Provider at a glance
- Category
- Tax Software
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- waltio.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 75 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Waltio
Crypto tax software for French filers
Tax Software
#7 Overall
Ranked #7 of 11 tax software in the published ranking
75
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
- €99 your cost/yr
Is Waltio right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?9/10, the category best
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?7/10; the category best is 8
Look elsewhere if these come first
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?7/10 here; Summ (formerly Crypto Tax Calculator) scores 9
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?4/10 here; ZenLedger scores 7
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best crypto tax software shows where it lands for you.
What will Waltio cost you?
€99 your cost/yr
- Transactions per year
- 1k
- Published tiers
- 4
- Cheapest tier that covers you
- Starter
Level with the median of 3 priced tax software.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Waltio?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Waltio
Compare all 4- 5Summ (formerly Crypto Tax Calculator)2 points above · stronger on complex transactions (9 against 7)77$99
- 6CoinTracker1 point above · stronger on cost-basis method (8 against 7)76
- 8ZenLedger2 points below · stronger on record portability (7 against 4)73$199
For your setup
Find out if Waltio fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Waltio lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best crypto tax softwareNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Waltio ranks #7
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (22.5 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 1 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
329+9.228.09#1/11Loading evidence…
267+5.827.08#5/11Loading evidence…
227+4.937.09#6/11Loading evidence…
204+2.566.08#9/11Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−1behind CoinTracker, #6
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 73–77 and ranks #6–#8
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Waltio’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? 9 → 10 on its ladder · passes CoinTracker+177#7 → #6
Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? 7 → 8 on its ladder · passes CoinTracker+177#7 → #6
My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? 7 → 8 on its ladder · passes CoinTracker+176#7 → #6
Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? 4 → 5 on its ladder · passes CoinTracker+176#7 → #6
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? 9 → 8 on its ladder · ZenLedger passes it−173#7 → #8
Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? 7 → 5 on its ladder · ZenLedger passes it−272#7 → #9
My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? 7 → 5 on its ladder · ZenLedger passes it−272#7 → #9
Smallest climb: “Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?” 9 → 10 passes CoinTracker, #6.
Strengths
2 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? — 9/10, the category best
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? — 7/10, category best 8/10
Tradeoffs
2 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? — 7/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? — 4/10 against a category best of 8/10
Record watch-outs
- Three served sentences compose into one trap: 'At the end of the subscription (end of calendar year), it is no longer possible to generate new reports.' (help.waltio.com/en/articles/4915779), 'To purchase access for a previous tax year, you must have an active subscription for the current year.' (.../5830168), and, on the transaction export, 'This feature is available only for Smart and Unlimited plans.' (.../6014877). So a Lite or Starter buyer who files, cancels, and is asked in 2028 to re-derive 2025 for an audit or an amended return cannot regenerate it, cannot buy 2025 on its own — they must first re-subscribe for whatever the then-current year is, then pay the 2025 tier fee on top, priced on 2025's own transaction count because 'each fiscal year is evaluated independently' (.../5444696) — and never had the raw transaction export at all, because that sits two tiers up at 249€. The article that looks like it should rescue the buyer does not: 'Obtaining a Tax Report for Previous Years' says 'If your subscription allows it, click "All documents" to download the tax documents for the selected year.' The Terms compound it: they are a 'seasonal subscription with automatic renewal' that says nothing about post-lapse access to a purchased year, and instead say 'The User must keep backups of their data.'
Competitive position
Where Waltio leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 1114.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#7 / 1116.9 of 30 · best 19.2
Friction#1 / 112.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 113.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 118.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Waltio leads
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?#1 / 11
Where it trails
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?#9 / 11
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
CoinTracker#6 of 11 · score 76 · 1.0 point ahead
Waltio leads on
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?9 vs 8
CoinTracker leads on
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?8 vs 7
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?8 vs 7
Largest single reason CoinTracker is ahead: published criteria (+1.0 display points).Scenario cost: CoinTracker has no verified pricing for this scenario.
ZenLedger#8 of 11 · score 73 · 2.0 points behind
Waltio leads on
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?9 vs 7
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?7 vs 6
ZenLedger leads on
- Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?7 vs 4
Largest single reason Waltio is ahead: published criteria (+1.8 display points).Scenario cost: Waltio has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Summ (formerly Crypto Tax Calculator)#5 of 11 · score 77 · 2.0 points ahead
Waltio leads on
- Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?9 vs 8
Summ (formerly Crypto Tax Calculator) leads on
- Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?8 vs 7
- My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?9 vs 7
Largest single reason Summ (formerly Crypto Tax Calculator) is ahead: published criteria (+2.3 display points).Scenario cost: Waltio has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
81 vs 75 · gap 6.0Why Koinly ranks above Waltio
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 6.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisKoinlyGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight16.919.2−6.0, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisKoinlyPoints
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? · w3298+1.02, better
Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? · w2678−0.83, worse
My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? · w2278−0.70, worse
Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? · w2048−2.56, worse
Net7581−6.0
Your scenario
What Waltio costs on your scenario
The cheapest published tier that covers your usage. List price before any discount; add-ons priced separately are excluded. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Transactions per year · your input1k
Published tiers · published rate4
Cheapest tier that covers you · published rateStarter
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 29 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in EUR; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
€99
Under the default inputs · EURCategory median€993 of 11 rows priced · Waltio at the median
Cheapest priced€99 · BlockpitWaltio costs the same · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with Blockpit
2 of 11 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
6 of 11 quote a zero fee that leaves costs out, so they are absent from the median and the cheapest row, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 29 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #6 to #8 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 29 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing?strength 9 · weight 32Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires?strength 7 · weight 26Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one?strength 7 · weight 22Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me?strength 4 · weight 20Report an error—29 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Regulatory failure (Waltio 9/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Which country's actual tax form comes out at the end — named, and for the year I am filing? · 32%
- Exit failure (Waltio 4/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Can my accountant take this without redoing it — and if I stop paying, does my per-lot basis still leave with me? · 20%
- Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.Scored by Which lot did it decide I sold, and does that method match what my tax authority actually requires? · 26% (Waltio 7/10)Scored by My history has DeFi, staking, NFTs, a rug and ten transfers between my own wallets — what does it do with each one? · 22% (Waltio 7/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- https://
www .waltio .com /pricing-2 / — fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200, plain curl (JSON-LD dateModified 2026-09-03T13:24:26+00:00). Header: "Your one-click tax return, at the right price." Five cards: Free "0€" "No credit card" ("Manual P&L", "Foreign accounts form"); Lite "39€" "per year" ("Up to 50 transactions", "Capital gains and losses report", "Tax certificate", "Documents export"); Starter "99€" "per year" ("Up to 1,000 transactions", "Step-by-step filing guide"); Smart "Popular" "249€" "per year" ("Up to 10,000 transactions"); Unlimited "999€" "per year" ("Unlimited transactions", "Repatriation of funds", "Tax audit document"). FAQ: "Pricing is calculated based only on transactions from the current tax year." | "However, you can also access tax reports for all previous years dating back to 2019. Since our pricing is based on the number of transactions per year, access to prior years is available for a fee." Billing rules from https:// help .waltio .com /en /articles /5830168 -billing-pricing-and-subscriptions (dateModified 24 September 2026, fetched 29 September 2026): "Each subscription covers a single tax year ." | "Automatic renewal takes place on October 1st of each year ." | "To purchase access for a previous tax year, you must have an active subscription for the current year." The transaction export (.xlsx) is limited to Smart and Unlimited (https:// help .waltio .com /en /articles /6014877 -exporting-your-transactions). Prices unchanged since 19 August 2026.Waltio — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026 - Prices published in
- EURWaltio — official pricing page ↗ · 29 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- VERIFIED. Five jurisdictions, statutory forms named, and the entry codes a filer actually types — every anchor re-fetched and matched byte-for-byte on 19 August 2026.
- Supported chains
- Not published
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Waltio: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 29 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 75, #7 of 11. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 1 October 2026
2026.10.0Layer-2 chains are ranked on whether you can leave with your funds- added Four l2_chains criteria with published band ladders: proof system (18), withdrawals if the operator stops (18), rollup stage (14) and exit window before an upgrade (6). EVM equivalence moves 40 to 17, Ethereum data availability 25 to 15 and maturity 35 to 12. Every chain's emergency exit window reads None, so the exit-window ladder also reads L2BEAT's regular, non-emergency upgrade path (Arbitrum One 10 days, Starknet and Arbitrum Nova 7, zkSync Era 4 days 3 hours); data availability separates full transaction data (10) from state diffs only (9, L2BEAT: Onchain (SD)). A stage L2BEAT marks Under review keeps its last score for at most one 45-day cycle and is never interpolated.
- changed l2_chains ranks through scoreCriterionObjective on fitStrength, like the other criterion-ranked categories; the hand-written structural scorer is deleted. All 105 criterion scores across 15 rows carry a quote and source in research-pending/rereads/2026-10-01-l2_chains.json; 131 of 135 quotes re-fetched verbatim on the read date, and the four behind a bot wall or a JavaScript shell were read by the adversarial model run.
- fixed Four facts corrected on the read: Scroll, Mantle and Blast are EVM-compatible, not equivalent (their own documentation, and for Blast live RPC probes); Starknet's public mainnet opened to users in 2022, not 2021. Arbitrum Nova's data has gone to Ethereum as blobs since 31 August 2026, and the row now leads with the Arbitrum DAO's decision to minimise it.
- fixed The old scorer credited Ethereum data availability whenever the data-availability text contained the word "ethereum", so Arbitrum Nova's committee ("…Ethereum L1 rollup fallback") and Polygon zkEVM's off-chain data ("…Ethereum L1 before the sunset") both scored full marks. Data availability is now a quoted L2BEAT reading.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt tax_software:waltio:2026.10.18:1bf07a0203ab
Are you Waltio? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.