Bungee scores 11 points above Stargate, led by trust, route clarity, and transfer speed. Stargate ranks #12 and Bungee #5 of 18 published bridges. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
Stargate51
vs
Bungee62
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #12 and #5 of 18
Criteria roundingThe criteria block is rounded to whole points before it is spread+0.1
Reproduced gap+10.9
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below6251+11.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
EvidenceEvidence evidence medium vs evidence high — how well each score is supported, not the score itself
BungeeScore 62Trading app with cross-chain swaps into any token, routed through SocketStrength: Route coverage — 8/10Watch-out: Default route selection is automatic — power users may want to overrideStargateScore 51Omnichain liquidity bridge for broader route coverageStrength: Route coverage — 8/10Watch-out: Less purely mainstream than a simpler route-led bridge default
Quick facts
At a glance
FactStargateBungee
PricingSnapshotStargate user docs, "Fees" (stargateprotocol.gitbook.io/stargate/v2-user-docs/whats-new-in-stargate-v2/fees.md, fetched 30 September 2026): "In V1, Stargate charged a flat 6 bps fee for all transactions via V1 pools. In V2, with the help of the AI Planning Module (AIPM) Stargate V2 enables dynamic fees." The fee "refers to the difference between the input by the user on the source chain and the received amount on the destination chain", and on a depleted pathway "a rebate is offered to help rebalance the liquidity in the system." Gas is paid separately in the source-chain native token for "LayerZero's execution fee" and the "Fee to the DVN for verifying the message between LayerZero endpoints". The V2 page publishes no rate, so the flat figure the previous note carried is the V1 rate, not a V2 price. Stargate's own quote API (stargate.finance/api/v1) answered HTTP 410 and points to LayerZero's Value Transfer API.Bungee's documentation link (docs.bungee.exchange) now resolves to Socket's docs. Socket, "Fees & Monetization" (docs.socket.tech/about/fees-monetization, fetched 30 September 2026): "For users, Socket does not charge any additional fees. All onchain execution costs are covered within the quoted fees. Socket does not add any markup or hidden fees to transactions." Integrators may charge their own fee ("integrations are free to implement fee charging for their own services"). The Bungee front end (bungee.exchange) renders client-side and now titles itself "Bungee | Infinite ways to play the market", so no live Bungee quote was read.
Asset coverageEditorialBroader route and liquidity coverage across supported token and chain pairsAggregated bridge and DEX swap routes across Socket-supported chains
Region fitSnapshotus, europe, globalglobal
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
Stargate
51#12 of 18
Pick it when
Stargate leads on no published criterion; its edge is availability (20 vs 14 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
Strength
Route coverage — 8/10
Tradeoff
Less purely mainstream than a simpler route-led bridge default
Bungee
62#5 of 18
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Bungee if trust matters most — it scores 6/10 to Stargate's 4/10 there (weight 26).
Strength
Route coverage — 8/10
Tradeoff
Default route selection is automatic — power users may want to override
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
Stargate
Stargate leads Bungee on no published criterion
Choose it only if something outside the published criteria decides for you — your country, a funding rail, or custody.
StargateScore 51Omnichain liquidity bridge for broader route coverageStrength: Route coverage — 8/10Watch-out: Less purely mainstream than a simpler route-led bridge default
BungeeLeads
Choose Bungee if trust matters most
Trust: 6/10 against 4/10 for Stargate (weight 26)
Route clarity: 6/10 against 3/10 for Stargate (weight 24)
Transfer speed: 7/10 against 4/10 for Stargate (weight 22)
BungeeScore 62Trading app with cross-chain swaps into any token, routed through SocketStrength: Route coverage — 8/10Watch-out: Default route selection is automatic — power users may want to override
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Route coverage
weight 6.7 of 86Tie
Stargate8/10 out of 10
Bungee8/10 out of 10
Route clarity
by 3 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Bungee leads
Stargate3/10 out of 10
Bungee6/10 out of 10
Transfer speed
by 3 of 10weight 5.3 of 86Bungee leads
Stargate4/10 out of 10
Bungee7/10 out of 10
Trust
by 2 of 10weight 6.2 of 86Bungee leads
Stargate4/10 out of 10
Bungee6/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86
Stargate20/20Bungee14/20
Stargate leads
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Stargate11.7/30Bungee16.3/30
Bungee leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Stargate2.7/10Bungee2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86
Stargate3.2/8Bungee3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86
Stargate6.9/18Bungee12.5/18
Bungee leads
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Bungee unless the term Stargate leads on is the one you are buying.
Stargate leads on no published criterion; its edge is availability (20 vs 14 points). Pick it if that term is what you are buying.
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Verification failure: an invalid state or transfer is accepted.
Scored by Trust posture · 26% (Stargate 4/10, Bungee 6/10)
Not assessed by this ranking: Contract failure, Control failure, Liveness failure, Custody failure, Regulatory failure, Execution failure, Exit failure. A high place says nothing about these; the Methodology tab says what each means.
Also scored, as cost, quality or a summary of several families: Route coverage (28%), Route clarity (24%), Execution speed (22%).
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Bungee scores 11 points above Stargate, led by trust, route clarity, and transfer speed. Published scores, out of 100: Stargate 51 (rank 12 of 18 bridges), Bungee 62 (rank 5 of 18).
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research
