Trust Wallet vs Sparrow Wallet Trust Wallet leads by 12 points.
Trust Wallet scores 12 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record. Trust Wallet ranks #3 and Sparrow Wallet #7 of 11 published wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Trust Wallet80
vs
SPSparrow Wallet68
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #3 and #7 of 11
Trust Wallet scores 12 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record.
Trust Wallet #3 of 1180
SPSparrow Wallet #7 of 1168
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termTrust Wallet leads on 3 of 4 published criteria; Sparrow Wallet on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermTrust WalletSparrow WalletWeightPoints
Clear signing8/105/107.2+5.6for Trust Wallet+2.9 of 32
Key export8/106/106.7+3.5for Trust Wallet+1.8 of 32
Incident record8/105/105.8+4.5for Trust Wallet+2.3 of 32
Account recovery7/109/104.3−2.2for Sparrow Wallet−1.2 of 32
Net of the terms+11.4
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+11.4
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below8068+12.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Trust WalletScore 80Mainstream self-custody mobile wallet with a genuinely documented simulate-and-decode signing screen on both platforms — but whose browser extension was supply-chain compromised in December 2025, still cannot export a raw private key, and whose audit register and security page carry no account of its own 2023 key-generation flaw.Strength: Key export — 8/10Watch-out: Read the vendor's own v2.68 post-mortem before you install the browser extension: https://trustwallet.com/blog/company/trust-wallet-browser-extension-v268-incident-community-update. Between 24 and 26 December 2025 an attacker published a backdoored build of the extension straight to the Chrome Web Store using a leaked API key, bypassing Trust Wallet's internal review; the vendor confirms 2,520 wallet addresses drained and approximately $8.5m in assets impacted. Reimbursement is promised but not finished: as of the post's last update on 17 July 2026 it still reads "We are finalizing the reimbursement workflow and ownership verification process", against "over 5,000 claims" for 2,520 verified addresses, and the page's own description calls itself "A work-in-progress update". The extension is also the weaker half of the product on exit: Developer Mode, the only documented private-key export, is "not available on Browser Extension". Separately, no vendor account of the 2022-23 key-generation flaw (CVE-2023-31290, exploited in the wild in December 2022 and March 2023) appears on its security-audit register or its /security page, both re-read on 2026-09-28, despite a published policy that remediated vulnerabilities will be disclosed. If you want Trust Wallet, the mobile app is the surface the evidence supports; treat the extension as the higher-risk, lower-portability half.Sparrow WalletScore 68A Bitcoin-only desktop wallet built for coin control, multisig and hardware signers: BIP-39 with the derivation path shown, every input and output decoded before signing, no bounty and no audit.Strength: Recovery exit — 9/10Watch-out: Sparrow is desktop-only and Bitcoin-only, and it is built for users who want to see every input and output: a newcomer should expect a transaction editor, not a one-tap send. No Sparrow page documents exporting a single private key (read 2026-10-28), and its security policy says "There is currently no bug bounty programme for Sparrow." It has published no security advisory and no fund-loss incident was found.
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 4 rows read the same for both.
FactTrust WalletSparrow Wallet
PricingSnapshotThe wallet is free: "Yes. Trust Wallet is free to download and use on iOS, Android and as a browser extension. Network and service fees apply to transactions such as swaps or buying crypto, and they are shown before you confirm." (FAQ answer in the structured data of trustwallet.com, fetched 28 October 2026). No Trust Wallet swap rate is published on any vendor page loaded on 28 October 2026 — the homepage fee sentence recorded in August, which stated separate stablecoin and other-token swap rates, is gone — and the vendor's own statements now conflict. The swap page says "No, Trust Wallet does not charge any additional service fees for swaps. Any swap fees incurred by users for swapping would be network gas fees and third-party provider fees, which are independent of Trust Wallet." (trustwallet.com/swap, fetched 28 October 2026), and the help centre repeats "Trust Wallet does not charge a service fee - fees shown are from the routing protocol and the underlying networks." (support.trustwallet.com/en/articles/717169-how-to-perform-cross-chain-swaps-in-trust-wallet, fetched 28 October 2026). Yet a campaign post dated 27 August 2026 says "When you swap one eligible stablecoin for another on the same chain, the Trust Wallet swap fee is 0%" and "Each of those swaps normally carries a fee." (trustwallet.com/blog/campaigns/swap-selected-stablecoins-with-0-fees-on-trust-wallet), and a second, dated 16 September 2026, offers "0% Trust Wallet swap fees" on eligible staked and wrapped pairs (trustwallet.com/blog/campaigns/wap-staked-assets-with-0-fees-on-trust-wallet). Read the fee line on the in-app quote; the vendor publishes no percentage."Sparrow is licensed under the Apache 2 software licence." (sparrowwallet.com/download/, fetched 28 October 2026). The download page lists installers for Windows, macOS and Linux with no price, and the site asks for donations. The features page lists no in-app swap or purchase; the only cost of a payment is the network fee, chosen against the fee chart Sparrow shows.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotglobalglobal
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the vendor cannot move funds without your keySelf-custody: the vendor cannot move funds without your key
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Trust Wallet
80#3 of 11
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Trust Wallet if clear signing matters most — it scores 8/10 to Sparrow Wallet's 5/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Key export — 8/10
Tradeoff
Read the vendor's own v2.68 post-mortem before you install the browser extension: https://trustwallet.com/blog/company/trust-wallet-browser-extension-v268-incident-community-update. Between 24 and 26 December 2025 an attacker published a backdoored build of the extension straight to the Chrome Web Store using a leaked API key, bypassing Trust Wallet's internal review; the vendor confirms 2,520 wallet addresses drained and approximately $8.5m in assets impacted. Reimbursement is promised but not finished: as of the post's last update on 17 July 2026 it still reads "We are finalizing the reimbursement workflow and ownership verification process", against "over 5,000 claims" for 2,520 verified addresses, and the page's own description calls itself "A work-in-progress update". The extension is also the weaker half of the product on exit: Developer Mode, the only documented private-key export, is "not available on Browser Extension". Separately, no vendor account of the 2022-23 key-generation flaw (CVE-2023-31290, exploited in the wild in December 2022 and March 2023) appears on its security-audit register or its /security page, both re-read on 2026-09-28, despite a published policy that remediated vulnerabilities will be disclosed. If you want Trust Wallet, the mobile app is the surface the evidence supports; treat the extension as the higher-risk, lower-portability half.
SP
Sparrow Wallet
68#7 of 11
Pick it when
Pick Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most — it scores 9/10 to Trust Wallet's 7/10 there (weight 18).
Strength
Recovery exit — 9/10
Tradeoff
Sparrow is desktop-only and Bitcoin-only, and it is built for users who want to see every input and output: a newcomer should expect a transaction editor, not a one-tap send. No Sparrow page documents exporting a single private key (read 2026-10-28), and its security policy says "There is currently no bug bounty programme for Sparrow." It has published no security advisory and no fund-loss incident was found.
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
Trust WalletLeads
Choose Trust Wallet if clear signing matters most
Clear signing: 8/10 against 5/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 30)
Key export: 8/10 against 6/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 28)
Incident record: 8/10 against 5/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 24)
Trust WalletScore 80Mainstream self-custody mobile wallet with a genuinely documented simulate-and-decode signing screen on both platforms — but whose browser extension was supply-chain compromised in December 2025, still cannot export a raw private key, and whose audit register and security page carry no account of its own 2023 key-generation flaw.Strength: Key export — 8/10Watch-out: Read the vendor's own v2.68 post-mortem before you install the browser extension: https://trustwallet.com/blog/company/trust-wallet-browser-extension-v268-incident-community-update. Between 24 and 26 December 2025 an attacker published a backdoored build of the extension straight to the Chrome Web Store using a leaked API key, bypassing Trust Wallet's internal review; the vendor confirms 2,520 wallet addresses drained and approximately $8.5m in assets impacted. Reimbursement is promised but not finished: as of the post's last update on 17 July 2026 it still reads "We are finalizing the reimbursement workflow and ownership verification process", against "over 5,000 claims" for 2,520 verified addresses, and the page's own description calls itself "A work-in-progress update". The extension is also the weaker half of the product on exit: Developer Mode, the only documented private-key export, is "not available on Browser Extension". Separately, no vendor account of the 2022-23 key-generation flaw (CVE-2023-31290, exploited in the wild in December 2022 and March 2023) appears on its security-audit register or its /security page, both re-read on 2026-09-28, despite a published policy that remediated vulnerabilities will be disclosed. If you want Trust Wallet, the mobile app is the surface the evidence supports; treat the extension as the higher-risk, lower-portability half.
SPSparrow Wallet
Choose Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most
Account recovery: 9/10 against 7/10 for Trust Wallet (weight 18)
Sparrow WalletScore 68A Bitcoin-only desktop wallet built for coin control, multisig and hardware signers: BIP-39 with the derivation path shown, every input and output decoded before signing, no bounty and no audit.Strength: Recovery exit — 9/10Watch-out: Sparrow is desktop-only and Bitcoin-only, and it is built for users who want to see every input and output: a newcomer should expect a transaction editor, not a one-tap send. No Sparrow page documents exporting a single private key (read 2026-10-28), and its security policy says "There is currently no bug bounty programme for Sparrow." It has published no security advisory and no fund-loss incident was found.
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Key export
by 2 of 10weight 6.7 of 86Trust Wallet leads
Trust Wallet8/10 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet6/10 out of 10
Clear signing
by 3 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Trust Wallet leads
Trust Wallet8/10 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet5/10 out of 10
Incident record
by 3 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Trust Wallet leads
Trust Wallet8/10 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet5/10 out of 10
Account recovery
by 2 of 10weight 4.3 of 86Sparrow Wallet leads
Trust Wallet7/10 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet9/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Trust Wallet14/20Sparrow Wallet14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Trust Wallet18.8/30Sparrow Wallet14.4/30
Trust Wallet leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Trust Wallet2.7/10Sparrow Wallet2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Trust Wallet3.2/8Sparrow Wallet3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Trust Wallet8.3/18Sparrow Wallet8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Trust Wallet unless the term Sparrow Wallet leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most — it scores 9/10 to Trust Wallet's 7/10 there (weight 18).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Can I export my own keys and use them elsewhere? · 28% (Trust Wallet 8/10, Sparrow Wallet 6/10)
Scored by Can I see exactly what I am signing? · 30% (Trust Wallet 8/10, Sparrow Wallet 5/10)
Scored by What has gone wrong, and did they publish it? · 24% (Trust Wallet 8/10, Sparrow Wallet 5/10)
Scored by If I lose my device, how do I get back in? · 18% (Trust Wallet 7/10, Sparrow Wallet 9/10)
Trust Wallet scores 12 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record. Published scores, out of 100: Trust Wallet 80 (rank 3 of 11 wallets), Sparrow Wallet 68 (rank 7 of 11).
ReviewedRe-read in progressOverdue; re-read by 10 November 2026.Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
