Wormhole and zkSync Bridge tie on score at 50; the published tie-break orders them. Wormhole is ahead on route coverage. Wormhole ranks #14 and zkSync Bridge #13 of 18 published bridges. The ledger below shows where each side is ahead — pick by the criterion that matters to you.
Wormhole50
vs
zkSync Bridge50
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #14 and #13 of 18
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below50500.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
WormholeScore 50Leading cross-chain messaging protocol connecting 30+ networksStrength: Route coverage — 7/10Watch-out: Higher fees on some routes than specialized bridgeszkSync BridgeScore 50Native canonical bridge for Ethereum ↔ zkSync EraStrength: Trust — 8/10Watch-out: Smaller dapp ecosystem than the largest L2s
Quick facts
At a glance
1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactWormholezkSync Bridge
PricingSnapshotWormhole Connect docs, "Routes" (wormhole.com/docs/ai/pages/products-connect-concepts-routes.md, fetched 30 September 2026): automatic routes deliver in one user transaction "for a small fee" - "Trustless relayers can execute the second transaction on the user's behalf, so the user only needs to perform one transaction on the origin chain to have the tokens delivered to the destination automatically - for a small fee." - while manual routes need a second, destination-chain transaction whose gas the user pays. No relayer fee amount is published on that page, so the dollar range the previous note carried is not repeated. Portal Bridge (portalbridge.com), Wormhole's consumer front end, renders client-side, so no live Portal quote was read.ZKsync docs, "Bridging assets" (docs.zksync.io/zksync-protocol/rollup/bridging-assets, fetched 30 September 2026): no bridge fee is stated on that page; withdrawals carry a time cost - "To provide additional security, withdrawals in ZKsync Chains are delayed for 3 hours" - and the finality page (docs.zksync.io/zksync-protocol/rollup/finality) adds that proof generation "typically takes about an hour". The ZKsync Bridge front end (portal.zksync.io/bridge, titled "ZKsync Bridge | Transfer funds between ZKsync and Ethereum") renders client-side, so no live quote was read.
Asset coverageEditorialMajor assets across all connected chainsETH and registered ERC-20s
Region fitSnapshotglobalglobal
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Wormhole
50#14 of 18
Pick it when
Pick Wormhole if route coverage matters most — it scores 7/10 to zkSync Bridge's 1/10 there (weight 28).
Strength
Route coverage — 7/10
Tradeoff
Higher fees on some routes than specialized bridges
zkSync Bridge
50#13 of 18
Pick it when
Pick zkSync Bridge if trust matters most — it scores 8/10 to Wormhole's 7/10 there (weight 26).
Strength
Trust — 8/10
Tradeoff
Smaller dapp ecosystem than the largest L2s
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
Wormhole
Choose Wormhole if route coverage matters most
Route coverage: 7/10 against 1/10 for zkSync Bridge (weight 28)
WormholeScore 50Leading cross-chain messaging protocol connecting 30+ networksStrength: Route coverage — 7/10Watch-out: Higher fees on some routes than specialized bridges
zkSync Bridge
Choose zkSync Bridge if trust matters most
Trust: 8/10 against 7/10 for Wormhole (weight 26)
Route clarity: 6/10 against 5/10 for Wormhole (weight 24)
Transfer speed: 5/10 against 4/10 for Wormhole (weight 22)
zkSync BridgeScore 50Native canonical bridge for Ethereum ↔ zkSync EraStrength: Trust — 8/10Watch-out: Smaller dapp ecosystem than the largest L2s
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Route coverage
by 6 of 10weight 6.7 of 86Wormhole leads
Wormhole7/10 out of 10
zkSync Bridge1/10 out of 10
Route clarity
by 1 of 10weight 5.8 of 86zkSync Bridge leads
Wormhole5/10 out of 10
zkSync Bridge6/10 out of 10
Transfer speed
by 1 of 10weight 5.3 of 86zkSync Bridge leads
Wormhole4/10 out of 10
zkSync Bridge5/10 out of 10
Trust
by 1 of 10weight 6.2 of 86zkSync Bridge leads
Wormhole7/10 out of 10
zkSync Bridge8/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Wormhole14/20zkSync Bridge14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Wormhole14.1/30zkSync Bridge11.8/30
Wormhole leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Wormhole2.7/10zkSync Bridge2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Wormhole6.4/8zkSync Bridge3.2/8
Wormhole leads
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Wormhole6.9/18zkSync Bridge12.5/18
zkSync Bridge leads
Decision rulePublished order
Same published score — pick by the criterion that matters to you.
Pick Wormhole if route coverage matters most — it scores 7/10 to zkSync Bridge's 1/10 there (weight 28).
Pick zkSync Bridge if trust matters most — it scores 8/10 to Wormhole's 7/10 there (weight 26).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Verification failure: an invalid state or transfer is accepted.
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Route coverage (28%), Route clarity (24%), Execution speed (22%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Wormhole and zkSync Bridge tie on score at 50; the published tie-break orders them. Wormhole is ahead on route coverage. Published scores, out of 100: Wormhole 50 (rank 14 of 18 bridges), zkSync Bridge 50 (rank 13 of 18).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
