The score, by dimension
- the same for all 9
- #3 of 9 · best 13.4
- the same for all 9
- the same for all 9
- the same for all 9
Tick: the best in this ranking · Methodology v2026.11.1
Zora Network
OP Stack L2 for NFT minting
#3 of all 9 worldwide65
- Rank
- #3 of all 9 worldwidere-runs: scores 63–68 and ranks #2–#4
- Your cost
- Not priced on this basis
- Evidence
- High4 of 4 criteria sourced
- Licence
- No MiCA record on file
- Freshness
- Read September 2026checked · re-read due
Check availability for your country
Zora Network · zora.energy. Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.
Commission: This provider pays ChainChoice nothing for this link. Disclosure
Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.
The verdict
Zora Network is #3 of 9 published appchains / L3s; it scores 5/10 on settlement security inherited, where the category best is 8. Its widest gap is liquidity on arrival: 1/10, where dYdX Chain scores 8. Choose dYdX Chain if liquidity on arrival matters most.
Is Zora Network right for you?
Look elsewhere if
- Security inherited from settlement layer5/10 here; the category best is 8
- Operators running the chain today3/10 here; dYdX Chain scores 7
- Measured liquidity on arrival1/10 here; dYdX Chain scores 8
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best appchain or L3 shows where it lands for you.
What will Zora Network cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Usage per month
- 10
How safe is Zora Network?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
If it doesn’t fit, choose
Compare all 4- 2dYdX ChainIf liquidity on arrival matters most: 81 point above · stronger on liquidity on arrival (8 against 1)66
- 4ApeChainIf permissionless exit matters most: 51 point below · stronger on permissionless exit (5 against 4)64
- 5XaiIf permissionless exit matters most: 55 points below · stronger on permissionless exit (5 against 4)60
Provider at a glance
- Category
- Appchains / L3s
- Entity
- All 2 Zora products
- Official website
- zora.energy
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 65 out of 100 under methodology 2026.11.1, from the evidence read in September 2026.
For your setup
Find out if Zora Network fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Zora Network lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best appchain or L3Nothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Zora Network ranks #3
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (11.4 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
355+5.601.08#2/9
Third party
Third party · read 2026-09-28254+3.203.05#3/9
Third party
Third party · read 2026-09-28203+1.923.07#3/9
Third party
Third party · read 2026-09-28201+0.642.08#6/9
Third party
Third party · read 2026-09-28Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−1behind dYdX Chain, #2 of all 9 worldwide, on the published score
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 63–68 and ranks #2–#4
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Zora Network’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Security inherited from settlement layer 5 → 6 on its ladder · passes dYdX Chain+168#3 → #2
Permissionless exit without the operator 4 → 5 on its ladder · passes dYdX Chain+167#3 → #2
Operators running the chain today 3 → 4 on its ladder · passes dYdX Chain+167#3 → #2
Measured liquidity on arrival 1 → 2 on its ladder · passes dYdX Chain+167#3 → #2
Security inherited from settlement layer 5 → 4 on its ladder · ApeChain passes it−163#3 → #4
Permissionless exit without the operator 4 → 3 on its ladder · ApeChain passes it−164#3 → #4
Operators running the chain today 3 → 1 on its ladder · ApeChain passes it−263#3 → #4
Smallest climb: security inherited from settlement layer 5 → 6 passes dYdX Chain, #2.
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Tradeoffs
3 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Security inherited from settlement layer — 5/10 against a category best of 8/10
- Operators running the chain today — 3/10 against a category best of 7/10
- Measured liquidity on arrival — 1/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- Zora's live product now runs on Base, and its documentation site no longer documents the network at all. A user can bridge ETH to Zora Network today and force their own transaction in within 12 hours, but cannot prove a withdrawal without the permissioned proposer, because the permissionless dispute game has no implementation deployed. There IS USDzC on the chain, contrary to the $0 the public stablecoin index still reports — about $100,560 on 2026-08-07 and 82,945.08 on 2026-09-28 (totalSupply() at Zora block 51,945,521).
Competitive position
How Zora Network places on each criterion
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Against the leader
78 vs 65 · gap 13.0Why Abstract ranks above Zora Network
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 13.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisAbstractGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight8.513.4−12.7, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisAbstractPoints
Security inherited from settlement layer · w3558−3.36, worse
Operators running the chain today · w2034−0.64, worse
Measured liquidity on arrival · w2015−2.56, worse
Net6578−13.0
Your scenario
Zora Network is not priced for this scenario
Metered usage beyond whatever the plan includes, for a year. Excludes egress, support tiers and enterprise minimums. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Usage per month · your input10
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 28 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDTypical costNot statedFewer than 5 priced rows: no typical cost is named · 0 of 9 rows priced
Lowest fee, priced rowsNone pricedDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filter
9 of 9 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the typical, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 28 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #2 to #4 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 10 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 28 September 2026.
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Security inherited from settlement layerstrength 5 · weight 35Report an errorThird-party page28 September 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Permissionless exit without the operatorstrength 4 · weight 25Report an errorThird-party page28 September 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Operators running the chain todaystrength 3 · weight 20Report an errorThird-party page28 September 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Measured liquidity on arrivalstrength 1 · weight 20Report an errorThird-party page28 September 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Verification failure: an invalid state or transfer is accepted.Scored by Security inherited from settlement layer · 35% (Zora Network 5/10)Scored by Operators running the chain today · 20% (Zora Network 3/10)
- Liveness failure (Zora Network 4/10): the operator stops, censors you or loses data.Scored by Permissionless exit without the operator · 25%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Execution failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Measured liquidity on arrival (20%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Zora publishes no gas or fee page for the network. Its documentation index still describes the whole site as "Documentation for the ZORA Coins Protocol — a protocol for creating and trading ERC-20 media coins on Base." and lists no page about Zora Network, its gas or its fees (docs.zora.co/llms.txt, fetched 28 September 2026). The only fees that index names are the Coins protocol's — "Fee structure (1% for creator/content coins, 0.01% for trend coins)" — and those are charged on Base, not on Zora Network. Worked example from the chain itself, not a published price: L2BEAT records ETH as the network's gas token; eth_gasPrice on rpc.zora.energy returned 0.001 gwei at Zora block 51,945,521 on 28 September 2026, so a 21,000-gas transfer costs 21000 x 0.001e-9 = 0.000000021 ETH, about 0.00006 US dollars at the ETH price of 2,644.08 US dollars returned by coins.llama.fi the same day. This is the L2 execution fee only; as an OP Stack chain Zora also charges an L1 data fee per transaction that eth_gasPrice does not report.Zora Network — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026
- Prices published in
- USDZora Network — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Zora Network, Ethereum
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
Legal entity on file: Zora, placed in 2 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Zora Network: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- 28 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.11.1Score 65, #3 of 9. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 15 October 2026
2026.10.10The live-data rule names the researched market measurements a criterion reads- changed The live-data rule names a second kind of figure a score reads: a researched, dated market measurement a criterion's ladder is built on, read again on the 45-day review. /methodology/live-data lists the 14 criteria that read one; no score, rank or order changes.
- changed A saved decision is checked again on the answers the reader saved. The drift check had merged a priority suggested by the market (price swings, gas) into those answers, so a market reading could move a saved decision's #1; the published ranking never read it.
- added On every build a test reads every criterion's published ladder: one that names a market quantity or a market-data source must be declared, and every scored row of a declared criterion must carry the source and the date its figure was read.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.11.1, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt appchains_l3s:zora_network:2026.11.1:97026bcdaac1
Are you Zora Network? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.