Linea scores 10 points above Blast, led by proof system, EVM equivalence, and track record. Linea ranks #12 and Blast #13 of 15 published L2 blockchains. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Linea57
vs
BLBlast47
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #12 and #13 of 15
Linea scores 10 points above Blast, led by proof system, EVM equivalence, and track record.
Linea #12 of 1557
BLBlast #13 of 1547
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termLinea leads on 4 of 8 published criteria; Blast on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermLineaBlastWeightPoints
Proof system10/100/104.3+11.2for Linea+5.8 of 32
Censorship resistance0/1010/102.9−7.5for Blast−3.8 of 32
EVM equivalence10/106/102.4+2.5for Linea+1.3 of 32
Track record6/104/102.4+1.2for Linea+0.6 of 32
Rollup stage3/100/101.9+1.5for Linea+0.8 of 32
Net of the terms+9.0
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+9.1
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below5747+10.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
LineaScore 57Consensys-built EVM-equivalent ZK rollupStrength: EVM equivalence — 10/10Watch-out: Only whitelisted proposers can publish state roots, so withdrawals freeze if they stop (L2BEAT proposer failure: Cannot withdraw)BlastScore 47OP Stack chain with native yield; no live proof systemStrength: Ethereum data availability — 10/10Watch-out: EVM-compatible, not equivalent: Blast describes itself as "an EVM-compatible, optimistic rollup", and its Yield precompile sits at the address Ethereum now uses for P256 verification
Quick facts
At a glance
2 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactLineaBlast
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Security postureSnapshotZK rollup; data availability: Ethereum L1 (blobs).No proof system; data availability: Ethereum L1 (blobs).
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Linea
57#12 of 15
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Linea if proof system matters most — it scores 10/10 to Blast's 0/10 there (weight 18).
Strength
EVM equivalence — 10/10
Tradeoff
Only whitelisted proposers can publish state roots, so withdrawals freeze if they stop (L2BEAT proposer failure: Cannot withdraw)
BL
Blast
47#13 of 15
Pick it when
Pick Blast if censorship resistance matters most — it scores 10/10 to Linea's 0/10 there (weight 12).
Strength
Ethereum data availability — 10/10
Tradeoff
EVM-compatible, not equivalent: Blast describes itself as "an EVM-compatible, optimistic rollup", and its Yield precompile sits at the address Ethereum now uses for P256 verification
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
LineaLeads
Choose Linea if proof system matters most
Proof system: 10/10 against 0/10 for Blast (weight 18)
EVM equivalence: 10/10 against 6/10 for Blast (weight 10)
Track record: 6/10 against 4/10 for Blast (weight 10)
LineaScore 57Consensys-built EVM-equivalent ZK rollupStrength: EVM equivalence — 10/10Watch-out: Only whitelisted proposers can publish state roots, so withdrawals freeze if they stop (L2BEAT proposer failure: Cannot withdraw)
BLBlast
Choose Blast if censorship resistance matters most
Censorship resistance: 10/10 against 0/10 for Linea (weight 12)
BlastScore 47OP Stack chain with native yield; no live proof systemStrength: Ethereum data availability — 10/10Watch-out: EVM-compatible, not equivalent: Blast describes itself as "an EVM-compatible, optimistic rollup", and its Yield precompile sits at the address Ethereum now uses for P256 verification
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8616 of 16 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
EVM equivalence
by 4 of 10weight 2.4 of 86Linea leads
Linea10/10 out of 10
Blast6/10 out of 10
Track record
by 2 of 10weight 2.4 of 86Linea leads
Linea6/10 out of 10
Blast4/10 out of 10
Data on Ethereum
weight 3.4 of 86Tie
Linea10/10 out of 10
Blast10/10 out of 10
Rollup stage
by 3 of 10weight 1.9 of 86Linea leads
Linea3/10 out of 10
Blast0/10 out of 10
Proof system
by 10 of 10weight 4.3 of 86Linea leads
Linea10/10 out of 10
Blast0/10 out of 10
Exit window
weight 2.4 of 86Tie
Linea0/10 out of 10
Blast0/10 out of 10
Forced withdrawals
weight 4.3 of 86Tie
Linea0/10 out of 10
Blast0/10 out of 10
Censorship resistance
by 10 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Blast leads
Linea0/10 out of 10
Blast10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Linea14/20Blast14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Linea12.1/30Blast8.6/30
Linea leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Linea2.7/10Blast2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Linea3.2/8Blast3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Linea5.5/18Blast5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Linea unless the term Blast leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Blast if censorship resistance matters most — it scores 10/10 to Linea's 0/10 there (weight 12).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Control failure: a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.
Scored by Exit window before an upgrade · 10% (Linea 0/10, Blast 0/10)
Verification failure: an invalid state or transfer is accepted.
Scored by Ethereum data availability · 14% (Linea 10/10, Blast 10/10)
Scored by Proof system · 18% (Linea 10/10, Blast 0/10)
Liveness failure: the operator stops, censors you or loses data.
Scored by Withdrawals if the operator stops · 18% (Linea 0/10, Blast 0/10)
Scored by Transactions if the sequencer censors you · 12% (Linea 0/10, Blast 10/10)
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: EVM equivalence (10%), Maturity & track record (10%), Rollup stage (8%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Linea scores 10 points above Blast, led by proof system, EVM equivalence, and track record. Published scores, out of 100: Linea 57 (rank 12 of 15 l2 blockchains), Blast 47 (rank 13 of 15).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
