OpenOcean scores 2 points above Bebop on the published criteria (21.2 vs 20.2 points), which this ranking scores from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion. Bebop ranks #9 and OpenOcean #7 of 11 published DEX aggregators. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
BEBebop65
vs
OpenOcean67
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #9 and #7 of 11
Published verdictRanking snapshot 12 November 2026
OpenOcean leads by 2 points
OpenOcean scores 2 points above Bebop on the published criteria (21.2 vs 20.2 points), which this ranking scores from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion.
BEBebop #9 of 1165
OpenOcean #7 of 1167
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termOpenOcean leads on 0 of 2 published criteria; Bebop on 0. The two are level on every published criterion: the whole gap is in the score dimensions below. The terms sum to the gap.
TermOpenOceanBebopWeightPoints
Published criteriaScore dimension21.220.230+2.6for OpenOcean
Net of the terms+2.6
Reproduced gap+2.6
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6765+2.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
This ranking scores its published criteria from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion, so they count here as one term and no single criterion is credited.
A row-above bound on one row means the criterion arithmetic does not reproduce the displayed gap exactly.
OpenOceanScore 67Full-chain aggregator across DEXs + CEXs — pathfinding routingStrength: Broad multi-chain coverageWatch-out: Routing engine is not fully open-sourceBebopScore 65RFQ aggregator — gasless, market-maker pricedStrength: Firm quotes via the RFQ API, gasless trading in the appWatch-out: RFQ pricing relies on trusting professional market makers; no governance token, a single-account router owner and a single-key-upgradeable Solana program
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactBebopOpenOcean
PricingSnapshot0.1% taker · read 3 November 2026 · source Fee schedule at the source · source
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotUnited States, Europe, GlobalUnited States, Europe, Global
Custody modelSnapshotSelf-custodialSelf-custodial
Security postureSnapshotExtensively audited; admin-controlled contracts; partly open source.Audited; admin-controlled contracts; partly open source.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
BE
Bebop
Published score 65 #9 of 11
Pick it when
Bebop leads OpenOcean on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Firm quotes via the RFQ API, gasless trading in the app
Tradeoff
RFQ pricing relies on trusting professional market makers; no governance token, a single-account router owner and a single-key-upgradeable Solana program
OpenOcean
Published score 67 #7 of 11
Leads
Pick it when
OpenOcean leads on no published criterion; its edge is published criteria (21.2 vs 20.2 points). That is a part of the score outside the published criteria; pick it if that part decides for you.
Strength
Broad multi-chain coverage
Tradeoff
Routing engine is not fully open-source
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
BEBebop
Bebop leads OpenOcean on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
BebopScore 65RFQ aggregator — gasless, market-maker pricedStrength: Firm quotes via the RFQ API, gasless trading in the appWatch-out: RFQ pricing relies on trusting professional market makers; no governance token, a single-account router owner and a single-key-upgradeable Solana program
OpenOceanLeads
OpenOcean leads Bebop on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
OpenOceanScore 67Full-chain aggregator across DEXs + CEXs — pathfinding routingStrength: Broad multi-chain coverageWatch-out: Routing engine is not fully open-source
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 860 of 4 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Security
weight 14.4 of 86Not scored
BebopNot scored
No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.
OpenOceanNot scored
No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.
Trust
weight 9.6 of 86Not scored
BebopNot scored
No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.
OpenOceanNot scored
No evidence cell for this criterion, so no strength is drawn.
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Bebop14/20OpenOcean14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Bebop20.2/30OpenOcean21.2/30
OpenOcean leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Bebop2.7/10OpenOcean2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Bebop3.2/8OpenOcean3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Bebop5.5/18OpenOcean5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose OpenOcean unless the term Bebop leads on is the one you are buying.
Bebop leads OpenOcean on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Contract failure: the code holding the funds is exploited.
Scored by Security & track record · 60%
Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
Scored by Trust-minimization · 40%
Not assessed by this ranking: Custody failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
OpenOcean scores 2 points above Bebop on the published criteria (21.2 vs 20.2 points), which this ranking scores from the record as a whole, not criterion by criterion. Published scores, out of 100: Bebop 65 (rank 9 of 11 dex aggregators), OpenOcean 67 (rank 7 of 11).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
