
5/10
Who sets the price that liquidates you, how long do you really get, and can they sell without telling you? · 26%
5/10
Can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply? · 22%
7/10
Which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? · 18%
5/10
Quick pick
Milo
Milo
A Florida NMLS-licensed direct lender (Milo Credit, LLC, NMLS #1811449, CFL 60DBO-128284) that publishes the pool's most complete PRE-APPLICATION number set for a crypto-backed loan — two priced SKUs (8.75% with monthly payments / 8.95% without), a stated 2% origination fee, a 10.75% APR floor, a 2:1 collateral ratio, a 67% LTV margin call, a 72-hour cure and mandated email+dashboard notice — while publishing NO binding loan document at all: the only contract on the site, the Terms of Service, contains ZERO occurrences of collateral, pledge, custodian, rehypothecation, security interest, margin call, liquidation, bankruptcy or insolvency across 117,413 bytes.
A Florida NMLS-licensed direct lender (Milo Credit, LLC, NMLS #1811449, CFL 60DBO-128284) that publishes the pool's most complete PRE-APPLICATION number set for a crypto-backed loan — two priced SKUs (8.75% with monthly payments / 8.95% without), a stated 2% origination fee, a 10.75% APR floor, a 2:1 collateral ratio, a 67% LTV margin call, a 72-hour cure and mandated email+dashboard notice — while publishing NO binding loan document at all: the only contract on the site, the Terms of Service, contains ZERO occurrences of collateral, pledge, custodian, rehypothecation, security interest, margin call, liquidation, bankruptcy or insolvency across 117,413 bytes. Strongest on can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply? (7/10): THE RATE LEVEL IS NOT SCORED; what is scored is that a non-customer can actually arrive at a number, and on Milo they can. Weakest on if the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? (4/10): NO GOVERNING DOCUMENT WAS READ BECAUSE MILO PUBLISHES NONE, AND THE ARCH PRECEDENT IN THE SPEC BINDS: every ownership, segregation and no-reuse claim Milo makes lives on a marketing, FAQ or glossary page, and the spec's 3-4 band names 'the only segregation claim is on a marketing page' as a literal trigger. Published price: THE RATE CARD, quoted character-exact from https://www.milo.io/crypto-loan/ (HTTP 200, 188,627 bytes, loaded anonymously 2026-08-19 — no KYC, no wallet, no email): Comparison table: 'Loan amount | Starting at $5,000 | Starting at $275,000' ; 'Interest rates…
Best for: Computable cost before you apply — 7/10
If the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? · 34%
4/10
Who sets the price that liquidates you, how long do you really get, and can they sell without telling you? · 26%
6/10
Can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply? · 22%
7/10
Which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? · 18%
5/10
Quick pick
SALT Lending
The longest-running US crypto-backed lender (since 2016) and the only one in this pool that publishes a real two-axis rate card (LTV tier x term), an explicit zero-fee schedule and a 26-row lending-licence table (25 states + DC) with numbers and Active status — sitting on top of a Terms of Use that grants the lender an express, unbounded right to 'repledge, sell or otherwise transfer or use' the borrower's collateral, a marketing page that flatly denies rehypothecation, an unpublished Loan and Security Agreement that governs over both, and SALT's own disclosure that it paused platform withdrawals on 15 November 2022 and had to have its California lending licence reinstated under a DFPI consent order effective 15 January 2025.
The longest-running US crypto-backed lender (since 2016) and the only one in this pool that publishes a real two-axis rate card (LTV tier x term), an explicit zero-fee schedule and a 26-row lending-licence table (25 states + DC) with numbers and Active status — sitting on top of a Terms of Use that grants the lender an express, unbounded right to 'repledge, sell or otherwise transfer or use' the borrower's collateral, a marketing page that flatly denies rehypothecation, an unpublished Loan and Security Agreement that governs over both, and SALT's own disclosure that it paused platform withdrawals on 15 November 2022 and had to have its California lending licence reinstated under a DFPI consent order effective 15 January 2025. Strongest on which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? (8/10): THE STRONGEST LENDING-LICENCE DISCLOSURE IN THIS POOL BY A WIDE MARGIN - AND NOT ONE NUMBER RESOLVED, SO 9-10 IS NOT AWARDABLE. Read the caveat before relying on this score. (a) THE CREDITOR IS NAMED UNAMBIGUOUSLY, AND IT IS NOT THE BRAND ON THE DOOR. Weakest on if the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? (1/10): BOTTOM BAND ON TWO INDEPENDENT 0-2 TRIGGERS, THEN A MANDATORY BAND DEDUCTION. Published price: SALT publishes the most complete pre-application rate card in this pool AND CONTRADICTS IT ON ANOTHER OF ITS OWN PAGES.
Best for: Lender of record and lending licence — 8/10
If the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then? · 34%
1/10
Who sets the price that liquidates you, how long do you really get, and can they sell without telling you? · 26%
6/10
Can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply? · 22%
6/10
Which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend? · 18%
8/10
Frequently asked
Questions people ask before choosing crypto-backed loans
Is my bitcoin still mine while the loan is open?
That is the whole question, and it carries 34 of the 100 points here. It is answered by the loan agreement, not the landing page — and on this page the two disagree more often than not. Two of the five lenders grant themselves an express right to re-pledge, sell or otherwise deal with the borrower's coin in the binding document while their marketing pages deny it, which is why both score 1 out of 10. Read the agreement, and if there is no loan agreement to read, that is the answer.
Why does nobody score above 6 out of 10?
Because the category is graded on documents that bind the lender, and only 8 of the 20 scored cells rest on one — the other 12 rest on marketing pages, FAQs and blog posts. Exactly one lender, Ledn, scores the heaviest criterion against a document whose own URL calls it a loan agreement. The pool mean is 4.58 and the leader is 5.44, and we publish that rather than round it up.
Why is a crypto-backed loan not the same as borrowing on Aave?
Custody. On a DeFi money market the collateral sits in a public contract whose rules and balances anyone can read, and no company can decide to lend it out. Here a company holds your coin and you hold a contractual promise about it. That is a different question with a different failure mode, which is why it is a separate page. The DeFi money markets are ranked under Lending & Borrowing, and every one of them is listed by name with its reason in the 'Considered and not ranked' block on this page.
Are these lenders licensed?
We could not confirm a single one on a public register, and we are publishing that rather than implying otherwise. All five attempts against NMLS Consumer Access or a state regulator failed the same way — an HTTP 403 behind a managed challenge, or a dead API host. So every licensing score on this page rests on what the lender publishes about itself, including the highest one. A blocked register is inconclusive, never proof of a licence and never proof of its absence.
What happens at a margin call?
It varies more than any other mechanic here, which is why it carries 26 points. The questions that separate these lenders are who decides the price, how much notice you get, whether you can top up, and whether the lender sells at its own discretion or by a published rule. A product page that says only 'we will notify you' is not an answer, and is scored as though it were not one.
Free advisorNo signup needed

Still unsure? Get your best crypto-backed loans pick

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — then review the evidence before deciding.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Browse this network
How this ranking is built
Reviewed on if the lender fails, is it your bitcoin or theirs — and what may they do with it before then?, who sets the price that liquidates you, how long do you really get, and can they sell without telling you?, can you compute your total cost, at your tier, before you apply?, and which entity actually becomes your creditor, and does a register say it may lend?.
Data checked Aug 2026 · Independent rankings · We show our work
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
ChainChoice
Compare onchain. A brighter future.
© 2026 ChainChoice. All rights reserved.
System statusFeeds last refreshed 9 days ago
Built from commit ba0993b · rankings.json sha256 e1eb24980abb
ChainChoice · The decision layer for crypto · Not financial adviceEducational analysis, not investment advice. Affiliate links may contribute to operations but never alter rankings.

ChainChoice provides informational content only. Nothing on this site constitutes financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Always do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.