Provider at a glance
- Category
- Crypto Subscriptions
- Entity
- All 3 Solana products
- Official website
- solana.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 80 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program
Subscription delegation program on Solana
Crypto Subscriptions
#1 Overall
Ranked #1 of 9 crypto subscriptions in the published ranking
80
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?9/10, the category best
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?10/10, the category best
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?8/10; the category best is 9
Look elsewhere if these come first
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?2/10 here; Request Network Recurring Payments scores 7
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto subscription platform shows where it lands for you.
What will Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Payments per month
- 500
- Average payment
- $100
How safe is Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program
Compare all 4- 2Superfluid Money Streaming6 points below · stronger on renewal failure path (3 against 2)74
- 3Request Network Recurring Payments7 points below · stronger on renewal failure path (7 against 2)73$5,400
- 4Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions)8 points below · weaker on revocation visibility (7 against 9)72$0.00
For your setup
Find out if Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best crypto subscription platformNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why it leads
Why Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program ranks #1
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (23.0 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 2 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
289+8.065.09#1/9Loading evidence…
262+1.663.09#8/9Loading evidence…
2410+7.686.010#1/9Loading evidence…
228+5.636.09#2/9Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin+6over Superfluid Money Streaming, #2
RobustnessHoldsacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 80 and stays #1
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run? 9 → 5 on its ladder · Superfluid Money Streaming passes it−478#1 → #3
If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today? 10 → 6 on its ladder · Superfluid Money Streaming passes it−479#1 → #2
What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that? 8 → 3 on its ladder · Superfluid Money Streaming passes it−578#1 → #3
Strengths
3 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run? — 9/10, the category best
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today? — 10/10, the category best
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that? — 8/10, category best 9/10
Tradeoffs
1 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it? — 2/10 against a category best of 9/10
Record watch-outs
- THE THING THAT WILL ANNOY THE BUYER WHO CHOSE THIS: there is no product here — only a mandate. Everything a recurring-billing operator actually staffs is absent by design, and the program does not merely omit dunning, it publishes the omission: 'There is no spend-time grace period.' No retry, no grace window, no failure event, no overdue state, no reminder, no HTTP webhook, no dashboard, no failureReason enum. A short balance on the second charge is a reverted transaction that the merchant must notice by running its own indexer over self-CPI events. And the notification asymmetry will catch people: the SubscriptionCancelledEvent that makes this the category reference exists ONLY in the subscription-plan model. Revoke a fixed or recurring delegation — 'The delegator can revoke the recurring delegation at any time. Revoking closes the delegation PDA and returns its rent to the signer.' — and the published event list emits nothing at all. The docs site discloses the close-does-not-revoke leak but not the reverse — though the REPOSITORY README does, and a buyer should read it: a subscriber who calls the SPL Token program's Revoke directly on their own token account silently kills the Subscription Authority's approval for EVERY delegation and subscription on that mint simultaneously, while the subscription PDA keeps reading as live. That is the exact silent-revocation failure this category exists to price, and it sits one layer below the layer the vendor documents. [Three further traps the vendor itself discloses, all in its repository README: (i) The SPL-layer approval the Subscription Authority holds is `u64::MAX` — unlimited; every cap you are buying is enforced by program logic, not by the token program. (ii) Revocation is not necessarily final: 'A held init+subscribe bundle survives `revokeSubscriptionAuthority` ... restoring a spendable permission with no new signature.' (iii) A held resume can erase a cancellation within the same billing period. The vendor publishes all three plainly, which is to its credit — but they are in the README, not on the docs pages a buyer is likely to read.]
Competitive position
Where Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 914.0 of 20 · pool best
Published criteria#1 / 917.3 of 30 · pool best
Friction#1 / 92.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 93.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 98.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program leads
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?#1 / 9
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?#1 / 9
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?#2 / 9
Where it trails
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?#8 / 9
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Superfluid Money Streaming#2 of 9 · score 74 · 6.0 points behind
Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program leads on
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?9 vs 8
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?10 vs 8
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?8 vs 6
Superfluid Money Streaming leads on
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?3 vs 2
Largest single reason Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program is ahead: published criteria (+6.0 display points).Scenario cost: Superfluid Money Streaming has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Request Network Recurring Payments#3 of 9 · score 73 · 7.0 points behind
Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program leads on
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?9 vs 4
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?10 vs 5
Request Network Recurring Payments leads on
- The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?7 vs 2
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?9 vs 8
Largest single reason Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program is ahead: published criteria (+6.8 display points).Scenario cost: Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions)#4 of 9 · score 72 · 8.0 points behind
Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program leads on
- My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?9 vs 7
- If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?10 vs 8
- What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?8 vs 7
Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions) leads onNo scored criterion
Largest single reason Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program is ahead: published criteria (+7.8 display points).Scenario cost: Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against #2
80 vs 74 · gap 6.0Why Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program ranks above Superfluid Money Streaming
DimensionThisSuperfluid Money StreamingGap share
Availability · 23% weight14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight17.315.0+6.0, better
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisSuperfluid Money StreamingPoints
My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run? · w2898+0.90, better
The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it? · w2623−0.83, worse
If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today? · w24108+1.54, better
What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that? · w2286+1.41, better
Net8074+6.0
Your scenario
Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program is not priced for this scenario
Percentage and fixed legs on each payment, for a year. Excludes chargebacks, FX markup and settlement fees priced separately. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Payments per month · your input500
Average payment · your input$100
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 28 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$5,9706 of 9 rows priced
Cheapest priced$0.00 · Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions)Difference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with Base Pay Subscriptions (Spend Permissions)
3 of 9 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 28 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessHoldsrank #1 across every one-point re-run
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 28 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run?strength 9 · weight 28Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it?strength 2 · weight 26Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today?strength 10 · weight 24Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that?strength 8 · weight 22Report an error—28 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Custody failure (Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program 8/10): whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.Scored by What exactly did my customer sign away, and what stops it from quietly becoming more than that? · 22%
- Execution failure (Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program 2/10): you get a worse price, later, or nothing.Scored by The second charge fails. What does the provider actually do next, and when do I hear about it? · 26%
- Exit failure (Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program 10/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by If this provider is gone next quarter, do I still get paid — and whose licence is the money moving under today? · 24%
- Information failure (Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program 9/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by My customer kills the allowance at midnight. Am I told, or do I find out at the next billing run? · 28%
Not assessed by this ranking: Liveness failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- No price is published, and that absence is the finding. The Overview (https://
solana .com /docs /payments /subscriptions /overview, fetched 28 September 2026) still runs Purpose / Program ID / Delegation Models / Supported Tokens / On-Chain Events / Versioning / Contributors / Audit Status / Demo Application and carries no pricing, fee or take-rate section; no page under solana.com/docs/payments/subscriptions/* states a protocol fee, and the program has no operator to charge one. The only costs the program's own sources quantify are Solana account rent, and rent is refundable, not a fee: "Closing returns the account's rent to its funder (the user, or whichever payer funded it)." (https:// solana .com /docs /payments /subscriptions /close-subscription-authority, fetched 28 September 2026). The repository README (https:// raw .githubusercontent .com /solana-program /subscriptions /main /README .md, fetched 28 September 2026) states "Rent is recoverable: closing a delegation, plan, or subscription authority returns its rent to the original payer." and tabulates rent in SOL: "Enable authority for a mint" 0.00162864, "Merchant creates a plan" 0.00430824, "Subscribe to a plan" 0.00196968, "Grant fixed delegation" 0.00219240, "Grant recurring delegation" 0.00235944. Not a price of this program: the 9.99 USDC, 30-day plan in the Pay.sh walkthrough (now served at https:// solana .com /docs /payments /pay-sh) is a merchant's demo subscription, not a fee. — no list price is published, so cost cannot be compared before a sales conversation.Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDSolana Subscriptions Delegation Program — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- TOP-BAND EVIDENCE, TWO HALVES, BOTH READ 17 August 2026. (a) A PUSH SIGNAL FOR REVOCATION ITSELF, DISTINCT FROM A FAILED CHARGE. Read on https://
solana .com /docs /payments /subscriptions /overview: 'The program emits on-chain events via self-CPI so indexers and applications can track activity. All events are registered in the published IDL, so generated clients can decode them. - Supported chains
- solana
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- No market restriction and, unusually, no OFAC/sanctions representation either: both were looked for and neither is there. The program itself is permissionless: no page under solana.com/docs/payments/subscriptions/* contains any geographic, KYC or eligibility language, because there is no operator to impose one. The only geographic sentence anywhere in the governing terms is the standard site-access disclaimer at https://
solana .com /tos (read 17 August 2026): 'The information provided on the Site is not intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject us to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country. Accordingly, those persons who choose to access the Site from other locations do so on their own initiative and are solely responsible for compliance with local laws, if and to the extent local laws are applicable.' CLASSIFICATION: this is neither a regional footprint nor the usual OFAC/sanctioned-persons representation — it is a boilerplate disclaimer about the solana.com WEBSITE, and it does not gate the program. A grep of the full ToS text for 'OFAC', 'sanction', 'embargo', 'Specially Designated' and 'prohibited jurisdiction' returned ZERO hits, and for 'custody', 'custodial' and 'money transmi*' also zero. The only other jurisdictional facts are the age gate ('The Service is intended for users who are at least 18 years old.') and the forum ('Arbitration proceedings will be held in Zug, Switzerland.'). Marked `global` accordingly: the sanctions burden here falls on whichever merchant or wallet the buyer integrates, not on the rail.
Legal entity on file: Solana, placed in 3 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
10 methodology entries
- 28 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 80, #1 of 9. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt subscriptions:solana_subscriptions_program:2026.10.18:e0e05bf0a22f
Are you Solana Subscriptions Delegation Program? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.