Provider at a glance
- Category
- Flash Loan Venues
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- developers.skyeco.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 81 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash)
Dai flash mint module
Flash Loan Venues
#2 Overall
Ranked #2 of 8 flash loan venues in the published ranking
81
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) right for you?
Right for you if these matter most
- Loan cost in basis points9/10; the category best is 10
- Integration surface10/10, the category best
- Venue incident record8/10; the category best is 9
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Single-transaction borrowable depth7/10 here; Aave V3 scores 10
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best flash loan venue shows where it lands for you.
What will Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Your monthly volume
- $1k
How safe is Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash)?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash)
Compare all 4- 1Morpho (Morpho Blue)1 point above · stronger on borrowable depth (9 against 7)82
- 3Uniswap v4 (flash accounting)4 points below · stronger on borrowable depth (8 against 7)77
- 4Aave V34 points below · stronger on borrowable depth (10 against 7)77
For your setup
Find out if Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best flash loan venueNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) ranks #2
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (26.9 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest. Best in this ranking on 1 of 4.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
307+6.727.510#5/8Loading evidence…
289+8.068.510#2/8Loading evidence…
2210+7.048.010#1/8Loading evidence…
208+5.127.59#2/8Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−1behind Morpho (Morpho Blue), #1
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 79–82 and ranks #1–#2
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash)’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Single-transaction borrowable depth 7 → 8 on its ladder · passes Morpho (Morpho Blue)+182#2 → #1
Loan cost in basis points 9 → 10 on its ladder · passes Morpho (Morpho Blue)+182#2 → #1
Venue incident record 8 → 10 on its ladder · passes Morpho (Morpho Blue)+282#2 → #1
Single-transaction borrowable depth 7 → 5 on its ladder · Uniswap v4 (flash accounting) passes it−277#2 → #3
Loan cost in basis points 9 → 6 on its ladder · Uniswap v4 (flash accounting) passes it−376#2 → #5
Integration surface 10 → 7 on its ladder · Uniswap v4 (flash accounting) passes it−377#2 → #4
Smallest climb: single-transaction borrowable depth 7 → 8 passes Morpho (Morpho Blue), #1.
Strengths
3 from the score dataWhere it leads
Best for readers who weight
- Loan cost in basis points — 9/10, category best 10/10
- Integration surface — 10/10, the category best
- Venue incident record — 8/10, category best 9/10
Tradeoffs
1 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Single-transaction borrowable depth — 7/10 against a category best of 10/10
Record watch-outs
- It mints Dai, and only Dai. Sky's own ecosystem has moved its centre of gravity to USDS — SparkLend's largest reserve at Ethereum block 25698729 (2026-08-06) was USDS at 274,141,154.964723 available versus 112,668,695.621999 DAI — so a strategy built on the 500m Dai ceiling depends on Dai liquidity remaining deep enough to convert into whatever the trade actually needs, on a token the issuer is steering users away from.
Competitive position
Where Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 814.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#2 / 820.2 of 30 · best 20.7
Friction#1 / 82.7 of 10 · constant here
Trust record#1 / 83.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 88.3 of 18 · constant here
Where Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) leads
- Loan cost in basis points#2 / 8
- Integration surface#1 / 8
- Venue incident record#2 / 8
Where it trailsNo criterion in the bottom third of its pool.
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Morpho (Morpho Blue)#1 of 8 · score 82 · 1.0 point ahead
Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) leads on
- Integration surface10 vs 7
Morpho (Morpho Blue) leads on
- Single-transaction borrowable depth9 vs 7
- Loan cost in basis points10 vs 9
Largest single reason Morpho (Morpho Blue) is ahead: published criteria (+1.3 display points).Scenario cost: Morpho (Morpho Blue) has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Uniswap v4 (flash accounting)#3 of 8 · score 77 · 4.0 points behind
Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) leads on
- Integration surface10 vs 6
Uniswap v4 (flash accounting) leads on
- Single-transaction borrowable depth8 vs 7
Largest single reason Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) is ahead: published criteria (+3.6 display points).Scenario cost: Uniswap v4 (flash accounting) has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Aave V3#4 of 8 · score 77 · 4.0 points behind
Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) leads on
- Loan cost in basis points9 vs 5
- Integration surface10 vs 9
- Venue incident record8 vs 7
Aave V3 leads on
- Single-transaction borrowable depth10 vs 7
Largest single reason Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) is ahead: published criteria (+3.9 display points).Scenario cost: Aave V3 has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
82 vs 81 · gap 1.0Why Morpho (Morpho Blue) ranks above Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash)
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 1.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisMorpho (Morpho Blue)Gap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here14.014.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight20.220.7−1.3, worse
Friction · 12% weight · constant here2.72.7same
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisMorpho (Morpho Blue)Points
Single-transaction borrowable depth · w3079−1.92, worse
Loan cost in basis points · w28910−0.90, worse
Integration surface · w22107+2.11, better
Net8182−1.0
Your scenario
Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) is not priced for this scenario
Trading fee on your volume for a year. Excludes network gas and any withdrawal fee. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your monthly volume · your input$1k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 27 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory medianNot priced0 of 8 rows priced
Cheapest pricedNone pricedDifference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filter
8 of 8 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 27 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #1 to #2 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 27 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Single-transaction borrowable depthstrength 7 · weight 30Report an error—27 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Loan cost in basis pointsstrength 9 · weight 28Report an error—27 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Integration surfacestrength 10 · weight 22Report an error—27 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Venue incident recordstrength 8 · weight 20Report an error—27 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Contract failure (Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) 8/10): the code holding the funds is exploited.Scored by Venue incident record · 20%
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Single-transaction borrowable depth (30%), Loan cost in basis points (28%), Integration surface (22%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Zero, and structurally so in the deployed contract, although the vendor's developer page still describes a fee. The module source, raw.githubusercontent.com/sky-ecosystem/dss-flash/master/src/flash.sol fetched 27 September 2026, hard-codes the price: flashFee ends "return 0;", the only parameter governance can file is the ceiling ('if (what == "max") {', anything else hits 'else revert("DssFlash/file-unrecognized-param");'), flashLoan hands the borrower a zero fee ('receiver.onFlashLoan(msg.sender, token, amount, 0, data) == CALLBACK_SUCCESS,') and pulls back exactly the principal ('dai.transferFrom(address(receiver), address(this), amount);'). That is the code deployed at 0x60744434d6339a6B27d73d9Eda62b6F66a0a04FA: Sourcify reports a full creation and runtime match for that address (deployment block 14787503), the repository README names it as the deployed mainnet address, and the chainlog key MCD_FLASH still resolves to it. Read on Ethereum at block 26070891 (27 September 2026): flashFee(DAI, 1e24) = 0; maxFlashLoan(DAI) = max() = 500000000000000000000000000 wad, i.e. 500,000,000 DAI; toll() reverts because the variable does not exist; flashFee for USDS reverts 'DssFlash/token-unsupported', so only DAI can be borrowed. The Sky developer page (developers.skyeco.com/protocol/liquidity/dai-flash-mint/, fetched 27 September 2026) still says the borrower must pay it back 'in the same transaction with a fee' and defines 'Minting Fees' as a parameter 'Encoded as toll in wad units.' The contract is what a borrower pays, and it charges nothing on any size up to the 500m ceiling.Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash) — official page at raw.githubusercontent.com ↗ · 27 September 2026
- Prices published in
- USDDai Flash Mint (DssFlash) — official page at raw.githubusercontent.com ↗ · 27 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Multi-chain
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Not published
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Not published
- Availability note
- Not published
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash): where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
11 methodology entries
- 27 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 81, #2 of 8. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 15 October 2026
2026.10.10The live-data rule names the researched market measurements a criterion reads- changed The live-data rule names a second kind of figure a score reads: a researched, dated market measurement a criterion's ladder is built on, read again on the 45-day review. /methodology/live-data lists the 14 criteria that read one; no score, rank or order changes.
- changed A saved decision is checked again on the answers the reader saved. The drift check had merged a priority suggested by the market (price swings, gas) into those answers, so a market reading could move a saved decision's #1; the published ranking never read it.
- added On every build a test reads every criterion's published ladder: one that names a market quantity or a market-data source must be declared, and every scored row of a declared criterion must carry the source and the date its figure was read.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt flash_loans:sky_dai_flash_mint:2026.10.18:e400b7d36cdc
Are you Dai Flash Mint (DssFlash)? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.