Provider at a glance
- Category
- Tokenised Equities
- Official website
- docs.ondo.finance
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 58 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Ondo Stocks
Tokenised stocks from Ondo
Tokenised Equities
#3 Overall
Ranked #3 of 8 tokenised equities in the published ranking
58
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is Ondo Stocks right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- US-person answer9/10, the category best
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Share or promise2/10 here; Securitize (tokenized SECZ) scores 10
- Issuer named6/10 here; Securitize (tokenized SECZ) scores 9
- Dividends explained6/10 here; the category best is 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Europe, Asia, Latin America, Middle East & North Africa. Restricted: United States, Canada.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best tokenised equity shows where it lands for you.
What will Ondo Stocks cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Your balance
- $10k
How safe is Ondo Stocks?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Ondo Stocks
Compare all 4- 4Securitize (tokenized SECZ)Level on score · stronger on share or promise (10 against 2)58
- 5Bullish tokenized BLSH sharesLevel on score · stronger on share or promise (8 against 2)58
- 6Dinari dSharesLevel on score · stronger on share or promise (5 against 2)58
For your setup
Find out if Ondo Stocks fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Ondo Stocks lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best tokenised equityNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Ondo Stocks ranks #3
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (16.4 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 1 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
352+2.243.510#5/8Loading evidence…
256+4.807.59#7/8Loading evidence…
226+4.225.58#3/8Loading evidence…
189+5.188.59#1/8Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−2behind Backed xStocks, #2
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 56–61 and ranks #2–#6
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Ondo Stocks’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me? 2 → 3 on its ladder · passes Backed xStocks+161#3 → #2
Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register? 6 → 7 on its ladder · passes Backed xStocks+160#3 → #2
When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get? 6 → 8 on its ladder · passes Backed xStocks+261#3 → #2
Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me? 2 → 1 on its ladder · Securitize (tokenized SECZ) passes it−156#3 → #6
Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register? 6 → 5 on its ladder · Securitize (tokenized SECZ) passes it−157#3 → #6
When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get? 6 → 5 on its ladder · Securitize (tokenized SECZ) passes it−157#3 → #6
Smallest climb: “Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me?” 2 → 3 passes Backed xStocks, #2.
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Can a US person hold this — and does the vendor give me the same answer twice? — 9/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
3 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me? — 2/10 against a category best of 10/10
- Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register? — 6/10 against a category best of 9/10
- When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get? — 6/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- You will pay tax like a BVI shell company for as long as you hold this. Every dividend on every US name in the book is docked 30% before it is reinvested - 'if AAPL paid out $1 in dividend, we'd only receive and reinvest $1 * (1-30%) = $0.70.' - because the withholding rate is set by where the ISSUER is incorporated, not where you live. A German, Singaporean or Brazilian investor holding Apple through a normal broker reclaims most of that under a double-tax treaty. You cannot: you are not the shareholder, you hold a debt instrument, and Ondo's own guidance is that whether you could ever be treated as beneficial owner for withholding purposes 'depends on their particular situation and local laws'. On a 3%-yielding name that is roughly 90bp a year of permanent, uncompensated leakage - four and a half times the 0.20% round-trip cap the KID discloses as the product's total cost, and it is the one cost that is nowhere in the cost table.
Competitive position
Where Ondo Stocks leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#2 / 812.0 of 20 · best 14.0
Published criteria#6 / 812.3 of 30 · best 19.0
Friction#1 / 82.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 83.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 88.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Ondo Stocks leads
- When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get?#3 / 8
- Can a US person hold this — and does the vendor give me the same answer twice?#1 / 8
Where it trails
- Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register?#7 / 8
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Securitize (tokenized SECZ)#4 of 8 · score 58 · same score
Ondo Stocks leads on
- When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get?6 vs 2
- Can a US person hold this — and does the vendor give me the same answer twice?9 vs 8
Securitize (tokenized SECZ) leads on
- Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me?10 vs 2
- Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register?9 vs 6
Largest single reason Ondo Stocks is ahead: availability (+15.6 display points).Scenario cost: Securitize (tokenized SECZ) has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Bullish tokenized BLSH shares#5 of 8 · score 58 · same score
Ondo Stocks leads on
- When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get?6 vs 5
Bullish tokenized BLSH shares leads on
- Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me?8 vs 2
- Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register?8 vs 6
Largest single reason Ondo Stocks is ahead: availability (+15.6 display points).Scenario cost: Bullish tokenized BLSH shares has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Dinari dShares#6 of 8 · score 58 · same score
Ondo Stocks leads on
- Can a US person hold this — and does the vendor give me the same answer twice?9 vs 1
Dinari dShares leads on
- Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me?5 vs 2
- Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register?7 vs 6
Largest single reason Ondo Stocks is ahead: published criteria (+0.8 display points).Scenario cost: Dinari dShares has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
81 vs 58 · gap 23.0Why Superstate Opening Bell ranks above Ondo Stocks
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 23.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisSuperstate Opening BellGap share
Availability · 23% weight12.014.0−5.2, worse
Published criteria · 35% weight12.319.0−17.4, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisSuperstate Opening BellPoints
Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me? · w35210−8.96, worse
Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register? · w2569−2.40, worse
When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get? · w2265+0.70, better
Can a US person hold this — and does the vendor give me the same answer twice? · w1896+1.73, better
Net5881−23.0
Your scenario
Ondo Stocks is not priced for this scenario
The annual management fee on your balance. Excludes performance fees, spreads and any redemption charge. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your balance · your input$10k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 29 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory medianNot priced0 of 8 rows priced
Cheapest pricedNone pricedDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filter
8 of 8 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 29 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #2 to #6 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 29 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me?strength 2 · weight 35Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register?strength 6 · weight 25Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get?strength 6 · weight 22Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Can a US person hold this — and does the vendor give me the same answer twice?strength 9 · weight 18Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Insolvency failure: the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.Scored by Do I own the share, or do I own a promise from whoever sold it to me? · 35% (Ondo Stocks 2/10)Scored by Whose name is on the paper I am buying — and can I look that entity up in a register? · 25% (Ondo Stocks 6/10)
- Regulatory failure (Ondo Stocks 9/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Can a US person hold this — and does the vendor give me the same answer twice? · 18%
- Information failure (Ondo Stocks 6/10): the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by When a dividend or a split happens, does anyone tell you in writing what you will get? · 22%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Custody failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- From the AAPLon PRIIPs Key Information Document (English file 'AAPLon_KID_Ondo_Lexify_12.12.2025 (EN).pdf' inside https://
cdn .sanity .io /files /8k2tqa6n /production /630a1 e519b89411882 c560d77 da760c 1216ea 938 .zip, still linked as 'Key Information Document' from https:// app .ondo .finance /assets /aaplon; 'Date of Production of the KID 11.11.2025'; read on 29 September 2026, HTTP 200), heading '4. WHAT ARE THE COSTS?': "Investment 10'000 USD Annual cost impact if you exit after 5 years Total costs (USD) 20.00 USD Cost Impact 0.20%"; composition table: "Entry costs Up to 0.1% of the market price of the Underlying, at the sole discretion of the Issuer1 10.00 USD", "Exit costs Up to 0.1% of the market price of the Underlying, at the sole discretion of the Issuer2 10.00 USD", "Management fees and admin and operating costs Not applicable 0.00 USD", "Performance Fees Not applicable 0.00 USD". Footnotes 1 and 2: "At present, no fees are charged to Investors. Should fees be applied in the future, such fees will not exceed 0.1% of the market price. Investors will bear no additional costs beyond those explicitly disclosed herein." So the entry/exit charge today is zero and the per-leg figure is a cap the Issuer may switch on at its discretion; https:// docs .ondo .finance /ondo-stocks /overview (same date) still says 'There are no mint or burn fees.' The unpriced leg, on https:// docs .ondo .finance /ondo-stocks /fees-and-taxes (same date): 'When a quote is generated for an investor to buy (or sell) a token, the price may be slightly more (or less) than the price at which Ondo Stocks buys (or sells) the underlying stock, with any difference and any fees being retained by Ondo Stocks. Investors are responsible for their own gas costs.' The dealing spread is never sized. The dividend haircut on the same fees page: 'For dividends from US-based companies, this rate is 30% in accordance with US tax regulations.', worked there as 'if AAPL paid out $1 in dividend, we'd only receive and reinvest $1 * (1-30%) = $0.70.'Ondo Stocks — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDOndo Stocks — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- THE BINDING TEXT NAMES IT A NOTE AND DISCLAIMS OWNERSHIP - FOUR DOCUMENTS, ALL LOADED 19 August 2026, ALL AGREEING. (1) READ ON https://
docs .ondo .finance /ondo-stocks /important-notes (HTTP 200): 'Ondo Stocks provide their holders with economic exposure to the value of their underlying assets, including the value of dividends (less applicable tax withholdings). - Supported chains
- ethereum, bnb-smart-chain, solana
- Markets served
- europe, asia, latam, mena
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- United States, Canada
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- BOTH KINDS OF LANGUAGE ARE PRESENT ON ONE PAGE AND THEY MUST NOT BE CONFLATED. Source for all of the below: https://
docs .ondo .finance /ondo-stocks /eligibility, loaded 19 August 2026. (A) GENUINE MARKET RESTRICTIONS - a real regional footprint, not a sanctions boilerplate. The UNITED STATES is excluded as a securities-law matter under Regulation S, not because of sanctions: 'United States, or any of its states, possessions, territories or federal districts' sits on the Prohibited Persons list, footnoted to 'Rule 902 of Regulation S'. CANADA is on the same prohibited list with no sanctions rationale at all - that is a commercial/regulatory decision. Seven further jurisdictions are open only to professional or qualified classes with published numeric thresholds: EEA and UK ('Professional Client' under MiFID II Annex II Section I, or 'Qualified Investor' under Prospectus Regulation art. 2(1)(e); 'EUR 500,000 financial portfolio'), Switzerland (FinSA 'Professional Client' or 'Institutional Client'), Hong Kong ('HK$8 million portfolio value'), Singapore ('S$2 million net personal assets'), Malaysia ('RM 3 million net personal/joint assets'), Brazil ('R$1 million in financial investments'). UAE access is venue-specific via 'Nest Exchange Limited, a Multilateral Trading Facility for Digital Assets operated by Binance in the Abu Dhabi Global Market' (important-notes). AUSTRALIA is named nowhere in Ondo's eligibility material, so I have NOT tagged 'au'. Africa is not restricted beyond the sanctioned states, but Ondo names no African market, so I have not tagged 'africa'. (B) STANDARD OFAC-SHAPED SANCTIONS REPRESENTATION - an eligibility rule applying everywhere, NOT a regional footprint, and it must not be read as one: Afghanistan, Belarus, Crimea/DNR/LNR/Kherson/Zaporizhzhia/Sevastopol, Cuba, Democratic Republic of Korea, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Russia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria - plus the ordinary 50%-ownership attribution rule: 'if Prohibited Persons, directly or indirectly, hold in the aggregate 50% or more beneficial ownership or control of any entity, such entity may also be ... prohibited'. This is the list nearly every crypto issuer carries.
Legal entity on file: Ondo Finance, placed in 4 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Ondo Stocks: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
10 methodology entries
- 29 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 58, #3 of 8. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.7Forty-one more products are offered only where their own quoted terms serve- fixed 141 country exclusions on 31 rows, each the name of a country the row's own quoted terms exclude: for example Mercuryo Hungary, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Chile, Colombia and Morocco; Gemini Custody the United Kingdom, Australia and the EU after its wind-down; Backed xStocks the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, Nigeria, the Philippines and Venezuela.
- changed Thirteen rows list the only countries their terms serve: Coins.ph the Philippines, Spritz bill pay, Brex, Unchained, WisdomTree, Franklin BENJI and AnchorWatch the United States (with its territories for AnchorWatch), PRYPCO Mint the UAE, N26 crypto seven EU countries, Gemini Tokenized Stocks the EU, XNET the US, Canada and the UK, Coldbit Steel and MetaMask Card the countries they list.
- changed Published (no-country) orders do not move. Country results change: in India six categories each lose one row (bill pay, cards, off-ramps, P2P, seed backup, tokenised real estate), and bill pay there has no row confirmed available, so it shows the published order marked as such; country pages list 23 fewer rows (24,357 to 24,334). The grounding test now matches full country names in any case, which shows seven earlier exclusions were quoted all along: the named debt of unquoted exclusions falls from 40 to 33 pairs.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt tokenised_equities:ondo_global_markets_tokeq:2026.10.18:89fb55ade437
Are you Ondo Stocks? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.