Provider at a glance
- Category
- Prediction Markets
- Entity
- Not verified
- Official website
- adipredictstreet.com
Independent rankingchecked How it works
Details
Scored 54 out of 100 under methodology 2026.10.18, from the evidence read in September 2026.
ADI PredictStreet
Prediction market from Gibraltar
Prediction Markets
#7 Overall
Ranked #7 of 8 prediction markets in the published ranking
54
ChainChoice Score
The ChainChoice Score, shown against 100: published scores run from 41 to 99.- High evidence confidence
Is ADI PredictStreet right for you?
Look elsewhere if these come first
- Resolution integrity2/10 here; Limitless Exchange scores 3
- Regulatory access6/10 here; the category best is 8
- Liquidity where you trade4/10 here; Limitless Exchange scores 5
- Total trading cost1/10 here; Opinion (Opinion Labs) scores 6
Not yet tested for your country. Markets it lists: Global.
to test where you can use it.
The rank above is the published one, the same for every reader. Find my best prediction market shows where it lands for you.
What will ADI PredictStreet cost you?
Not priced on this basis
- Your monthly volume
- $1k
How safe is ADI PredictStreet?
- Evidence: verified4 of 4 criteria rest on quoted, sourced receipts. Read September 2026.
- LicenceMiCA (EU): no register record on file here.
Alternatives to ADI PredictStreet
Compare all 4- 5Limitless Exchange10 points above · stronger on cost (3 against 1)64$360
- 6Myriad Markets2 points above · stronger on cost (4 against 1)56$240
- 8Opinion (Opinion Labs)1 point below · stronger on cost (6 against 1)53$120
For your setup
Find out if ADI PredictStreet fits you
The rank above is the published one — the same for every visitor. Answer the category's questions and this section shows where ADI PredictStreet lands for you, which criteria your answers weight up, and which stated needs the record does or does not meet. The published rank stays beside it.
- A few questions
- No account required
- Ranking-blind: no commercial input
- Personalised in under 60 seconds
Find my best prediction marketNothing is inferred from clicks, popularity or commercial value.
Why this rank
Why ADI PredictStreet ranks #7
Each strength is read from evidence on a 0–10 ladder and weighted as the published methodology states. The 32 objective points these produce (10.7 here) sit inside the score; availability, friction, trust record and measured data add the rest.
4 published criteria · Σ weight 100
CriterionWeightStrength · 0–10ScoreContrib.MedianBestRankEvidence
322+2.053.05#7/8Loading evidence…
266+4.994.58#3/8Loading evidence…
244+3.075.59#6/8Loading evidence…
181+0.584.57#8/8Loading evidence…
Hairline = best in this ranking · tick = its median · a missing bar is "not scored", never zero
Margin−2behind Myriad Markets, #6
RobustnessOne point from changingacross a one-point change to each of its 4 criterion scores, the re-run scores 52–56 and ranks #6–#8
Evidence4 of 4 scored4 quoted, 4 with a source link
What would move the rank
Each line is the ranking run again with one of ADI PredictStreet’s criterion scores changed and every other value held: the smallest whole-point change on that criterion that moves its rank, and where the re-run puts it. Up to 4 climbs and 3 falls are listed, smallest change first. Nothing here is a forecast.
Resolution integrity 2 → 3 on its ladder · passes Myriad Markets+156#7 → #6
Regulatory access 6 → 7 on its ladder · passes Myriad Markets+156#7 → #6
Liquidity where you trade 4 → 5 on its ladder · passes Myriad Markets+156#7 → #6
Total trading cost 1 → 3 on its ladder · passes Myriad Markets+257#7 → #6
Resolution integrity 2 → 1 on its ladder · Opinion (Opinion Labs) passes it−152#7 → #8
Regulatory access 6 → 5 on its ladder · Opinion (Opinion Labs) passes it−153#7 → #8
Liquidity where you trade 4 → 3 on its ladder · Opinion (Opinion Labs) passes it−153#7 → #8
Smallest climb: resolution integrity 2 → 3 passes Myriad Markets, #6.
Strengths
0 from the score dataWhere it leads
No scored criterion is at or within one point of the category best, so no strength can be stated from the data.
Tradeoffs
4 from the score dataWhere it trails
Not for readers who put first
- Resolution integrity — 2/10 against a category best of 5/10
- Regulatory access — 6/10 against a category best of 8/10
- Liquidity where you trade — 4/10 against a category best of 9/10
- Total trading cost — 1/10 against a category best of 7/10
Record watch-outs
- It is regulated as gambling, not as a market, and the licence buys a complaints channel rather than resolution integrity.
- Identity verification is triggered at 2,000 USD1 of cumulative net deposits or at the first withdrawal request. The FAQ and Terms clause 7.2 disagree on the settlement asset (USD1 versus USDC).
- No exploit, outage, disputed resolution or failed payout documented - on an operating history that began with its March 2026 licence and the FIFA World Cup.
Competitive position
Where ADI PredictStreet leads and where it trails
Rank on every objective dimension among the rows scored on it. A criterion in the top third of its pool is listed as a lead, the bottom third as a trail; the middle is neither. Popularity, size and commercial terms are not dimensions.
Availability#1 / 820.0 of 20 · constant here
Published criteria#6 / 88.0 of 30 · best 15.7
Friction#8 / 80.7 of 10 · best 4.7
Trust record#1 / 83.2 of 8 · constant here
Measured data#1 / 88.3 of 18 · constant here
Where ADI PredictStreet leads
- Regulatory access#3 / 8
Where it trails
- Resolution integrity#7 / 8
- Liquidity where you trade#6 / 8
- Total trading cost#8 / 8
Closest alternatives
The 3 nearest rows by score
Nearest by published score in either direction. Each card states the criteria on which the two rows differ and the cost difference under the same scenario inputs; the compare arithmetic below shows why the higher one ranks higher.
Opinion (Opinion Labs)#8 of 8 · score 53 · 1.0 point behind
ADI PredictStreet leads on
- Resolution integrity2 vs 1
- Regulatory access6 vs 3
- Liquidity where you trade4 vs 3
Opinion (Opinion Labs) leads on
- Total trading cost6 vs 1
Largest single reason ADI PredictStreet is ahead: published criteria (+2.6 display points).Scenario cost: ADI PredictStreet has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Myriad Markets#6 of 8 · score 56 · 2.0 points ahead
ADI PredictStreet leads on
- Regulatory access6 vs 3
- Liquidity where you trade4 vs 1
Myriad Markets leads on
- Resolution integrity3 vs 2
- Total trading cost4 vs 1
Largest single reason Myriad Markets is ahead: friction (+5.2 display points).Scenario cost: ADI PredictStreet has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Limitless Exchange#5 of 8 · score 64 · 10.0 points ahead
ADI PredictStreet leads on
- Regulatory access6 vs 5
Limitless Exchange leads on
- Resolution integrity3 vs 2
- Liquidity where you trade5 vs 4
- Total trading cost3 vs 1
Largest single reason Limitless Exchange is ahead: friction (+5.2 display points).Scenario cost: ADI PredictStreet has no verified pricing for this scenario.
Against the leader
83 vs 54 · gap 29.0Why Kalshi ranks above ADI PredictStreet
The compare workspace's arithmetic applied to these two rows. Each dimension's share of the gap is its weight × the difference, on the displayed scale — it reproduces the displayed gap of 29.0 to within rounding.
DimensionThisKalshiGap share
Availability · 23% weight · constant here20.020.0same
Published criteria · 35% weight8.015.7−20.0, worse
Friction · 12% weight0.74.0−8.6, worse
Trust record · 9% weight · constant here3.23.2same
Measured data · 21% weight · constant here8.38.3same
Published criterionThisKalshiPoints
Resolution integrity · w3225−3.07, worse
Regulatory access · w2668−1.66, worse
Liquidity where you trade · w2449−3.84, worse
Total trading cost · w1814−1.73, worse
Net5483−29.0
Your scenario
ADI PredictStreet is not priced for this scenario
Trading spread on your volume for a year. Excludes network gas and any withdrawal fee. Change an input and every figure recomputes from the published rate; the published rank does not move.
your cost/yr · default scenario — set your own
Your monthly volume · your input$1k
Rate read from the provider’s published pricing ↗ on 14 September 2026.
your cost/yrCost is stated as your cost/yr in USD; it is never a yield, never annualised, and it does not enter the score.
Not priced on this basis
Under the default inputs · USDCategory median$2256 of 8 rows priced
Cheapest priced$120 · Opinion (Opinion Labs)Difference not stated · availability not applied — set your country to filterCompare with Opinion (Opinion Labs)
2 of 8 rows in this ranking have no verified rate for this scenario and are absent from the median, not counted as free.
Evidence
Evidence read 14 September 2026
One row per published criterion: the page each strength was read from, its source type by domain, the reading date and whether the file and the published table agree. Open a row for the quote and the receipt.
4 of 4 cells scored
Score evidenceVerified4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from receipts
4 of 4 criteria reconstruct from a quoted, sourced receipt equal to the published strength.Public receiptsReading…4 quoted with a source URL
The receipt file has not been read yet.Evidence confidenceHighcoverage and corroboration, never freshness
4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.RobustnessOne point from changingrank #6 to #8 across one-point re-runs
Whether the position holds when one criterion score is changed by one point and the ranking is run again. It is always a re-run of the ranking, never an estimate.The newest evidence read on the platform is 3 November 2026; this category's reading is older. The scores stand as read on 14 September 2026.
Reading the evidence ledger…
CriterionSourceTypeReadFreshnessStatusReceipt
Resolution integritystrength 2 · weight 32Report an error—14 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Regulatory accessstrength 6 · weight 26Report an error—14 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Liquidity where you tradestrength 4 · weight 24Report an error—14 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.Total trading coststrength 1 · weight 18Report an error—14 September 2026*
Unknown
No reading date is recorded for this cell or its category.No receipt
A strength is published but no quote or source page is on file for it.How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
- Oracle failure (ADI PredictStreet 2/10): a wrong price or outcome liquidates or settles a position.Scored by Resolution integrity · 32%
- Regulatory failure (ADI PredictStreet 6/10): no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.Scored by Regulatory access · 26%
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means. Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Liquidity where you trade (24%), Total trading cost (18%).
Facts
facts, not scoresWhat the record publishes
- Pricing
- Fees are disclosed, but no headline rate is published. The FAQ: 'Trading commission: A small percentage of the value of each trade, charged at the time of the trade. The exact rate is displayed on each market page before you trade'. Gas on deposits and withdrawals is charged in stablecoin/ADI. The Terms (effective 27 Mar 2026, clause 5.6) say the Company may charge trading, settlement and withdrawal fees, that applicable fees are published on the Platform, and that no deposit fee is charged save as otherwise disclosed. The market data served on adipredictstreet.com on 14 Sep 2026 carried feeTakerBps 600 on all 34 listed markets; the base that rate applies to is not documented. DefiLlama (api.llama.fi/summary/fees/predictstreet, total30d) shows $875,834 of fees on $45.95M of 30-day volume (summary/dexs, total30d), a realised take rate of about 1.9%.ADI PredictStreet — verified source ↗ · 14 September 2026
- Prices published in
- USDADI PredictStreet — verified source ↗ · 14 September 2026
- Licences held
- Not published
- Compliance level
- partial
- Regulatory note
- Not published
- Supported chains
- Multi-chain
- Markets served
- global
- Primary markets
- Global
- Restricted markets
- Not published
- Operating limits
- Licensed by the Gibraltar Licensing Authority as a betting intermediary (Remote Gambling Licence 167). Identity verification is triggered at 2,000 USD1 of cumulative net deposits or at the first withdrawal request. The FAQ says deposits are accepted in USD1 only at launch (purchasable via Alchemy), while Terms clause 7.2 says the platform 'primarily settles in USDC': the provider's own pages disagree on the settlement asset. The platform operates on the ADI blockchain network. Restricted countries are not published; applicants are told at registration.
- Availability note
- Licensed by the Gibraltar Licensing Authority as a betting intermediary (Remote Gambling Licence 167). Identity verification is triggered at 2,000 USD1 of cumulative net deposits or at the first withdrawal request. The FAQ says deposits are accepted in USD1 only at launch (purchasable via Alchemy), while Terms clause 7.2 says the platform 'primarily settles in USDC': the provider's own pages disagree on the settlement asset. The platform operates on the ADI blockchain network. Restricted countries are not published; applicants are told at registration.
No confirmed legal entity is on file for this record. Nothing is inferred from the brand name.
If something goes wrong with ADI PredictStreet: where to complain, and where to report a scam
Loading the routes for your country.
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means this product in this category was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.
How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money
History
What the record carries
Changes to published ranks are recorded in a ledger; every step and its cause is listed on the rank-history page. The entries below begin with the current verified snapshot, then the methodology versions whose changes applied to this category, newest first.
10 methodology entries
- 14 September 2026Current verified snapshot · methodology 2026.10.18Score 54, #7 of 8. 4 of 4 criteria scored. History starts here; earlier values are not interpolated.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.8When nothing serves your country, the list shown for reference is the published ranking · platform-wide- fixed The reference list shown when nothing serves your country is the published order with the published scores, and a build check now fails any such list out of that order or with a score the ranking does not publish.
- fixed The explorer prints an overall rank only for a row the published ranking holds; a country entrant such as Coinbase Commerce for US merchants shows no overall rank.
- changed Published orders do not move. Country results change only where nothing serves the country: in India bill pay keeps Bitcoin Well first and now shows Strike second, as published; 35 such runs across all categories and countries now match the published list exactly.
- 10 October 2026
2026.10.6A criterion you require re-scores the rows that meet it · platform-wide- changed The explorer sends each criterion you require, at any band, as fit_required with your other answers; region, licence, chain and fact filters stay filters. On /best, a required criterion joins For you as a marked preference does, which needs your country; Overall stays the published ranking, filtered.
- added Every published criterion has a golden case as the explorer sends it (require:<criterion>), so the order a requirement gives is replayed and gated as the published order is, and a change to it needs an entry here.
- 16 September 2026
2026.09.15Dimension scores carry tenths, and eleven more categories are re-read from primary sources · platform-wide- changed Dimension scores resolve to tenths of a point (O-04b), and weightedTotal is rounded to six decimal places before the order is read. 518 published scores move across 107 categories that were not re-read; none of them moves by more than 4 points, and most move by 1.
- fixed 66 published scores change in the eleven re-read categories, against a verbatim source each. The largest moves are Reflexer RAI (−16), Beefy and Unrekt (−11), Aztec (−10) and Golem (+9) — all of them rows whose sources had moved since their last read.
- changed Published order moves in 38 of 119 categories and three #1s change: smart_contract_audits (Zellic → Certora) and travel_rule_compliance (Sumsub Travel Rule → CodeVASP) on the finer resolution, kyc_compliance (Veriff → Sumsub) on the re-read.
- added availabilitySource (O-04g): for a reader who states a country, a row whose availability in that country rests on a region tag its record gives no source for sorts below every sourced row. It is inert in every order published here, which states no country.
Methodology 2026.10.18, the same published run every visitor sees · receipt prediction_markets:adi-predictstreet:2026.10.18:58d25fc5e062
Are you ADI PredictStreet? Reply to this verdict, or send evidence, ask for a correction or claim the listing. Every message gets a public ticket number; none of it changes a rank unless a public page or a signed statement supports it.