Tangem vs Ledger Nano X Ledger Nano X leads by 21 points.
Ledger Nano X scores 21 points above Tangem, led by secure element, rebuildable firmware, and fund-loss record. Tangem ranks #23 and Ledger Nano X #13 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Tangem42
vs
Ledger Nano X63
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #23 and #13 of 23
Ledger Nano X scores 21 points above Tangem, led by secure element, rebuildable firmware, and fund-loss record.
Tangem #23 of 2342
Ledger Nano X #13 of 2363
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termLedger Nano X leads on 4 of 6 published criteria; Tangem on 0. The terms sum to the gap.
TermLedger Nano XTangemWeightPoints
Secure element9/103/106.5+10.1for Ledger Nano X+5.2 of 32
Rebuildable firmware4/100/106.5+6.7for Ledger Nano X+3.5 of 32
Fund-loss record10/107/102.6+2.1for Ledger Nano X+1.1 of 32
Maker independence6/104/102.6+1.4for Ledger Nano X+0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+20.3
Reproduced gap+20.3
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6342+21.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Ledger Nano XScore 63Seven years without a device-level fund loss, an EAL5+ chip you can look up — Bluetooth and USB-C, $99Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Its ST33J2M0 secure element is certified at EAL5+, one level below the Nano S Plus's EAL6+ chip, so it scores 9 rather than 10TangemScore 42Tap-to-phone NFC cards — closed firmware, and a 2026 laser attack it cannot patchStrength: Proof the device is genuine and unmodified — 7/10Watch-out: In July 2026 Ledger Donjon reset the card password with a laser fault and signed transactions; it affects every card in circulation and cannot be patched
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactTangemLedger Nano X
One-time priceSnapshotTangem Wallet 2 Cards set at $59.90 on https://tangem.com/en/pricing/, read 1 October 2026.Ledger Nano X: the Offer on https://shop.ledger.com/products/ledger-nano-x reads "price":"99","priceCurrency":"USD", read 2 October 2026. The same page shows a visitor in Germany "€99" (read 28 October 2026).
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, EAL6+ certified; closed source; no air-gapped signing.Secure element, EAL5+ certified; partly open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Tangem
42#23 of 23
Pick it when
Tangem leads Ledger Nano X on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
Strength
Proof the device is genuine and unmodified — 7/10
Tradeoff
In July 2026 Ledger Donjon reset the card password with a laser fault and signed transactions; it affects every card in circulation and cannot be patched
Ledger Nano X
63#13 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Ledger Nano X if secure element matters most — it scores 9/10 to Tangem's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Its ST33J2M0 secure element is certified at EAL5+, one level below the Nano S Plus's EAL6+ chip, so it scores 9 rather than 10
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
Tangem
Tangem leads Ledger Nano X on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
TangemScore 42Tap-to-phone NFC cards — closed firmware, and a 2026 laser attack it cannot patchStrength: Proof the device is genuine and unmodified — 7/10Watch-out: In July 2026 Ledger Donjon reset the card password with a laser fault and signed transactions; it affects every card in circulation and cannot be patched
Ledger Nano XLeads
Choose Ledger Nano X if secure element matters most
Secure element: 9/10 against 3/10 for Tangem (weight 27)
Rebuildable firmware: 4/10 against 0/10 for Tangem (weight 27)
Maker independence: 6/10 against 4/10 for Tangem (weight 11)
Ledger Nano XScore 63Seven years without a device-level fund loss, an EAL5+ chip you can look up — Bluetooth and USB-C, $99Strength: Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10Watch-out: Its ST33J2M0 secure element is certified at EAL5+, one level below the Nano S Plus's EAL6+ chip, so it scores 9 rather than 10
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Secure element
by 6 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Ledger Nano X leads
Tangem3/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X9/10 out of 10
Rebuildable firmware
by 4 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Ledger Nano X leads
Tangem0/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X4/10 out of 10
Genuine check
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Tangem7/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X7/10 out of 10
Checkable keys
weight 2.9 of 86Tie
Tangem0/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X0/10 out of 10
Maker independence
by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Ledger Nano X leads
Tangem4/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X6/10 out of 10
Fund-loss record
by 3 of 10weight 2.6 of 86Ledger Nano X leads
Tangem7/10 out of 10
Ledger Nano X10/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Tangem14/20Ledger Nano X14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Tangem6.9/30Ledger Nano X14.7/30
Ledger Nano X leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Tangem2.7/10Ledger Nano X2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Tangem3.2/8Ledger Nano X3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Tangem5.5/18Ledger Nano X5.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Ledger Nano X unless the term Tangem leads on is the one you are buying.
Tangem leads Ledger Nano X on no published criterion and no score dimension — pick it only if a fact outside the score (country, funding rail, custody) decides for you.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (Tangem 3/10, Ledger Nano X 9/10)
Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (Tangem 0/10, Ledger Nano X 4/10)
Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (Tangem 7/10, Ledger Nano X 7/10)
Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (Tangem 0/10, Ledger Nano X 0/10)
Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (Tangem 4/10, Ledger Nano X 6/10)
Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (Tangem 7/10, Ledger Nano X 10/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Ledger Nano X scores 21 points above Tangem, led by secure element, rebuildable firmware, and fund-loss record. Published scores, out of 100: Tangem 42 (rank 23 of 23 hardware wallets), Ledger Nano X 63 (rank 13 of 23).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
