Provider at a glance
- Category
- NFT Marketplaces
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- fragment.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 62 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read on file.
Fragment
Telegram collectibles marketplace
NFT Marketplaces
#3 Overall
Ranked #3 of 9 NFT marketplaces in the published ranking
62
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- Low evidence confidence
- $600 your cost/yr
Is Fragment right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Custody & approval risk7/10; the category best is 8
Look elsewhere if these come first
- True cost of a round trip3/10 here; Tensor scores 4
- Exit liquidity honesty3/10 here; OKX NFT Marketplace scores 7
- Royalty enforcement3/10 here; SuperRare scores 9
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best NFT marketplace shows where it lands for you.
What will Fragment cost you?
$600 your cost/yr
- Your monthly volume
- $1k
- Marketplace fee
- 5%
$360 above the median of 6 priced NFT marketplaces.
How this is calculatedHow safe is Fragment?
- Evidence: unknown4 of 4 criteria scored; no receipt file yet. The score is provisional until a quoted source is on file.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Fragment
Compare all 4- 4Tensor1 point below · stronger on royalties (7 against 3)61$240
- 5OKX NFT Marketplace3 points below · stronger on liquidity (7 against 3)59
- 6SuperRare4 points below · stronger on royalties (9 against 3)58$360
For your setup
Find out if Fragment fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Fragment lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best NFT marketplaceNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Fragment ranks #3
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (13.4 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
307+6.724.08#2/9Loading evidence…
243+2.304.08#7/9Loading evidence…
243+2.305.09#7/9Loading evidence…
223+2.113.09#5/9Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−7behind UniSat Marketplace, #2
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 60–63 and ranks #3–#4
Evidence4 of 4 scoredno receipt file for this category
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Fragment’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
True cost of a round trip 3 → 8 on its ladder · passes UniSat Marketplace+569#3 → #2
Exit liquidity honesty 3 → 8 on its ladder · passes UniSat Marketplace+569#3 → #2
Royalty enforcement 3 → 9 on its ladder · passes UniSat Marketplace+670#3 → #2
Custody & approval risk 7 → 6 on its ladder · Tensor passes it−160#3 → #4
True cost of a round trip 3 → 2 on its ladder · Tensor passes it−160#3 → #4
Exit liquidity honesty 3 → 2 on its ladder · Tensor passes it−160#3 → #4
Smallest climb: true cost of a round trip 3 → 8 passes UniSat Marketplace, #2.
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Custody & approval risk — 7/10, category best 8/10
Tradeoffs
3 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- True cost of a round trip — 3/10 against a category best of 8/10
- Exit liquidity honesty — 3/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Royalty enforcement — 3/10 against a category best of 9/10
Record watch-outs
- Issuer risk: Telegram defines, mints and can change the assets
- Zero third-party NFT collections — this is a single-issuer venue
Competitive position
Where Fragment leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 920.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#5 / 910.1 of 30 · best 16.9
Friction#1 / 94.7 of 10 · pool best
Trust record#2 / 93.2 of 8 · best 6.4
Measured data#1 / 98.3 of 18 · pool best
Where Fragment leads
- Custody & approval risk#2 / 9
Where it trails
- True cost of a round trip#7 / 9
- Exit liquidity honesty#7 / 9
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Tensor#4 of 9 · score 61 · 1.0 point behind
Fragment leads on
- Custody & approval risk7 vs 4
Tensor leads on
- True cost of a round trip4 vs 3
- Exit liquidity honesty5 vs 3
- Royalty enforcement7 vs 3
Largest single reason Fragment is ahead: friction (+5.2 display points).Scenario cost: Tensor is −$360 against Fragment.
OKX NFT Marketplace#5 of 9 · score 59 · 3.0 points behind
Fragment leads on
- Custody & approval risk7 vs 2
OKX NFT Marketplace leads on
- True cost of a round trip4 vs 3
- Exit liquidity honesty7 vs 3
- Royalty enforcement4 vs 3
Largest single reason Fragment is ahead: friction (+1.8 display points).Scenario cost: OKX NFT Marketplace has no verified pricing for this scenario.
SuperRare#6 of 9 · score 58 · 4.0 points behind
Fragment leads on
- Custody & approval risk7 vs 4
- True cost of a round trip3 vs 1
- Exit liquidity honesty3 vs 2
SuperRare leads on
- Royalty enforcement9 vs 3
Largest single reason Fragment is ahead: friction (+1.8 display points).Scenario cost: SuperRare is −$240 against Fragment.
Against the leader
84 vs 62 · gap 22.0Why OpenSea ranks above Fragment
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 22.0 to within rounding. Fragment is ahead on measured data (+3.6 in its favour).
DimensionThisOpenSeaGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here20.020.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight10.116.9−17.7, worse
Friction · 12% weight4.74.7same
Trust record · 9% weight3.26.4−8.3, worse
Measured data · 21% weight8.36.9+3.6, better
Published criterionThisOpenSeaPoints
True cost of a round trip · w2438−3.84, worse
Exit liquidity honesty · w2439−4.61, worse
Royalty enforcement · w2234−0.70, worse
Net6284−22.0
Your scenario
What Fragment costs on your scenario
Marketplace fee on your volume for a year. Excludes network gas and any withdrawal fee. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
$1k a month × 12 months × 5% marketplace fee = $600 / year
Your monthly volume · your input$1k
Marketplace fee · published rate5%
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 14 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
$600
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$2406 of 9 rows priced · Fragment +$360 vs median
Cheapest priced$60 · UniSat MarketplaceFragment costs +$540 more · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with UniSat Marketplace
2 of 9 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
1 of 9 quote a zero fee that leaves costs out, so they are absent from the median and the cheapest row, not counted as free.
Evidence
No evidence reading date recorded
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceUnknownno observation on file
No structured observation on file for this category; the strengths are the catalog’s published values.Public receiptsReading…category publishes no receipt file
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceNot yet ratedcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
No structured observation on file for this category; the receipt count is not counted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #3 to #4 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.No structured observation is on file for this provider in this category; the strengths are the catalog’s published values.
9 listed rows in this category still await an evidence read and sit outside the scored pool.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Custody & approval riskstrength 7 · weight 30Report an error——
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.True cost of a round tripstrength 3 · weight 24Report an error——
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Exit liquidity honestystrength 3 · weight 24Report an error——
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Royalty enforcementstrength 3 · weight 22Report an error——
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Custody failure (Fragment 7/10): whoever holds the assets loses or withholds them.Scored by Custody & approval risk · 30%
- Exit failure (Fragment 3/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Exit liquidity honesty · 24%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: True cost of a round trip (24%), Royalty enforcement (22%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Flat 5% platform fee on every collectible sale (direct sales, and the highest bid when an auction ends), plus small blockchain fees (~1 Gram; Fragment now denominates in Grams, $GRAM). Converting a basic username into a collectible costs a one-off flat 5 Grams, deducted from the proceeds of its first auction. Caution: DefiLlama's 'Fragment' fees figure is not marketplace volume. Its methodology counts all TON received by Fragment wallets, covering Telegram Stars, Ads, Premium, Gift Market, Gateway, username auctions and Telegram Gifts.Fragment about page ↗ · 14 September 2026
- Prices published in
- USDFragment about page ↗ · 14 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- TON
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Global wallet-based users
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Wallet custody is yours: Fragment's terms say the company does not have access to your TON wallet.
- Availability note
- Global except where Telegram/Fragment restricts — terms allow limiting countries without notice. TON only.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Fragment: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- currentCurrent verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 62, #3 of 9. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt nft_marketplace:fragment:2026.10.18:ac26a0b45900
Are you Fragment? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.