Skip to main content
Country guidePLPLNMiCA-regulated

Best crypto naming services in Poland

#1 for PolandENS (Ethereum Name Service)81 out of 100 ChainChoice Score
Audit receipt#cc-PL-NAM-2026.11-474f63a2 Methodology §3affiliate economics did not influence this ranking

ENS (Ethereum Name Service) ranks highest in ChainChoice’s published naming services ranking among the providers that list Poland — Onchain .eth registry on Ethereum mainnet. Flat 19% — straightforward. PLN-rail availability varies; many users on-ramp via SEPA + EUR.

RegulatorKNFKomisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF) · Polish Financial Supervision Authority
Currencyzł PLNPolish Zloty
Payment railsSEPABLIK · Przelewy24
MiCA statusAppliesCASP licensing required
Reviewed Next review by Published Methodology v2026.11.1
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means every product ranked on this page was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Direct answer

Which crypto naming service should Poland residents use in November 2026?

ENS (Ethereum Name Service) ranks highest in ChainChoice’s published naming services ranking among the providers that list Poland — Onchain .eth registry on Ethereum mainnet. The order is the published ranking itself; providers whose terms exclude Poland are removed. Check authorisation with KNF before depositing.

Right fit for this list
  • Poland residents holding capital in PLN
  • Users who need KNF-aligned compliance and audit-grade reporting
  • Buy-and-hold profiles benefiting from Poland's tax treatment
  • Sophisticated retail and family-office treasurers
Wrong fit — look elsewhere
  • Derivatives / perpetuals traders (use a regulated futures venue instead)
  • Privacy-focused users avoiding KYC (these are licensed venues)
  • Day-traders chasing the lowest spreads regardless of regulator posture
  • Anyone needing a service KNF does not currently authorise

General guidance for Poland: the ranking engine does not compute these notes and they do not change the order below. If none fits you, answer the Find My Best questions for a result for your profile.

6 naming services listed for Poland

In ChainChoice’s published ranking order, from this category’s 6 providers: those whose terms exclude Poland are removed; naming Poland or a region that covers it counts the same, and those whose terms do not state it come last. Each chip names the basis: a dated check, a region listing, or the provider's own claim.

  1. #1 for PolandENS (Ethereum Name Service)#1 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Onchain .eth registry on Ethereum mainnet; annual renewal required

    Does your wallet resolve it without a plugin — 10/10Onchain registry or company namespace — 9/10Published price and renewal terms — 9/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    ENS (Ethereum Name Service) · ens.domains.

  2. #2 for PolandBase Names (Basenames)#2 globallyProvider states broad availability

    ENS-protocol names on Base L2, issued by Coinbase, priced in ETH

    Does your wallet resolve it without a plugin — 7/10Whether you can lose the name — 6/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Base Names (Basenames) · base.org.

  3. #3 for PolandSNS (Solana Name Service, formerly Bonfida)#3 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Solana name registry migrating .sol to .sns; one-time payment, no renewal fees today

    Whether you can lose the name — 5/10Onchain registry or company namespace — 5/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    SNS (Solana Name Service, formerly Bonfida) · sns.id.

  4. #4 for PolandSPACE ID#4 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Multi-chain name service issuing .bnb and .arb, annual registration

    Whether you can lose the name — 4/10Onchain registry or company namespace — 4/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    SPACE ID · space.id.

  5. #5 for PolandLens Usernames (formerly Lens Handles)#5 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Onchain usernames inside Lens social protocol; free in the default namespace

    Whether you can lose the name — 4/10Onchain registry or company namespace — 4/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Lens Usernames (formerly Lens Handles) · lens.xyz.

  6. #6 for PolandUnstoppable Domains#6 globallyProvider states broad availability

    Company-issued Web3 TLDs sold as one-time mints, plus ICANN DNS registrar

    Whether you can lose the name — 4/10Onchain registry or company namespace — 3/10
    Broad availabilityprovider-stated, not checked by us

    Unstoppable Domains · unstoppabledomains.com.

Commission: None of these providers pays ChainChoice anything for these links. Disclosure

Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Whether you can lose the name · 40% (ENS (Ethereum Name Service) 7/10, Base Names (Basenames) 6/10, SNS (Solana Name Service, formerly Bonfida) 5/10)
    Scored by Onchain registry or company namespace · 25% (ENS (Ethereum Name Service) 9/10, Base Names (Basenames) 4/10, SNS (Solana Name Service, formerly Bonfida) 5/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Does your wallet resolve it without a plugin (25%), Published price and renewal terms (10%).

Each cell is verified against the provider's filings or the KNF register; a gap shows "—", never an estimate.

Fee, KYC, rails and licence by provider in Poland
ProviderTaker fee in PolandKYC tierPLN railsKNF license
#1ENS (Ethereum Name Service)————
#2Base Names (Basenames)————
#3SNS (Solana Name Service, formerly Bonfida)————
#4SPACE ID————
#5Lens Usernames (formerly Lens Handles)————

Source: ChainChoice provider catalog cross-referenced with the KNF register; each fee as of its entry's latest verification (accuracy methodology).

Is using a crypto naming service legal in Poland?

Yes. Poland regulates crypto-asset service providers under MiCA (EU Regulation 2023/1114), enforced from 30 December 2024. KNF oversees naming services operating in Poland; only providers authorised under MiCA may serve retail clients. Verify any provider against ESMA’s interim MiCA register.

How is crypto taxed in Poland?

Crypto gains taxed at a flat 19% under the capital gains category. Losses can offset other crypto gains within the same year. Editorial summary, not tax advice: consult a qualified tax advisor in Poland before filing.

What payment methods work for buying crypto in Poland?

The most common rails for retail onramps in Poland are: SEPA, BLIK, Przelewy24.

Are international platforms (Coinbase, Kraken, Binance) available in Poland?

Coinbase and Kraken hold MiCA authorisation valid in Poland. Binance does not: no Binance entity is on ESMA's register (read 10 November 2026); every transitional period ended by 1 July 2026, so none covers it there.

Who supervises crypto services in Poland

No authority is designated yet to authorise crypto-asset service providers in Poland. The authorities below supervise only the remit shown.

  • KNF · Komisja Nadzoru Finansowegoe-money tokens onlyRead on knf.gov.pl

Authorities read . Each source is re-read within 180 days, or the build fails.

Country data verifiednot publishedSourceKNF ↗Methodology v2026.11.1
Best crypto naming services — other countries