The score, by dimension
- the same for all 7
- #4 of 7 · best 17.8
- the same for all 7
- the same for all 7
- the same for all 7
Tick: the best in this ranking · Methodology v2026.11.1
DeFi Saver Automation
DeFi position automation
#4 of all 7 worldwide66
- Rank
- #4 of all 7 worldwidere-runs: scores 64–68 and ranks #3–#5
- Your cost
- Not priced on this basis
- Evidence
- High4 of 4 criteria sourced
- Licence
- No MiCA record on file
- Freshness
- Read September 2026checked · re-read due
Check availability for your country
DeFi Saver Automation · docs.defisaver.com. Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.
Commission: This provider pays ChainChoice nothing for this link. Disclosure
Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.
The verdict
DeFi Saver Automation is #4 of 7 published automation & keepers; it scores 9/10 on published lateness bound, the category best. Its widest gap is survives the vendor: 4/10, where Keep3r Network scores 9. Choose Keep3r Network if survives the vendor matters most.
Is DeFi Saver Automation right for you?
Suits you if
- The lateness the vendor will put in writing, and the conditions under which it declines to execute9/10, the category best
Look elsewhere if
- Whether the job survives the vendor: who else can turn the crank, and what end-of-life is published4/10 here; Keep3r Network scores 9
- What can fire the call, against what target, and who can check the condition was true4/10 here; Reactive Network scores 8
- Whether a run that never happened is visible, or the job just goes quiet5/10 here; Reactive Network scores 7
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best automation network shows where it lands for you.
What will DeFi Saver Automation cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Usage per month
- 10
How safe is DeFi Saver Automation?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Entity: not verified. No hand-confirmed record on file ties DeFi Saver Automation to the company that runs it, so this page cannot say which other products that company operates. Read the legal entity in its terms before you deposit. How we read the evidence
Open the evidenceIf it doesn’t fit, choose
Compare all 4- 2KeeperHubIf survives the vendor matters most: 63 points above · stronger on survives the vendor (6 against 4)69
- 3Reactive NetworkIf trigger surface and predicate locus matter most: 82 points above · stronger on trigger surface and predicate locus (8 against 4)68
- 5Keep3r NetworkIf survives the vendor matters most: 91 point below · stronger on survives the vendor (9 against 4)65
Provider at a glance
- Category
- Automation & Keepers
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- docs.defisaver.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 66 out of 100 under methodology 2026.11.1, from the evidence read in September 2026.
For your setup
Find out if DeFi Saver Automation fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where DeFi Saver Automation lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best automation networkNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why DeFi Saver Automation ranks #4
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (16.4 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 1 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
284+3.586.08#6/7
Primary
Provider page · read 2026-09-28304+3.844.09#4/7
Primary
Provider page · read 2026-09-28245+3.845.07#4/7
Primary
Provider page · read 2026-09-28189+5.186.09#1/7
Primary
Provider page · read 2026-09-28Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−2behind Reactive Network, #3 of all 7 worldwide, on the published score
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 64–68 and ranks #3–#5
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of DeFi Saver Automation’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
What can fire the call, against what target, and who can check the condition was true 4 → 5 on its ladder · passes Reactive Network+168#4 → #3
Whether the job survives the vendor: who else can turn the crank, and what end-of-life is published 4 → 5 on its ladder · passes Reactive Network+168#4 → #3
Whether a run that never happened is visible, or the job just goes quiet 5 → 7 on its ladder · passes Reactive Network+269#4 → #3
What can fire the call, against what target, and who can check the condition was true 4 → 3 on its ladder · Keep3r Network passes it−164#4 → #5
Whether the job survives the vendor: who else can turn the crank, and what end-of-life is published 4 → 3 on its ladder · Keep3r Network passes it−164#4 → #5
Whether a run that never happened is visible, or the job just goes quiet 5 → 4 on its ladder · Keep3r Network passes it−164#4 → #5
Smallest climb: what can fire the call, against what target, and who can check the condition was true 4 → 5 passes Reactive Network, #3.
Strengths
1 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- The lateness the vendor will put in writing, and the conditions under which it declines to execute — 9/10, the category best
Tradeoffs
3 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Whether the job survives the vendor: who else can turn the crank, and what end-of-life is published — 4/10 against a category best of 9/10
- What can fire the call, against what target, and who can check the condition was true — 4/10 against a category best of 8/10
- Whether a run that never happened is visible, or the job just goes quiet — 5/10 against a category best of 7/10
Record watch-outs
- Second, and worse than the floor itself: if your debt later falls to $5,000 or below on Ethereum, the subscription still reads active onchain and in the UI but "will not execute once its conditions are met", and no page describes any notice when you cross that line. Third, this is not a general-purpose scheduler and must not be compared as one - it cannot call an arbitrary address with arbitrary calldata, and every trigger and action must first be added to the DFSRegistry by the DeFi Saver multisig. Fourth, one multisig can stop every job: "Each contract can be killed (destroyed) by the Owner multisig, which effectively pauses any execution until further investigation is done" (https://docs.defisaver.com/protocol/security-and-audits/pause-control.md), with core contracts on a 7-day registry timelock and action contracts on 1 day, and Automation upgrades behind a 24h timelock activated by a 2/3 Admin multisig and initiated by a separate 3/5 Owner multisig (https://docs.defisaver.com/protocol/security-and-audits/admin-access-control.md).
Competitive position
How DeFi Saver Automation places on each criterion
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Against the leader
80 vs 66 · gap 14.0Why TukTuk (Helium) ranks above DeFi Saver Automation
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 14.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisTukTuk (Helium)Gap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight12.317.8−14.3, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisTukTuk (Helium)Points
What can fire the call, against what target, and who can check the condition was true · w2848−3.58, worse
Whether the job survives the vendor: who else can turn the crank, and what end-of-life is published · w3048−3.84, worse
Whether a run that never happened is visible, or the job just goes quiet · w2457−1.54, worse
The lateness the vendor will put in writing, and the conditions under which it declines to execute · w1896+1.73, better
Net6680−14.0
Your scenario
DeFi Saver Automation is not priced for this scenario
Metered usage beyond whatever the plan includes, for a year. Excludes egress, support tiers and enterprise minimums. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Usage per month · your input10
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 28 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDTypical costNot statedFewer than 5 priced rows: no typical cost is named · 0 of 7 rows priced
Lowest fee, priced rowsNone pricedDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filter
7 of 7 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the typical, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 28 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #3 to #5 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 10 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 28 September 2026.
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
What can fire the call, against what target, and who can check the condition was truestrength 4 · weight 28Report an errorProvider's own page28 September 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Whether the job survives the vendor: who else can turn the crank, and what end-of-life is publishedstrength 4 · weight 30Report an errorProvider's own page28 September 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.Whether a run that never happened is visible, or the job just goes quietstrength 5 · weight 24Report an errorProvider's own page28 September 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.The lateness the vendor will put in writing, and the conditions under which it declines to executestrength 9 · weight 18Report an errorProvider's own page28 September 2026…
Verified
The published strength matches the evidence cell and a source page is on file.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Control failure (DeFi Saver Automation 4/10): a key or vote changes the rules, freezes or mints.Scored by What can fire the call, against what target, and who can check the condition was true · 28%
- Liveness failure (DeFi Saver Automation 5/10): the operator stops, censors you or loses data.Scored by Whether a run that never happened is visible, or the job just goes quiet · 24%
- Execution failure (DeFi Saver Automation 9/10): you get a worse price, later, or nothing.Scored by The lateness the vendor will put in writing, and the conditions under which it declines to execute · 18%
- Exit failure (DeFi Saver Automation 4/10): you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.Scored by Whether the job survives the vendor: who else can turn the crank, and what end-of-life is published · 30%
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored.
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Fetched 28 September 2026 from https://
help .defisaver .com /automations /fees (and its .md source), unchanged since August: "Automations have a fee of 0.05% on each triggered automation transaction." | "Note that simply enabling and keeping any automated strategy enabled for your position does not involve any kind of one-time or on-going, continuous service fees." | "The transaction fee for each executed automated transaction will effectively be charged to the position, during transaction execution." | "This essentially means that the gas costs for the transaction will be charged to the position, not the user's wallet." | Swap-inclusive strategies additionally carry "0.25% on the swapped amount for swaps of assets that are not correlated in price (e.g. ETH --> USDC)", "0.1% on the swapped amount for swaps of assets that are correlated in price (e.g. ETH --> wstETH)" and "0.01% on the swapped amount for swaps of stablecoin pairs (e.g. USDT --> USDC)". | Flash-loan cost the buyer may pay: "Automations use flash loans as part of the recipe for the transaction - DeFi Saver defaults to using free flash loan sources, but in case there's a lack of liquidity in free sources, it will use an Aave flash loan (which has a 0.09% fee)". Recorded as disclosure only; price ranks in no criterion on this page.DeFi Saver Automation — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026 - Prices published in
- USDDeFi Saver Automation — official pricing page ↗ · 28 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- ethereum, arbitrum, optimism, base, linea, plasma
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- No geographic restriction is published on any page that could be read, re-checked 14 August 2026. DeFi Saver Automation is a non-custodial dapp with no account, no signup and no KYC - the position stays in the user's own Safe or DSProxy and "our Automations have no interaction with the funds in your wallet" (https://
help .defisaver .com /automations /are-there-risks-when-using-automation .md). https:// help .defisaver .com /legal /terms-and-conditions .md was re-read in full this pass: it contains no restricted-country list, no US or EU carve-out and no eligibility clause. https:// defisaver .com / was fetched (452KB, real server-rendered content, "Non-custodial management platform for decentralized finance integrating 15+ protocols") and grepped for jurisdiction / eligibility / prohibited / OFAC / KYC / 'not available in' / 'residents of' - zero matches. Deployment is by chain, not by country: contracts are published for Ethereum mainnet, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Linea and Plasma (https:// docs .defisaver .com /protocol /deployed-contracts .md, which embeds exactly those six address files), and automation availability varies WITHIN them - "No automations available for Compound on Optimism", "No automations available for Aave on Linea and Plasma", "No automations available for the Compound USDS market on Base+", "No automations available for Fluid on Plasma" (all four re-verified character-exact on https:// help .defisaver .com /automations /compatibility .md, 14 August 2026). The Notify alerting layer is narrower still: "The Notify feature is currently available on Ethereum Mainnet, Arbitrum, Base and Optimism." (https:// help .defisaver .com /features /notify .md). One caveat: https:// app .defisaver .com /terms-of-service returns HTTP 200 but is a 2,779-byte JavaScript shell with no readable legal text (as is the privacy policy, also 2,779 bytes), so the app's operative terms-of-service document could not be read. The 'global' bucket therefore rests on the help-centre terms page and the marketing site, not on that document.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with DeFi Saver Automation: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
9 methodology entries
- 28 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.11.1Score 66, #4 of 7. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.11.1, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt automation_keepers:defi_saver_automation:2026.11.1:89ccfa60e9be
Are you DeFi Saver Automation? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.