SecuX scores 4 points above Tangem, led by rebuildable firmware and fund-loss record. Tangem ranks #23 and SecuX #20 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Tangem42
vs
SESecuX46
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #23 and #20 of 23
SecuX scores 4 points above Tangem, led by rebuildable firmware and fund-loss record.
Tangem #23 of 2342
SESecuX #20 of 2346
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termSecuX leads on 2 of 6 published criteria; Tangem on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermSecuXTangemWeightPoints
Rebuildable firmware3/100/106.5+5.1for SecuX+2.6 of 32
Genuine check2/107/102.9−3.7for Tangem−1.9 of 32
Fund-loss record10/107/102.6+2.1for SecuX+1.1 of 32
Net of the terms+3.4
Reproduced gap+3.4
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below4642+4.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
SecuXScore 46Seven years without a fund loss, but an uncertified chip and partial firmware source with the signing code withheld — USB only, $49Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matchedTangemScore 42Tap-to-phone NFC cards — closed firmware, and a 2026 laser attack it cannot patchStrength: Proof the device is genuine and unmodified — 7/10Watch-out: In July 2026 Ledger Donjon reset the card password with a laser fault and signed transactions; it affects every card in circulation and cannot be patched
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactTangemSecuX
One-time priceSnapshotTangem Wallet 2 Cards set at $59.90 on https://tangem.com/en/pricing/, read 1 October 2026.SecuX W10 at $49.00 on the US store https://secuxtech.com/products/secux-w10-series?country=US, read 1 October 2026.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL6+ certified; closed source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Tangem
42#23 of 23
Pick it when
Pick Tangem if genuine check matters most — it scores 7/10 to SecuX's 2/10 there (weight 12).
Strength
Proof the device is genuine and unmodified — 7/10
Tradeoff
In July 2026 Ledger Donjon reset the card password with a laser fault and signed transactions; it affects every card in circulation and cannot be patched
SE
SecuX
46#20 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick SecuX if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 3/10 to Tangem's 0/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
Tangem
Choose Tangem if genuine check matters most
Genuine check: 7/10 against 2/10 for SecuX (weight 12)
TangemScore 42Tap-to-phone NFC cards — closed firmware, and a 2026 laser attack it cannot patchStrength: Proof the device is genuine and unmodified — 7/10Watch-out: In July 2026 Ledger Donjon reset the card password with a laser fault and signed transactions; it affects every card in circulation and cannot be patched
SESecuXLeads
Choose SecuX if rebuildable firmware matters most
Rebuildable firmware: 3/10 against 0/10 for Tangem (weight 27)
Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 7/10 for Tangem (weight 11)
SecuXScore 46Seven years without a fund loss, but an uncertified chip and partial firmware source with the signing code withheld — USB only, $49Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Names its secure chip only as an Infineon SLE family with an EAL5+ claim, so no certificate can be matched
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
weight 6.5 of 86Tie
Tangem3/10 out of 10
SecuX3/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 3 of 10weight 6.5 of 86SecuX leads
Tangem0/10 out of 10
SecuX3/10 out of 10
Genuine check
by 5 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Tangem leads
Tangem7/10 out of 10
SecuX2/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Tangem0/10 out of 10
SecuX0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
weight 2.6 of 86Tie
Tangem4/10 out of 10
SecuX4/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 3 of 10weight 2.6 of 86SecuX leads
Tangem7/10 out of 10
SecuX10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Tangem14/20SecuX14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Tangem6.9/30SecuX8.2/30
SecuX leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Tangem2.7/10SecuX2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Tangem3.2/8SecuX3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Tangem5.5/18SecuX5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose SecuX unless the term Tangem leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Tangem if genuine check matters most — it scores 7/10 to SecuX's 2/10 there (weight 12).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (Tangem 3/10, SecuX 3/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (Tangem 0/10, SecuX 3/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (Tangem 7/10, SecuX 2/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (Tangem 0/10, SecuX 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (Tangem 4/10, SecuX 4/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (Tangem 7/10, SecuX 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
SecuX scores 4 points above Tangem, led by rebuildable firmware and fund-loss record. Published scores, out of 100: Tangem 42 (rank 23 of 23 hardware wallets), SecuX 46 (rank 20 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
