Skip to main content
Leading options · 8 ranked

Blockchain Indexers

Indexers evaluated across query cost at real volume, self-host escape hatch, vendor continuity, and indexing speed and coverage.

Ranked here: blockchain indexers that run indexing logic you write yourself and answer queries on the indexed data. Not ranked here: products that do not run indexing logic you write yourself.

#1 of 8published ranking
Ponder
80ChainChoice Score
Why it leads
Ponder scores higher than everything else in this ranking on its cost at volume.
Show the arithmetic
Best in this ranking on cost at volume (10/10; next 8/10)
Cost
Not priced · No published rate on this basis
Reviewed Next review by Published Methodology v2026.11.1
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means every product ranked on this page was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

No provider can pay for a position in this table. The code that computes this order cannot read which links carry a referral code, and every build proves it. Every score below rebuilds from the published criteria.Ranking v2026.11.1 · 4 criteria · 8 products · same inputs, same order

How we review · 8 ranked of 8 assessed · 4 criteria · 0 sponsor weight

How we review
8ranked
8assessed
4criteria
0sponsor weight
Recommendation first, comparison only if needed.
Reviewed and rechecked on the current cycle.
Commercial relationships disclosed before clickout.
Personal comparison

What blockchain indexers cost you

Your inputs update the cost column. The independent ranking stays fixed.

Metered usage beyond whatever the plan includes, for a year. Excludes egress, support tiers and enterprise minimums.

RankProviderBest fitScoreYour cost
1
PonderOpen-source TypeScript EVM indexing fra...Top ranked
Cost at production query volume — 10/10Trade-off: MIT and free means you are the operator: no SLA, no on-call, no backups, and every Po...
80score
-Not published
Check availability for your country

Ponder · ponder.sh. Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.

Commission: This provider pays ChainChoice nothing for this link. Disclosure

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

2
GoldskyHosted subgraphs plus streaming pipelin...
Cost at production query volume — 7/10Trade-off: Queries are free but state is not: storage is metered per entity at $0.0053/hour per...
76score
your cost/yr
Check availability for your country

Goldsky · goldsky.com. Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.

Commission: This provider pays ChainChoice nothing for this link. Disclosure

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

Tied for #2 · ordered by tie-break points (1.98 against 0)
3
Envio (HyperIndex)TypeScript indexer with HyperSync data...
Cost at production query volume — 7/10Trade-off: The free Development tier is explicitly disposable — "no backups, potential downtime,...
76score
your cost/yr
Check availability for your country

Envio (HyperIndex) · envio.dev. Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.

Commission: This provider pays ChainChoice nothing for this link. Disclosure

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

4
Ormi 0xGraphSubgraph-spec-compatible hosted indexer...
Cost at production query volume — 8/10Trade-off: The pricing you read about may not apply to you — the April 2026 model is explicitly...
75score
your cost/yr
Check availability for your country

Ormi 0xGraph · ormilabs.com. Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.

Commission: This provider pays ChainChoice nothing for this link. Disclosure

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

5
SubQuery (managed service now OnFinality Indexer Service)Multi-chain indexing SDK; managed hosti...
Self-host escape hatch and format portability — 8/10Trade-off: You are buying from two companies. The SDK and network are SubQuery's; the managed se...
74score
your cost/yr
Check availability for your country

SubQuery (managed service now OnFinality Indexer Service) · subquery.network. Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.

Commission: This provider pays ChainChoice nothing for this link. Disclosure

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

6
SentioIndexing processor plus hosted subgraph...
Cost at production query volume — 7/10Trade-off: You cannot forecast the bill. Pricing is denominated in "Sentio Units" and the pricin...
73score
Lowest at your inputs
Check availability for your country

Sentio · sentio.xyz. Provider links appear once we know which country you are browsing from: ChainChoice links to providers only where it serves in full.

Commission: This provider pays ChainChoice nothing for this link. Disclosure

Crypto products are high risk. Check the provider is authorised where you live before you deposit.

2 more assessed and ranked below — none of them hidden for commercial reasons.
Ranking blindCommercial terms excludedDated primary sources

Ranked on 4 published criteria weighted 30/25/25/20, which set goal alignment — 30 of the 86 points. The rest: regional access 20 (constant here), evidence depth 18 (constant here), ease of use 10 (constant here), institutional trust 8 (constant here). Profile match is shown in breakdowns but carries no weight.

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Exit failure: you cannot get out at par, on time, or with what is yours.
    Scored by Self-host escape hatch and format portability · 25% (Ponder 8/10, Goldsky 6/10, Envio (HyperIndex) 5/10)
    Scored by Vendor continuity and control · 25% (Ponder 4/10, Goldsky 6/10, Envio (HyperIndex) 7/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Liveness failure, Information failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Cost at production query volume (30%), Indexing speed and chain coverage (20%).
Audit
Infrastructure
Methodology
2026.11.1
published 10 November 2026
Providers tracked
860+
across 121 categories
Last verified
3 November 2026
newest dated pricing or sentiment read
Named on the roster
2 people
managing directors · 6 automated processes
Decision guide

What matters most before choosing in this category

The best indexer depends on your query volume and on how badly a vendor exit would hurt. Continuity is not a tail risk in this category — five of the eight products a buyer would shortlist changed owner or operator inside fourteen months, and one was switched off entirely despite carrying a 99.9% SLA. Portability is scored beside it for the same reason: an open licence and a spec-compatible mapping are what turn a vendor's exit into a migration rather than a rewrite.

What query volume are you actually planning for, not launching with?
If this vendor shut down next quarter, could you self-host the same mapping?
How often will you need to reindex from genesis, and how long can that take?
Current engine lead

The #1 overall and the scoring weights

PonderData checked Nov 2026
Open-source TypeScript EVM indexing framework; no hosted service

Open-source TypeScript EVM indexing framework; no hosted service. Strongest on cost at production query volume (10/10): Ponder is MIT-licensed open-source software with no hosted plan and no vendor fee; at any query volume the only costs are the operator's own Postgres database and RPC access. Weakest on vendor continuity and control (4/10): The Monad Foundation acquired the team behind Ponder on 17 February 2026; the team says it will keep developing Ponder as open source, and the repository remains active. Published facts: No commercial pricing exists. The Ponder README (github.com/ponder-sh/ponder, read 3 November 2026) states "Ponder is MIT-licensed open-source software."; no hosted or cloud offering is documented on ponder.sh, and the self-hosting guide states "Ponder works best…

Best forCost at production query volume — 10/10
Main tradeoffMIT and free means you are the operator: no SLA, no on-call, no backups, and every Postgres failure and RPC rate-limit is yours. The larger surprise is governance — since February 2026 the people who decide Ponder's roadmap are paid by the Monad Foundation, so a non-Monad EVM team's priorities now sit behind a competing chain's.
Verify before signupNo commercial pricing exists. The Ponder README (github.com/ponder-sh/ponder, read 3 November 2026) states "Ponder is MIT-licensed open-source software."; no hosted or cloud offering is documented on ponder.sh, and the self-hosting guide states "Ponder works best with a Postgres database running in the same private network." Your only costs are your own Postgres and RPC.
Weighted criteria
Cost at production query volume30%
Self-host escape hatch and format portability25%
Vendor continuity and control25%
Indexing speed and chain coverage20%
Methodology

How this category is reviewed

Reviewed on query cost at production volume, the self-host escape hatch and format portability, vendor continuity, and indexing speed and chain coverage.

The order on this page is the published ranking for this category. Every criterion, weight and source behind it is on the methodology page.
Frequently asked

Questions people ask before choosing indexers

Why is vendor continuity weighted so heavily?
Because in this category it is the base rate, not the exception. Products here have been acquired, handed to new operators, or sunset outright within a year or two of launch — including one backed by an acquisition and an SLA.
Is a hosted service or a self-hosted framework better?
They fail differently. Hosted removes operational work and adds vendor risk; self-hosted does the reverse. What is scored is whether you have the option at all — an open licence and published self-host instructions.
Does subgraph compatibility matter if I am not using The Graph?
It matters as an exit route. Logic written to a spec that at least one other host accepts can move; logic written to a proprietary format cannot.
Reviewed3 November 2026Method4 criteriaCategoryindexers
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research