Skip to main content

Head-to-head · DEX Aggregators

OpenOcean vs DODO DODO leads by 7 points.

DODO scores 7 points above OpenOcean on the published criteria (23.6 vs 21.2 points), which this ranking scores from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion. OpenOcean ranks #7 and DODO #5 of 11 published DEX aggregators. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

OpenOcean67
DODO74
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #7 and #5 of 11
Methodology v2026.11.1Ranking snapshot 2 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-OPENOCEAN-VS-DODO-35827fc0
Published verdictRanking snapshot 12 November 2026

DODO leads by 7 points

DODO scores 7 points above OpenOcean on the published criteria (23.6 vs 21.2 points), which this ranking scores from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion.

OpenOcean #7 of 1167
DODO #5 of 1174
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termDODO leads on 0 of 2 published criteria; OpenOcean on 0. The two are level on every published criterion: the whole gap is in the score dimensions below. The terms sum to the gap.
TermDODOOpenOceanWeightPoints
Published criteriaScore dimension23.621.230+6.2for DODO
Net of the terms+6.2
Reproduced gap+6.2
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7467+7.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

  • This ranking scores its published criteria from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion, so they count here as one term and no single criterion is credited.
  • A row-above bound on one row means the criterion arithmetic does not reproduce the displayed gap exactly.
Quick facts

At a glance

3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactOpenOceanDODO
PricingSnapshotFee schedule at the source · source 0.1% taker · read 3 November 2026 · source
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotUnited States, Europe, GlobalUnited States, Europe, Global
Custody modelSnapshotSelf-custodialSelf-custodial
Security postureSnapshotAudited; admin-controlled contracts; partly open source.Audited; upgradeable contracts; partly open source.
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

OpenOcean

Published score 67 #7 of 11
Pick it when
OpenOcean leads DODO on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Broad multi-chain coverage
Tradeoff
Routing engine is not fully open-source

DODO

Published score 74 #5 of 11
Leads
Pick it when
DODO leads on no published criterion; its edge is published criteria (23.6 vs 21.2 points). That is a part of the score outside the published criteria; pick it if that part decides for you.
Strength
Long-running, audited protocol
Tradeoff
A 2021 hack hit a separate V2 Crowdpooling contract (not the SmartTrade aggregator) — a mark on the wider team record to weigh
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

OpenOcean

OpenOcean leads DODO on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
DODOLeads

DODO leads OpenOcean on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 860 of 4 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Security

weight 14.4 of 86Not scored
OpenOceanNot scored

No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.

DODONot scored

No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.

Trust

weight 9.6 of 86Not scored
OpenOceanNot scored

No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.

DODONot scored

No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
OpenOcean14/20DODO14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
OpenOcean21.2/30DODO23.6/30
DODO leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
OpenOcean2.7/10DODO2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
OpenOcean3.2/8DODO3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
OpenOcean5.5/18DODO5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose DODO unless the term OpenOcean leads on is the one you are buying.

OpenOcean leads DODO on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Contract failure: the code holding the funds is exploited.
    Scored by Security & track record · 60%
  • Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Trust-minimization · 40%
Not assessed by this ranking: Custody failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

DODO scores 7 points above OpenOcean on the published criteria (23.6 vs 21.2 points), which this ranking scores from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion. Published scores, out of 100: OpenOcean 67 (rank 7 of 11 dex aggregators), DODO 74 (rank 5 of 11).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.11.1
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research