Rabby Wallet vs Sparrow Wallet Rabby Wallet leads by 13 points.
Rabby Wallet scores 13 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record. Rabby Wallet ranks #1 and Sparrow Wallet #7 of 11 published wallets. Every term of the gap is on the ledger below; the inputs are on the audit receipt.
RBRabby Wallet81
vs
SPSparrow Wallet68
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99 · ranks #1 and #7 of 11
Rabby Wallet scores 13 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record.
RBRabby Wallet #1 of 1181
SPSparrow Wallet #7 of 1168
Scores are out of 100; published scores fall within 41–99; a bar is empty at 41 and full at 99.
Why, term by termRabby Wallet leads on 3 of 4 published criteria; Sparrow Wallet on 1. The terms sum to the gap.
TermRabby WalletSparrow WalletWeightPoints
Clear signing8/105/107.2+5.6for Rabby Wallet+2.9 of 32
Key export9/106/106.7+5.2for Rabby Wallet+2.7 of 32
Incident record7/105/105.8+3.0for Rabby Wallet+1.5 of 32
Account recovery8/109/104.3−1.1for Sparrow Wallet−0.6 of 32
Net of the terms+12.7
Reproduced gap+12.7
Published gapAfter score rounding and bounds — see the note below8168+13.0
Weight is in points of the 86-point weighted total. Points are score points of the gap between the two.
Rabby WalletScore 81The reference implementation of pre-signature transparency in this pool, and the product that proves the signing axis actually separates. Rabby is a self-custodial EVM wallet from OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD. (the DeBank team), shipping as an MIT-licensed browser extension, a desktop app and iOS/Android apps. Where most wallets show a confirm button, Rabby's help centre documents an entire pre-signature apparatus: a simulation that previews the exact balance change, a decode that turns calldata into a readable action, a named Security Engine whose heuristics are published rather than hand-waved, and — uniquely in this pool — a hard lockout, "If a risk is detected, the Sign button will be disabled." Key custody is equally plain: one vendor page documents both Backup Seed Phrase and Backup Private Key on both platforms, with no email or account anywhere in the flow. The paperwork is better than it first appears: fourteen dated third-party audit reports across two repositories, from SlowMist, Least Authority and Cure53, spanning 2021-2025 and covering the extension, iOS and Android separately, joined by SlowMist reports dated 2026-08-24 for all three. What is genuinely missing is the disclosure machinery — no bug bounty, no security policy, no advisory archive — and the help centre remains silent on the October 2022 Rabby Swap contract exploit that cost users roughly $194,000, an event the vendor did in fact disclose on the day, on X, but never on its own website.Strength: Key export — 9/10Watch-out: Read the incident record before the feature list. Rabby is the strongest pre-signature product in this pool and among the weakest at maintaining a place to tell you when it has failed. There is no bug bounty (zero occurrences of "bount" anywhere in the homepage bundle or the help centre), no SECURITY.md (GitHub states outright "No security policy detected"), no security.txt, no advisory archive, no security@ contact and no postmortem page anywhere on rabby.io or support.rabby.io — so a researcher has no published private channel to report a vulnerability. On 2022-10-11 the Rabby Swap contract was drained of roughly $194,000 of user funds via approvals granted to it. In fairness the vendor did disclose it the same day on X, with a list of affected addresses, the four exploited contract addresses and revoke instructions — but that thread is now the ONLY disclosure that exists, and nearly four years on Rabby's own website and help centre still contain no mention of the event, nor any confirmation that the promised "satisfying solution for users within 1 week" was ever delivered. Weigh that against what IS published, which is more than it first appears: fourteen dated third-party audit reports across two repositories, from SlowMist, Least Authority and Cure53, spanning 2021-2025, with iOS and Android audited separately, and the extension set linked from a "Security & Transparency" section on Rabby's own homepage. Better than most of this pool, and newly refreshed: since August, SlowMist reports dated 2026-08-24 for the extension, iOS and Android have been added to the two repositories' audits/2026 folders. Three narrower things before committing. First, the protection you are buying is documented and sold for the EXTENSION: the Chrome Web Store listing advertises "pre-transaction potential risk scanning" and "upcoming balance change before you sign", while Rabby's own App Store and Google Play descriptions claim neither, so do not assume the mobile app is the same object. Second, no Rabby page ever prints "BIP-39" or a derivation path — verified zero hits across every vendor surface — so if you later want to restore your phrase into a different wallet you will be cycling HD-path options by trial and error. Third, the open-source guarantee is uneven: the extension's code is under an MIT grant (its LICENSE adds that "Brand name and logo of Rabby is copyright reserved", and GitHub reports the licence as NOASSERTION), but the mobile repository carries no licence file at all, so its published source grants no formal right to rebuild it if the vendor disappears.Sparrow WalletScore 68A Bitcoin-only desktop wallet built for coin control, multisig and hardware signers: BIP-39 with the derivation path shown, every input and output decoded before signing, no bounty and no audit.Strength: Recovery exit — 9/10Watch-out: Sparrow is desktop-only and Bitcoin-only, and it is built for users who want to see every input and output: a newcomer should expect a transaction editor, not a one-tap send. No Sparrow page documents exporting a single private key (read 2026-10-28), and its security policy says "There is currently no bug bounty programme for Sparrow." It has published no security advisory and no fund-loss incident was found.
Quick facts
At a glance
3 of 4 rows read the same for both.
FactRabby WalletSparrow Wallet
PricingSnapshotThe wallet itself is free: the iOS listing returns formattedPrice "Free" (iTunes Lookup API, id 6474381673, version 0.6.96, fetched 28 October 2026) and the Chrome Web Store listing carries no price, only an install action (version 0.94.13, "Updated October 23, 2026", fetched 28 October 2026). Rabby monetises the swap route, not the wallet. The vendor states the rate once, on its swap help article: "To support the continuous development of the wallet, a service fee of 0.25% is applied to swaps. This fee is already included in the quote shown to you." (support.rabby.io/en/articles/14134156-how-to-use-rabby-swap, fetched 28 October 2026). A separate vendor page waives that fee for like-for-like pairs: "Enjoy fee-free swaps for eligible pairs on the same chain", with the two groups written open-ended, "Stablecoin ↔ Stablecoin(USDT, USDC, USDS, USDe, etc.)" and "ETH & ETH DeFi tokens(WETH, stETH, wstETH, etc.)" (support.rabby.io/en/articles/15956135-0-swap-fee-token-pairs, fetched 28 October 2026). On its own swap route Rabby does not request infinite approvals: "Rabby only approves the required amount for your specific swap." Two further paid surfaces are priced on their own pages, not this one: Rabby Perps — "Rabby's Perps feature is powered by Hyperliquid. When users place trades, both trading fees and builder fees apply." (support.rabby.io/en/articles/14150488-understanding-rabby-perps-fees) — and GasAccount, where the vendor states "Rabby Wallet does not charge any additional service fees for using GasAccount." (support.rabby.io/en/articles/15338818-what-is-gasaccount-and-how-to-use-it), both fetched 28 October 2026. No subscription, licence or per-seat charge is published on any support.rabby.io page loaded."Sparrow is licensed under the Apache 2 software licence." (sparrowwallet.com/download/, fetched 28 October 2026). The download page lists installers for Windows, macOS and Linux with no price, and the site asks for donations. The features page lists no in-app swap or purchase; the only cost of a payment is the network fee, chosen against the fee chart Sparrow shows.
Asset coverageEditorial——
Region fitSnapshotglobalglobal
Custody modelEditorialSelf-custody: the vendor cannot move funds without your keySelf-custody: the vendor cannot move funds without your key
From the published criteria
Which should you pick?
RB
Rabby Wallet
81#1 of 11
Leads
Pick it when
Pick Rabby Wallet if clear signing matters most — it scores 8/10 to Sparrow Wallet's 5/10 there (weight 30).
Strength
Key export — 9/10
Tradeoff
Read the incident record before the feature list. Rabby is the strongest pre-signature product in this pool and among the weakest at maintaining a place to tell you when it has failed. There is no bug bounty (zero occurrences of "bount" anywhere in the homepage bundle or the help centre), no SECURITY.md (GitHub states outright "No security policy detected"), no security.txt, no advisory archive, no security@ contact and no postmortem page anywhere on rabby.io or support.rabby.io — so a researcher has no published private channel to report a vulnerability. On 2022-10-11 the Rabby Swap contract was drained of roughly $194,000 of user funds via approvals granted to it. In fairness the vendor did disclose it the same day on X, with a list of affected addresses, the four exploited contract addresses and revoke instructions — but that thread is now the ONLY disclosure that exists, and nearly four years on Rabby's own website and help centre still contain no mention of the event, nor any confirmation that the promised "satisfying solution for users within 1 week" was ever delivered. Weigh that against what IS published, which is more than it first appears: fourteen dated third-party audit reports across two repositories, from SlowMist, Least Authority and Cure53, spanning 2021-2025, with iOS and Android audited separately, and the extension set linked from a "Security & Transparency" section on Rabby's own homepage. Better than most of this pool, and newly refreshed: since August, SlowMist reports dated 2026-08-24 for the extension, iOS and Android have been added to the two repositories' audits/2026 folders. Three narrower things before committing. First, the protection you are buying is documented and sold for the EXTENSION: the Chrome Web Store listing advertises "pre-transaction potential risk scanning" and "upcoming balance change before you sign", while Rabby's own App Store and Google Play descriptions claim neither, so do not assume the mobile app is the same object. Second, no Rabby page ever prints "BIP-39" or a derivation path — verified zero hits across every vendor surface — so if you later want to restore your phrase into a different wallet you will be cycling HD-path options by trial and error. Third, the open-source guarantee is uneven: the extension's code is under an MIT grant (its LICENSE adds that "Brand name and logo of Rabby is copyright reserved", and GitHub reports the licence as NOASSERTION), but the mobile repository carries no licence file at all, so its published source grants no formal right to rebuild it if the vendor disappears.
SP
Sparrow Wallet
68#7 of 11
Pick it when
Pick Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most — it scores 9/10 to Rabby Wallet's 8/10 there (weight 18).
Strength
Recovery exit — 9/10
Tradeoff
Sparrow is desktop-only and Bitcoin-only, and it is built for users who want to see every input and output: a newcomer should expect a transaction editor, not a one-tap send. No Sparrow page documents exporting a single private key (read 2026-10-28), and its security policy says "There is currently no bug bounty programme for Sparrow." It has published no security advisory and no fund-loss incident was found.
Self-identify in 10 seconds
Which one is actually for you?
RBRabby WalletLeads
Choose Rabby Wallet if clear signing matters most
Clear signing: 8/10 against 5/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 30)
Key export: 9/10 against 6/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 28)
Incident record: 7/10 against 5/10 for Sparrow Wallet (weight 24)
Rabby WalletScore 81The reference implementation of pre-signature transparency in this pool, and the product that proves the signing axis actually separates. Rabby is a self-custodial EVM wallet from OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD. (the DeBank team), shipping as an MIT-licensed browser extension, a desktop app and iOS/Android apps. Where most wallets show a confirm button, Rabby's help centre documents an entire pre-signature apparatus: a simulation that previews the exact balance change, a decode that turns calldata into a readable action, a named Security Engine whose heuristics are published rather than hand-waved, and — uniquely in this pool — a hard lockout, "If a risk is detected, the Sign button will be disabled." Key custody is equally plain: one vendor page documents both Backup Seed Phrase and Backup Private Key on both platforms, with no email or account anywhere in the flow. The paperwork is better than it first appears: fourteen dated third-party audit reports across two repositories, from SlowMist, Least Authority and Cure53, spanning 2021-2025 and covering the extension, iOS and Android separately, joined by SlowMist reports dated 2026-08-24 for all three. What is genuinely missing is the disclosure machinery — no bug bounty, no security policy, no advisory archive — and the help centre remains silent on the October 2022 Rabby Swap contract exploit that cost users roughly $194,000, an event the vendor did in fact disclose on the day, on X, but never on its own website.Strength: Key export — 9/10Watch-out: Read the incident record before the feature list. Rabby is the strongest pre-signature product in this pool and among the weakest at maintaining a place to tell you when it has failed. There is no bug bounty (zero occurrences of "bount" anywhere in the homepage bundle or the help centre), no SECURITY.md (GitHub states outright "No security policy detected"), no security.txt, no advisory archive, no security@ contact and no postmortem page anywhere on rabby.io or support.rabby.io — so a researcher has no published private channel to report a vulnerability. On 2022-10-11 the Rabby Swap contract was drained of roughly $194,000 of user funds via approvals granted to it. In fairness the vendor did disclose it the same day on X, with a list of affected addresses, the four exploited contract addresses and revoke instructions — but that thread is now the ONLY disclosure that exists, and nearly four years on Rabby's own website and help centre still contain no mention of the event, nor any confirmation that the promised "satisfying solution for users within 1 week" was ever delivered. Weigh that against what IS published, which is more than it first appears: fourteen dated third-party audit reports across two repositories, from SlowMist, Least Authority and Cure53, spanning 2021-2025, with iOS and Android audited separately, and the extension set linked from a "Security & Transparency" section on Rabby's own homepage. Better than most of this pool, and newly refreshed: since August, SlowMist reports dated 2026-08-24 for the extension, iOS and Android have been added to the two repositories' audits/2026 folders. Three narrower things before committing. First, the protection you are buying is documented and sold for the EXTENSION: the Chrome Web Store listing advertises "pre-transaction potential risk scanning" and "upcoming balance change before you sign", while Rabby's own App Store and Google Play descriptions claim neither, so do not assume the mobile app is the same object. Second, no Rabby page ever prints "BIP-39" or a derivation path — verified zero hits across every vendor surface — so if you later want to restore your phrase into a different wallet you will be cycling HD-path options by trial and error. Third, the open-source guarantee is uneven: the extension's code is under an MIT grant (its LICENSE adds that "Brand name and logo of Rabby is copyright reserved", and GitHub reports the licence as NOASSERTION), but the mobile repository carries no licence file at all, so its published source grants no formal right to rebuild it if the vendor disappears.
SPSparrow Wallet
Choose Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most
Account recovery: 9/10 against 8/10 for Rabby Wallet (weight 18)
Sparrow WalletScore 68A Bitcoin-only desktop wallet built for coin control, multisig and hardware signers: BIP-39 with the derivation path shown, every input and output decoded before signing, no bounty and no audit.Strength: Recovery exit — 9/10Watch-out: Sparrow is desktop-only and Bitcoin-only, and it is built for users who want to see every input and output: a newcomer should expect a transaction editor, not a one-tap send. No Sparrow page documents exporting a single private key (read 2026-10-28), and its security policy says "There is currently no bug bounty programme for Sparrow." It has published no security advisory and no fund-loss incident was found.
Criterion by criterion
Scorecard
Published criteria · weight in points of 868 of 8 cells scored. Strength is read from the evidence file; the weight is the published one. Methodology
Key export
by 3 of 10weight 6.7 of 86Rabby Wallet leads
Rabby Wallet9/10 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet6/10 out of 10
Clear signing
by 3 of 10weight 7.2 of 86Rabby Wallet leads
Rabby Wallet8/10 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet5/10 out of 10
Incident record
by 2 of 10weight 5.8 of 86Rabby Wallet leads
Rabby Wallet7/10 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet5/10 out of 10
Account recovery
by 1 of 10weight 4.3 of 86Sparrow Wallet leads
Rabby Wallet8/10 out of 10
Sparrow Wallet9/10 out of 10
Score dimensions
weights sum to 86
The published score is five dimensions, each weighted for the category. "Published criteria" is the criteria block above; the other four are the engine's own terms — availability, friction, trust record, measured data. Each bar is one side's points out of that dimension's maximum; the weight beside the name is its points of the 86-point weighted total. The published criteria above can fill 24 of the block’s 30. A weight marked “constant here” belongs to a dimension every ranked product in the category holds at the same value: it still counts in the total, and it orders nothing here.
Availabilityweight 20 of 86 · constant here
Rabby Wallet14/20Sparrow Wallet14/20
Tie
Published criteriaweight 30 of 86
Rabby Wallet19.3/30Sparrow Wallet14.4/30
Rabby Wallet leads
Frictionweight 10 of 86 · constant here
Rabby Wallet2.7/10Sparrow Wallet2.7/10
Tie
Trust recordweight 8 of 86 · constant here
Rabby Wallet3.2/8Sparrow Wallet3.2/8
Tie
Measured dataweight 18 of 86 · constant here
Rabby Wallet8.3/18Sparrow Wallet8.3/18
Tie
Decision rulePublished order
Choose Rabby Wallet unless the term Sparrow Wallet leads on is the one you are buying.
Pick Sparrow Wallet if account recovery matters most — it scores 9/10 to Rabby Wallet's 8/10 there (weight 18).
The published order weighs every criterion the same way for everyone. To weigh them your way, run .
From the published order
Next best action
If this isn't your case
Other matchups worth comparing
How you can lose money here, and what the ranking scores
Key failure: your own keys are made, shown or recovered unsafely.
Scored by Can I export my own keys and use them elsewhere? · 28% (Rabby Wallet 9/10, Sparrow Wallet 6/10)
Scored by Can I see exactly what I am signing? · 30% (Rabby Wallet 8/10, Sparrow Wallet 5/10)
Scored by What has gone wrong, and did they publish it? · 24% (Rabby Wallet 7/10, Sparrow Wallet 5/10)
Scored by If I lose my device, how do I get back in? · 18% (Rabby Wallet 8/10, Sparrow Wallet 9/10)
Rabby Wallet scores 13 points above Sparrow Wallet, led by clear signing, key export, and incident record. Published scores, out of 100: Rabby Wallet 81 (rank 1 of 11 wallets), Sparrow Wallet 68 (rank 7 of 11).
ReviewedRe-read in progressOverdue; re-read by 10 November 2026.Methodology v2026.10.18
How this page is reviewed
Reviewed means both products compared here was read against its sources on or after that date; every ranked category is re-read at least every 45 days. Models research, extract and parse. A deterministic engine ranks. Every quote passes an adversarial refute pass.
Answer a few quick questions and get one clear recommendation based on how you actually plan to use crypto — with rationale, tradeoffs, and a path to monitor the decision.
No signup·Free first pass · Private·No spam · No account
Not financial advice · Independent · Always do your own research
Not financial advice · For informational purposes only · Always do your own research