Provider at a glance
- Category
- NFT Marketplaces
- Entity
- All 4 OKX products
- Official website
- web3.okx.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 59 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read on file.
OKX NFT Marketplace
NFT aggregator in the OKX wallet
NFT Marketplaces
#5 Overall
Ranked #5 of 9 NFT marketplaces in the published ranking
59
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- Low evidence confidence
Is OKX NFT Marketplace right for you?
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Custody & approval risk2/10 here; Fragment scores 7
- True cost of a round trip4/10 here; the category best is 8
- Exit liquidity honesty7/10 here; the category best is 9
- Royalty enforcement4/10 here; SuperRare scores 9
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best NFT marketplace shows where it lands for you.
What will OKX NFT Marketplace cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Your monthly volume
- $1k
How safe is OKX NFT Marketplace?
- Evidence: unknown4 of 4 criteria scored; no receipt file yet. The score is provisional until a quoted source is on file.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
- On the registersMiCA: authorised, OKX Europe Limited (MT, since 2025-01-27). Read 3 November 2026. Open the register
Alternatives to OKX NFT Marketplace
Compare all 4- 3Fragment3 points above · stronger on custody (7 against 2)62$600
- 4Tensor2 points above · stronger on royalties (7 against 4)61$240
- 6SuperRare1 point below · stronger on royalties (9 against 4)58$360
For your setup
Find out if OKX NFT Marketplace fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where OKX NFT Marketplace lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best NFT marketplaceNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why OKX NFT Marketplace ranks #5
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (13.2 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
302+1.924.08#9/9Loading evidence…
244+3.074.08#4/9Loading evidence…
247+5.385.09#2/9Loading evidence…
224+2.823.09#3/9Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−2behind Tensor, #4
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 57–61 and ranks #4–#6
Evidence4 of 4 scoredno receipt file for this category
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of OKX NFT Marketplace’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Custody & approval risk 2 → 3 on its ladder · passes Tensor+161#5 → #4
True cost of a round trip 4 → 5 on its ladder · passes Tensor+161#5 → #4
Exit liquidity honesty 7 → 8 on its ladder · passes Tensor+161#5 → #4
Royalty enforcement 4 → 6 on its ladder · passes Tensor+262#5 → #3
Custody & approval risk 2 → 1 on its ladder · SuperRare passes it−157#5 → #6
True cost of a round trip 4 → 3 on its ladder · SuperRare passes it−158#5 → #6
Exit liquidity honesty 7 → 6 on its ladder · SuperRare passes it−158#5 → #6
Smallest climb: custody & approval risk 2 → 3 passes Tensor, #4.
Strengths
0 from the score dataWhere it leads
No scored criterion is at or within one point of the category best, so no strength can be stated from the data.
Tradeoffs
4 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Custody & approval risk — 2/10 against a category best of 8/10
- True cost of a round trip — 4/10 against a category best of 8/10
- Exit liquidity honesty — 7/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Royalty enforcement — 4/10 against a category best of 9/10
Record watch-outs
- Aggregator: destination-venue fees and royalties pass through — “0%” is OKX’s leg only
- Listing grants Marketplace Contracts a standing approval to transfer your NFT, and no contract address is published to check who controls them
- OKX suspended its Web3 DEX aggregator in Mar 2025 under EU regulatory pressure — product-surface risk is real
- OKX’s Web3 terms say the Services may not be available in all markets and that OKX may restrict use from further locations
Competitive position
Where OKX NFT Marketplace leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 920.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#6 / 99.9 of 30 · best 16.9
Friction#4 / 94.0 of 10 · best 4.7
Trust record#2 / 93.2 of 8 · best 6.4
Measured data#1 / 98.3 of 18 · pool best
Where OKX NFT Marketplace leads
- Exit liquidity honesty#2 / 9
- Royalty enforcement#3 / 9
Where it trails
- Custody & approval risk#9 / 9
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
SuperRare#6 of 9 · score 58 · 1.0 point behind
OKX NFT Marketplace leads on
- True cost of a round trip4 vs 1
- Exit liquidity honesty7 vs 2
SuperRare leads on
- Custody & approval risk4 vs 2
- Royalty enforcement9 vs 4
Largest single reason OKX NFT Marketplace is ahead: published criteria (+1.3 display points).Scenario cost: OKX NFT Marketplace has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Tensor#4 of 9 · score 61 · 2.0 points ahead
OKX NFT Marketplace leads on
- Exit liquidity honesty7 vs 5
Tensor leads on
- Custody & approval risk4 vs 2
- Royalty enforcement7 vs 4
Largest single reason Tensor is ahead: published criteria (+4.9 display points).Scenario cost: OKX NFT Marketplace has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Fragment#3 of 9 · score 62 · 3.0 points ahead
OKX NFT Marketplace leads on
- True cost of a round trip4 vs 3
- Exit liquidity honesty7 vs 3
- Royalty enforcement4 vs 3
Fragment leads on
- Custody & approval risk7 vs 2
Largest single reason Fragment is ahead: friction (+1.8 display points).Scenario cost: OKX NFT Marketplace has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
84 vs 59 · gap 25.0Why OpenSea ranks above OKX NFT Marketplace
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 25.0 to within rounding. OKX NFT Marketplace is ahead on measured data (+3.6 in its favour).
DimensionThisOpenSeaGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here20.020.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight9.916.9−18.2, worse
Friction · 12% weight4.04.7−1.8, worse
Trust record · 9% weight3.26.4−8.3, worse
Measured data · 21% weight8.36.9+3.6, better
Published criterionThisOpenSeaPoints
Custody & approval risk · w3027−4.80, worse
True cost of a round trip · w2448−3.07, worse
Exit liquidity honesty · w2479−1.54, worse
Net5984−25.0
Your scenario
OKX NFT Marketplace is not priced for this scenario
Marketplace fee on your volume for a year. Excludes network gas and any withdrawal fee. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your monthly volume · your input$1k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 14 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$2406 of 9 rows priced
Cheapest priced$60 · UniSat MarketplaceDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with UniSat Marketplace
2 of 9 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
1 of 9 quote a zero fee that leaves costs out, so they are absent from the median and the cheapest row, not counted as free.
Evidence
No evidence reading date recorded
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceUnknownno observation on file
No structured observation on file for this category; the strengths are the catalog’s published values.Public receiptsReading…category publishes no receipt file
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceNot yet ratedcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
No structured observation on file for this category; the receipt count is not counted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #4 to #6 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.No structured observation is on file for this provider in this category; the strengths are the catalog’s published values.
9 listed rows in this category still await an evidence read and sit outside the scored pool.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Custody & approval riskstrength 2 · weight 30Report an error——
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.True cost of a round tripstrength 4 · weight 24Report an error——
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Exit liquidity honestystrength 7 · weight 24Report an error——
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Royalty enforcementstrength 4 · weight 22Report an error——
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Custody failure (OKX NFT Marketplace 2/10): whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.Scored by Custody & approval risk · 30%
- Exit failure (OKX NFT Marketplace 7/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Exit liquidity honesty · 24%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of a round trip (24%), Royalty enforcement (22%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- OKX's NFT FAQ (updated 5 Aug 2026) states "You don't have to pay any service fee to buy or sell NFTs in OKX NFT Marketplace". The NFT Marketplace User Agreement (last updated 19 May 2026) says OKX "currently does not charge you Service Fees" but reserves the right to. OKX aggregates other venues: the FAQ warns that "other platforms may charge you some money for buying or listing" and that, depending on the NFT and venue, a royalty may apply. A routed trade therefore pays the destination venue's fee and royalty, plus gas. No single all-in rate is defensible; treat the total as the routed venue's schedule.OKX NFT FAQ + NFT Marketplace User Agreement ↗ · 14 September 2026
- Prices published in
- USDOKX NFT FAQ + NFT Marketplace User Agreement ↗ · 14 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum One, BNB Chain, and more
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Global wallet-based users
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Approval-based: a listing authorises Marketplace Contracts to transfer the listed NFT; PSBT-based on Bitcoin.
- Availability note
- Global except OKX's Restricted Locations: Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and the Crimea, Donetsk, Sevastopol and Luhansk regions of Ukraine. Also excluded is any region under Singapore, EU, UK or US embargo or sanctions, or designated high-risk by an intergovernmental body such as the FATF. The Web3 terms warn the Services may not be available in all markets and that OKX may restrict use from further locations. They include a governing-law clause for users located in the United States. Per-country feature availability is not published.
Legal entity on file: OKX, placed in 4 products. Only confirmed entities are shown; nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with OKX NFT Marketplace: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- currentCurrent verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 59, #5 of 9. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt nft_marketplace:okx_nft:2026.10.18:ac26a0b45900
Are you OKX NFT Marketplace? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.