Skip to main content

Head-to-head · L2 Blockchains

Unichain vs Ink Ink leads by 1 point.

Ink scores 1 point above Unichain, led by track record. Unichain ranks #5 and Ink #4 of 15 published L2 blockchains. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Unichain75
Ink76
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #5 and #4 of 15
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 8 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-UNICHAIN-VS-INK-255ff648
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Ink leads by 1 point

Ink scores 1 point above Unichain, led by track record.

Unichain #5 of 1575
Ink #4 of 1576
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termInk leads on 1 of 8 published criteria; Unichain on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermInkUnichainWeightPoints
Track record4/102/102.4+1.2for Ink+0.6 of 32
Net of the terms+1.2
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+1.3
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7675+1.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

2 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactUnichainInk
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Security postureSnapshotOptimistic rollup; data availability: Ethereum L1 (blobs).Optimistic rollup; data availability: Ethereum L1 (EIP-4844 blobs).
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Unichain

75#5 of 15
Pick it when
Unichain leads Ink on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
EVM equivalence — 10/10
Tradeoff
Newest chain here (mainnet 2025) — the shortest production track record

Ink

76#4 of 15
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Ink if track record matters most — it scores 4/10 to Unichain's 2/10 there (weight 10).
Strength
EVM equivalence — 10/10
Tradeoff
Younger than the 2021-era rollups: public mainnet since December 2024
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

Unichain

Unichain leads Ink on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
InkLeads

Choose Ink if track record matters most

  • Track record: 4/10 against 2/10 for Unichain (weight 10)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 8616 of 16 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

EVM equivalence

weight 2.4 of 86Tie
Unichain10 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Track record

by 2 of 10weight 2.4 of 86Ink leads
Unichain2 out of 10
Ink4 out of 10

Data on Ethereum

weight 3.4 of 86Tie
Unichain10 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Rollup stage

weight 1.9 of 86Tie
Unichain7 out of 10
Ink7 out of 10

Proof system

weight 4.3 of 86Tie
Unichain10 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Exit window

weight 2.4 of 86Tie
Unichain0 out of 10
Ink0 out of 10

Forced withdrawals

weight 4.3 of 86Tie
Unichain10 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Censorship resistance

weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Unichain10 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Unichain14/20Ink14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Unichain19.1/30Ink19.6/30
Ink leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Unichain2.7/10Ink2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Unichain3.2/8Ink3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Unichain5.5/18Ink5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Ink unless the term Unichain leads on is the one you are buying.

Unichain leads Ink on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Exit window before an upgrade · 10% (Unichain 0/10, Ink 0/10)
  • Verification failure: an invalid state or transfer is accepted.
    Scored by Ethereum data availability · 14% (Unichain 10/10, Ink 10/10)
    Scored by Proof system · 18% (Unichain 10/10, Ink 10/10)
  • Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
    Scored by Withdrawals if the operator stops · 18% (Unichain 10/10, Ink 10/10)
    Scored by Transactions if the sequencer censors you · 12% (Unichain 10/10, Ink 10/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Execution failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: EVM equivalence (10%), Maturity & track record (10%), Rollup stage (8%).
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Ink scores 1 point above Unichain, led by track record. Published scores, out of 100: Unichain 75 (rank 5 of 15 l2 blockchains), Ink 76 (rank 4 of 15).

Related pages

Go deeper

Trust & process
Individual reviews
Other comparisons
Written and reviewed by Founder
Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research