Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Onramps

Unlimit Crypto vs Koywe Unlimit Crypto leads by 4 points.

Unlimit Crypto scores 4 points above Koywe, led by named licence. Unlimit Crypto ranks #11 and Koywe #13 of 16 published onramps. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Unlimit Crypto45
Koywe41
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #11 and #13 of 16
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-UNLIMIT-CRYPTO-VS-KOYWE-acdcb4ae
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Unlimit Crypto leads by 4 points

Unlimit Crypto scores 4 points above Koywe, led by named licence.

Unlimit Crypto #11 of 1645
Koywe #13 of 1641
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termUnlimit Crypto leads on 1 of 4 published criteria; Koywe on 2. The terms sum to the gap.
TermUnlimit CryptoKoyweWeightPoints
Purchase cost1/103/108.2−4.2for Koywe−2.2 of 32
Quote honesty2/105/106.2−4.9for Koywe−2.5 of 32
Named licence7/106/105.3+1.4for Unlimit Crypto+0.7 of 32
AvailabilityScore dimension12620+15.6for Unlimit Crypto
Net of the terms+7.9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.2
Reproduced gap+8.1
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below4541+4.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

  • Unlimit Crypto's lead rests on lighter criteria: Koywe is ahead on purchase cost, which carries more weight (34) than any criterion Unlimit Crypto leads on (22).
  • A floor bound on one row means the criterion arithmetic does not reproduce the displayed gap exactly.
Quick facts

At a glance

1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactUnlimit CryptoKoywe
PricingSnapshotNo published fee schedule. Unlimit Crypto User Terms (PDF at https://cdn.unlimit.com/site-crypto/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/27064344/2025-06-Unl-Crypto_User-TC_06.2025.pdf, "Last updated: 27.06.2025"), fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200, name fee types without a number: "Processing Fee is due for payment by User in Fiat." and "Any other fees that are applicable and effective at the time of User Order.", set "at the sole discretion of Unlimit Crypto" (section 5.1); "User Fees shall be presented to User prior to processing of User Order." (section 5.2). Numeric fees exist only per quote through the authenticated Get-a-quote API (fields processingFee, networkFee, markupFee on docs.gatefi.com). The former brand site www.crypto.unlimit.com, including /pricing/, now redirects (HTTP 301) to stable.com, an Unlimit-group stablecoin app whose User Terms (v2, 24.06.2026) also carry no onramp fee number. A EUR 200 all-in cannot be reconstructed from any published page.No end-user fee schedule is published. Koywe developer docs "Quotes and exchange rates" (https://docs.koywe.com/en/core-concepts/quotes-and-exchange-rates), fetched 29 September 2026, HTTP 200, give only an integrator-facing typical range: Processing Fee, "All transactions", "0.5% - 2%"; Network Fee "Variable (blockchain fees)"; country-specific taxes on amount and on fee. The spread is acknowledged in the docs' example ("Slightly lower than buy rate (spread)") but not quantified or benchmarked. The pricing routes www.koywe.com/en/pricing and /es/precios still return HTTP 404 (29 September 2026). The Terms ("Fecha de última actualización: 18 de mayo de 2026") put actual fees behind login or contract: "El uso de los Servicios estará sujeto al pago de las Comisiones y tipo de cambio vigentes informadas en la Plataforma o establecidas en la documentación contractual aplicable." No representative purchase can be reconstructed: the quote API needs KYB-gated credentials and there is no public widget.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshoteurope, latam, africalatam
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Unlimit Crypto

45#11 of 16
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Unlimit Crypto if named licence matters most — it scores 7/10 to Koywe's 6/10 there (weight 22).
Strength
Licence identity — 7/10
Tradeoff
You cannot know the price before you start and you have no refund right after you pay: no fee schedule exists anywhere on Unlimit's surfaces, the terms let the settled amount 'be different from the amounts presented to User', all orders are 'final and cannot be refunded/returned', Unlimit may cancel 'without advance notice... and without providing reason' — and your entire written recourse is a contact form and a complaint answered within 14 days under Cyprus law.

Koywe

41#13 of 16
Pick it when
Pick Koywe if purchase cost matters most — it scores 3/10 to Unlimit Crypto's 1/10 there (weight 34).
Strength
Licence identity — 6/10
Tradeoff
You cannot see a price before you onboard: Koywe is a KYB-gated B2B API, the pricing pages 404, the fee schedule lives 'informadas en la Plataforma' behind login, and the only public number is a non-binding '0.5% - 2%' typical range in the developer docs — a buyer commits to merchant onboarding before learning what the PIX-to-USDC conversion actually costs.
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

Unlimit CryptoLeads

Choose Unlimit Crypto if named licence matters most

  • Named licence: 7/10 against 6/10 for Koywe (weight 22)
Koywe

Choose Koywe if purchase cost matters most

  • Purchase cost: 3/10 against 1/10 for Unlimit Crypto (weight 34)
  • Quote honesty: 5/10 against 2/10 for Unlimit Crypto (weight 26)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Purchase cost

by 2 of 10weight 8.2 of 86Koywe leads
Unlimit Crypto1 out of 10
Koywe3 out of 10

Quote honesty

by 3 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Koywe leads
Unlimit Crypto2 out of 10
Koywe5 out of 10

Named licence

by 1 of 10weight 5.3 of 86Unlimit Crypto leads
Unlimit Crypto7 out of 10
Koywe6 out of 10

KYC and speed

weight 4.3 of 86Tie
Unlimit Crypto3 out of 10
Koywe3 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Unlimit Crypto12/20Koywe6/20
Unlimit Crypto leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Unlimit Crypto7.1/30Koywe10/30
Koywe leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Unlimit Crypto2.7/10Koywe2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Unlimit Crypto3.2/8Koywe3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Unlimit Crypto8.3/18Koywe8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Unlimit Crypto unless the term Koywe leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick Koywe if purchase cost matters most — it scores 3/10 to Unlimit Crypto's 1/10 there (weight 34).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Regulatory failure: no licence where you are, or a forced market exit.
    Scored by Whose money-transmission licence is my money riding — and is that entity my counterparty? · 22% (Unlimit Crypto 7/10, Koywe 6/10)
  • Execution failure: you get a worse price, later, or nothing.
    Scored by Is the number on the widget the number that settles? · 26% (Unlimit Crypto 2/10, Koywe 5/10)
  • Information failure: the number is wrong or bought, or your data leaks.
    Scored by How much identity do I surrender before the coins land in my wallet, and how long does that take? · 18% (Unlimit Crypto 3/10, Koywe 3/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Insolvency failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: What does a €200 purchase actually cost me — by card and by bank, all-in? (34%).
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Unlimit Crypto scores 4 points above Koywe, led by named licence. Published scores, out of 100: Unlimit Crypto 45 (rank 11 of 16 onramps), Koywe 41 (rank 13 of 16).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research