Skip to main content

Best Self-Custody Wallets

Self-custody wallets should be chosen around control, recovery discipline, and the real chain or app workflow that follows.

12providers tracked
11ranked (methodology v2026.11.1)
12 November 2026Ranking snapshot
10 November 2026oldest read · due 25 Dec
Independent. Evidence-based.We rank with a published method and sourced evidence. No one can pay to rank.How it works

Set your country and amount to see your costs ·

Your setup

What your country changesPick a country to see which crypto wallets serve it. Nothing is hidden — any that does not is listed with that reason.

This affects provider availability.

Your chains and devices
Runs on
Requirements (0)
    Preferences (0)

    Preferences re-weight Fit for you, which needs your country.

    More filters

    11 providers match your requirements

    Out of 11 ranked providers. 0 excluded.

    What this ranks
    Ranked here: software wallets, the apps a reader keeps keys in and signs with, as a way into crypto and web3.Not ranked here: hardware wallet devices, including hardware-first devices with a companion app, since this page ranks software wallets only.11 of the 12 assessed are ranked; 1 were turned away by name. Who, and whyRequirements narrow the list; they never change a published ChainChoice Score. How the ranking works
    #1
    Rabby Wallet
    How Rabby Wallet was chosenWins the weighted total without leading any single criterion
    The reference implementation of pre-signature transparency in this pool, and the product that proves the signing axis actually separates.
    81 out of 100published score, #1 of all 11 worldwide
    Evidence
    High4/4 criteria scored, with 4 dated sources quoted.
    Key exportClear signingAccount recovery

    Why it leads

    • Rabby Wallet is 1 point ahead of MetaMask, mainly because it scores higher on its clear signing.
    • Ahead of MetaMask on clear signing (+3.7 points)
    • Key export 9/10 (weight 28%)

    Tradeoff

    Key export: 1 point below the best in this ranking

    Share
    #ProviderChainsSwap feeRuns onCompare
    2
    The default EVM wallet
    80 out of 100
    Ethereum & EVM, Solana, Bitcoin, Tron
    0.875%
    Browser extension, iPhone, Android
    3Same score, not joint · ordered by weighted total (47.10 against 47.00)
    Mainstream self-custody mobile wallet
    80 out of 100
    Bitcoin, Ethereum & EVM, Solana, Tron, Cosmos, Sui, TON
    Not published
    Browser extension, iPhone, Android
    4
    The Solana-native software wallet turned...
    78 out of 100
    Solana, Ethereum & EVM, Bitcoin, Sui
    0.85%
    Browser extension, iPhone, Android
    5
    Solana-only self-custody wallet
    75 out of 100
    Solana
    Not published
    Browser extension, iPhone, Android
    6
    Closed-source multi-device self-custody wallet...
    69 out of 100
    Bitcoin, Ethereum & EVM, Solana, Cosmos, Tron, TON, Sui
    Not published
    iPhone, Android, Desktop app
    7
    GPL-3.0 open-source EVM wallet
    67 out of 100
    Ethereum & EVM
    Not published
    Browser extension, iPhone, Android
    8Same score, not joint · ordered by weighted total (42.20 against 42.00)
    A Bitcoin-only desktop wallet
    67 out of 100
    Bitcoin
    Not published
    Desktop app
    9
    The reference Bitcoin desktop and Android...
    66 out of 100
    Bitcoin
    Not published
    Android, Desktop app
    10Tied for #9 · ordered by name, A to Z
    The self-custody multichain wallet of the OKX...
    66 out of 100
    Bitcoin, Ethereum & EVM, Solana, Sui, Tron, TON
    Not published
    Browser extension, iPhone, Android
    11Same score, not joint · ordered by weighted total (41.90 against 41.80)
    Coinbase's self-custody wallet
    66 out of 100
    Ethereum & EVM, Solana
    Not published
    Browser extension, iPhone, Android

    Compare providers (0)

    See key differences in features, fees, security and more.