Skip to main content
Country guideSGSGDMAS-licensed

Best crypto staking in Singapore

Audit receipt#cc-SG-STK-2026.09-a6738e07 Methodology §3affiliate economics did not influence this ranking

Kiln ranks highest in ChainChoice’s published staking ranking among the providers that list Singapore. No capital gains tax for individuals. MAS-licensed Digital Payment Token Service Providers required for retail-facing platforms.

RegulatorMASMonetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
CurrencyS$ SGDSingapore Dollar
Payment railsFASTPayNow · Wire
MiCA statusNot applicableLocal framework
Reviewed Next review by Published Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means every product ranked on this page was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Direct answer

Which crypto staking platform should Singapore residents use in November 2026?

Kiln ranks highest in ChainChoice’s published staking ranking among the providers that list Singapore. The order is the published ranking itself; providers whose terms exclude Singapore are removed. Check authorisation with MAS before depositing.

Right fit for this list
  • Singapore residents holding capital in SGD
  • Users who need MAS-aligned compliance and audit-grade reporting
  • Buy-and-hold profiles benefiting from Singapore's tax treatment
  • Sophisticated retail and family-office treasurers
Wrong fit — look elsewhere
  • Derivatives / perpetuals traders (use a regulated futures venue instead)
  • Privacy-focused users avoiding KYC (these are licensed venues)
  • Day-traders chasing the lowest spreads regardless of regulator posture
  • Anyone needing a service MAS does not currently authorise

General guidance for Singapore: the ranking engine does not compute these notes and they do not change the order below. If none fits you, answer the Find My Best questions for a result for your profile.

7 staking listed for Singapore

In ChainChoice’s published ranking order, from this category’s 7 providers: those whose terms exclude Singapore are removed; those silent on it come last. Each chip names the basis: a dated check, a region listing, or the provider's own claim.

  1. #1 for SingaporeKiln#1 globallyProvider states broad availability

    The white-label validator operator running under other firms' staking buttons, with 15 named custody-platform integration guides and a per-network lock-up figure published across 26 protocol docs pages (28 September 2026 count) — but a slashing base layer whose size it has never quantified, a commission printed for only two of those 26 networks, and a governance posture stated for two niche products while the Cosmos-family chains where delegated stake actually votes are left silent.

    Unbonding disclosure — 8/10Governance under custody — 7/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Kiln · kiln.fi.

  2. #2 for SingaporeLuganodes#2 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Institutional non-custodial validator operator on 40+ networks that is the only member of this pool to name a licensed insurer for slashing — confirmed on the Bermuda Monetary Authority's own register — and state the client pays nothing for it, while publishing a commission figure for just three of those networks (TRON, Sui and Hyperliquid on 28 September 2026), no exit-queue figure for Ethereum at all, and a contract that caps its own liability at the fees it collected.

    Slashing indemnity — 9/10Governance under custody — 6/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Luganodes · luganodes.com.

  3. #3 for SingaporeChorus One#3 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Institutional validator operator now trading as Bitwise Onchain Solutions, running non-custodial delegated staking across 30+ proof-of-stake networks, with a named Ledger Enterprise custody integration and a genuinely public per-network commission feed - but a March 2026 contract that disclaims slashing loss entirely, and two different legal entities named on its own site as the staking provider.

    Governance under custody — 9/10Commission transparency — 7/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Chorus One · chorus.one.

  4. #4 for SingaporeFigment#4 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Institutional non-custodial validator operator publishing a 25-network catalog table (28 September 2026 count) with per-network unbonding and 28 named custody integrations, whose only public price is an Ethereum self-serve app fee stated as "10% of total rewards" in an answer that first scopes it to execution-layer rewards, while the institutional contract rate, and the size of its slashing coverage, are both set behind "Meet With Us".

    Unbonding disclosure — 6/10Commission transparency — 6/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Figment · figment.io.

  5. #5 for SingaporeEverstake#5 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Cayman-domiciled non-custodial validator operator claiming 130+ networks and $7B+ staked, which publishes a numeric per-network commission and a 14-day fee-change notice on its own pages without a sales call — while its Terms of Use expressly disclaim all liability for slashing losses and cap total liability at six months of fees, and its pages name no insurer, limit or policy.

    Unbonding disclosure — 7/10Commission transparency — 7/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Everstake · everstake.com.

  6. #6 for SingaporeTwinstake#6 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Cayman-registered, Nethermind- and Webn-backed non-custodial validator operator built exclusively for professional investors (its own briefing notes state "Twinstake does not provide staking services to retail customers"), with a genuinely useful ungated per-protocol lock-up corpus and a shipped Ethereum exit-queue product — but with no fee published anywhere, no assets-under-stake figure, a lock-up corpus that lives only in PDFs whose own landing pages are empty stubs, and a loss-allocation claim that consists of the two words "slashing insurance" repeated across twelve pages without an insurer, a limit or a policy.

    Unbonding disclosure — 6/10Governance under custody — 6/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Twinstake · twinstake.com.

  7. #7 for SingaporeBlockdaemon#7 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Bank-facing non-custodial validator operator (70+ protocols per its homepage counter, though /validators says "50+ protocols"; ISO 27001 / SOC 2 Type II claimed; $110B+ assets secured platform-wide but only "$6+ billion" in staking infrastructure) whose staking pitch rests on a "100% slashing insurance guarantee" that names no underwriter, no limit and no policy anywhere on its own domain — while publishing tiered self-serve per-compute-unit pricing for its API product and no staking commission at all.

    Unbonding disclosure — 5/10Governance under custody — 5/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Blockdaemon · blockdaemon.com.

Commission: None of these providers pays ChainChoice anything for these links. Disclosure

Facts only in your country: local rules on promoting crypto-asset products are under review, so ChainChoice shows no sign-up links and earns no referral fees here.

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Do you keep custody and still get to vote — and who presses the button? · 20% (Kiln 7/10, Luganodes 6/10, Chorus One 9/10)
  • Insolvency failure: the firm or issuer that owes you cannot pay.
    Scored by If a validator you delegated to gets slashed, who actually writes the cheque? · 34% (Kiln 6/10, Luganodes 9/10, Chorus One 3/10)
  • Exit failure: you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
    Scored by How long are the assets locked per network, and did they tell you before you signed? · 22% (Kiln 8/10, Luganodes 3/10, Chorus One 5/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Liveness failure, Custody failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Can you find the rate you would actually pay without booking a sales call? (24%).

Each cell is verified against the provider's filings or the MAS register; a gap shows "—", never an estimate.

Fee, KYC, rails and licence by provider in Singapore
ProviderTaker fee in SingaporeKYC tierSGD railsMAS license
#1Kiln————
#2Luganodes————
#3Chorus One————
#4Figment————
#5Everstake————

Source: ChainChoice provider catalog cross-referenced with the MAS register; each fee as of its entry's latest verification (accuracy methodology).

Is using a crypto staking platform legal in Singapore?

Yes. Crypto staking are regulated in Singapore by Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Always verify a platform's licensing status with MAS before transacting.

How is crypto taxed in Singapore?

Singapore has no capital gains tax. Trading crypto as a business or profession is taxed as income. Editorial summary, not tax advice: consult a qualified tax advisor in Singapore before filing.

What payment methods work for buying crypto in Singapore?

The most common rails for retail onramps in Singapore are: FAST, PayNow, Wire. Most regulated platforms support at least the first of these. Card payments may incur 2-4% fees vs. ~0.5% for bank transfers.

Are international platforms (Coinbase, Kraken, Binance) available in Singapore?

Availability varies by platform and product. Singapore has its own licensing regime under MAS, and not every global platform is registered. The shortlist above removes platforms whose terms exclude Singapore; the chip on each row says whether availability is verified, listed or unstated.

Who supervises crypto services in Singapore

  • MAS · Monetary Authority of Singaporelicenses or registers crypto services; conduct and client protection; anti-money-launderingRead on mas.gov.sg

Authorities read . Each source is re-read within 180 days, or the build fails.

Country data verifiednot publishedSourceMAS ↗Methodology v2026.10.18
Best crypto staking — other countries