Provider at a glance
- Category
- Crypto Subscriptions
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- docs.superfluid.org
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 74 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Superfluid Money Streaming
Per-second money streaming
Crypto Subscriptions
#2 Overall
Ranked #2 of 9 crypto subscriptions in the published ranking
74
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is Superfluid Money Streaming right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?8/10; the category best is 9
Look elsewhere if these come first
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?3/10 here; Request Network Recurring Payments scores 7
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?8/10 here; the category best is 10
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?6/10 here; Request Network Recurring Payments scores 9
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto subscription platform shows where it lands for you.
What will Superfluid Money Streaming cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Payments per month
- 500
- Average payment
- $100
How safe is Superfluid Money Streaming?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Superfluid Money Streaming
Compare all 4- 3Request Network Recurring Payments1 point below · stronger on renewal failure path (7 against 3)73$5,400
- 4Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions)2 points below · stronger on what the mandate permits (7 against 6)72$0.00
- 5Sablier Flow3 points below · stronger on what the mandate permits (7 against 6)71$5,940
For your setup
Find out if Superfluid Money Streaming fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Superfluid Money Streaming lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best crypto subscription platformNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Superfluid Money Streaming ranks #2
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (20.0 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
288+7.175.09#2/9Loading evidence…
263+2.503.09#5/9Loading evidence…
248+6.146.010#3/9Loading evidence…
226+4.226.09#5/9Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−6behind Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program, #1
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 72–76 and ranks #2–#3
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Superfluid Money Streaming’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it? 3 → 7 on its ladder · passes Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program+480#2 → #1
My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run? 8 → 7 on its ladder · Request Network Recurring Payments passes it−172#2 → #3
The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it? 3 → 2 on its ladder · Request Network Recurring Payments passes it−172#2 → #3
If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today? 8 → 7 on its ladder · Request Network Recurring Payments passes it−172#2 → #3
Smallest climb: “The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?” 3 → 7 passes Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program, #1.
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run? — 8/10, category best 9/10
Tradeoffs
3 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it? — 3/10 against a category best of 9/10
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today? — 8/10 against a category best of 10/10
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that? — 6/10 against a category best of 9/10
Record watch-outs
- A temporary shortfall does not delay your revenue — it permanently deletes the subscription, and a stranger is paid to make that happen fast. The moment your customer's Super Token balance touches zero, 'the permissions on the stream now allow anyone to close it', and Superfluid pays a bounty to whoever gets there first inside a '30 minutes patrician period'. There is no retry, no grace, no reminder and no cure path anywhere in the docs; once a sentinel closes the flow the mandate is gone and only the customer can recreate it. Worse for the merchant's accounting, the unconsumed buffer is not yours — 'When the stream is closed, any remaining buffer is taken and assigned/distributed either to the PIC or a Pleb .' So an ordinary involuntary-churn event that a fiat processor would recover with a 3-day dunning cycle becomes, here, a hard cancellation executed by an anonymous third party within half an hour, plus a forfeited deposit. The correct way to buy Superfluid is as a rail with an exceptionally honest and well-instrumented failure mechanic, not as a subscription product — the churn recovery is entirely yours to build.
Competitive position
Where Superfluid Money Streaming leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 914.0 of 20 · pool best
Published criteria#2 / 915.0 of 30 · best 17.3
Friction#1 / 92.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 93.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 98.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Superfluid Money Streaming leads
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?#2 / 9
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?#3 / 9
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Request Network Recurring Payments#3 of 9 · score 73 · 1.0 point behind
Superfluid Money Streaming leads on
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?8 vs 4
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?8 vs 5
Request Network Recurring Payments leads on
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?7 vs 3
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?9 vs 6
Largest single reason Superfluid Money Streaming is ahead: published criteria (+0.8 display points).Scenario cost: Superfluid Money Streaming has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions)#4 of 9 · score 72 · 2.0 points behind
Superfluid Money Streaming leads on
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?8 vs 7
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?3 vs 2
Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions) leads on
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?7 vs 6
Largest single reason Superfluid Money Streaming is ahead: published criteria (+1.8 display points).Scenario cost: Superfluid Money Streaming has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Sablier Flow#5 of 9 · score 71 · 3.0 points behind
Superfluid Money Streaming leads on
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?8 vs 7
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?8 vs 6
Sablier Flow leads on
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?7 vs 6
Largest single reason Superfluid Money Streaming is ahead: published criteria (+3.4 display points).Scenario cost: Superfluid Money Streaming has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
80 vs 74 · gap 6.0Why Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program ranks above Superfluid Money Streaming
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 6.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisSolana Subscriptions Delegation ProgramGap share
Availability · 23% weight14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight15.017.3−6.0, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisSolana Subscriptions Delegation ProgramPoints
My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run? · w2889−0.90, worse
The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it? · w2632+0.83, better
If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today? · w24810−1.54, worse
What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that? · w2268−1.41, worse
Net7480−6.0
Your scenario
Superfluid Money Streaming is not priced for this scenario
Percentage and fixed legs on each payment, for a year. Excludes chargebacks, FX markup and settlement fees priced separately. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Payments per month · your input500
Average payment · your input$100
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 28 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$5,9706 of 9 rows priced
Cheapest priced$0.00 · Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions)Difference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions)
3 of 9 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 28 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #2 to #3 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 28 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?strength 8 · weight 28Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?strength 3 · weight 26Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?strength 8 · weight 24Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?strength 6 · weight 22Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Custody failure (Superfluid Money Streaming 6/10): whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.Scored by What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that? · 22%
- Execution failure (Superfluid Money Streaming 3/10): you get a worse price, later, or nothing.Scored by The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it? · 26%
- Exit failure (Superfluid Money Streaming 8/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today? · 24%
- Information failure (Superfluid Money Streaming 8/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run? · 28%
Not assessed by this ranking: Liveness failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- No price is published; that absence is the finding. https://
superfluid .org /pricing does not exist (HTTP 307 to https:// superfluid .org /, checked 28 September 2026) and the site navigation (fetched 28 September 2026) now reads "Technology Builders Ecosystem Adoptions Governance Contact", with no Pricing item. The page that should carry a price is the Fees & Taxes clause of the Terms of Use (https:// superfluid .org /terms-of-use, "Version: 2", "Latest Reviewed on: 23 April 2025", fetched 28 September 2026), and it names only network gas and tax: "Users acknowledge and agree that they are solely responsible for:" / "any applicable transaction fees, including where applicable blockchain network fees ("gas fees"), associated with using the Site; and" / "determining, reporting, and paying any applicable taxes arising from their receipt or use of the Tokens." The docs FAQ (https:// docs .superfluid .org /docs /faq /, fetched 28 September 2026) is likewise silent on fees. The nearest published cost of use is the capital tied up in the solvency buffer, not a price: "4 hour deposit" on the Polygon / Ethereum Mainnet / Gnosis Chain / Optimism / Arbitrum parameter table, with Ethereum L1 minimums of "ETHx: 0.042 ETHx" and "USDCx & DAIx: 69 tokens" (https:// docs .superfluid .org /docs /protocol /advanced-topics /solvency /liquidations-and-toga, fetched 28 September 2026). No vendor page states the protocol fee is zero, so none is asserted. — no list price is published, so cost cannot be compared before a sales conversation.Superfluid Money Streaming — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDSuperfluid Money Streaming — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- (a) NOBODY STANDS BETWEEN THE TWO WALLETS, AND THE VENDOR SAYS SO IN ITS TERMS, NOT ITS MARKETING. Read on https://
superfluid .org /terms-of-use ('Version: 2', 'Latest Reviewed on: 23 April 2025', read 17 August 2026). - Supported chains
- Ethereum, Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum One, Base, BNB Smart Chain, Avalanche C-Chain, Gnosis Chain, Celo, Scroll, Degen Chain, Sepolia (testnet), Optimism Sepolia (testnet), Scroll Sepolia (testnet), Avalanche Fuji (testnet)
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- STANDARD SANCTIONS/OFAC REPRESENTATION, NOT A REGIONAL FOOTPRINT — with one clause that goes half a step further. Read on https://
superfluid .org /terms-of-use (17 August 2026). The sanctions eligibility rule applies everywhere and names no market: 'you are not subject to sanctions or otherwise designated on any list of prohibited or restricted parties or excluded or denied persons, including but not limited to the lists maintained by:' / 'the United States' Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control;' / 'the United Kingdom's Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation;' / 'the United Nations Security Council;' / 'the European Union or its Member States; or' / 'any other government authority (a "Prohibited Person");'. The suitability disclaimer is also generic, not a restriction: 'The Site is intended for use only by individuals and entities who are legally permitted to send and receive digital assets under the laws applicable to them. The Foundation makes no claims or representations that the Site (or any part thereof) is appropriate in your country or jurisdiction.' THE ONE CLAUSE WORTH FLAGGING implies geo-blocking exists on the Dashboard while naming no country, so it cannot be mapped to any region in the vocabulary: 'you will not use a virtual private network or similar tool to circumvent any geo-blocking and/or other restrictions that we have implemented in connection with the Site. Any such deliberate circumvention, or attempted circumvention, of our controls may permanently disqualify you from accessing the Site, as determined in our sole discretion;'. Also: 'The Foundation reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to determine your eligibility to use the Site.' Note the scope — all of this binds the SITE ('"Site" means superfluid.org and the Dashboard .'), not the protocol, which the same document calls 'decentralised, permissionless, self-operational'. Recorded as 'global' because no market is excluded by name on any page read.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Superfluid Money Streaming: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
10 methodology entries
- 28 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 74, #2 of 9. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt subscriptions:superfluid_streams:2026.10.18:e0e05bf0a22f
Are you Superfluid Money Streaming? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.