Skip to main content

Head-to-head · L2 Blockchains

Starknet vs Ink Ink leads by 13 points.

Ink scores 13 points above Starknet, led by forced withdrawals, data on Ethereum, and censorship resistance. Starknet ranks #8 and Ink #4 of 15 published L2 blockchains. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Starknet63
Ink76
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #8 and #4 of 15
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 8 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-STARKNET-VS-INK-6016d388
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Ink leads by 13 points

Ink scores 13 points above Starknet, led by forced withdrawals, data on Ethereum, and censorship resistance.

Starknet #8 of 1563
Ink #4 of 1576
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termInk leads on 4 of 8 published criteria; Starknet on 2. The terms sum to the gap.
TermInkStarknetWeightPoints
Forced withdrawals10/105/104.3+5.6for Ink+2.9 of 32
Data on Ethereum10/109/103.4+0.9for Ink+0.4 of 32
Censorship resistance10/105/102.9+3.7for Ink+1.9 of 32
EVM equivalence10/100/102.4+6.2for Ink+3.2 of 32
Track record4/108/102.4−2.5for Starknet−1.3 of 32
Exit window0/102/102.4−1.2for Starknet−0.6 of 32
Net of the terms+12.7
Reproduced gap+12.7
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below7663+13.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

2 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactStarknetInk
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Security postureSnapshotZK rollup; data availability: Ethereum L1 (blobs).Optimistic rollup; data availability: Ethereum L1 (EIP-4844 blobs).
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Starknet

63#8 of 15
Pick it when
Pick Starknet if track record matters most — it scores 8/10 to Ink's 4/10 there (weight 10).
Strength
Proof system — 10/10
Tradeoff
Non-EVM (Cairo) — existing Solidity contracts do not run unchanged

Ink

76#4 of 15
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Ink if forced withdrawals matters most — it scores 10/10 to Starknet's 5/10 there (weight 18).
Strength
EVM equivalence — 10/10
Tradeoff
Younger than the 2021-era rollups: public mainnet since December 2024
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

Starknet

Choose Starknet if track record matters most

  • Track record: 8/10 against 4/10 for Ink (weight 10)
  • Exit window: 2/10 against 0/10 for Ink (weight 10)
InkLeads

Choose Ink if forced withdrawals matters most

  • Forced withdrawals: 10/10 against 5/10 for Starknet (weight 18)
  • Data on Ethereum: 10/10 against 9/10 for Starknet (weight 14)
  • Censorship resistance: 10/10 against 5/10 for Starknet (weight 12)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 8616 of 16 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

EVM equivalence

by 10 of 10weight 2.4 of 86Ink leads
Starknet0 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Track record

by 4 of 10weight 2.4 of 86Starknet leads
Starknet8 out of 10
Ink4 out of 10

Data on Ethereum

by 1 of 10weight 3.4 of 86Ink leads
Starknet9 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Rollup stage

weight 1.9 of 86Tie
Starknet7 out of 10
Ink7 out of 10

Proof system

weight 4.3 of 86Tie
Starknet10 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Exit window

by 2 of 10weight 2.4 of 86Starknet leads
Starknet2 out of 10
Ink0 out of 10

Forced withdrawals

by 5 of 10weight 4.3 of 86Ink leads
Starknet5 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Censorship resistance

by 5 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Ink leads
Starknet5 out of 10
Ink10 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Starknet14/20Ink14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Starknet14.7/30Ink19.6/30
Ink leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Starknet2.7/10Ink2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Starknet3.2/8Ink3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Starknet5.5/18Ink5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Ink unless the term Starknet leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick Starknet if track record matters most — it scores 8/10 to Ink's 4/10 there (weight 10).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
    Scored by Exit window before an upgrade · 10% (Starknet 2/10, Ink 0/10)
  • Verification failure: an invalid state or transfer is accepted.
    Scored by Ethereum data availability · 14% (Starknet 9/10, Ink 10/10)
    Scored by Proof system · 18% (Starknet 10/10, Ink 10/10)
  • Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
    Scored by Withdrawals if the operator stops · 18% (Starknet 5/10, Ink 10/10)
    Scored by Transactions if the sequencer censors you · 12% (Starknet 5/10, Ink 10/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Execution failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: EVM equivalence (10%), Maturity & track record (10%), Rollup stage (8%).
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Ink scores 13 points above Starknet, led by forced withdrawals, data on Ethereum, and censorship resistance. Published scores, out of 100: Starknet 63 (rank 8 of 15 l2 blockchains), Ink 76 (rank 4 of 15).

Related pages

Go deeper

Trust & process
Individual reviews
Other comparisons
Written and reviewed by Founder
Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research