Trezor vs Blockstream Jade Trezor leads by 11 points.
Trezor scores 11 points above Blockstream Jade, led by secure element and genuine check. Trezor ranks #2 and Blockstream Jade #8 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Trezor80
vs
Blockstream Jade69
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #2 and #8 of 23
Trezor scores 11 points above Blockstream Jade, led by secure element and genuine check.
Trezor #2 of 2380
Blockstream Jade #8 of 2369
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termTrezor leads on 2 of 6 published criteria; Blockstream Jade on 2. The terms sum to the gap.
TermTrezorBlockstream JadeWeightPoints
Secure element10/104/106.5+10.1for Trezor+5.2 of 32
Genuine check7/100/102.9+5.2for Trezor+2.7 of 32
Checkable keys7/1010/102.9−2.2for Blockstream Jade−1.2 of 32
Fund-loss record7/109/102.6−1.4for Blockstream Jade−0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+11.7
Reproduced gap+11.7
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below8069+11.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
TrezorScore 80Trezor Safe 3: certified chip you can look up — firmware rebuilt and matched by independent reviewers, at EUR 59 (US$59)Strength: Secure element you can look up — 10/10Watch-out: Graded on the Safe 3, which first shipped in November 2023, so its record counts three years, not the brand's twelveBlockstream JadeScore 69Air-gapped QR signer at $67 — no secure element, a blind PIN oracle you can run yourselfStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: No secure element: someone holding the device faces the PIN oracle and your passphrase, not a certified chip
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactTrezorBlockstream Jade
One-time priceSnapshotTrezor Safe 3: the Product JSON-LD on https://trezor.io/trezor-safe-3 reads "priceCurrency":"USD","price":59, read 1 October 2026 and again 28 October 2026; the Bitcoin-only edition is the same price. The same page shows a visitor in Germany "Buy for EUR 59" (read 28 October 2026).Blockstream Jade Classic: the US store's product data reads "price":"67.00" with "compare_at_price":"79.00" (US dollars, sale and regular), read 1 October 2026 from https://store.blockstream.com/products/blockstream-jade-hardware-wallet.json?country=US.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL6+ certified; fully open source; no air-gapped signing.No secure element; fully open source; air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Trezor
80#2 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Trezor if secure element matters most — it scores 10/10 to Blockstream Jade's 4/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Secure element you can look up — 10/10
Tradeoff
Graded on the Safe 3, which first shipped in November 2023, so its record counts three years, not the brand's twelve
Blockstream Jade
69#8 of 23
Pick it when
Pick Blockstream Jade if checkable keys matters most — it scores 10/10 to Trezor's 7/10 there (weight 12).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
No secure element: someone holding the device faces the PIN oracle and your passphrase, not a certified chip
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
TrezorLeads
Choose Trezor if secure element matters most
Secure element: 10/10 against 4/10 for Blockstream Jade (weight 27)
Genuine check: 7/10 against 0/10 for Blockstream Jade (weight 12)
TrezorScore 80Trezor Safe 3: certified chip you can look up — firmware rebuilt and matched by independent reviewers, at EUR 59 (US$59)Strength: Secure element you can look up — 10/10Watch-out: Graded on the Safe 3, which first shipped in November 2023, so its record counts three years, not the brand's twelve
Blockstream Jade
Choose Blockstream Jade if checkable keys matters most
Checkable keys: 10/10 against 7/10 for Trezor (weight 12)
Fund-loss record: 9/10 against 7/10 for Trezor (weight 11)
Blockstream JadeScore 69Air-gapped QR signer at $67 — no secure element, a blind PIN oracle you can run yourselfStrength: Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10Watch-out: No secure element: someone holding the device faces the PIN oracle and your passphrase, not a certified chip
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
by 6 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Trezor leads
Trezor10/10 out of 10
Blockstream Jade4/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
weight 6.5 of 86Tie
Trezor10/10 out of 10
Blockstream Jade10/10 out of 10
Genuine check
by 7 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Trezor leads
Trezor7/10 out of 10
Blockstream Jade0/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
by 3 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Blockstream Jade leads
Trezor7/10 out of 10
Blockstream Jade10/10 out of 10
Maker independence
weight 2.6 of 86Tie
Trezor10/10 out of 10
Blockstream Jade10/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Blockstream Jade leads
Trezor7/10 out of 10
Blockstream Jade9/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Trezor14/20Blockstream Jade14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Trezor21.5/30Blockstream Jade17/30
Trezor leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Trezor2.7/10Blockstream Jade2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Trezor3.2/8Blockstream Jade3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Trezor5.5/18Blockstream Jade5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Trezor unless the term Blockstream Jade leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Blockstream Jade if checkable keys matters most — it scores 10/10 to Trezor's 7/10 there (weight 12).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (Trezor 10/10, Blockstream Jade 4/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (Trezor 10/10, Blockstream Jade 10/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (Trezor 7/10, Blockstream Jade 0/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (Trezor 7/10, Blockstream Jade 10/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (Trezor 10/10, Blockstream Jade 10/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (Trezor 7/10, Blockstream Jade 9/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Trezor scores 11 points above Blockstream Jade, led by secure element and genuine check. Published scores, out of 100: Trezor 80 (rank 2 of 23 hardware wallets), Blockstream Jade 69 (rank 8 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
