Skip to main content

Head-to-head · Hardware Wallets

SafePal S1 vs Cypherock X1 Cypherock X1 leads by 12 points.

Cypherock X1 scores 12 points above SafePal S1, led by rebuildable firmware and genuine check. SafePal S1 ranks #19 and Cypherock X1 #15 of 23 published hardware wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.

SafePal S148
Cypherock X160
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #19 and #15 of 23
Methodology v2026.10.18Ranking snapshot Evidence verified through 6 published criteria5 score dimensions Receipt #cc-VS-SAFEPAL-S1-VS-CYPHEROCK-X1-8638ba02
Published verdictRanking snapshot 3 November 2026

Cypherock X1 leads by 12 points

Cypherock X1 scores 12 points above SafePal S1, led by rebuildable firmware and genuine check.

SafePal S1 #19 of 2348
Cypherock X1 #15 of 2360
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termCypherock X1 leads on 2 of 6 published criteria; SafePal S1 on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermCypherock X1SafePal S1WeightPoints
Rebuildable firmware10/103/106.5+11.8for Cypherock X1+6.0 of 32
Genuine check7/105/102.9+1.5for Cypherock X1+0.8 of 32
Fund-loss record8/1010/102.6−1.4for SafePal S1−0.7 of 32
Net of the terms+11.9
Reproduced gap+12.0

Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.

Quick facts

At a glance

2 of 5 rows read the same for both.
FactSafePal S1Cypherock X1
One-time priceSnapshotSafePal S1 at $49.99, VAT and duty excluded, on https://www.safepal.com/en/store, read 1 October 2026.Cypherock X1 Basic (one vault, four cards): the maker's store feed https://api-commerce.cypherock.com/api/products reads "price":99,"compareAtPrice":129, read 1 October 2026; the same feed names "currency":"USD" (read 28 October 2026).
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotglobalus, europe, global
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the keys stay on the deviceSelf-custody: the keys stay on the device
Security postureSnapshotSecure element, no listed certificate; partly open source; air-gapped signing.Secure element, EAL5+ certified; firmware open source; no air-gapped signing.
From the published criteria

Which should you pick?

SafePal S1

48#19 of 23
Pick it when
Pick SafePal S1 if fund-loss record matters most — it scores 10/10 to Cypherock X1's 8/10 there (weight 11).
Strength
Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss — 10/10
Tradeoff
Its secure element is claimed at EAL5+ on one SafePal page and EAL6+ on another, with no part number

Cypherock X1

60#15 of 23
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most — it scores 10/10 to SafePal S1's 3/10 there (weight 27).
Strength
Firmware anyone can rebuild and match — 10/10
Tradeoff
DARKNAVY's 2025 exploit chain changed the vault firmware and took control of newly generated seeds; Cypherock names no fix, and the bootloader cannot be updated
Self-identify in 10 seconds

Which one is actually for you?

SafePal S1

Choose SafePal S1 if fund-loss record matters most

  • Fund-loss record: 10/10 against 8/10 for Cypherock X1 (weight 11)
Cypherock X1Leads

Choose Cypherock X1 if rebuildable firmware matters most

  • Rebuildable firmware: 10/10 against 3/10 for SafePal S1 (weight 27)
  • Genuine check: 7/10 against 5/10 for SafePal S1 (weight 12)
Criterion by criterion

Scorecard

Published criteria · weight in points of 8612 of 12 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology

Secure element

weight 6.5 of 86Tie
SafePal S13 out of 10
Cypherock X13 out of 10

Rebuildable firmware

by 7 of 10weight 6.5 of 86Cypherock X1 leads
SafePal S13 out of 10
Cypherock X110 out of 10

Genuine check

by 2 of 10weight 2.9 of 86Cypherock X1 leads
SafePal S15 out of 10
Cypherock X17 out of 10

Checkable keys

weight 2.9 of 86Tie
SafePal S10 out of 10
Cypherock X10 out of 10

Maker independence

weight 2.6 of 86Tie
SafePal S14 out of 10
Cypherock X14 out of 10

Fund-loss record

by 2 of 10weight 2.6 of 86SafePal S1 leads
SafePal S110 out of 10
Cypherock X18 out of 10

Score dimensions

weights sum to 86

The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.

Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
SafePal S114/20Cypherock X114/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
SafePal S19/30Cypherock X113.6/30
Cypherock X1 leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
SafePal S12.7/10Cypherock X12.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
SafePal S13.2/8Cypherock X13.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
SafePal S15.5/18Cypherock X15.5/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order

Choose Cypherock X1 unless the term SafePal S1 leads on is the one you are buying.

Pick SafePal S1 if fund-loss record matters most — it scores 10/10 to Cypherock X1's 8/10 there (weight 11).

The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .

From the published order

Next best action

If this isn't your case

Other matchups worth comparing

How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
  • Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
    Scored by Secure element you can look up · 27% (SafePal S1 3/10, Cypherock X1 3/10)
    Scored by Firmware anyone can rebuild and match · 27% (SafePal S1 3/10, Cypherock X1 10/10)
    Scored by Proof the device is genuine and unmodified · 12% (SafePal S1 5/10, Cypherock X1 7/10)
    Scored by Key creation and signing you can check · 12% (SafePal S1 0/10, Cypherock X1 0/10)
    Scored by Sign and recover without the maker · 11% (SafePal S1 4/10, Cypherock X1 4/10)
    Scored by Years in buyers' hands without a device-level fund loss · 11% (SafePal S1 10/10, Cypherock X1 8/10)
Every failure family that applies to this category is scored, except Information failure, which the provider pages show as a fact.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Cypherock X1 scores 12 points above SafePal S1, led by rebuildable firmware and genuine check. Published scores, out of 100: SafePal S1 48 (rank 19 of 23 hardware wallets), Cypherock X1 60 (rank 15 of 23).

Related pages

Go deeper

Reviewed Next review by Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed

Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.

Accountable for this review: Mathias Siemonsmeier, Founder.

How we review · Review calendar · Corrections log · How we make money

Free advisorNo signup needed

Skip the comparison — get your best match

Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.

No signupFree first pass · PrivateNo spam · No account

Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research

Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research