Same published score — 69 each
MetaMask Card and Nexo Card tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them.
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Head-to-head · Crypto Cards
MetaMask Card and Nexo Card tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them. Nexo Card ranks #3 and MetaMask Card #4 of 9 published crypto cards. The ledger below shows where each side is ahead — pick by the criterion that matters to you.
MetaMask Card and Nexo Card tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them.
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Pick Nexo Card if cost abroad matters most — it scores 8/10 to MetaMask Card's 6/10 there (weight 33).
MetaMask Card leads on no published criterion; its edge is availability (12 vs 6 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
MetaMask Card and Nexo Card tie on score at 69; the published tie-break orders them. Published scores, out of 100: Nexo Card 69 (rank 3 of 9 crypto cards), MetaMask Card 69 (rank 4 of 9).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research