Skip to main content

Public — correction log, archive

Corrections CC-2026-0101 to CC-2026-0120

Factual errors, misapplied scoring, stale data and claims the site could not back. Each entry says what was wrong, what was fixed, how it was caught and whether the published order moved. An entry whose logged date is later than its corrected date was copied here from the methodology or data changelog that first published the fix. No entry is ever deleted.

This page prints the corrections numbered CC-2026-0101 to CC-2026-0120, in full. It is closed: no entry is added to it or taken from it. 20 corrections, logged 2026-11-05 to 2026-11-11. · All archive pages ·

IDCC-2026-0120Corrected2026-11-11TypefactualSeverityhigh
Category: Intent Networks · Providers: Across Protocol, NEAR Intents, deBridge Liquidity Network (DLN), Relay Protocol, 1inch Fusion
What was wrong

On 10 November 2026 at 2:05 p.m. ET (19:05 UTC) Across posted on its own X account that users should not visit its app, connect wallets or sign transactions while it investigates a possible security incident affecting its domain (as reported by Cointelegraph and The Defiant the same day). By 22:05 UTC across.to, app.across.to and docs.across.to no longer resolved. Intents still ranked Across Protocol third (score 67), with a link to across.to on its row.

What was fixed

From 00:48 UTC on 11 November 2026 (an emergency step) the rows stayed ranked with a dated warning and no link to across.to; this correction takes them out of the ranking. Across Protocol leaves the intents ranking as a pending re-read. It is listed under "Not confirmed" with the line "Re-read pending: Across says across.to was taken over through its registrar on 10 November 2026; its post-mortem is not out yet". No page links to across.to or its subdomains while it is held: they are listed in data/outbound-blocked-hosts.json, which the build checks every outbound link against, and its review and two comparison guides are withdrawn. It returns, re-scored, once Across publishes its post-mortem on its own site (root cause, hijack window, contracts unaffected), the domain stays clean for 7 days after it, and the row is read live on its own pages.

How it was caught

Reports of Across’s warning on 10 November 2026 (Cointelegraph, The Defiant), checked the same evening against the domain itself: across.to did not resolve to an address and app.across.to and docs.across.to answered NXDOMAIN.

Did the published order move?

Yes, in intents every row below Across Protocol moves up one place: NEAR Intents #4 to #3; deBridge Liquidity Network (DLN) #5 to #4; Relay Protocol #6 to #5; 1inch Fusion #7 to #6. CoW Protocol stays first and UniswapX second; no score changes. In all 27 country lists (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States and Vietnam) Across Protocol leaves third place and NEAR Intents takes it, with every row below it up one; CoW Protocol stays first and UniswapX second in each.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-across-reread-pending · src/lib/rereadPending.ts · data/outbound-blocked-hosts.json
IDCC-2026-0119Corrected2026-11-11TypefactualSeverityhigh
Category: Bridges · Providers: Across, Jumper Exchange, Squid Router, Bungee, Base Bridge, Orbiter Finance
What was wrong

On 10 November 2026 at 2:05 p.m. ET (19:05 UTC) Across posted on its own X account that users should not visit its app, connect wallets or sign transactions while it investigates a possible security incident affecting its domain (as reported by Cointelegraph and The Defiant the same day). By 22:05 UTC across.to, app.across.to and docs.across.to no longer resolved. Bridges still ranked Across second (score 79), with a link to across.to on its row and on its review page, and sixteen other bridge rows and five reviews suggested choosing Across instead.

What was fixed

From 00:48 UTC on 11 November 2026 (an emergency step) the rows stayed ranked with a dated warning and no link to across.to; this correction takes them out of the ranking. Across leaves the bridges ranking as a pending re-read. It is listed under "Not confirmed" with the line "Re-read pending: Across says across.to was taken over through its registrar on 10 November 2026; its post-mortem is not out yet". No page links to across.to or its subdomains while it is held: they are listed in data/outbound-blocked-hosts.json, which the build checks every outbound link against, and its review and two comparison guides are withdrawn. It returns, re-scored, once Across publishes its post-mortem on its own site (root cause, hijack window, contracts unaffected), the domain stays clean for 7 days after it, and the row is read live on its own pages. The rows and reviews that suggested Across as an alternative now name only the other products they already named, or no product.

How it was caught

Reports of Across’s warning on 10 November 2026 (Cointelegraph, The Defiant), checked the same evening against the domain itself: across.to did not resolve to an address and app.across.to and docs.across.to answered NXDOMAIN.

Did the published order move?

Yes, in bridges every row below Across moves up one place: Jumper Exchange #3 to #2; Squid Router #4 to #3; Bungee #5 to #4; Base Bridge #6 to #5; Orbiter Finance #7 to #6; Arbitrum Bridge #8 to #7; Optimism Gateway #9 to #8; Scroll Bridge #10 to #9; Synapse #11 to #10; Stargate #12 to #11; zkSync Bridge #13 to #12; Wormhole #14 to #13; deBridge #15 to #14; Symbiosis #16 to #15; Everclear (formerly Connext) #17 to #16; Hop Protocol #18 to #17. Relay stays first; no score changes. In all 27 country lists (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States and Vietnam) Across leaves second place and Jumper Exchange takes it, with every row below it up one; Relay stays first in each.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-across-reread-pending · src/lib/rereadPending.ts · data/outbound-blocked-hosts.json
IDCC-2026-0118Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeveritymaterial
Category: Crypto Cards · Providers: Nexo Card, MetaMask Card
What was wrong

Nexo Card was scored 9 of 10 on how long the card programme is likely to last. The 9-10 band also asks that no partner change has interrupted the card in 24 months, and Nexo's own status record, read on 10 November 2026, begins on 13 October 2025, so 24 months cannot be shown.

What was fixed

Nexo Card's programme survival is scored 8 from its card page, its card terms (which name DiPocket as issuer) and its status record, as read on 10 November 2026; its total falls from 69 to 68.

How it was caught

The November cadence re-read of crypto cards, with a second reader on every change to a card that was in the top three.

Did the published order move?

Yes, in crypto cards: MetaMask Card moves from fourth to third (69, unchanged) and Nexo Card from third to fourth. ether.fi Cash stays first and Crypto.com Card second. In 15 European country lists (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom) MetaMask Card replaces Nexo Card in third place.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-cr-nov-push-e-reread · src/lib/catalog/cryptoCardPool.ts
IDCC-2026-0117Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeveritymaterial
Category: Staking · Providers: Chorus One, Figment
What was wrong

Chorus One was ranked third in staking on evidence read on 28 September 2026 from chorus.one. Its own site now says "Chorus One is now a part of Bitwise", and its validators run under the name Bitwise Onchain Solutions, so its staking offer has to be read on the new operator's own pages, and that read has not been made yet.

What was fixed

Chorus One leaves the ranking and is listed under "Not confirmed": "Re-read pending, new operator: Chorus One is now part of Bitwise, and its staking offer is being re-read on Bitwise's own pages." Its earlier scores are not shown. It returns to the ranking when that read is made.

How it was caught

The November cadence re-read of staking, with an independent review of the exit that read no page on chorus.one, whose terms do not allow automated reading.

Did the published order move?

Yes, in staking: Figment moves from fourth to third, Everstake from fifth to fourth, Twinstake from sixth to fifth and Blockdaemon from seventh to sixth. Kiln stays first and Luganodes second. In 27 country lists Figment takes the third place Chorus One held.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-cr-nov-push-e-reread · src/lib/methodologySpecs/exclusions/staking.ts · src/lib/rereadPending.ts
IDCC-2026-0116Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeverityhigh
Categories: Crypto Cards, Onramps, Staking
What was wrong

Crypto cards, on-ramps and staking were due for their 45-day re-read by 12 November 2026; every row had last been read on 28 September 2026. Some scores, prices and availability statements no longer matched the providers' own pages: Coinify's site shows "Coinify Services are Temporarily unavailable" on every page; Zeal's card programme is closing; ether.fi's ATM limits and fee pages changed; Topper's own help centre says its service is paused in the European Economic Area since 1 July 2026; and Chorus One is now part of Bitwise.

What was fixed

The rows of the three categories were re-read against the providers' own pages on 10 November 2026, under our named research agent or by hand in a signed-out browser, and each quote was matched against the page as read. A row is dated only when every item in it was read that day. All 28 rows these categories rank are dated 10 November 2026. Four rows that could not be read leave their tables under "Not confirmed", with their earlier scores not shown: RedotPay Card (its card page and terms show a block page, and its fee table is an image), Unlimit Crypto (its pricing page now forwards to the Stable.com home page, which shows no prices), Kotani Pay (its developer documentation does not load) and Chorus One (now part of Bitwise; see CC-2026-0117).

How it was caught

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push E), with a second reader refuting each score, an independent second reader on every "none published" finding, reviews of every change near a first place, and by-hand reads where a page answered only to a browser.

Did the published order move?

Yes. Measured on rankings.json and data/country-orders.json against origin/main (df6baed55). 7 published scores moved in 3 categories: Nexo Card 69 to 68, Bleap Card 59 to 60, Zeal 49 to 43 (its programme is closing), Coinify 75 to 74 (operating status unclear), Onramp.money 51 to 48, Alchemy Pay 42 to 41 and Everstake 67 to 69. No first place changed, worldwide or in any country list. The top three changed in crypto cards (MetaMask Card third, Nexo Card fourth; CC-2026-0118) and in staking (Figment third; CC-2026-0117); in seven country lists (Hong Kong, Japan, the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates and Vietnam) RedotPay Card leaves the crypto card list, where it was third. Lower in the lists, as rows leave: Coinbase Card moves from seventh to sixth and Plutus Card from ninth to eighth in crypto cards; in on-ramps Alchemy Pay moves from twelfth to eleventh, Koywe from thirteenth to twelfth, Onmeta from fourteenth to thirteenth and Fonbnk from fifteenth to fourteenth. In country lists, from the providers' own availability pages as read on 10 November 2026: MetaMask Card enters the United Kingdom crypto card list in third place; Topper enters the on-ramp lists for Japan (sixth), Indonesia (seventh) and South Korea (seventh); Coinbase Onramp leaves the Japan list, where it was fifth; and Alchemy Pay leaves the United Kingdom list, where it was tenth.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-cr-nov-push-e-reread · src/lib/rereadPending.ts · scripts/check-review-cadence-is-kept.ts
IDCC-2026-0115Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeverityhigh
Categories: P2P Exchanges, OTC Desks, Token Launchpads, Liquid Staking · Providers: Binance P2P, Binance OTC & Execution Services, Binance Launchpool, Binance Staked ETH (WBETH)
What was wrong

Every country page for Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Sweden, Finland and Norway asked whether Coinbase, Kraken and Binance are available there and answered that "most major platforms have completed MiCA licensing for the EU". That was true of Coinbase and Kraken, not of Binance: no Binance entity is on ESMA’s MiCA register, and every transitional period in the EU and EEA had ended by 1 July 2026. The AMF’s list of struck-off providers shows Binance France SAS removed on 2 July 2026, for "Caducité automatique du fait de la fin de période transitoire MiCA" (it lapsed automatically when the MiCA transitional period ended). Binance P2P, Binance OTC, Binance Launchpool and Binance Staked ETH (WBETH) were also listed in those countries’ rankings, because their records said they serve Europe or the world and named none of these countries as restricted. The links to Binance were already withheld from readers in the EEA.

What was fixed

The answer now names only the platforms that ESMA’s register shows as authorised, read from the same register record the licence lines on our provider pages use: Coinbase and Kraken hold MiCA authorisation; Binance does not, and no transitional period has covered it there since 1 July 2026. When the register record changes, the answer changes with it. The four Binance rows are restricted in the thirteen countries, with a note dated 10 November 2026 that quotes the AMF and says ESMA’s register lists no Binance entity. Their scores do not change, and they stay listed for readers outside the EU and EEA.

How it was caught

A re-read in the November cadence round (CR-NOV push E) found Binance France struck off the AMF’s list; an independent check of ESMA’s register, the AMF and national registers on 10 November 2026 confirmed that Binance holds no MiCA authorisation in any of these countries.

Did the published order move?

Yes, in 51 country lists, measured on data/country-orders.json. Binance P2P leaves the peer-to-peer exchange lists for Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Sweden, Finland and Norway, where it was #6 of 8. Binance OTC & Execution Services leaves the OTC desk lists for Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Sweden, Finland and Norway, where it was #3 of 8 (in the Netherlands it was already restricted). Binance Launchpool leaves the launchpad lists for Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Sweden, Finland and Norway, where it was #5 of 9. Binance Staked ETH (WBETH) leaves the liquid staking lists for Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Sweden, Finland and Norway, where it was #9 of 11. No #1 changes, no score changes, and the worldwide order does not change.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-binance-eu-eea-mica · src/lib/countryAvailabilityFaq.ts · tests/country-availability-faq.test.ts
IDCC-2026-0114Corrected2026-11-10TypefactualSeverityminor
What was wrong

Every correction in the Atom feed (/api/feed.xml) linked the top of the corrections log, with no anchor to the entry. From 5 November 2026 the earlier entries were printed on the archive page, so their items pointed at a page that did not print them (59 of the 111 on 10 November). The correction log as data (/data/corrections.json) gave no address for any entry, and an old address of an entry (the log or the archive with the entry's anchor) opened the top of a page instead of the entry.

What was fixed

Each feed item links to the page that prints the entry, with its anchor, and each entry in /data/corrections.json carries that address as url. The earlier corrections are filed on closed archive pages of 20 numbers each, which never change; a corrections page asked for an entry it does not print sends the reader to the page that does, and the archive index lists every archived entry under its old anchor, so those links land without JavaScript.

How it was caught

An internal review of the corrections pages (2026-11-10) followed the feed's links and found every one at the top of the log.

Did the published order move?

No. No published score or rank changed.

Recorded in: src/lib/trust/correctionsPages.ts · tests/corrections-archive.test.ts · tests/feed-names-what-it-carries.test.ts
IDCC-2026-0113Corrected2026-11-10TypefactualSeveritymaterial
Categories: Simple Buy, Crypto Savings Plans · Providers: Relai, Trade Republic, Scalable Capital
What was wrong

The licence line said Relai's MiCA authorisation was passported to the EEA, while ESMA's register lists the 26 other EU member states and none of Iceland, Liechtenstein or Norway. It said Trade Republic and Scalable Capital were authorised by BaFin, while the register lists both credit institutions under an Article 60 notification, not an Article 63 authorisation; Scalable Capital's entry is for Germany alone, not the EU and EEA.

What was fixed

Relai's line names the 26 EU member states the register passports it to. Trade Republic's and Scalable Capital's lines say they provide crypto-asset services under a MiCA Article 60 notification to BaFin, with the register date; Scalable Capital's names Germany alone.

How it was caught

An independent review of a branch (2026-11-10), checked against ESMA's register (CASPS.csv, read 2026-11-10, legal basis column).

Did the published order move?

No. No published score or rank changed.

Recorded in: src/lib/micaLicenseRegistry.ts · tests/licence-basis.test.ts
IDCC-2026-0112Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeveritymaterial
Category: Sentiment Analytics · Providers: cookie.fun (Cookie DAO), Kaito Pro, Augmento
What was wrong

cookie.fun’s row could not be re-read on time. Its address, its pricing page and its terms address now redirect to pro.cookie.fun, which presents Cookie Pro, an AI research app with a paid plan; the pricing page the row was read from no longer exists. Its price stayed at its 7 August 2026 read, past our 45-day promise, and we could not establish that the product the row described is still offered as described.

What was fixed

cookie.fun leaves the sentiment analytics ranking and is listed as not confirmed, with that reason. It is not a judgement on Cookie; it returns, re-scored, after its pages are read again by hand, or is retired if the product is no longer offered. Its date is not changed. Cookie’s terms, read on 10 November 2026, list 29 restricted jurisdictions, among them the United States, China, Nigeria, the Philippines, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates and Vietnam; the entry’s reason says so.

How it was caught

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push D): a by-hand read of its pricing address landed on a different product.

Did the published order move?

Yes, in sentiment analytics: cookie.fun (Cookie DAO) (#6 of 8, score 58) leaves the ranking; Kaito Pro moves from #7 to #6 and Augmento from #8 to #7, their scores unchanged. No score, no #1 and no top-five place changes. cookie.fun also leaves each of the 27 country lists for sentiment analytics, where it was #6 of 8; every other row keeps its order there.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-cookie-fun-reread-pending · src/lib/rereadPending.ts · src/lib/methodologySpecs/exclusions/sentimentAnalytics.ts
IDCC-2026-0111Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeveritymaterial
Category: Payment Gateways · Provider: Plisio
What was wrong

We listed Plisio as a working payment gateway, sixth of twelve worldwide and fifth for Germany, with a button that read “Start with Plisio”. Plisio’s site has shown only one notice since at least 8 November 2026: "Our service is currently experiencing a security incident caused by a hacker attack. Restoration work is underway. For security reasons, the processing of incoming and outgoing payments has been temporarily suspended." Our page did not say so until 10 November.

What was fixed

Plisio’s entry now opens with what its site says and the day we read it, its first caution quotes the notice, and its button no longer invites a sign-up. This is not a score for the incident: Plisio has not yet said what was taken or whether merchants are covered. Plisio keeps its place in the list for now. This category’s method has no criterion that reads an outage, and taking the row out of the ranking until its service is back is the next step; it is not done yet.

How it was caught

We read Plisio’s own site on 10 November 2026.

Did the published order move?

No. No score and no place changed: Plisio is still shown sixth of twelve worldwide and fifth for Germany, now with the notice.

Recorded in: src/lib/providerCatalog.ts
IDCC-2026-0110Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeverityhigh
Categories: Exchanges, Wallets, Seed Phrase Backup, Token Screeners, Market-Data APIs, DAO Governance Tools, Sentiment Analytics, Wrapped Assets, Incentive Distribution, Relayers, Tokenised Commodities, NFT Lending, Shared Sequencers
What was wrong

Thirteen categories were due for their 45-day re-read by 10 November 2026; some scores, prices and availability statements no longer matched the providers’ own pages (Binance’s notices of unauthorised withdrawals from 30 October 2026; CoinDCX’s entry fee; BitBox’s shipping line; DEX Screener’s own platform fee; Gemini’s, Aragon’s, Binance’s and Solv’s country lists), and some rows could not be read at all.

What was fixed

The rows of these categories were re-read against the providers’ own pages on 10 November 2026, under our named research agent or by hand in a signed-out browser, and each quote was matched against the page as read. A row is dated only when every item in it was read that day. Of the 91 rows these categories rank, 86 are dated 10 November 2026. Five keep an older date, each because one item could not be read: Dune’s API (27 September 2026), Bybit (29 September), and Zealy, GMGN and Coinkite Seedplate (28 October). cookie.fun, whose price could not be read, left its table the same day (CC-2026-0112). VNX Gold’s reserve report was read from the Internet Archive’s copy of 6 July 2026, because VNX’s own link to it refused every reader on 27 September, 28 October and 10 November 2026; its score for whether the report can be opened falls from 4 to 3. Rows that could not be read left their tables as named, dated exclusions (Mercado Bitcoin, Gelato Relay, Common, Amberdata; Absinthe Labs is retired). NFT lending and shared sequencers are not ranked right now.

How it was caught

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push D), with a second reader refuting each score, independent reviews of every change near a first place, and by-hand reads where a page answered only to a browser.

Did the published order move?

Yes. Measured on rankings.json and data/country-orders.json against origin/main (01c0bb23a). 23 published scores moved in 7 categories, each named below with its before and after. No worldwide #1 and no worldwide top-three place changed. In country lists the top three changed in three places: Bybit moves from #2 to #3, behind OKX, in thirteen EEA exchange lists (CC-2026-0105); Aragon leaves #2 in the United States list for governance tools; kBTC leaves #3 in Japan’s list for wrapped assets. 5 rows left their rankings as named exclusions, and NFT lending and shared sequencers are not ranked right now, so their #1s (MetaStreet v2, Taiko) and every row leave the ranking. exchange: Bitstamp #2 79 → #2 80; Binance #4 75 → #4 73; Coinbase #5 69 → #5 68; Luno #6 68 → #7 68; OKX #7 67 → #6 68; Bit2Me #8 64 → #10 63; Bitvavo #10 63 → #8 65; Kraken #11 59 → #13 60; BSDEX #12 59 → #11 61; VALR #13 59 → #12 61; Gemini #14 47 → #14 48; CoinDCX #15 46 → #15 41; Mercado Bitcoin leaves the ranking (it was #16, score 41); Bitso #17 41 → #16 41. governance tools: Colony #6 64 → #7 64; Snapshot #7 58 → #6 65; Common (formerly Commonwealth) leaves the ranking (it was #8, score 41). incentive distribution: Absinthe Labs leaves the ranking (it was #9, score 41). market data apis: Messari API #5 64 → #5 66; Amberdata leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 58); CoinDesk Data API #8 55 → #7 57. nft lending: MetaStreet v2 leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 80); GONDI V3.1 leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 71); BendDAO leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 71); Zharta NFT Lending V2 leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 62); Blend (by Blur) leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 62); JPEG’d leaves the ranking (it was #6, score 41); NFTfi leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 41). relayers: Gelato Relay leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 59). screeners: DEX Screener #2 74 → #2 71. seed backup: SEEDPLATE 24 Words #2 78 → #2 80; Coldbit Steel #3 71 → #3 73; Hodlr Shield — Stealth Titanium Heart 24 #4 66 → #4 67; CRYPTOTAG Zeus #5 64 → #5 65; Keystone Tablet Plus #6 50 → #6 54; The Billfodl #7 44 → #7 45. shared sequencers: Taiko (Taiko Alethia) leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 79); Espresso Network leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 76); Spire (Based Stack / Pylon) leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 64); Rome Protocol leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 64); Radius leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 57); AltLayer SQUAD leaves the ranking (it was #6, score 55). tokenised commodities: VNX Gold (VNXAU) #5 54 → #5 53. wallet: Sparrow Wallet #7 68 → #8 67; Rainbow #8 67 → #7 67. In governance tools, Aragon (OSx + Aragon App) leaves the country landings in the United States. In nft lending, MetaStreet v2 leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam. In shared sequencers, Taiko (Taiko Alethia) leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam. In wrapped assets, SolvBTC (Solv Protocol) leaves the country landings in Canada, Netherlands, Singapore, United States. In wrapped assets, Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) leaves the country landings in Japan.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-cr-nov-push-d-reread · src/lib/trust/notRanked.ts · src/lib/rereadPending.ts · scripts/check-review-cadence-is-kept.ts
IDCC-2026-0109Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeveritymaterial
Category: OTC Desks · Provider: Binance OTC & Execution Services
What was wrong

Binance OTC was shown to readers in the Netherlands and Canada. Binance’s own List of Prohibited Countries ("Updated: 5 January 2026") bars anyone "located, incorporated, otherwise established in, or resident of" Canada or the Netherlands, and the United States, from a Binance account, and the OTC desk settles to one: "Trades are settled directly to the Binance Spot Account you specify". The row carried no restriction.

What was fixed

Binance OTC is restricted in the United States, Canada and the Netherlands, with the list quoted in its note, as on Binance’s exchange row. The row was read for availability only and is not re-dated.

How it was caught

An independent review of the otc_desks change during the November cadence round (CR-NOV push D).

Did the published order move?

Yes, in two country lists: Binance OTC leaves the lists for the Netherlands and Canada, where it was fourth. No #1 changes, and the worldwide order does not change.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-gemini-uk-eea-availability · src/lib/catalog/otcDesksPool.ts
IDCC-2026-0108Corrected2026-11-10TypefactualSeveritymaterial
Categories: Block Explorers, Crypto Neobanks, DeFi Insurance, KYC & Compliance, Simple Buy, Smart Accounts & Multisig, Smart-Contract Audits, Yield Aggregators · Providers: Routescan, Solscan, Arkham Intelligence, Xapo Bank, Revolut, Relm Insurance, Evertas, Entrust IDV (formerly Onfido), Bitpanda, Revolut Crypto, Coinbase (Simple Buy), Den, Sherlock, Yearn Finance
What was wrong

Fourteen product pages showed our internal working notes in their description: text such as "LIVE RE-READ … BY HAND 2026-11-04" where a sentence of evidence belongs. Twelve of them since our update of 4 November 2026 and two since that of 5 November, until 10 November. The cause was ours: when a re-read item carried no sentence written for readers, the page fell back to the model run’s working note.

What was fixed

In the fourteen descriptions each of those notes is replaced by the criterion and its score alone; a sentence of evidence returns when the row is next read. The fallback is removed: a description never prints a working note again, and a re-read whose item has no sentence written for readers is not applied until it has one. A build check refuses the working marks in any published catalog text, with the leaked sentences planted as its negative test. No score, order or date changed.

How it was caught

A review of the November cadence round (CR-NOV push D) found the same defect in one of its own rows before publication and traced it to the earlier pushes.

Did the published order move?

No: no score, rank or date changed. Only the description text of the fourteen rows.

Recorded in: scripts/apply-reread.ts · scripts/lib/catalogVoice.ts · tests/catalog-voice.test.ts
IDCC-2026-0107Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeverityhigh
Category: Tokenised Equities · Provider: Gemini Tokenized Stocks
What was wrong

Gemini Tokenized Stocks was shown to readers in twelve EEA countries until 10 November 2026. Gemini’s notice says all customer accounts in the European Economic Area closed on 6 April 2026, and the product’s own page now tells a German visitor: "Gemini Tokenized Stocks are not available in your region". Our reads of 19 August and 29 September 2026 quoted the page’s marketing copy and legal documents, which still describe an EU service, and did not find the notice.

What was fixed

The product is no longer shown to readers in Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Sweden or Finland, the only lists it was on. Its note prints the notice, the product page’s sentence and the fact that the page’s marketing copy and two legal documents still describe an EU service. The row stays in the data as not available in the EEA since 6 April 2026 by Gemini’s notice; it is not recorded as retired, because its page still exists.

How it was caught

The same read as CC-2026-0106.

Did the published order move?

Yes, in twelve country lists: Gemini Tokenized Stocks leaves the lists for Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden, where it was last of seven. No #1 and no top-three place changes, and the worldwide order does not change.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-gemini-uk-eea-availability · src/lib/catalog/tokenisedEquitiesPool.ts
IDCC-2026-0106Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeverityhigh
Category: OTC Desks · Provider: Gemini eOTC
What was wrong

Gemini eOTC was shown to readers in the United Kingdom, Australia and thirteen EEA countries, first in each list, until 10 November 2026. Gemini’s own notice says: "Effective 6 April 2026, Gemini will close all customer accounts in the United Kingdom, European Economic Area, and Australia." Our reads of 6 August and 24 September 2026 followed the OTC page, which is undated and says the desk is available in "70 jurisdictions including the US…, UK, Ireland and Singapore", and did not find the notice.

What was fixed

Gemini eOTC is no longer shown to readers in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Poland, Sweden, Finland or Norway. For Australia and the EEA countries other than Ireland, no Gemini sentence says the desk serves them. For the United Kingdom and Ireland the question is unsettled: the OTC page still names them as served through Gemini NuSTAR, LLC, the notice closes all customer accounts there, the notice does not mention eOTC, and we could not establish which holds; the note says so and prints both statements. The row stays in the table for the other countries and is not re-dated. Kraken OTC Desk, first in those lists now, was read again on 10 November 2026.

How it was caught

A banner on Gemini’s fee page, seen during the November cadence round (CR-NOV push D), followed by a by-hand read of the notice and the OTC page.

Did the published order move?

Yes, in fifteen country lists: Gemini eOTC leaves the lists for Australia, Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom, where it was #1. Kraken OTC Desk, #2 until now and read again on 10 November 2026, leads each of them; B2C2 is second. Kraken OTC Desk itself leaves the lists for Japan and Singapore, where it was #2 behind Gemini eOTC: on that read Kraken’s own page lists Japan among the regions it does not serve and says “Kraken is not licensed or regulated in Singapore.”; B2C2 is second in the lists for Japan and Singapore now. The worldwide order does not change.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-gemini-uk-eea-availability · src/lib/catalog/otcDesksPool.ts
IDCC-2026-0105Corrected2026-11-10TypefactualSeveritymaterial
Category: Exchanges · Provider: Bybit
What was wrong

From 3 to 10 November 2026 this site showed Bybit EU’s entry fee as 0.15% maker and 0.2% taker. That was our misreading, not a change by Bybit. Bybit EU’s fee table gives one rate per volume band, the same for maker and taker. On 3 November we took two figures from the page’s embedded configuration ("sub_level 1: taker 0.002, maker 0.0015") and from a flattened copy of the table without its rows. 0.15% and 0.2% are the table’s two highest-volume bands (from 500,000 USD, and under 500,000 USD). A Regular User pays 0.25% maker and taker on crypto pairs and on fiat pairs under 100,000 USD of 30-day volume, as our read of 28 October 2026 said.

What was fixed

The EEA rate is 0.25% maker and taker again, read by hand from the table as rendered on 10 November 2026 and confirmed in a second browser read, with the tier table quoted. Every figure computed from it follows, and the order in each EEA country’s exchange list changed as a result: Bybit moves from second to third, behind OKX. A rate rebuilt from table cells now needs a capture of the table as rendered, and a single cell cut from its row fails the build. The entry-tier figures of eight other exchanges’ fee tables (Kraken, Gemini, Luno, VALR, Bitso, Bit2Me, BSDEX and OKX in the United States) were read again as rendered the same day, and each matched; Upbit’s, whose source is a raw file and not a page, was not.

How it was caught

A by-hand read of Bybit EU’s fee page during the November cadence round (CR-NOV push D).

Did the published order move?

Yes, in thirteen country lists; no worldwide place moves, because the worldwide order does not read a regional rate. In Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden, Bybit moves from #2 to #3, behind OKX; the first place in each of those lists is Bitstamp, before and after. A German reader’s yearly cost at Bybit, at EUR 1,000 a month, is EUR 30 and not EUR 24; the typical exchange for that reader is Bitvavo, at EUR 30, before and after.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-cr-nov-push-d-reread · scripts/check-regional-pricing.ts · tests/pricing-truth-gates.test.ts
IDCC-2026-0104Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeveritymaterial
Category: Shared Sequencers · Providers: Taiko (Taiko Alethia), Radius, AltLayer SQUAD
What was wrong

Two of the six shared sequencers we ranked are no longer products on offer, and both stayed in the table until the 10 November re-read. Radius said on 27 August 2026 that it "evolved from block production and MEV resistance to operating solvers and building execution systems". AltLayer SQUAD is one line in AltLayer’s documentation overview; its own page is gone, and AltLayer’s product and updates pages do not name it.

What was fixed

Radius and AltLayer SQUAD are listed as no longer offered, each with its source and read date. Four products remain where a ranking needs five, so shared sequencers are not ranked right now. The four are listed alphabetically under their own heading, each with the day it was last read in full (three on 10 November 2026, Espresso Network on 28 October 2026), and Taiko keeps its incident line of 21 June 2026. A category may take this state only when every remaining row was read within its promise and each departed row carries dated evidence.

How it was caught

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push D).

Did the published order move?

Yes: shared sequencers publish no order while fewer than five products remain. Taiko (Taiko Alethia) leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 79), with Espresso Network (#2, 76), Spire (Based Stack / Pylon) (#3, 64), Rome Protocol (#4, 64), Radius (#5, 57) and AltLayer SQUAD (#6, 55). Every country landing for shared sequencers closes with the ranking.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-cr-nov-push-d-reread · src/lib/trust/notRanked.ts · tests/not-ranked.test.ts · scripts/check-review-cadence-is-kept.ts
IDCC-2026-0103Corrected2026-11-10Typestale dataSeveritymaterial
Category: NFT Lending · Provider: MetaStreet v2
What was wrong

NFT lending measured one of its four scores, the operating record, on DefiLlama, a source paused on 27 October 2026 while we ask for permission to republish it, so the 10 November re-read could not date that score for any venue. The same read found the venue ranked first closing: MetaStreet’s own app reads "MetaStreet app is winding down. Withdraw your positions below." NFTfi (closed 31 August 2026) and JPEG’d (new loans ended 28 December 2024) were already shut, which leaves four operating venues where a ranking needs five.

What was fixed

NFT lending is not ranked right now: its page says why, since when and what restores it, and lists the five venues it holds alphabetically. NFTfi and JPEG’d are listed as retired, each with its date and source.

How it was caught

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push D).

Did the published order move?

Yes: NFT lending publishes no order while it is not ranked right now. MetaStreet v2 leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 80), with GONDI V3.1 (#2, 71), BendDAO (#3, 71), Zharta NFT Lending V2 (#4, 62) and Blend (by Blur) (#5, 62); NFTfi and JPEG’d, already shut, leave their last places. Every country landing for NFT lending closes with the ranking.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-10-cr-nov-push-d-reread · src/lib/trust/notRanked.ts · tests/not-ranked.test.ts
IDCC-2026-0102Corrected2026-11-05Typestale dataSeveritymaterial
Categories: Privacy Tools, DePIN Networks · Providers: Railgun, GEODNET
What was wrong

Privacy tools and DePIN networks each measure one of four scores on a source paused on 27 October 2026 while we ask for permission to republish it (L2BEAT and DefiLlama for the anonymity set; DefiLlama’s fees API for verified demand), so their 3 November re-read could not date that score for any row.

What was fixed

The two categories are not ranked right now: their pages say why, since when and what restores them, and list what they compare alphabetically. Every row is listed as not confirmed rather than ranked on a September measure.

How it was caught

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push C).

Did the published order move?

Yes: privacy tools and DePIN networks publish no order while they are not ranked right now. Their #1s leave the ranking with every row: Railgun leaves the ranking in privacy tools (it was #1, score 80), and GEODNET leaves the ranking in DePIN networks (it was #1, score 80).

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-05-cr-nov-push-c-reread · src/lib/trust/notRanked.ts · tests/not-ranked.test.ts
IDCC-2026-0101Corrected2026-11-05Typestale dataSeverityhigh
Categories: Decentralised Compute, DePIN Networks, KYC & Compliance, Layer-1 Blockchains, Privacy Tools, Token Approval & Revoke Tools, Yield Aggregators
What was wrong

Seven categories were due for their 45-day re-read by 7 November 2026; some scores and availability statements no longer matched the providers’ own pages (Aptos’s terms do bar sanctioned persons and countries; Beefy’s app blocks one vault group in five countries), and some rows could not be read at all.

What was fixed

Every row was re-read against the provider’s own pages and each quote matched against its page capture or by-hand read. Every row of the five ranked categories was read in full; privacy tools and DePIN networks are not ranked right now because each method reads a source we have paused.

How it was caught

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push C), with model runs that matched each quote and refuted each score, and by-hand reads in a signed-out browser where a page answered only to one.

Did the published order move?

Yes. Measured on rankings.json and data/country-orders.json against ef381cf1c. 6 published scores moved in 4 categories, each named below with its before and after. Privacy tools and DePIN networks are not ranked right now, so their #1s (Railgun, GEODNET) and every row leave the ranking. decentralised compute: Render Network #7 50 → #7 52. depin networks: GEODNET leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 80); Helium leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 57); Wingbits leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 53); WeatherXM leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 51); DIMO leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 48); XNET Mobile leaves the ranking (it was #6, score 43); Bee Maps (Hivemapper) leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 41). kyc compliance: ComplyCube #3 77 → #3 76. layer1 chains: TON (The Open Network) #2 76 → #3 74; Avalanche #3 75 → #2 75; Cardano #4 73 → #5 71; Solana #5 71 → #4 72. privacy tools: Railgun leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 80); Tornado Cash leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 74); Privacy Pools (0xbow) leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 66); Umbra leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 61); Penumbra leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 59); Zama Confidential Tokens leaves the ranking (it was #6, score 58); Aztec Network leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 54); Fluidkey leaves the ranking (it was #8, score 54). revoke tools: Etherscan Token Approval Checker #3 66 → #3 65. In depin networks, GEODNET leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam. In privacy tools, Railgun leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam.

Recorded in: data changelog 2026-11-05-cr-nov-push-c-reread · src/lib/trust/notRanked.ts · src/lib/rereadPending.ts · scripts/check-review-cadence-is-kept.ts

This page prints the corrections numbered CC-2026-0101 to CC-2026-0120, in full. It is closed: no entry is added to it or taken from it. 20 corrections, logged 2026-11-05 to 2026-11-11. · All archive pages ·