Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Web3 Apps

Uniswap vs 1inch Uniswap leads by 18 points.

Uniswap scores 18 points above 1inch, led by job fit, ecosystem, and confidence. Uniswap ranks #1 and 1inch #2 of 10 published Web3 apps. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

Uniswap87
1inch69
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #1 and #2 of 10
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 4 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-UNISWAP-VS-1INCH-97ac6386
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Uniswap leads by 18 points

Uniswap scores 18 points above 1inch, led by job fit, ecosystem, and confidence.

Uniswap #1 of 1087
1inch #2 of 1069
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termUniswap leads on 4 of 4 published criteria; 1inch on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermUniswap1inchWeightPoints
Job fit10/108/107.2+3.7for Uniswap+1.9 of 32
Ecosystem10/106/105.8+6.0for Uniswap+3.1 of 32
Confidence9/108/105.8+1.5for Uniswap+0.8 of 32
Operating style8/106/105.3+2.7for Uniswap+1.4 of 32
Trust recordScore dimension6.45.68+2.1for Uniswap
FrictionScore dimension4.7410+1.8for Uniswap
Net of the terms+17.9
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+17.9
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below8769+18.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

1 of 3 rows read the same for both.
FactUniswap1inch
Swap spreadSnapshotUniswap Labs' help-centre article "What are Uniswap Labs' fees?" (read through its Zendesk API on 30 September 2026, updated 23 September 2026) says: "As of December 27, 2025 Uniswap Labs does not charge interface fees." Its table lists the Interface + Wallet interface fee as "0%". What a swapper still pays is the pool's swap fee, per the developers.uniswap.org Fees page (fetched 30 September 2026): "In Uniswap v2, every pool charges a flat 0.30% fee"; "The standard v3 tiers are 0.05%, 0.30%, and 1%" (the same page also tables a 0.01% v3 tier); in v4 "Pool creators can set any fee from 0% to 100%". Since the December 2025 UNIfication vote a protocol fee of about 1/6 of the swap fee is carved out of that pool fee on v2 and select v3 pools; it is not charged on top. Network gas applies.1inch's fee help article and Terms of Use state no swap-fee percentage; its infrastructure-fee FAQ gives a range (last sentence). Its help article "Do I pay fees when using 1inch?" (help.1inch.com, written 5 March 2026, fetched 30 September 2026) names three possible costs. Gas: "In the Swap interface, you usually do not pay gas fees—they are covered by the resolvers who fill your order", but "Swaps involving the Solana network or from native tokens will include gas fees charged to the user", as do Pro-interface (DEX-aggregator) swaps. Swap surplus: positive slippage is kept at "the API-provider level (operated by 1inch Business)". Infrastructure fees: "Certain swaps may include infrastructure fees, which are charged when you use the service"; the taker covers them in the Swap interface and for limit orders, and the user pays them on routes through the DEX aggregator. The 1inch.com Terms of Use (Last updated: 14 September 2026) describe them as "software infrastructure fees charged contemporaneously with your use of the service". No rate is stated on either page. The infrastructure-fee FAQ at business.1inch.com (fetched 30 September 2026) gives the range: "All 1inch interfaces or channels (dApp, Wallet and others using the API) may incur infrastructure fees in the following ranges: 0–5 bps for stable pairs and 0–30 bps for non-stable pairs."
Asset coverageEditorialOnchain swap assets and mainstream DeFi executionRoute-aware token swapping across supported EVM and Solana assets
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

Uniswap

87#1 of 10
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Uniswap if job fit matters most — it scores 10/10 to 1inch's 8/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Job fit — 10/10
Tradeoff
Less aligned if your real activity is Solana-native

1inch

69#2 of 10
Pick it when
1inch leads Uniswap on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Job fit — 8/10
Tradeoff
Less relevant if your actual app life is Solana-native
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

UniswapLeads

Choose Uniswap if job fit matters most

  • Job fit: 10/10 against 8/10 for 1inch (weight 30)
  • Ecosystem: 10/10 against 6/10 for 1inch (weight 24)
  • Confidence: 9/10 against 8/10 for 1inch (weight 24)
1inch

1inch leads Uniswap on no published criterion

  • Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Job fit

by 2 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Uniswap leads
Uniswap10 out of 10
1inch8 out of 10

Ecosystem

by 4 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Uniswap leads
Uniswap10 out of 10
1inch6 out of 10

Operating style

by 2 of 10weight 5.3 of 86Uniswap leads
Uniswap8 out of 10
1inch6 out of 10

Confidence

by 1 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Uniswap leads
Uniswap9 out of 10
1inch8 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Uniswap20/201inch20/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Uniswap22.4/301inch17/30
Uniswap leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86
Uniswap4.7/101inch4/10
Uniswap leads
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Uniswap6.4/81inch5.6/8
Uniswap leads
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Uniswap6.9/181inch6.9/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Uniswap unless the term 1inch leads on is the one you are buying.

1inch leads Uniswap on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
None of this ranking's criteria scores a way of losing money; the families that apply are listed below as not assessed.
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Use-case fit (30%), Ecosystem fit (24%), Operating style (22%), Confidence signal (24%).
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Uniswap scores 18 points above 1inch, led by job fit, ecosystem, and confidence. Published scores, out of 100: Uniswap 87 (rank 1 of 10 web3 apps), 1inch 69 (rank 2 of 10).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research