Corrections CC-2026-0081 to CC-2026-0100

Oracles, NFT marketplaces and prediction markets each measure one of four scores on DefiLlama, a source paused on 27 October 2026 while we ask for permission to republish it, so their 3 November re-read could not date that score for any row.

The three categories are not ranked right now: their pages say why, since when and what restores them, and list what they compare alphabetically. Every row is listed as not confirmed rather than ranked on a September measure.

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push B).

Yes: oracles, NFT marketplaces and prediction markets publish no order while they are not ranked right now. Their #1s leave the ranking with every row: Pyth Network leaves the ranking in oracles (it was #1, score 83), OpenSea leaves the ranking in NFT marketplaces (it was #1, score 84), and Kalshi leaves the ranking in prediction markets (it was #1, score 83).

Two block-explorer scores no longer matched what the providers publish: Routescan’s data-quality score was not grounded in any record of index completeness or lag, and Blockscout’s verification score sat below what its own documentation supports.

Re-read from the providers’ own pages: Routescan’s data quality 8 to 5 (level with Blockscout, the only explorer that publishes index measurements) and its free usability 9 to 8; Blockscout’s contract verification 6 to 8 (level with Etherscan: Foundry and Hardhat, one key, any chain). A skeptic model run upheld all three.

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push B) and a refute-by-default skeptic model run on the #1 move.

Yes, in block explorers: Blockscout rises from #3 76 to #1 83 and Routescan falls from #1 84 to #2 82. It turns on three re-read scores together: Routescan’s data quality (8 to 5, now level with Blockscout), Routescan’s free usability (9 to 8) and Blockscout’s contract verification (6 to 8, level with Etherscan). The margin is narrow, 0.39 points of the weighted criterion total: Routescan one band higher on data quality or free usability, or Blockscout one band lower on verification, would put Routescan back on top.

Two cross-chain-swap scores for Across no longer matched what its own pages publish: its fee page documents fewer of the fee lines its live quote returns, and its security record now counts the provider’s full history.

Re-read from the providers’ own pages: Across’s bridge security model 8 to 7 and fee transparency 8 to 7; Relay’s fee transparency 8 to 7. A skeptic model run upheld all three.

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push B) and a refute-by-default skeptic model run on the #1 move.

Yes, in cross chain swaps: Relay rises from #2 80 to #1 80 and Across falls from #1 80 to #2 78. Across’s bridge security model (8 to 7) decides it; Relay’s own fee-transparency correction narrows its lead but does not change it.

Seventeen categories were due for their 45-day re-read by 6 November 2026; some scores, prices and availability statements no longer matched the providers’ own pages, and some rows could not be read at all.

Every row was re-read against the provider’s own pages and each quote matched against its page capture. A row we could not read honestly left the ranking, named with why; oracles, NFT marketplaces and prediction markets are not ranked right now because each method reads a source we have paused.

The November cadence round (CR-NOV push B), with model runs that matched each quote and refuted each score, and by-hand reads in a browser where a page answered only to one.

Yes. Measured on rankings.json and data/country-orders.json against 08871a285. Two #1s change on the re-read, each held by a refute-by-default skeptic model run: in cross chain swaps Relay replaces Across, and in block explorers Blockscout replaces Routescan. Oracles, NFT marketplaces and prediction markets are not ranked right now, so their #1s (Pyth Network, OpenSea, Kalshi) and every row leave the ranking. block explorers: Routescan #1 84 → #2 82; Etherscan #2 76 → #3 80; Blockscout #3 76 → #1 83; mempool.space #4 72 → #4 76; Tenderly leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 68); Solscan #6 59 → #5 61; OKLink leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 54); Arkham Intelligence #8 50 → #6 54; Subscan #9 45 → #7 50. bug bounties: HackerOne leaves the ranking (it was #6, score 60); Secure3 leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 52). cross chain swaps: Across #1 80 → #2 78; Relay #2 80 → #1 80; LI.FI / Jumper #3 66 → #5 65; Squid #4 66 → #3 68; Rango Exchange leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 66); deBridge #6 64 → #4 65; Bungee / Socket leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 60). crypto neobanks: Xapo Bank #2 79 → #2 81; Wirex leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 52); N26 #4 51 → #3 52; Bitpanda #5 49 → #4 51; Nexo #6 43 → #5 44; Fold #7 41 → #6 41. defi dashboards: DefiLlama leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 72); Octav #3 66 → #2 65; Zerion #4 59 → #3 59; Portals (Explorer) #5 58 → #4 54; DeBank #6 57 → #5 54; Nansen Portfolio #7 52 → #6 52; CoinStats #8 49 → #7 49. defi insurance: Breach Insurance leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 41). indexers: Envio (HyperIndex) #2 77 → #3 76; Goldsky #3 77 → #2 76; SubQuery (managed service now OnFinality Indexer Service) #4 74 → #5 74; Ormi 0xGraph #5 74 → #4 75; SQD (formerly Subsquid) #6 74 → #7 72; Sentio #7 73 → #6 73. naming services: 3DNS leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 63); SNS (Solana Name Service, formerly Bonfida) #4 61 → #3 56; Lens Usernames (formerly Lens Handles) #5 53 → #5 50; SPACE ID #6 52 → #4 52; Unstoppable Domains #7 51 → #6 50. nft marketplace: OpenSea leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 84); UniSat Marketplace leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 69); Fragment leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 62); Tensor leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 61); OKX NFT Marketplace leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 59); SuperRare leaves the ranking (it was #6, score 58); Courtyard leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 55); Magic Eden leaves the ranking (it was #8, score 53); Blur leaves the ranking (it was #9, score 51). oracles: Pyth Network leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 83); DIA leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 71); Api3 leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 68); Chainlink leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 61); RedStone leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 61); Chronicle Protocol leaves the ranking (it was #6, score 59); Switchboard leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 51); Supra leaves the ranking (it was #8, score 49); Stork leaves the ranking (it was #9, score 45). prediction markets: Kalshi leaves the ranking (it was #1, score 83); Polymarket leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 81); Predict.fun leaves the ranking (it was #3, score 69); SX Bet leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 65); Limitless Exchange leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 64); Myriad Markets leaves the ranking (it was #6, score 56); ADI PredictStreet leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 54); Opinion (Opinion Labs) leaves the ranking (it was #8, score 53). simple buy: Bitpanda #7 41 → #8 41; River #8 41 → #7 41. smart accounts: Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe) #2 78 → #2 76. smart contract audits: Certora #1 82 → #1 81; Zellic leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 79); Sherlock #3 71 → #2 72; Trail of Bits leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 71); Immunefi leaves the ranking (it was #5, score 70); Cyfrin / CodeHawks #6 66 → #3 67; OpenZeppelin #7 56 → #4 60; Spearbit / Cantina #8 49 → #6 50; CertiK #9 49 → #5 53. stablecoin yield: Ondo USDY #3 67 → #3 65; Coinbase USDC Rewards #6 44 → #7 44; Ethena (sUSDe) #7 43 → #6 44. tokenised tbills: Janus Henderson Anemoy Treasury Fund (JTRSY) #4 69 → #5 68; Ondo OUSG #5 69 → #4 69; VanEck VBILL leaves the ranking (it was #7, score 53); Invesco USTB (Superstate) #8 53 → #7 53; Midas mTBILL leaves the ranking (it was #9, score 47). trading bots: Pionex leaves the ranking (it was #2, score 68); Cryptohopper #3 67 → #2 67; Bitsgap leaves the ranking (it was #4, score 63); Hummingbot #5 61 → #4 59; 3Commas #6 58 → #5 58; HaasOnline #7 56 → #6 56; Gunbot #8 56 → #3 67; Coinrule leaves the ranking (it was #9, score 49). In nft marketplace, OpenSea leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam. In oracles, Pyth Network leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam. In prediction markets, Limitless Exchange leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Australia, France, United Kingdom. In prediction markets, Kalshi leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Austria, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United States, Vietnam. In prediction markets, SX Bet leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Belgium, Poland, Singapore, Thailand. In prediction markets, Polymarket leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Canada, Portugal, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates. In prediction markets, Predict.fun leaves the country landings, which close with the ranking, in Ireland, Italy. In tokenised tbills, Ondo OUSG leaves the country landings in South Korea.

SushiSwap’s DEX row could not be re-read on time: Sushi’s terms page has been unavailable since 3 November 2026, so its country note stayed at its 13 September read, past our 45-day promise from 5 November.

SushiSwap leaves the DEX ranking and is listed as not confirmed, with that reason. It is not a judgement on SushiSwap; it returns, re-scored, after a live re-read.

The November cadence round: its re-read found Sushi’s terms page empty.

Yes, in DEXs: SushiSwap (#7 of 12, score 48) leaves the ranking; Osmosis, Aerodrome, Maverick Protocol, Balancer and Raydium each move up one place. No score or #1 changes.

Odos held a row in the DEX aggregator table after it shut down on 27 July 2026, and two DEX rows could not be dated on their own sources.

Odos leaves the table, named as an exclusion with its shutdown notice. PancakeSwap’s exploit record rests on its own 2021 post; OpenOcean’s missing terms are recorded on dated captures.

The November cadence round (CR-NOV).

Yes: Odos (#12 of 12, score 41) leaves DEX aggregators; nothing else moves.

The job views said "Serves" from a provider's own region tags, not a licence (Bybit for UK readers, Binance Staked ETH for German and UK readers), and priced each reader at the base rate: Bybit at 0.10% for a German reader, Trezor and Koinly in dollars.

A custodial row is licensed for an EEA or UK reader only by a register fact covering the country; without one it is listed last, by name, for information. Each row is priced at the serving entity's read rate (Bybit EU: 0.2%), in the reader's currency where published.

The 3 November value benchmark, re-checked by a model run told to refute each call.

Yes, in the job views only. Germany: Bybit #1 → Gate EU #1 (buy, plan, sell); ether.fi Cash #1 → Bleap Card #1 (cards). UK plan: Bybit #1 → Bitstamp #1. No ranking's #1 moved.

Nineteen categories were due for their 45-day re-read by 7 November 2026; some scores, prices and availability statements no longer matched the providers’ own pages.

Every row was re-read against the provider’s own pages (fourteen categories on 22 October, five on 3 November) and each quote matched against its page or capture. A row with an item that could not be read keeps its last full read.

The November cadence round (CR-NOV), with model runs that matched each quote and refuted each score.

Yes, in 16 categories; no #1 changed (a proposed move from Yearn (v3) to Morpho Vaults was refused by a two-lens skeptic model run, and Yearn (v3) stays #1). cdp stablecoins: Sky (formerly MakerDAO) USDS in Hong Kong from #5 to unlisted; Sky (formerly MakerDAO) USDS in the United Kingdom from #5 to unlisted. crypto payroll: Toku 79 to 78. data availability: Celestia 70 to 68; NEAR DA from #7 to #6; 0G DA from #6 to #7. decentralised id: Privado ID (formerly Polygon ID) 74 to 72. decentralised storage: Walrus 63 to 62; Arweave from #5 to #4. dex: Trader Joe (LFJ) in the United Kingdom from #4 to unlisted; Maverick Protocol in the United States from #10 to unlisted; Trader Joe (LFJ) in the United States from #4 to unlisted. dex aggregator: DODO from #4 to #5; UniswapX from #5 to #4; Bebop in Canada from #9 to unlisted; Bebop in Singapore from #9 to unlisted; Jupiter in Singapore from #8 to unlisted; 1inch in the United Arab Emirates from #2 to unlisted; Bebop in the United States from #9 to unlisted; DODO in the United States from #4 to unlisted; Jupiter in the United States from #8 to unlisted; LI.FI (Jumper) in the United States from #10 to unlisted; KyberSwap in Vietnam from #6 to unlisted. mpc wallets: Web3Auth (now MetaMask Embedded Wallets) 67 to 65. offramps: Ramp Network 74 to 76. onchain analytics: Arkham 46 to 45; Messari 53 to 58; Glassnode from #5 to #6; Nansen from #4 to #5. onchain monitoring: BlockSec Phalcon 75 to 78. rpc nodes: dRPC 76 to 78; Chainstack from #2 to #3. tokenised funds: ADDX 58 to 56; Blockchain Capital BCAP in the United States from #4 to unlisted. tokenised realestate: Blocksquare 48 to 46; Figure Connect 58 to 48; RedSwan CRE 47 to 48; Reental from #3 to #2. wallet screening: AMLBot 47 to 52; Crystal Intelligence 45 to 62; Elliptic 74 to 78; Global Ledger 49 to 55; Merkle Science from #6 to #7. yield vaults: Beefy 78 to 77; Fluid Lite 78 to 76; Lagoon 65 to 64; Upshift 59 to 58; Yearn (v3) 83 to 82.

Five rows ranked on 28 October 2026 (Bit2Me and Gate EU in Exchanges; OKX Wallet, Electrum and Sparrow Wallet in Software wallets) showed "no observation on file" for every criterion, although each was scored from a re-read holding a quote, source and read date per criterion, and /best/exchange called Bit2Me and Gate EU provisional.

Their evidence cells are published from those re-reads, each held to the page captures committed with it; Bit2Me's and Gate EU's proof of reserves reads "none found on the pages read", with the pages named.

The deploy chain's tests on the merged push 3 tree, 29 October 2026 (tests/provisional-scores-marked and the explore desk facts).

No. No score, rank or country order changed.

Simple Buy's evidence page stopped being published when Trade Republic was ranked on 28 October 2026: its four cells were scored but not added to the re-read the page is built from, so every Simple Buy row's provider page lost its quoted evidence.

Trade Republic's cells joined the re-read, each with a quote from its own help centre, price list or press release kept as a page capture; Fidelity Crypto's and Uphold's cells are dated the day they were read, 28 October 2026.

The deploy chain's tests on the merged push 3 tree, 29 October 2026 (tests/evidence-dates-are-reads).

No. No score, rank or country order changed.

Every Simple Buy row said it had no evidence on file, and Strike’s provider page said “no receipt file yet”, although the 14 September 2026 re-read had read all nine ranked rows on all four criteria, each with a quote and a source page, then checked by a second model run that tried to refute each one (36 cells). The re-read recorded its 27 confirmed cells without the value it confirmed, and the evidence generator publishes only a cell that carries one, so it published no file.

Simple Buy publishes its evidence again, from the 28 October 2026 re-read of every row (2026-10-28-dex-simple-buy-re-read): each cell’s score, quote, source and reading date opens on the provider page and in the score popover. The 14 September re-read’s 27 confirmed cells now also carry the value they confirmed, equal to the strength the catalog already ranks on. Finst and BISON, which joined on 27 October 2026, publish their cells from that day’s read, so all 14 rows open their evidence (56 cells). A build check now fails when the #1 row of a flagship category, Simple Buy included, shows no evidence on file.

An editorial audit of the buy journey on 27 October 2026 compared /best/simple_buy, which read as having no evidence, with /best/onramp, which reads High.

No. No published score or rank changed.

From 19 August to 28 October 2026 Simple Buy refused Trade Republic for having no way to move coins to a wallet you control, and Exchanges gave the same reason. We relied on Trade Republic's help article, which still says so, while its customer agreement and price list have provided free outgoing transfers to the customer's own wallet, plus network fees, since the November 2025 Crypto Wallet launch.

Trade Republic enters Simple Buy at #4 with 41, scored on its own price list, customer agreement and licence. Bitpanda moves from #4 to #5, River from #5 to #6, Uphold from #6 to #7, Fidelity Crypto from #7 to #8, PayPal Crypto from #8 to #9, Cash App Bitcoin from #9 to #10, Revolut Crypto from #10 to #11 and Robinhood Crypto from #11 to #12, each at 41. The Exchanges refusal now gives its real reason: Trade Republic has no order book.

A review of every refusal against the provider's binding documents found the price list line and the transfer terms on 28 October 2026.

Yes. Trade Republic enters Simple Buy at #4 with 41, and eight rows each move down one place at an unchanged 41. Strike stays #1 (86), and the Exchanges order does not move. Trade Republic is added to the Simple Buy list on the country pages for Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal and Spain.

Fiat Simple Buy had no row and no refusal for Fidelity Crypto, Uphold or SoFi Crypto, so a US or UK reader looking for them found nothing and no reason why. Uphold appeared only as Topper, its onramp widget.

Fidelity Crypto and Uphold are ranked from their own fee, withdrawal and availability pages, read on 28 October 2026. SoFi Crypto is named as a coverage gap: every SoFi page that states its fee, transfers or states answered with a bot challenge that day, so nothing about it is scored.

A provider-universe audit on 28 October 2026 compared the catalog with the US app-store finance chart and found both missing.

Yes, below the top five. Strike (#1, 86), Coinbase (#2, 64), Relai (#3, 43), Bitpanda (#4, 41) and River (#5, 41) are unchanged. Uphold enters at #6 and Fidelity Crypto at #7, both at 41. PayPal Crypto moves from #6 to #8, Cash App Bitcoin from #7 to #9, Revolut Crypto from #8 to #10 and Robinhood Crypto from #9 to #11, each still at 41. No published score changed. On the United States page for Fiat Simple Buy, Uphold and Fidelity Crypto are newly listed at #4 and #5 behind Strike, Coinbase and River, and PayPal Crypto (#4 to #6), Cash App Bitcoin (#5 to #7) and Robinhood Crypto (#6 to #8) move down; on the United Kingdom page, Uphold is newly listed at #5 and Revolut Crypto moves from #5 to #6. Strike stays #1 on both.

Vertex Protocol, closed since July 2025, was shown with 40 markets from no source; Lighter’s and Paradex’s notes repeated L2BEAT’s multisig thresholds instead of what their own docs say; the live market counts of six perp venues and Jupiter Perps’ market list were September figures.

All 12 perp_dex and 12 dex_aggregator rows were re-read on 28 October from the providers’ own docs, APIs and chains. Vertex lists 0 markets; Lighter’s and Paradex’s notes state their own docs; the market counts and Jupiter Perps’ nine markets are the 28 October reads. Facts no own page states today keep their September read and are marked unverified.

The 28 October cadence re-read of perp_dex and dex_aggregator, page by page from the providers’ own sources.

No. No score, rank or Find-my-best answer changed in perp_dex, dex_aggregator or dex.

Readers in the EEA were priced at rates their entity does not charge: Bybit at bybit.com's 0.10% (Bybit EU GmbH charges 0.25%), which put Bybit first on cost for Germany, and OKX at 0.10% (a spot-only account pays 0.20%). Euro prices printed as converted dollars (Koinly's €99 plan as ≈ €88, Trezor Safe 3's EUR 59 as ≈ €53), deBridge was ranked the cheapest bridge on one of its four fees, and Hop Protocol, withdrawn on 23 October, was still sorted second-cheapest.

Each figure was read again from the provider's own page on 28 October and is priced per reader, by the entity or store that serves their country; euro prices print in euros; deBridge's fixed fee and taker margin are named, so its figure reads as a floor and is not ranked as a total; Hop Protocol carries no price; Coinbase Staking says the 10% is cbETH's and prints the 35% in-app rate beside it. Three build checks now fail on each of these defects.

The value benchmark of 28 October 2026 checked ten reader jobs against providers' own pages.

Yes. Under methodology 2026.10.14 (owner ruling the same day: each reader is scored on the rate of the entity serving their country) the published exchange #1 stays Bybit; OKX falls from #2 to #7, its EU rate applying to EEA readers only. For readers in the EEA and the United States, Bitstamp ranks first. Bridges: deBridge falls from 49 to 46 and keeps #15.

A reader in the United Kingdom was shown an EU (MiCA) passport as the licence that covers them, which it does not, and Binance Staked ETH (WBETH) was listed as available in the United Kingdom although the FCA register reads "No longer authorised" for Binance Markets Limited (FRN 688849).

A UK reader now sees each provider's FCA register record (for Kraken, PAYWARD LTD., FRN 928768, registered since 23 November 2021; for Bybit, not on the register), with a link to the register, and a firm the register says is no longer authorised is not offered to a UK reader.

A value benchmark on 2026-10-28 asked as a UK reader "is it FCA-registered?" and "stake ETH as a UK resident", and the FCA register was read the same day.

No. Every published default order and score is unchanged. Binance Staked ETH (WBETH), #9 of 11, is removed from the liquid staking list for the United Kingdom, which now lists 10; its #1, Jito, is unchanged.

Exodus was scored 4 on “Can I see exactly what I am signing?” for a dApp signing screen in its Web3 Wallet browser extension, which Exodus discontinued on 1 October 2026; its mobile app had already removed WalletConnect and the dApp browser.

Exodus now scores 2 on that criterion, the 0-2 description for a wallet whose own pages describe no screen for signing third-party requests, and its published score moves 73 → 69; its tagline and watchout say it no longer signs dApp requests.

The scheduled 28 October re-read of the wallet category found the extension’s signing page gone and its end-of-support page saying support ended on 1 October 2026.

No. The wallet order is unchanged: Exodus stays #6 and its score moves 73 → 69.

Bitcoin Keeper (BitHyve) was scored 9 of 10 for recovery without the vendor on help-centre articles that no longer exist: the help centre is gone and the app has passed from BitHyve to a community project whose site names no software that can read its exported wallet file. Strike Send Globally was scored on an August FAQ that gave the payout method for each country; its support page now gives one list for all 13 countries.

Both rows were re-read on 28 October from the providers’ own current pages. Bitcoin Keeper’s recovery score drops three points and Strike Send Globally’s corridor score drops one, each by the published ladder; the page text behind every score is committed.

The 28 October cadence re-read of seven categories, which could read strike.me again and found the Bitcoin Keeper help centre gone.

Yes. In key_recovery, Bitcoin Keeper (BitHyve) moves #6 53 → #7 47 and Unchained moves #7 49 → #6 49. In remittances, Strike Send Globally moves 70 → 69 and keeps fourth place. No #1 changed.

Aragon scored 9 on published price for a no-fee sentence its rebuilt docs no longer carry (the page answers HTTP 404). Rome Protocol scored 1 on named mainnet chains as testnet-only, but its docs now name a mainnet, Rubicon, whose endpoint answers.

Aragon moved from 79 to 76 in governance_tools because its published-price criterion fell from 9 to 7. Rome Protocol moved from 57 to 64 in shared_sequencers because its named-mainnet criterion rose from 1 to 4. Both receipts quote the pages read on 28 October.

The 28 October cadence re-read of seven categories, page by page from the providers’ own sources.

No. No published order changed: Aragon stays #2 and Rome Protocol stays #4.

Four crypto apps a German buyer compares first were not ranked here. BISON sat on the Simple Buy refusal list for an unpublished spread although its cost page now publishes one; Finst had never been researched; BSDEX had never been researched; and Scalable Capital had no refusal at all. Trade Republic, the fifth, is corrected in CC-2026-0088.

Each was read from its own pages on 27 October 2026. Finst and BISON enter Simple Buy, each scored with verbatim quotes against the published criteria, and Scalable Capital is refused because its crypto is held as exchange-traded products, not coins a buyer can withdraw. BSDEX, Börse Stuttgart’s order book for German residents, enters Crypto Exchanges with its published 0.20% maker and 0.35% taker fee, and Scalable Capital is refused in Crypto Exchanges on the same read.

A comparison against the crypto ranking German readers see most often found none of the five in the published rankings.

Yes. In simple_buy BISON enters at #3 (44) and Finst enters at #5 (41); Relai #3 → #4; Trade Republic #4 → #6; Bitpanda #5 → #7; River #6 → #8; Uphold #7 → #9; Fidelity Crypto #8 → #10; PayPal Crypto #9 → #11; Cash App Bitcoin #10 → #12; Revolut Crypto #11 → #13; Robinhood Crypto #12 → #14. Strike stays #1 in Simple Buy. In exchange BSDEX enters at #12 (59); Bitstamp 80 → 79, Coinbase 70 → 69, Luno 70 → 68, OKX 68 → 67, Bit2Me 65 → 64, Kraken 60 → 59, Gemini 48 → 47; VALR #12 → #13, Gemini #13 → #14, CoinDCX #14 → #15, Mercado Bitcoin #15 → #16, Bitso #16 → #17. Bybit stays #1 in Crypto Exchanges.